Ignore the point about money though I think the money statement is one of his weakest points

But everything else is spot on



1x1=1 models absolutely nothing in the universe it’s a slight of hand and contradicts physics

“Make them believe the map is the territory and they will be running in a trapped maze of a false axiom. Their thoughts words and ideas all controlled.” - gesten

You believe imaginary concepts exist in real life

I’m almost positive Terrence did some big thesis that was complete bullshit when looked at with detail. He says a bunch of words that sound good but don’t hold up under the microscope. I’m not sure if he is mentally Ill or a shiester.

No.. all of u are fukin retarded no offense

I’ve delved hard into this the last year and everything he’s saying is spot on. My conclusions pretty much matched his

You’re mapping a map. You’re modeling fiction. You’re stunting and bottlenecking physics. Your multiplication is a fallacy and goes against logic. 1x1=1 models nothing in the universe. Its self referential delusion

Same applies to 0 infinity and groups

Some of this is valid but debated math. Terryology is basically a mix of empiricism, ultrafinitism, and nomalism.
And terryology would be an objective grounded math. Terryology is basically a solution to the flaws that those other maths point out






In math they inserted a catch 22 1984 style rule that says you can not use objective reality to justify or rebut an axiom. This is not a technical limit, it’s a choice. This effectively cuts off any kind of alternative objective math where it’s grounded in reality. This subjective rule cuts off Terrence Howard’s math

You can now only replace an arbitrary axiom with another arbitrary axiom.. just lol @ the deception holy shit

Get help, bruh. I'm sure a thousand ppl have told you already, but still. I'd like to see a sane Gesten actually proving Einstein wrong.

Reminds me of Eric Weinstein getting torn to pieces by Sean M. Carroll (physics/math.)

Get this in your heads

Math inserted a 1984 style subjective catch 22 rule that says you can’t use objective reality to justify or rebut its starting assumptions


And you npcs are okay with this. LMAO







1984: ignore what you see and hear, the party defines the truth

Math: ignore what you see and hear, the party defines the truth


The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command

I made a thread on that vid

They’re both cranks

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=1000014498&post_id=10000215043#post_id-10000215043

I just watched some of the video because I'm semi interested in it, and its exactly what I thought. He gives no DEFINITIVE proof of ANYTHING. He speaks in quasi terms an generational terms without being specific at all. The fuck does he mean by we need to be "interstellar and this math I'm talking about explains that" WHAT MATH? Lines don't exist? How does that affect math? How does that affect humans in their day to day life? Why isn't he concrete on a single fucking thing? Hes like the genius version of a schizophrenic.

His entire math is concrete.. standard current math is the opposite

Maybe u need to learn more about math if u can’t see this

Groups 0 and infinity do not refer to anything in real life. It refers to absolute fiction. What it refers to has never been observed in the history of man kind and it contradicts the laws of physics

And no straight lines don’t exist wtf a straight line he never been emperically observed

You need to throw away the abstract concepts you’ve been brainwashed with since you were birth and only look at raw empirical observation.. throw away the imaginary subjective abstract concepts you’ve been literally programmed

leaving educated and knowledgeable

thanks OP