math inserted a subjective 1984 style catch 22 authoritarian rule that forbides you to use objectice observable reality to justy or rebut an axiom. This is not a technical limitation, it’s a choice. You can only replace a subjective axiom with another subjective axiom in math

by definition this is crank behavior

- Immunization Against Refutation: Cranks often invent personal, unyielding rules to protect their theories from being proven wrong.

- Rejection of Standard Logic: Forbidding objective, observable reality isolates their argument from reality

- Circular Frameworks: A subjective Catch-22 ensures their foundational assumptions (axioms) can never be challenged, which is a hallmark behavior of crank theories.

Now fast foward to 2026 we have these 2 cranks arguing within a false axiom of math. With one being more successful than the other



Lmao it’s an absolute clown show

, ,

, ,

, ,