Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Does youthful glow always decrease with age? (pics)
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 141
  2. Page 4 of 5
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  10. Last

Thread: Does youthful glow always decrease with age? (pics)

post 1444315681 05-26-2016, 01:27 PM
-
#91
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 63,763
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 258895
Disagree. Babies don't have glow. They have faces fat as f*ck. I mean it's youthful I guess but no glow.

The glow sets in around age 16 or so for females and then is gone by 25 usually.

Think of it more like a bell curve where when it starts the sharp peak up that's age 16 and when it ends that's age 25.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
post 1444316361 05-26-2016, 01:31 PM
-
#92
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, Uganda
  5. Posts: 25,380
  6. Rep Power: 219281
[QUOTE=Azmine post_id=1444291311]LDAR so long ago I'm already a statue brah

[img]http://www.artbyjanis.com/womanlying.jpg[mg][/QUOTE]this is the irony with the glow phenomenon.

1) unless a girl LDAR's most her life, many of the things she does in her life will leech her glow from her
2) once a girl has lost her glow, the only thing she can do is LDAR

seems like a very strong correlation between LDAR'ing and glowton presense. It's the female's worst nightmare of a catch-22. To maintain glow, one must LDAR. But once glow is gone, the only option is LDAR. so really, why glow when it's all about the LDAR
"So t
post 1444316501 05-26-2016, 01:31 PM
-
#93
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Disagree. Babies don't have glow. They have faces fat as f*ck. I mean it's youthful I guess but no glow.

The glow sets in around age 16 or so for females and then is gone by 25 usually.

Think of it more like a bell curve where when it starts the sharp peak up that's age 16 and when it ends that's age 25.
Originally Posted By waias15⏩
just another thought: what about the Ugly Duckling Paradox -ie the rare females that don't quite fit the standard deviation, due to an abnormally low glowton level early in life, only to produce a much higher later on. If there are a fixed number of glowtons in the female body, how would said "Ugly Duckling" go from a low level of glowtons to seemingly increasing them??
I do believe there may be something to this.

a baby has max glowton count BUT different people may reach full glow maturity at different times.
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444316861 05-26-2016, 01:33 PM
-
#94
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
I do believe there may be something to this.

a baby has max glow level BUT different people may reach glow maturity at different times.
I think the glowtons take time to activate or burn as some experts put it. The later in life a glowton is activated the later it will burn due to no prior usage.
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444317441 05-26-2016, 01:37 PM
-
#95
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, Uganda
  5. Posts: 25,380
  6. Rep Power: 219281
Originally Posted By waias15⏩
just another thought: what about the Ugly Duckling Paradox -ie the rare females that don't quite fit the standard deviation, due to an abnormally low glowton level early in life, only to produce a much higher later on. If there are a fixed number of glowtons in the female body, how would said "Ugly Duckling" go from a low level of glowtons to seemingly increasing them??
I prefer to think of glowtons as similar to a Kamehaha. The formative years are spent maximizing a female's genetic peak glow potential, similar to Goku charging up his kamehameha. Puberty and on is akin to Goku firing the Kamehameha, with the reduction of glow relating similarly to the natural light in the DBZ universe returning after the Kamehameha has worn off, and the only thing at the other end is either some vaporized shell of an alien, or a female the likes of Jennifer Aniston or Kate Beckinsale
"So t
post 1444317571 05-26-2016, 01:38 PM
-
#96
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By ppscalzo⏩
I think the glowtons take time to activate or burn as some experts put it. The later in life a glowton is activated the later it will burn due to no prior usage.
I think we can all agree that Glowtons and rate of Glowton Decay is not the same across all females. Babies are born with different levels of potential glow, reach peak glow at different times, and the natural glow decay rate is different and predetermined by genetics at the moment of conception based on the mothers Glow Genetics and the father's LDAR Particle count.

Then you still have to account for the induced glow decay rate which is determined by slootiness, dink count, and other behavioral factors of today's western woman.
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444318001 05-26-2016, 01:40 PM
-
#97
  1. krazy33
  2. Banned
  1. krazy33
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 10,951
  5. Rep Power: 0
imma guess as a general consensus for a generality

but some bishes hit puberty later/ may have some weird body stuff in which they mature later. i think glow is prob just peak fertility
post 1444318801 05-26-2016, 01:44 PM
-
#98
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 63,763
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 258895
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
I think we can all agree that Glowtons and rate of Glowton Decay is not the same across all females. Babies are born with different levels of potential glow, reach peak glow at different times, and the natural glow decay rate is different and predetermined by genetics at the moment of conception based on the mothers Glow Genetics and the father's LDAR Particle count.

Then you still have to account for the induced glow decay rate which is determined by slootiness, dink count, and other behavioral factors of today's western woman.
Yes there is definitely no constant glow rate. Some females never get any glow at all. There's a lot of factors involved for sure.

The only thing we know for sure is that is clusters in a certain age range generally speaking. Outliers in glow length observed obviously exist, and peak height can differ greatly as well. These are the hard facts we have to work with.

I'm not sure if I've ever seen glow fade and then return with bimodal peaks. Does anyone have any case studies of this occurrence? If so what age was each of the peaks observed? Glow could seems to be a 1 shot thing from what I have personally seen.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
post 1444319161 05-26-2016, 01:47 PM
-
#99
  1. dipatel13
  2. Registered User
  1. dipatel13
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 12,326
  7. Rep Power: 48678
All this glow info:

post 1444319671 05-26-2016, 01:50 PM
-
#100
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Yes there is definitely no constant glow rate. Some females never get any glow at all. There's a lot of factors involved for sure.

The only thing we know for sure is that is clusters in a certain age range generally speaking. Outliers in glow length observed obviously exist, and peak height can differ greatly as well. These are the hard facts we have to work with.

I'm not sure if I've ever seen glow fade and then return with bimodal peaks. Does anyone have any case studies of this occurrence? If so what age was each of the peaks observed? Glow could seems to be a 1 shot thing from what I have personally seen.
one thing we have not touched on is glow intensity. if we can isolate and prove that a glowton could fluctuate in glow output intensity, then that could be a possible explanation to a bimodal peak observation.
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444319861 05-26-2016, 01:50 PM
-
#101
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
We are the founders of the University of Glowology.
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444320071 05-26-2016, 01:51 PM
-
#102
  1. weightsb4dates
  2. Registered User
  1. weightsb4dates
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2008
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 26,563
  6. Rep Power: 96351
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
great point thanks for asking. see, notice that the additional glow, or as we in the business like to call babyglow (not the same as fauxglow), occurs during pregnancy because the mother is fostering the child's glowtons in her womb. so to put this hard science into laymans terms,

a mother CAN look like she has increased glow during pregnancy, a.k.a babyglow, but will fade shortly after the baby is born and the glowtransfer has completed.
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
yes, very good question and ill explain why:

the mother is born with her genetic total glow potential (TGP). this genetic trait is passed to child much like any other characteristic. it has been documented in rare cases that her genetic TGP levels can be influenced by outside environmental conditions.



While the practice is widely used, it has not been thoroughly researched. initial observations note that this glow has a slightly different appearance and half life. this glow is known as fauxglow. at the initial application, fauxglow is virtually indistinguishable from natural glow but soon fades and the glowton levels of the female stabilize and her true glow level is revealed but showing signs of glow decay

there have been some connections between this and a theorized "LDAR Particle".
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
in the absence of a donor, physically repulsive or low-desirability females are capable of producing small amounts of the LDAR particle on their own.

though this is EXTREMELY rare since there is no shortage of WKs who act as artificial LDAR-blockers, by preventing LDAR levels in women from rising by giving them false desirability. what the WK does not know is he's increasing his LDAR particle count every time he WKs.
excellent research in this thread, i think its safe to say that Badlasagna is on the forefront of Glowology
Originally Posted By waias15⏩
just another thought: what about the Ugly Duckling Paradox -ie the rare females that don't quite fit the standard deviation, due to an abnormally low glowton level early in life, only to produce a much higher later on. If there are a fixed number of glowtons in the female body, how would said "Ugly Duckling" go from a low level of glowtons to seemingly increasing them??
as rare as this is, it could be due to a hormonal issue early in life seen in a vary rare .0024% of all females born. You need to first understand that the decaying of glowtons is what produces glow. In these rare individuals, the glowtons are not decaying at a normal rate, which allows said individual to emmit a stunted "dimmer" glow. Now generally upon pubescent age this imbalance in biochemicals is resolves naturaally, and the glowtons begin to decay sometimes even at a faster rate than normal, in these case the "ugly duckling" will surpass the other females in the amount of glow she has for a short while, until eventually she begins to decline. The carrier of the ugly duckling gene may benefit from this phenomena by having her glow later into her life than non ugly duckings. how ever if the chemistry is not balanced in time, and the ugly duckling is unable to decay the glowtons by the age of about 16, many other fctors will dim her glow before it even gets started, such as drugs, alcohol, and depression.

edit: Some believe that due to being an "ugly Duckling" well into your teens, glowtons are preserved because you were not given such opportunities to diminish glowton counts via external variables, I.E. Dinks
post 1444320201 05-26-2016, 01:52 PM
-
#103
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
one thing we have not touched on is glow intensity. if we can isolate and prove that a glowton could fluctuate in glow output intensity, then that could be a possible explanation to a bimodal peak observation.
I think this opens up many more possibilities. Is glow determined by individual glowton output or by the quantity or glowtons burning at a single time? Is it better to have brighter glowtons or to have a higher quantity?
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444320391 05-26-2016, 01:53 PM
-
#104
  1. midcoastking33
  2. Registered User
  1. midcoastking33
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 30,048
  6. Rep Power: 69010
people age. deal with it
post 1444320501 05-26-2016, 01:54 PM
-
#105
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Originally Posted By ppscalzo⏩
I think this opens up many more possibilities. Is glow determined by individual glowton output or by the quantity or glowtons burning at a single time? Is it better to have brighter glowtons or to have a higher quantity?
the blue supergiant vs the red dwarf so to speak
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444320691 05-26-2016, 01:55 PM
-
#106
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 63,763
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 258895
Originally Posted By ppscalzo⏩
I think this opens up many more possibilities. Is glow determined by individual glowton output or by the quantity or glowtons burning at a single time? Is it better to have brighter glowtons or to have a higher quantity?
If multiple glowtons burn at a single time, does this decrease the potential length of glow as well? In other words you have so many glowtons, if a bunch are used to heighten the intensity at one point in time is that at the expense of establishing glow at a lower intensity for a longer period of time? So many questions.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
post 1444321291 05-26-2016, 01:59 PM
-
#107
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By jbball92⏩
the blue supergiant vs the red dwarf so to speak
the candle that burns twice as bright burns in half the time, if you will
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444321321 05-26-2016, 01:59 PM
-
#108
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
If multiple glowtons burn at a single time, does this decrease the potential length of glow as well? In other words you have so many glowtons, if a bunch are used to heighten the intensity at one point in time is that at the expense of establishing glow at a lower intensity for a longer period of time? So many questions.
yes. Look at Britney spears as an example
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444321431 05-26-2016, 02:00 PM
-
#109
  1. weightsb4dates
  2. Registered User
  1. weightsb4dates
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2008
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 26,563
  6. Rep Power: 96351
Originally Posted By badlasagna⏩
the candle that burns twice as bright burns in half the time, if you will
very well put
post 1444321461 05-26-2016, 02:00 PM
-
#110
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
If multiple glowtons burn at a single time, does this decrease the potential length of glow as well? In other words you have so many glowtons, if a bunch are used to heighten the intensity at one point in time is that at the expense of establishing glow at a lower intensity for a longer period of time? So many questions.
Glowton intensity does affect the burn time. Each glowton only has a certain amount of glow in it before it burns out forever
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444321921 05-26-2016, 02:03 PM
-
#111
  1. waias15
  2. SPC: German Contract Law
  1. waias15
  2. SPC: German Contract Law
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Massachusetts, United States
  5. Posts: 22,098
  6. Rep Power: 60212
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
I'm not sure if I've ever seen glow fade and then return with bimodal peaks. Does anyone have any case studies of this occurrence? If so what age was each of the peaks observed? Glow could seems to be a 1 shot thing from what I have personally seen.
what about Jennifer Aniston? she was definitely at a high glowton level during her marriage to Brad Pitt





EDIT: figured that post-Brad-divorce, Jennifer Aniston may have gone thru a period of low glowton levels, only to be revived years down the road, but alas, Jennifer has always seemingly run at peak levels, cementing herself as one of America's sweethearts

a novel
post 1444322571 05-26-2016, 02:07 PM
-
#112
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By ppscalzo⏩
Glowton intensity does affect the burn time. Each glowton only has a certain amount of glow in it before it burns out forever
correct
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444322951 05-26-2016, 02:09 PM
-
#113
  1. TheAmazon
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAmazon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Denton, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 8,470
  6. Rep Power: 36812
I have to politely disagree with the other young man's assertion that babies do not have glow. I posit that since the child and the mother obviously share similar glowton genetics (TGP Transference, Bad Lasagna 2016), that others who are not genetically related to the child do not see the potential glowton levels present.

Also , gentelmen, we should pause and consider the potential bio ethical implications on the horizon now that faux glow technology has increased greatley in it's ability to mimic and pro-long glowton half life. Should we not mark these individuals in society or should we let this push towards trans humanism -glowing continue?
Check out my supplement log for Gaspari's Size On!
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=172059223
post 1444323821 05-26-2016, 02:15 PM
-
#114
  1. CazU
  2. Banned
  1. CazU
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 1,246
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By midcoastking33⏩
people age. deal with it
Why'd you even come into this thread??
post 1444324141 05-26-2016, 02:18 PM
-
#115
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Originally Posted By TheAmazon⏩
I have to politely disagree with the other young man's assertion that babies do not have glow. I posit that since the child and the mother obviously share similar glowton genetics (TGP Transference, Bad Lasagna 2016), that others who are not genetically related to the child do not see the potential glowton levels present.

Also , gentelmen, we should pause and consider the potential bio ethical implications on the horizon now that faux glow technology has increased greatley in it's ability to mimic and pro-long glowton half life. Should we not mark these individuals in society or should we let this push towards trans humanism -glowing continue?
I think some of the resources used for faux glow tech should be used to make anti-LDAR particle tech. A complete removal of LDAR particles will result in more glow overall for everyone. A glowvelution if you will.
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444324561 05-26-2016, 02:20 PM
-
#116
  1. TheAmazon
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAmazon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Denton, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 8,470
  6. Rep Power: 36812
^^^^
That sir, is truly the way forward. If more resources were equally allocated to both problems society's benefit would be beyond compare, something akin to the advent of agriculture, communication technology, toilet paper. For far too long we've neglected R&D for Anti-LDAR.
Check out my supplement log for Gaspari's Size On!
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=172059223
post 1444326331 05-26-2016, 02:33 PM
-
#117
  1. rwrynn
  2. Registered User
  1. rwrynn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Age: 49
  5. Posts: 94
  6. Rep Power: 166
R&D lies in physical activity and lulz:bitchface ratio.
Start now, not tomorrow!
Goal bf%= 12%
Current= 19%
No coach or trainer, it's all me! Internet educated and self-taught.
USBF 2016 Bikini Competitor and four-time Medal-Winner
Actual Legit Female
post 1444328151 05-26-2016, 02:46 PM
-
#118
  1. tinfoilpotato
  2. Registered User
  1. tinfoilpotato
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 37
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By ppscalzo⏩
How would females acquire LDAR particles when the men who primarily posses them do not get much female interaction?
I'd like to expound on this point. Females are capable of producing LDAR particles in trace amounts, with a positive relation to the decay of GLOW. The presence of Glowtons has a pronounced effect on inhibiting LDAR particles. Once GLOW has been lost however, LDAR particles increase exponentially.

Women still exhibit lower levels of LDAR particles due to the activity of WKs. WKs act as LDARabsorbers, severely depressing the level of LDAR particles found in women, while increasing their own levels of LDAR particles at the same time.

The real question is, what happens to the LDAR particles if a woman engages in slooting with a WK? We've established that slooting decreases GLOW in theory. I posit that the process of slootmosis represents a significant transfer of LDAR particles. If she sloots with a Chad then the LDAR transfer is minimal, and LDAR levels are quickly reduced through either Glowtons or WK activity. HOWEVER, if she sloots with a WK, a rare occurence in nature, then the amount of LDAR particles transferred is statistically significant and may be a sign of an already severely decreased level of glowtons. Whether the WK remains a WK after the transfer depends on how many LDAR particles remain in his system.

I submit my solution to the LDAR Paradox for peer review.
post 1444330411 05-26-2016, 03:00 PM
-
#119
  1. chroneos
  2. Registered User
  1. chroneos
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 4,122
  5. Rep Power: 21136
Originally Posted By waias15⏩
just another thought: what about the Ugly Duckling Paradox -ie the rare females that don't quite fit the standard deviation, due to an abnormally low glowton level early in life, only to produce a much higher later on. If there are a fixed number of glowtons in the female body, how would said "Ugly Duckling" go from a low level of glowtons to seemingly increasing them??
This is due to epigenetic factors which up-regulate glowton production transcription factors. Normally, cawks + booze + drugs suppresses the synthesis of these transcription factors leading to swift decrease in glowtons/glow, but the absence of cawks + booze + drugs the transcription factors remain active and glow levels increase during development.
post 1444333501 05-26-2016, 03:18 PM
-
#120
  1. Clkflynn
  2. Registered User
  1. Clkflynn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 4,817
  6. Rep Power: 3048
I'd say the glow starts at 15, peaking at around 17 and then stays like that until about 20-25 depending on how lucky they are. Followed by a steady decline until about 30 and then a sharp skyfall where all glow dissipates at around 35 if they're lucky.

Healthy glow of about 15, maturity. 80% glow
True glow aura at its brightest lasting until her early 20's/late 20's if lucky. Only few last utill theirs 30's with the glow.
!Only friends are family crew!
!Die alone crew!
!Balding crew!
!Kissless crew!
!Only girl who has smiled at me is Mom crew!
!Left Nofap crew!
!Still watch porn crew!

Eternal Monk for the next 62 years seeking that divinity.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts