Yesterday, 08:20 AM
-
#1
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
-
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,329
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 162174
-
-
Misc's favorite queen goes to trial
https://www.fox9.com/news/woman-accused-racist-playground-slur-rochester-begins-trial-july-2026
The Brief
Jury selection for the trial of a Rochester woman accused of using racist slurs toward an 8-year-old at a Rochester playground has begun.
Shiloh Marie Hendrix is facing two misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct for allegedly calling an 8-year-old boy with autism a racial slur. (who was caught stealing from her purse which resulted in her dropping the dinger word.)
Hendrix has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for each count.
Yes, this is real. We're putting people on trial to face jail time for dropping the dinger bomb.

The Brief
Jury selection for the trial of a Rochester woman accused of using racist slurs toward an 8-year-old at a Rochester playground has begun.
Shiloh Marie Hendrix is facing two misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct for allegedly calling an 8-year-old boy with autism a racial slur. (who was caught stealing from her purse which resulted in her dropping the dinger word.)
Hendrix has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for each count.
Yes, this is real. We're putting people on trial to face jail time for dropping the dinger bomb.

Yesterday, 08:26 AM
-
#2
- hendrixfreak70
- My eyes are up here.
-
- hendrixfreak70
- My eyes are up here.
- Join Date: Feb 2016
- Location: United States
- Posts: 29,410
- Subscribers: 16
- Rep Power: 750857
-
-
Myyy wiiiiife.
Yesterday, 08:49 AM
-
#3
- stupid000
- Registered User
-
- stupid000
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,705
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 95258
-
-
She looks like a smoke show in that picture.
Surely she can't be facing charges for this right? This is just Fox propaganda trying to stir up shit? I hate liberals, but I also hate the media both left and right. I also hate Minnesota though.
Surely she can't be facing charges for this right? This is just Fox propaganda trying to stir up shit? I hate liberals, but I also hate the media both left and right. I also hate Minnesota though.
Yesterday, 09:20 AM
-
#4
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
-
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,329
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 162174
-
-
Originally Posted By stupid000⏩
https://www.kttc.com/2026/07/20/understanding-legalese-disorderly-conduct-charges-minnesota/
She looks like a smoke show in that picture.
Surely she can't be facing charges for this right? This is just Fox propaganda trying to stir up shit? I hate liberals, but I also hate the media both left and right. I also hate Minnesota though.
Surely she can't be facing charges for this right? This is just Fox propaganda trying to stir up shit? I hate liberals, but I also hate the media both left and right. I also hate Minnesota though.
ROCHESTER, Minn. (KTTC) – The high-profile jury trial for the woman seen in a viral video calling a Black child a racial slur at a Rochester park last year got underway Monday in Olmsted County.Shiloh Hendrix, 37, is charged with two disorderly conduct charges tied to the April 28, 2025, incident.Hendrix’s attorney had previously asked the court to drop the charges arguing they are unconstitutional— saying while the language used by Hendrix was offensive, she did not incite violence.
The probable cause in the complaint - According to the criminal complaint—that’s the charging document used in the court system to establish probable cause—the two disorderly conduct charges against Hendrix are misdemeanors.The probable cause, as stated by the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office, was based on a summary provided in the complaint, filed on August, 26, 2025, that noted that Hendrix “wrongfully and unlawfully engaged in offensive, obscene, abusive , boisterous, or noisy conduct, or in offensive obscene, or abusive language that would reasonably tend to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others.”
The complaint also referenced Hendrix’s use of “this particular racial epithet toward multiple individuals, including an eight year old disabled child, does rise to the level of ‘fighting words,’ and is ‘inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction or incite an immediate breach of the peace.’”
Yesterday, 09:22 AM
-
#5
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
-
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,329
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 162174
-
-
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/07/21/jury-seated-in-shiloh-hendrix-trial-over-rochester-racial-slur-incidentThe boy has taken other people’s things beforeThe boy’s father testified with the help of a Somali interpreter on the witness stand. He said his son’s autism makes it hard for him to understand that he shouldn’t take things that aren’t his. And he said it’s happened before but, usually, people express more compassion than what happened last year. At that point in his testimony, he got choked up and had to pause. He said parents are usually willing to help him when his son behaves that way in public.
Yesterday, 09:28 AM
-
#6
- stupid000
- Registered User
-
- stupid000
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,705
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 95258
-
-
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
https://www.kttc.com/2026/07/20/understanding-legalese-disorderly-conduct-charges-minnesota/
ROCHESTER, Minn. (KTTC) – The high-profile jury trial for the woman seen in a viral video calling a Black child a racial slur at a Rochester park last year got underway Monday in Olmsted County.Shiloh Hendrix, 37, is charged with two disorderly conduct charges tied to the April 28, 2025, incident.Hendrix’s attorney had previously asked the court to drop the charges arguing they are unconstitutional— saying while the language used by Hendrix was offensive, she did not incite violence.
The probable cause in the complaint - According to the criminal complaint—that’s the charging document used in the court system to establish probable cause—the two disorderly conduct charges against Hendrix are misdemeanors.The probable cause, as stated by the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office, was based on a summary provided in the complaint, filed on August, 26, 2025, that noted that Hendrix “wrongfully and unlawfully engaged in offensive, obscene, abusive , boisterous, or noisy conduct, or in offensive obscene, or abusive language that would reasonably tend to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others.”
The complaint also referenced Hendrix’s use of “this particular racial epithet toward multiple individuals, including an eight year old disabled child, does rise to the level of ‘fighting words,’ and is ‘inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction or incite an immediate breach of the peace.’”
ROCHESTER, Minn. (KTTC) – The high-profile jury trial for the woman seen in a viral video calling a Black child a racial slur at a Rochester park last year got underway Monday in Olmsted County.Shiloh Hendrix, 37, is charged with two disorderly conduct charges tied to the April 28, 2025, incident.Hendrix’s attorney had previously asked the court to drop the charges arguing they are unconstitutional— saying while the language used by Hendrix was offensive, she did not incite violence.
The probable cause in the complaint - According to the criminal complaint—that’s the charging document used in the court system to establish probable cause—the two disorderly conduct charges against Hendrix are misdemeanors.The probable cause, as stated by the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office, was based on a summary provided in the complaint, filed on August, 26, 2025, that noted that Hendrix “wrongfully and unlawfully engaged in offensive, obscene, abusive , boisterous, or noisy conduct, or in offensive obscene, or abusive language that would reasonably tend to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others.”
The complaint also referenced Hendrix’s use of “this particular racial epithet toward multiple individuals, including an eight year old disabled child, does rise to the level of ‘fighting words,’ and is ‘inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction or incite an immediate breach of the peace.’”
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
Gosh dang man, wtf. That Somali and his son should be deported for stealing not this shit. And if gdfred responds saying this is okay he should be deported too. 👍
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/07/21/jury-seated-in-shiloh-hendrix-trial-over-rochester-racial-slur-incidentThe boy has taken other people’s things beforeThe boy’s father testified with the help of a Somali interpreter on the witness stand. He said his son’s autism makes it hard for him to understand that he shouldn’t take things that aren’t his. And he said it’s happened before but, usually, people express more compassion than what happened last year. At that point in his testimony, he got choked up and had to pause. He said parents are usually willing to help him when his son behaves that way in public.
Yesterday, 09:39 AM
-
#7
- MajorTendonitis
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Location: East Kootenays BC
- Age: 65
- Height: 5'8"
- Weight: 241 lbs
- Posts: 42,045
- Subscribers: 8
- Rep Power: 718688
-
-
Just tell them that it’s just a natural reflex , nothing to see here . Funny , if a black called a white a cracker there would be no repercussions.
Ded srs I find the N word very offensive , and I wish they would quit repeating it frequently in rap music
Ded srs I find the N word very offensive , and I wish they would quit repeating it frequently in rap music
Back with my Fam
Yesterday, 09:51 AM
-
#8
This will actually be a big story if they violate freedom of speech over "obscenity".
Hope she walks free right into my arms.
INB4 the kids not a retard and its proven in court.
Hope she walks free right into my arms.
INB4 the kids not a retard and its proven in court.
**Florida Crew**
**Waiting for National Guard Bus Ride to Labor Camp Crew**
Yesterday, 09:54 AM
-
#9
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,510
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 594517
-
-
Wood soak
23 hours ago, 12:17 PM
-
#10
23 hours ago, 12:24 PM
-
#11
23 hours ago, 12:27 PM
-
#12
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,537
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418615
-
-
It has been established for a long time this is one of a few exceptions to free speech.
The idea is that it is intended to start shit or it is expected this type of language would start shit.
I think that is exactly what the idea of protecting speech is for, but my opinion is not the law.
Losing emotional control with an eight year old is wild.
The idea is that it is intended to start shit or it is expected this type of language would start shit.
I think that is exactly what the idea of protecting speech is for, but my opinion is not the law.
Losing emotional control with an eight year old is wild.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
23 hours ago, 12:32 PM
-
#13
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
This is insane.
https://www.fox9.com/news/woman-accused-racist-playground-slur-rochester-begins-trial-july-2026
The Brief
Jury selection for the trial of a Rochester woman accused of using racist slurs toward an 8-year-old at a Rochester playground has begun.
Shiloh Marie Hendrix is facing two misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct for allegedly calling an 8-year-old boy with autism a racial slur. (who was caught stealing from her purse which resulted in her dropping the dinger word.)
Hendrix has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for each count.
Yes, this is real. We're putting people on trial to face jail time for dropping the dinger bomb.
The Brief
Jury selection for the trial of a Rochester woman accused of using racist slurs toward an 8-year-old at a Rochester playground has begun.
Shiloh Marie Hendrix is facing two misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct for allegedly calling an 8-year-old boy with autism a racial slur. (who was caught stealing from her purse which resulted in her dropping the dinger word.)
Hendrix has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for each count.
Yes, this is real. We're putting people on trial to face jail time for dropping the dinger bomb.
When shit like this goes viral, the private sector deals with it in the form of shame/firings, etc, this is not not the govts role and those brining this case forward should be fired.
23 hours ago, 12:34 PM
-
#14
- p7nk
- Registered Goyim
-
- p7nk
- Registered Goyim
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Location: Applebee's
- Age: 40
- Posts: 66,813
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 237587
-
-
little wild but try and charge someone for throwing out a racial slur. but it's also wild to drop one on a little retarded kid. Black people aren't going to realize how the outcome of this trial will snowball and end up affecting them as well.
💋👨🏽🍳🇨🇴
AP4 Crew
23 hours ago, 12:36 PM
-
#15
- Basedbabyy
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Posts: 2,417
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 16696
-
-
Originally Posted By naich⏩
plot twist they all are.
INB4 the kids not a retard and its proven in court.
23 hours ago, 12:36 PM
-
#16
- Basedbabyy
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Posts: 2,417
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 16696
-
-
Originally Posted By p7nk⏩
How are you supposed to know if a black is retarded or not they all act like it
little wild but try and charge someone for throwing out a racial slur. but it's also wild to drop one on a little retarded kid. Black people aren't going to realize how the outcome of this trial will snowball and end up affecting them as well.
23 hours ago, 12:41 PM
-
#17
Is it really racist if it's true.
I didn't read the story...too many words
I didn't read the story...too many words
St. Louis Blues Crew
I cannot suck my entire dong but I can lollipop the head crew
It might be short but it sure is skinny crew
RICHSTRONG's personal s*x toy
23 hours ago, 12:53 PM
-
#18
- OptimusTrajan
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Posts: 14,087
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 124133
-
-
She’s looking gooood in that pic. Wood wife.
23 hours ago, 01:03 PM
-
#19
- p7nk
- Registered Goyim
-
- p7nk
- Registered Goyim
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Location: Applebee's
- Age: 40
- Posts: 66,813
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 237587
-
-
Originally Posted By Basedbabyy⏩
regardless your chimping out if your cursing at a little kid. there's a reason she's a single mom
How are you supposed to know if a black is retarded or not they all act like it
💋👨🏽🍳🇨🇴
AP4 Crew
23 hours ago, 01:06 PM
-
#20
- AllLifter
- Toker
-
- AllLifter
- Toker
- Join Date: Feb, 2026
- Location: Jew S A
- Age: 30
- Height: 6'2"
- Weight: 189 lbs
- Posts: 2,425
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 459
-
-
Oh heavenly blessed beauty, whose inner beauty is simply diving and everlasting, I would love to be your knight in shining armor. If you want to talk to a good friend, honest, sweet and tender, you can do with me at any moment, I am a good person, kind, loyal and sincere. My friendship that I offer you is clean and transparent. I congratulate to you, because you are very beautiful, your beauty, your charming figure, your pleasant and angelical smile, your personality, your happiness, your charm, your kindness, your beautiful eyes, your lips soft and exquisite, delicate your hands, your legs precious Your beautiful, spectacular and divine body, you have all these qualities and more, you are a wonderful and perfect woman, your gaze is tender and sweet, penetrating my soul. The beauty of a rose has no comparison with the sweetness of your face and the beauty of your heart. I am of the people, I like to have a good relationship with all my friends.
“Islam to a man is like rabies to a dog”-Churchill
"I was repelled by the conglomeration of races which the capital showed me, repelled by this whole mixture of Czechs, Poles, Hungarians, Ruthenians, Serbs, and Croats, and everywhere, the eternal mushroom of humanity Jews and more Jews."-Hitler
23 hours ago, 01:08 PM
-
#21
- Jaydubs
- Former Misc Jasonw1178
-
- Jaydubs
- Former Misc Jasonw1178
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Georgia, US
- Age: 47
- Height: 5'5"
- Weight: 148 lbs
- Posts: 1,582
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 36091
-
-
You know if this was 2020-2024 she would probably get some crazy sentence to make an example to white people what will happen if they offend black people, especially refugee somolians.
From what I have read, the case is weak.]
The kid was Somolian so it sholdn't matter, they aren't really humans.
If they do find her guilty I really really hope Trump pardon's her to spite the court and "the Somilian community".
From what I have read, the case is weak.]
The kid was Somolian so it sholdn't matter, they aren't really humans.
If they do find her guilty I really really hope Trump pardon's her to spite the court and "the Somilian community".
21 hours ago, 02:15 PM
-
#22
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
-
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,329
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 162174
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Not saying you're wrong, but where's the established case law stating Dinger is not protected speech? If this is true, it's absolutely an idiotic standard since you could claim that saying almost anything is 'intended to start shit'. Every one of us here would be facing jail time. It would be an absolute idiotic standard.
It has been established for a long time this is one of a few exceptions to free speech.
The idea is that it is intended to start shit or it is expected this type of language would start shit.
I think that is exactly what the idea of protecting speech is for, but my opinion is not the law.
Losing emotional control with an eight year old is wild.
The idea is that it is intended to start shit or it is expected this type of language would start shit.
I think that is exactly what the idea of protecting speech is for, but my opinion is not the law.
Losing emotional control with an eight year old is wild.
21 hours ago, 02:26 PM
-
#23
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
-
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: AntiTranny Aktion
- Height: 6'6"
- Posts: 32,374
- Subscribers: 7
- Rep Power: 447189
-
-
Somalians do not belong here.
They all need to go home.
"Boss not feel good please use sick day" - low IQ tranny.
"Send him to Phaggy_Cholo"
21 hours ago, 02:27 PM
-
#24
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,537
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418615
-
-
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
Chaplinski v New Hampshire 1942: if a racial slurs is used face to face in an attempt to escalate conflict, first amendment protections can be revoked and the person can be prosecuted under local statute such as breech of peace, disorderly conduct or harassment. Of course if you use a racial slur while committing a statutory crime, it will be classified as a hate crime depending on jurisdiction which can lead to more significant legal punishment t.
Not saying you're wrong, but where's the established case law stating Dinger is not protected speech? If this is true, it's absolutely an idiotic standard since you could claim that saying almost anything is 'intended to start shit'. Every one of us here would be facing jail time. It would be an absolute idiotic standard.
Saying it online in jest would be protected. Shit you can say almost anything on line in jest.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
21 hours ago, 02:44 PM
-
#25
- Bigbuster2
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Posts: 473
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 5682
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
But honestly, is that what she did? I barely remember, but I don’t think that’s what she did.
Chaplinski v New Hampshire 1942: if a racial slurs is used face to face in an attempt to escalate conflict, first amendment protections can be revoked and the person can be prosecuted under local statute such as breech of peace, disorderly conduct or harassment. Of course if you use a racial slur while committing a statutory crime, it will be classified as a hate crime depending on jurisdiction which can lead to more significant legal punishment t.
Saying it online in jest would be protected. Shit you can say almost anything on line in jest.
Saying it online in jest would be protected. Shit you can say almost anything on line in jest.
21 hours ago, 02:48 PM
-
#26
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,537
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418615
-
-
Originally Posted By Bigbuster2⏩
It has been prosecuted before. I’m sure once the jury is instructed that free speech protections do not apply some nonsense like disorderly is easy to convict.
But honestly, is that what she did? I barely remember, but I don’t think that’s what she did.
I guess we will see what the jury says.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
21 hours ago, 02:50 PM
-
#27
21 hours ago, 02:53 PM
-
#28
- Donald_Trump
- Very important User
-
- Donald_Trump
- Very important User
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: McDonald's
- Height: 6'4"
- Posts: 712
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 9661
-
-
fuark she looks cute in that photo
21 hours ago, 02:54 PM
-
#29
- PovertyGhost
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Posts: 253
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
wait you can go to prison for saying a word now? lmao
can we just get this civil war started already ffs. Progressives need to be purged
can we just get this civil war started already ffs. Progressives need to be purged
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts