Thread:
Democrat's Main Objectives
01-23-2026, 03:50 PM
-
#1
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Democrat's Main Objectives
To Change the Demographics of the entire United States, State by State
The main narrative IMO is: Mass immigration by the democrats via open borders and protecting illegal immigrants, is designed to change the demographics of the United States. Immigrants, especially from Latin America, overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so Democrats decided to import a new electorate to secure permanent power.
Fuck the democrats as we disassemble their illegal operations, nationwide, starting with Minnesota.
The main narrative IMO is: Mass immigration by the democrats via open borders and protecting illegal immigrants, is designed to change the demographics of the United States. Immigrants, especially from Latin America, overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so Democrats decided to import a new electorate to secure permanent power.
Fuck the democrats as we disassemble their illegal operations, nationwide, starting with Minnesota.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-23-2026, 03:56 PM
-
#2
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
It's unfortunate all you can do in these difficult times is post about your seething hatred for Democrats instead of celebrating the Republican's main objectives, the daily steps they are taking to achieve them, and the one's they have achieved.
To Change the Demographics of the entire United States, State by State
The main narrative IMO is: Mass immigration by the democrats via open borders and protecting illegal immigrants, is designed to change the demographics of the United States. Immigrants, especially from Latin America, overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so Democrats decided to import a new electorate to secure permanent power.
Fuck the democrats as we disassemble their illegal operations, nationwide, starting with Minnesota.
The main narrative IMO is: Mass immigration by the democrats via open borders and protecting illegal immigrants, is designed to change the demographics of the United States. Immigrants, especially from Latin America, overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so Democrats decided to import a new electorate to secure permanent power.
Fuck the democrats as we disassemble their illegal operations, nationwide, starting with Minnesota.
01-23-2026, 04:44 PM
-
#3
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,502
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 117374
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
Was anything he said wrong?
It's unfortunate all you can do in these difficult times is post about your seething hatred for Democrats instead of celebrating the Republican's main objectives, the daily steps they are taking to achieve them, and the one's they have achieved.
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
01-23-2026, 05:11 PM
-
#4
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
As the ape man asked, please tell us what I posted that was wrong, aside from pissing you off with the truth.
It's unfortunate all you can do in these difficult times is post about your seething hatred for Democrats instead of celebrating the Republican's main objectives, the daily steps they are taking to achieve them, and the one's they have achieved.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-23-2026, 05:50 PM
-
#5
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
Everyone is welcome to their opinions. I was sharing what we humans call empathy.
Was anything he said wrong?
I was semi-srs too. If day after day politics is just criticizing whoever your opponent for sucking and fucking everything up, it's got to wear on a fella. Not saying the criticism isn't valid, just that it looks like a way to cope with a lack of results.
01-23-2026, 06:43 PM
-
#6
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,502
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 117374
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
So you have absolutely nothing except platitudes of horseshit.
Everyone is welcome to their opinions. I was sharing what we humans call empathy.
I was semi-srs too. If day after day politics is just criticizing whoever your opponent for sucking and fucking everything up, it's got to wear on a fella. Not saying the criticism isn't valid, just that it looks like a way to cope with a lack of results.
I was semi-srs too. If day after day politics is just criticizing whoever your opponent for sucking and fucking everything up, it's got to wear on a fella. Not saying the criticism isn't valid, just that it looks like a way to cope with a lack of results.
I spend most of my time here calling out Republicans for the dumb shit, but when Democrats are wrong I call them out too. It's not hard to do when you're intellectually honest
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
01-23-2026, 07:04 PM
-
#7
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
I don't mind you disagreeing with me.
Everyone is welcome to their opinions. I was sharing what we humans call empathy.
I was semi-srs too. If day after day politics is just criticizing whoever your opponent for sucking and fucking everything up, it's got to wear on a fella. Not saying the criticism isn't valid, just that it looks like a way to cope with a lack of results.
I was semi-srs too. If day after day politics is just criticizing whoever your opponent for sucking and fucking everything up, it's got to wear on a fella. Not saying the criticism isn't valid, just that it looks like a way to cope with a lack of results.
I really believe what I wrote and I believe that we are witnessing the proof of it in Minnesota, but the real life is much more horrific than what I wrote. I could have added that the democrats are a criminal organization, by allowing welfare fraud in the tens of billions and then turning a blind eye. In legal circles, that is called Willful Blindness. That welfare fraud not only funds the Somalis luxurious lifestyle, but also funds terrorism and most importantly it will come out that it funds the democrat party. Rinse and repeat in all blue States. Wait until we get to California and Illinois.
Lastly, to complete the circle of money laundering, this welfare fraud obligates those thousands or millions of Somalis to vote democrat. When was the last time a republican won much of anything in Minnesota?
Meanwhile, the democrats and the MSM as usual, are working up white liberal women into a frenzy and distracting the public with horror ICE stories and how mean they are. The democrats are freaking out because their operations are being dismantled.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-23-2026, 07:06 PM
-
#8
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
Cool. Thank you for your service.
So you have absolutely nothing except platitudes of horseshit.
I spend most of my time here calling out Republicans for the dumb shit, but when Democrats are wrong I call them out too. It's not hard to do when you're intellectually honest
I spend most of my time here calling out Republicans for the dumb shit, but when Democrats are wrong I call them out too. It's not hard to do when you're intellectually honest
01-23-2026, 07:24 PM
-
#9
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
There is a lot of unsubstantiated leaps of logic in all of that though. From a what I can tell the Somalians in the US are mostly all US citizens or legal residents that came in under multiple administrations and multiple congressional majorities. Tying it solely to Democrats or illegal immigration doesn't make any sense to me. That fraud is a partisan political problem belonging to Democrats simply isn't true, and there is no evidence that committing or getting away with fraud somehow obligates anyone to vote a certain way. In fact, Somalians as a group made a significant exodus away from the D party last election because they're against all the gay and tranny stuff.
I don't mind you disagreeing with me.
I really believe what I wrote and I believe that we are witnessing the proof of it in Minnesota, but the real life is much more horrific than what I wrote. I could have added that the democrats are a criminal organization, by allowing welfare fraud in the tens of billions and then turning a blind eye. In legal circles, that is called Willful Blindness. That welfare fraud not only funds the Somalis luxurious lifestyle, but also funds terrorism and most importantly it will come out that it funds the democrat party. Rinse and repeat in all blue States. Wait until we get to California and Illinois.
Lastly, to complete the circle of money laundering, this welfare fraud obligates those thousands or millions of Somalis to vote democrat. When was the last time a republican won much of anything in Minnesota?
Meanwhile, the democrats and the MSM as usual, are working up white liberal women into a frenzy and distracting the public with horror ICE stories and how mean they are. The democrats are freaking out because their operations are being dismantled.
I really believe what I wrote and I believe that we are witnessing the proof of it in Minnesota, but the real life is much more horrific than what I wrote. I could have added that the democrats are a criminal organization, by allowing welfare fraud in the tens of billions and then turning a blind eye. In legal circles, that is called Willful Blindness. That welfare fraud not only funds the Somalis luxurious lifestyle, but also funds terrorism and most importantly it will come out that it funds the democrat party. Rinse and repeat in all blue States. Wait until we get to California and Illinois.
Lastly, to complete the circle of money laundering, this welfare fraud obligates those thousands or millions of Somalis to vote democrat. When was the last time a republican won much of anything in Minnesota?
Meanwhile, the democrats and the MSM as usual, are working up white liberal women into a frenzy and distracting the public with horror ICE stories and how mean they are. The democrats are freaking out because their operations are being dismantled.
At the same time, what you point out isn't flatly wrong, but it's not the kind of stuff (IMO) that should be viewed through a partisan lens, because it just bogs everything down in politics.
01-24-2026, 08:06 AM
-
#10
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
Ok. Your first post above mentioned that my OP was just seething hatred for democrats in these difficult times. The truth is the truth and fraud is fraud.
There is a lot of unsubstantiated leaps of logic in all of that though. From a what I can tell the Somalians in the US are mostly all US citizens or legal residents that came in under multiple administrations and multiple congressional majorities. Tying it solely to Democrats or illegal immigration doesn't make any sense to me. That fraud is a partisan political problem belonging to Democrats simply isn't true, and there is no evidence that committing or getting away with fraud somehow obligates anyone to vote a certain way. In fact, Somalians as a group made a significant exodus away from the D party last election because they're against all the gay and tranny stuff.
At the same time, what you point out isn't flatly wrong, but it's not the kind of stuff (IMO) that should be viewed through a partisan lens, because it just bogs everything down in politics.
At the same time, what you point out isn't flatly wrong, but it's not the kind of stuff (IMO) that should be viewed through a partisan lens, because it just bogs everything down in politics.
Again, I meant every word my post #7 is based on a lot of gathering and it is my opinion. It is not based on hatred. We are focusing on Minnesota right now.
It really does not matter how the Somalis entered Minnesota, but it started with their civil war and refugees coming here under Bush and then Clinton.
What matters is that Somalis took advantage of our welfare system to the tune of tens of billions and Walz and Frey did nothing about it. In fact, if the fraud wasn't exposed, it would be flourishing still. It is also happening in other blue States. I sincerely believe that it is a business model to build consensus and votes.
Have you ever asked yourself why the democrats protect illegal immigrants so hard? While ignoring the needs of Black and Hispanic citizens? Why did the democrats create sanctuary cities? To protect illegal immigrants and build consensus and votes. Why did Biden and the democrats open the borders? To replace native-born citizens with non-native-born who are dependent upon welfare for housing, food, education and healthcare.
The republicans have nothing to do with all that. Just a fact. Minnesota fraud alone is $18 Billion+ and counting.
California Fraud
Why do democrats coddle illegal immigrants? Answer is that the democrat's goal is to import voters and replace native-born citizens.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-24-2026, 08:29 AM
-
#11
- Fishman15
- Ultra Dark MAGA
-
- Fishman15
- Ultra Dark MAGA
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: United States
- Posts: 28,514
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 328678
-
-
In my opinion, the democrat party has jumped the shark. There is no coming back from the chit they pulled since Trump became the nominee in 2016...
Hey Timmy, show us on the boy doll where the tampon goes...
01-24-2026, 08:43 AM
-
#12
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Fishman15⏩
100%. The Man of Many Fishes has spoken.
In my opinion, the democrat party has jumped the shark. There is no coming back from the chit they pulled since Trump became the nominee in 2016...
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-24-2026, 11:29 AM
-
#13
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
I think the question is based on a false premise. The Democrats as recently as Obama were not protective of illegals, and if you look at the facts going back as far as Reagan, the Republicans have arguably been as or more damaging with their immigration policies. Voters make their choices for a lot of different reasons, in DC the only thing that matters is power and they all use immigration as a tool (with different pretense) to further the agenda of more power. Biden fucked up pretty bad with immigration, but I don't think he had any plan whatsoever other than to do the opposite of Trump. That he walked it all back later in his term supports he was only motivated to get votes, not to enact some grand plan.
Have you ever asked yourself why the democrats protect illegal immigrants so hard? While ignoring the needs of Black and Hispanic citizens? Why did the democrats create sanctuary cities? To protect illegal immigrants and build consensus and votes. Why did Biden and the democrats open the borders? To replace native-born citizens with non-native-born who are dependent upon welfare for housing, food, education and healthcare.
You are also conflating the realities of state and federal government roles which are inherently different. The consequences of decades of federal immigration management are left to the states to solve in their own way based on their own circumstances. If the hard reality is that there are 2 million illegal aliens in your state working and driving around, I'd prefer they pay taxes and are licensed and insured and they get some basic healthcare to not spread disease. The states are also where you get the bleeding heart activists who don't have the corporate resources to lobby in DC, but they can influence local and state politicians, so you get all the weird sanctuary city and tranny books in school shit.
I don't care about any of the above related to crime, everyone has to held to the same standard. But I would much rather take my chances living with street criminals and illegals than with criminals supported and given immunity by the government, so you're halfway there by being critical of Democrats.
01-25-2026, 03:07 AM
-
#14
- BigNik78
- Five Star Man
-
- BigNik78
- Five Star Man
- Join Date: May 2015
- Location: Arizona
- Posts: 19,904
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 373712
-
-
Originally Posted By Fishman15⏩
They sure did indoctrinate millions of children and young adults though. I hope that's not enough to overcome the sane people who see libtards for what they are.
In my opinion, the democrat party has jumped the shark. There is no coming back from the chit they pulled since Trump became the nominee in 2016...
On a separate note I also think the left wants to destroy the constitution by any means possible and make a ne one in their image. Rat f'ing bastards and there's no clean way out of it and back to normalcy.
Ultra-Low Test Crew
MAGA
01-25-2026, 08:37 AM
-
#15
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
We completely disagree on everything. I don't care about Obama in this conversation because the democrats dramatically changed their strategy with Biden opening the borders with the democrats approving. See my OP #1. It is the same Globalist strategy that many of the Euro countries have implemented and it is having disastrous effects.
I think the question is based on a false premise. The Democrats as recently as Obama were not protective of illegals, and if you look at the facts going back as far as Reagan, the Republicans have arguably been as or more damaging with their immigration policies. Voters make their choices for a lot of different reasons, in DC the only thing that matters is power and they all use immigration as a tool (with different pretense) to further the agenda of more power. Biden fucked up pretty bad with immigration, but I don't think he had any plan whatsoever other than to do the opposite of Trump. That he walked it all back later in his term supports he was only motivated to get votes, not to enact some grand plan.
You are also conflating the realities of state and federal government roles which are inherently different. The consequences of decades of federal immigration management are left to the states to solve in their own way based on their own circumstances. If the hard reality is that there are 2 million illegal aliens in your state working and driving around, I'd prefer they pay taxes and are licensed and insured and they get some basic healthcare to not spread disease. The states are also where you get the bleeding heart activists who don't have the corporate resources to lobby in DC, but they can influence local and state politicians, so you get all the weird sanctuary city and tranny books in school shit.
I don't care about any of the above related to crime, everyone has to held to the same standard. But I would much rather take my chances living with street criminals and illegals than with criminals supported and given immunity by the government, so you're halfway there by being critical of Democrats.
You are also conflating the realities of state and federal government roles which are inherently different. The consequences of decades of federal immigration management are left to the states to solve in their own way based on their own circumstances. If the hard reality is that there are 2 million illegal aliens in your state working and driving around, I'd prefer they pay taxes and are licensed and insured and they get some basic healthcare to not spread disease. The states are also where you get the bleeding heart activists who don't have the corporate resources to lobby in DC, but they can influence local and state politicians, so you get all the weird sanctuary city and tranny books in school shit.
I don't care about any of the above related to crime, everyone has to held to the same standard. But I would much rather take my chances living with street criminals and illegals than with criminals supported and given immunity by the government, so you're halfway there by being critical of Democrats.
There is no conflation and you gloss over what the blue States are doing protecting illegal immigrants over citizens. There are no other reasons others than to change the demographics of our country because the current majority have been turning their backs on democrats.
Look at Virginia and the new governor Spanberger (sp). She did not run on higher taxes, but she is proposing higher taxes and far-left ideologies that our country has rejected. Virginia voters did not vote for higher taxes. The democrats like to force-feed their far-left ideologies instead of listening to the citizens and the greater good.
After your post I am convinced that we will get nowhere in any type of debate, so you believe what you want.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 08:48 AM
-
#16
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
Don't act like the Republicans haven't also been working to change demographics, for the last 50 years. Just because it is legal doesn't change the fact it is still demographics replacement and change. The 1965 Immigration act had overwhelming bipartisan support with 85% of Rs approving.
We completely disagree on everything. I don't care about Obama in this conversation because the democrats dramatically changed their strategy with Biden opening the borders with the democrats approving. See my OP #1. It is the same Globalist strategy that many of the Euro countries have implemented and it is having disastrous effects.
There is no conflation and you gloss over what the blue States are doing protecting illegal immigrants over citizens. There are no other reasons others than to change the demographics of our country because the current majority have been turning their backs on democrats.
Look at Virginia and the new governor Spanberger (sp). She did not run on higher taxes, but she is proposing higher taxes and far-left ideologies that our country has rejected. Virginia voters did not vote for higher taxes. The democrats like to force-feed their far-left ideologies instead of listening to the citizens and the greater good.
After your post I am convinced that we will get nowhere in any type of debate, so you believe what you want.
There is no conflation and you gloss over what the blue States are doing protecting illegal immigrants over citizens. There are no other reasons others than to change the demographics of our country because the current majority have been turning their backs on democrats.
Look at Virginia and the new governor Spanberger (sp). She did not run on higher taxes, but she is proposing higher taxes and far-left ideologies that our country has rejected. Virginia voters did not vote for higher taxes. The democrats like to force-feed their far-left ideologies instead of listening to the citizens and the greater good.
After your post I am convinced that we will get nowhere in any type of debate, so you believe what you want.
Look at Europe, for the last 20 years they have been voting in people who say they will lower immigration from both sides, and they never do, same as over here. Trump just banned a ton of countries immigration that don't matter anyway, India is still on the list, have you been in Texas lately? They're taking over, many areas are little India.
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
01-25-2026, 09:03 AM
-
#17
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
Nice to meet another bullshit poster. Before you equate the democrat's strategies that I have posted, bring evidence that republicans have opened the borders to import future voters and increase consensus and electorates their way, alienating and ignoring the needs of US citizens.
Don't act like the Republicans haven't also been working to change demographics, for the last 50 years. Just because it is legal doesn't change the fact it is still demographics replacement and change. The 1965 Immigration act had overwhelming bipartisan support with 85% of Rs approving.
Look at Europe, for the last 20 years they have been voting in people who say they will lower immigration from both sides, and they never do, same as over here. Trump just banned a ton of countries immigration that don't matter anyway, India is still on the list, have you been in Texas lately? They're taking over, many areas are little India.
Look at Europe, for the last 20 years they have been voting in people who say they will lower immigration from both sides, and they never do, same as over here. Trump just banned a ton of countries immigration that don't matter anyway, India is still on the list, have you been in Texas lately? They're taking over, many areas are little India.
Your India reference is noted. However, Indians have not participated in multi-Billion $ welfare fraud money laundering operations in red States.
Nice to meet you, but not really.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 09:11 AM
-
#18
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
Okay so really you're just a civic nationalist? Just the way you were talking about "demographic changing" had me thinking you were a ethno nationalist. You're okay with the replacement as long as they work hard and "assimilate" type.
Nice to meet another bullshit poster. Before you equate the democrat's strategies that I have posted, bring evidence that republicans have opened the borders to import future voters and increase consensus and electorates their way, alienating and ignoring the needs of US citizens.
Your India reference is noted. However, Indians have not participated in multi-Billion $ welfare fraud money laundering operations in red States.
Nice to meet you, but not really.
Your India reference is noted. However, Indians have not participated in multi-Billion $ welfare fraud money laundering operations in red States.
Nice to meet you, but not really.
Also, you don't have to be so passive aggressive and bitchy, very feminine.
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
01-25-2026, 09:34 AM
-
#19
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
No, I just believe everything I wrote. You invent unequal and false equivalents. Not even the MSM have brought up the false equivalents that you have.
Okay so really you're just a civic nationalist? Just the way you were talking about "demographic changing" had me thinking you were a ethno nationalist. You're okay with the replacement as long as they work hard and "assimilate" type.
Also, you don't have to be so passive aggressive and bitchy, very feminine.
Also, you don't have to be so passive aggressive and bitchy, very feminine.
Republicans have not participated in any replacement.
Passive aggressive? No, just defending my positions.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 09:39 AM
-
#20
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
Reagan was bringing in 900k legal immigrants per year mostly from asia, india and central africa, by the end of his run, 7-8M had come in. Look it up dipshit, both sides have been selling us out since the 1960s.
No, I just believe everything I wrote. You invent unequal and false equivalents. Not even the MSM have brought up the false equivalents that you have.
Republicans have not participated in any replacement.
Passive aggressive? No, just defending my positions.
Republicans have not participated in any replacement.
Passive aggressive? No, just defending my positions.
What is conservative about mass importing other cultures?
The 1986 Immigration reform and control act was signed by Reagan himself.....allowing 3 million illegals to gain status
Don't come at me unless you're ready brosky
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
01-25-2026, 09:56 AM
-
#21
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
Fuck you. The ultimate objectives of Reagan and Biden opening the borders with democrat's blessings to change the consensus and electorates in their favor, were very different.
Reagan was bringing in 900k legal immigrants per year mostly from asia, india and central africa, by the end of his run, 7-8M had come in. Look it up dipshit, both sides have been selling us out since the 1960s.
What is conservative about mass importing other cultures?
The 1986 Immigration reform and control act was signed by Reagan himself.....allowing 3 million illegals to gain status
Don't come at me unless you're ready brosky
What is conservative about mass importing other cultures?
The 1986 Immigration reform and control act was signed by Reagan himself.....allowing 3 million illegals to gain status
Don't come at me unless you're ready brosky
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 10:01 AM
-
#22
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
It's still REPLACEMENT you dimwit fuck, you are STILL getting replaced.
Fuck you. The ultimate objectives of Reagan and Biden opening the borders with democrat's blessings to change the consensus and electorates in their favor, were very different.
When's the last time the US government has actually pandered to white people?
It's ALWAYS pandering to foreigners with this statue of liberty welcome scum of the earth bullshit.
Bidenwave was horrid, but both sides have been allowing this shit to happen for 60 years. Wake the fuck up and stop buying into this partisan puppet show, just go suck DTs dick already.
Also you don't think Reagan had in the back of his mind that by signing off on that, that he would without a doubt secure a new 3m voters?
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
01-25-2026, 10:03 AM
-
#23
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
Go fuck yourself you lying ignorant bitch. Thank you for making me a fierce enemy.
It's still REPLACEMENT you dimwit fuck, you are STILL getting replaced.
When's the last time the US government has actually pandered to white people?
It's ALWAYS pandering to foreigners with this statue of liberty welcome scum of the earth bullshit.
Bidenwave was horrid, but both sides have been allowing this shit to happen for 60 years. Wake the fuck up and stop buying into this partisan puppet show you have going on, just go suck DTs dick already.
When's the last time the US government has actually pandered to white people?
It's ALWAYS pandering to foreigners with this statue of liberty welcome scum of the earth bullshit.
Bidenwave was horrid, but both sides have been allowing this shit to happen for 60 years. Wake the fuck up and stop buying into this partisan puppet show you have going on, just go suck DTs dick already.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 10:04 AM
-
#24
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
Dispute what I said, try it.
Go fuck yourself you lying bitch. Thank you for making me a fierce enemy.
You're seething because I shined a light of truth on your heroes which are a bunch of losers no better than the lefties.
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
01-25-2026, 10:08 AM
-
#25
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
You did not add constructive conversation and your post history verifies this. I made my positions very clear. You did not.
Dispute what I said, try it.
You're seething because I shined a light of truth on your heroes which are a bunch of losers no better than the lefties.
You're seething because I shined a light of truth on your heroes which are a bunch of losers no better than the lefties.
We are done and you are on ignore.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 10:11 AM
-
#26
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,502
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 117374
-
-
Originally Posted By LongNstrong⏩
God damn you just wrecked Mark with facts. Some of these Boomer types can't get past the fact it's really a one-party system and that they're conservative Gods were part of the problem. You exposed Reagan, now let's do Bush
Dispute what I said, try it.
You're seething because I shined a light of truth on your heroes which are a bunch of losers no better than the lefties.
You're seething because I shined a light of truth on your heroes which are a bunch of losers no better than the lefties.
George W. Bush advocated for comprehensive immigration reform during his presidency (2001–2009). His position emphasized securing the borders, increasing enforcement (both at the border and in the interior/worksite), creating a guest/temporary worker program, and providing a path to legalization (often described as earned citizenship or a path to citizenship) for many of the undocumented immigrants already in the U.S., while explicitly opposing blanket "amnesty."
Bush viewed immigration as vital to the U.S. economy and America's identity as a nation of immigrants, while stressing the need to control illegal immigration. He later called the failure to pass reform one of his biggest regrets.
For legal permanent residents (green cards/new lawful immigrants): Annual numbers during Bush's terms (FY 2001–2009) were generally in the 700,000–1.2 million range per year, with totals around 8–10 million over the full period (2001–2009 calendar years roughly align with FY2001–FY2009). The decade 2000–2010 overall saw high legal inflows, part of a record-setting period.
For net immigration (overall population growth from immigration, including legal and net unauthorized): Estimates vary, but one source charts annual net immigration during Bush's later years at roughly 800,000–910,000 per year (e.g., 910,000 in 2006, 800,000 in 2007, 835,000 in 2008). Over his full presidency, cumulative net immigration was in the range of about 7–9 million or higher when including the high early-2000s inflows.
Broader estimates (legal + illegal net settlement): The 2000–2010 decade saw nearly 14 million new immigrants (legal and illegal combined) settle in the U.S., the highest on record for any decade, with a significant portion occurring under Bush before the 2008 recession slowed flows.
Brb, let's just blame Democrats derp derp derpBush viewed immigration as vital to the U.S. economy and America's identity as a nation of immigrants, while stressing the need to control illegal immigration. He later called the failure to pass reform one of his biggest regrets.
For legal permanent residents (green cards/new lawful immigrants): Annual numbers during Bush's terms (FY 2001–2009) were generally in the 700,000–1.2 million range per year, with totals around 8–10 million over the full period (2001–2009 calendar years roughly align with FY2001–FY2009). The decade 2000–2010 overall saw high legal inflows, part of a record-setting period.
For net immigration (overall population growth from immigration, including legal and net unauthorized): Estimates vary, but one source charts annual net immigration during Bush's later years at roughly 800,000–910,000 per year (e.g., 910,000 in 2006, 800,000 in 2007, 835,000 in 2008). Over his full presidency, cumulative net immigration was in the range of about 7–9 million or higher when including the high early-2000s inflows.
Broader estimates (legal + illegal net settlement): The 2000–2010 decade saw nearly 14 million new immigrants (legal and illegal combined) settle in the U.S., the highest on record for any decade, with a significant portion occurring under Bush before the 2008 recession slowed flows.
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
01-25-2026, 10:16 AM
-
#27
- WoofieNugget
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Age: 51
- Posts: 24,070
- Rep Power: 108966
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
This is an idiotic metric. Texas has 60x the population of Minneapolis and is closer to a major border. If they are only deporting 10x the illegals there, then it's actually a very low number in proportion.
01-25-2026, 10:17 AM
-
#28
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,837
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715571
-
-
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
My other enemy materializes, ignoring the facts that I laid out. No surprise that the Pagjjjgeet Pussy Monkey ignores fraud on a national scale.
God damn you just wrecked Mark with facts. Some of these Boomer types can't get past the fact it's really a one-party system and that they're conservative Gods were part of the problem. You exposed Reagan, now let's do Bush
Brb, let's just blame Democrats derp derp derp
Brb, let's just blame Democrats derp derp derp
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
01-25-2026, 10:20 AM
-
#29
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,502
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 117374
-
-
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
When have I ever ignored fraud and not talked about it? Of course Democrats are full of shit and are insurrectionists pieces of garbage but that doesn't change what Republicans have done as well. Patiently waiting for Pam Bondi to go after the king makers in this game, not a couple of low level retards
My other enemy materializes, ignoring the facts that I laid out. No surprise that the Pagjjjgeet Pussy Monkey ignores fraud on a national scale.
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
01-25-2026, 10:49 AM
-
#30
- LongNstrong
- Banned
-
- LongNstrong
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Alt heaven
- Posts: 1,765
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
When have I ever ignored fraud and not talked about it? Of course Democrats are full of shit and are insurrectionists pieces of garbage but that doesn't change what Republicans have done as well. Patiently waiting for Pam Bondi to go after the king makers in this game, not a couple of low level retards
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
Exactly. Can’t stand these moron boomers.
God damn you just wrecked Mark with facts. Some of these Boomer types can't get past the fact it's really a one-party system and that they're conservative Gods were part of the problem. You exposed Reagan, now let's do Bush
Brb, let's just blame Democrats derp derp derp
Brb, let's just blame Democrats derp derp derp
The legal immigration numbers were right in the 30-50k range of European immigrants in the early 60s, once that immigration act went through, it
boomed to 500k within a year. This was massively supported by both sides. Just got worse from there.
The last president that truly cared was JFK
Leave a like in the comment section.
Due to the graphic nature of this program, viewer discretion is advised.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts