Forum
»
The more I learn about philosophy and math
- Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
Page 1 of 1
06-15-2026, 12:28 PM
-
#1
The more I learn about philosophy and math
The more I keep going back to Terrence Howard vid with Joe Rogan and realizing how right and common sense all the points about math he’s making is
You’ve been played for a fool. Logic is calling groups zero and infinity a 1984 style trap
Math inserted a 1984 style authoritarian catch 22 rule that says you can not use objective observable reality to justify or rebut a starting assumption(axiom).. this is not a technical limitation, it’s a choice
You can only replace an arbitrary axiom with another arbitrary axiom
This effectively locks out any kind of objective grounded math.. letting the dominate party control math and in return control bottleneck and limit the field of physics through language
Logic calls this catch 22 rule beyond absurd, a fallacy, a system of control.. etc etc
It’s a circular framework. A subjective Catch-22 ensures their foundational assumptions (axioms) can never be challenged.
I mean come on… people can’t be this brainwashed. They literally inserted rule that says you can’t use reality to justify or rebut their starting assumptions..
You’ve been played for a fool. Logic is calling groups zero and infinity a 1984 style trap
Math inserted a 1984 style authoritarian catch 22 rule that says you can not use objective observable reality to justify or rebut a starting assumption(axiom).. this is not a technical limitation, it’s a choice
You can only replace an arbitrary axiom with another arbitrary axiom
This effectively locks out any kind of objective grounded math.. letting the dominate party control math and in return control bottleneck and limit the field of physics through language
Logic calls this catch 22 rule beyond absurd, a fallacy, a system of control.. etc etc
It’s a circular framework. A subjective Catch-22 ensures their foundational assumptions (axioms) can never be challenged.
I mean come on… people can’t be this brainwashed. They literally inserted rule that says you can’t use reality to justify or rebut their starting assumptions..
06-25-2026, 08:24 PM
-
#2
- chalup
- Registered User
-
- chalup
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 37,885
- Rep Power: 123589
-
-
why does terrence go off on a tagent when asked to explain why 1x1 equals 2 to him?
Terrence Howard Explains Why 1*1 = 2 | TikTok
You do realize google gives you multiple reasons on why 1x1=1 right? and they are all basic and straight forward, none of them have to jump around to different topics talking about other completely random shit to make you forget what your original question was.
also negged
Terrence Howard Explains Why 1*1 = 2 | TikTok
You do realize google gives you multiple reasons on why 1x1=1 right? and they are all basic and straight forward, none of them have to jump around to different topics talking about other completely random shit to make you forget what your original question was.
also negged
06-25-2026, 08:28 PM
-
#3
- explosiveMidget
- Always creepin never sleepin
-
- explosiveMidget
- Always creepin never sleepin
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Location: IRELAND
- Age: 35
- Height: 5'6"
- Weight: 203 lbs
- Posts: 29,032
- Subscribers: 11
- Rep Power: 280350
-
-
fascinating stuff, geston
as always
as always
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts