Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» In WW2, Which Country Could Have Beaten Germany 1 on 1?
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 97
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Last
post 1610570341 07-14-2020, 11:54 AM
-
#1
  1. ChristmasFnatic
  2. Resident Rocker
  1. ChristmasFnatic
  2. Resident Rocker
  3. Join Date: Jun 2008
  4. Age: 46
  5. Posts: 48,047
  6. Rep Power: 353496

In WW2, Which Country Could Have Beaten Germany 1 on 1?

Yes, Germany lost in Stalingrad, but then it is not all their forces who went to Russia. They lost in Battle of the Bulge, but it is an allied effort to beat them.

How about 1 on 1. Could USA have beaten them?

France which got a superior army fell to the Germans(mainly cuz France were arrogant and thus, got surprised).
post 1610570451 07-14-2020, 11:56 AM
-
#2
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
USA or Russia.

Definitely not the cuck British who were getting railed up the a** until we saved them.
post 1610570601 07-14-2020, 11:58 AM
-
#3
  1. kalvinmc
  2. ( ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ)
  1. kalvinmc
  2. ( ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ)
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Location: Balding, North Carolina, Chad
  5. Posts: 5,971
  6. Rep Power: 22988
USA would have nuked Germany so yeah
"Sometimes nobody shows up and you automatically win."

27.55lb x 12 alternating bicep curl
220lb x 8 barbell hip thrust
post 1610572241 07-14-2020, 12:14 PM
-
#4
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Russia and USA for sure


Maybe Japan


That’s it
post 1610572501 07-14-2020, 12:16 PM
-
#5
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 2,304
  6. Rep Power: 5808
in what sense? overall or?


Probably 1944 USA.
post 1610572551 07-14-2020, 12:17 PM
-
#6
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 36,953
  5. Rep Power: 416934
Originally Posted By kalvinmc
USA would have nuked Germany so yeah
Had Germany not been engaged on all fronts they probably would have developed nuclear weapons first.

They also had a delivery system.

▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
post 1610572651 07-14-2020, 12:18 PM
-
#7
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 2,304
  6. Rep Power: 5808
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout
Had Germany not been engaged on all fronts they probably would have developed nuclear weapons first.

They also had a delivery system.

they had rockets but they werent close to nukes by stretch. They hadnt the resources or expertise by the time the war turned against them.
post 1610572731 07-14-2020, 12:18 PM
-
#8
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 10,877
  6. Rep Power: 68142
Originally Posted By ChristmasFnatic
How about 1 on 1. Could USA have beaten them?
Obviously. Just drop a couple A bombs on them.
post 1610574091 07-14-2020, 12:31 PM
-
#9
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Germany was unstoppable if it hadn't been for the International Clique funding the other sides with more money. On a purely one on one war, Germany had the strongest military overall with the exception to their navy.


lol @ Americans claiming "muh atomic bombs". Germany started their nuclear weapons program as early as 1938 (four years before the Manhattan Project that began in 1942) but it was halted when Poland baited Germany (in September 1939) into invading to trigger a World War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German...eapons_program
post 1610574411 07-14-2020, 12:33 PM
-
#10
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout
Had Germany not been engaged on all fronts they probably would have developed nuclear weapons first.

They also had a delivery system.

Not even close to it. their best shot to get a nuke first was not to drive out all the Jewish brain power / scientists from their country.


With that, and not provoking Russia, was their only chance to victory. Tactically or in terms of manpower Germany was ****ed from the start. The only way they win is with atomic weapons
post 1610574761 07-14-2020, 12:37 PM
-
#11
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 10,877
  6. Rep Power: 68142
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
Germany was unstoppable if it hadn't been for the International Clique funding the other sides with more money. On a purely one on one war, Germany had the strongest military overall with the exception to their navy.


lol @ Americans claiming "muh atomic bombs". Germany started their nuclear weapons program as early as 1938 (six years before the Manhattan Project that began in 1942) but it was halted when Poland baited Germany (in September 1939) into invading to trigger a World War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German...eapons_program
lol @ playing firsties.
post 1610574781 07-14-2020, 12:37 PM
-
#12
  1. MarkyMark215
  2. Chad lite
  1. MarkyMark215
  2. Chad lite
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 1,456
  5. Rep Power: 28299
Originally Posted By maesterseymour
...poland baited germany into invading to trigger a world war.
uwotm8
post 1610574851 07-14-2020, 12:37 PM
-
#13
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By meanstringbean
Not even close to it. their best shot to get a nuke first was not to drive out all the Jewish brain power / scientists from their country.


With that, and not provoking Russia, was their only chance to victory. Tactically or in terms of manpower Germany was ****ed from the start. The only way they win is with atomic weapons
lol @ Jewish brainpower.

post 1610574941 07-14-2020, 12:38 PM
-
#14
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  3. Join Date:
  4. Posts: 12,500
  5. Rep Power: 1
Probably none srs.

Maybe Russia.
I think the georaphical positions would have created a stalemate between the US. But no chance of the USA successfully invading Germany alone.

People forget that Germany had the finest military in the world. It wasn't even close. Srs. Post the invention of nuclear weapons the USA would have rekt them though obviously.

Imagine all that extra attention the Germans could have given towards missile development. They basically ditched their neclear programme to develop missiles, which were way superior to anything the allies had.
post 1610574981 07-14-2020, 12:38 PM
-
#15
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By shmobin
lol @ playing firsties.
lol @ stealing Intel
post 1610575491 07-14-2020, 12:42 PM
-
#16
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MarkyMark215
uwotm8
https://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm

post 1610575711 07-14-2020, 12:46 PM
-
#17
  1. mobp
  2. Banned
  1. mobp
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,421
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
lol @ Jewish brainpower.

Italy, #6, how?

post 1610575871 07-14-2020, 12:47 PM
-
#18
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By mobp
Italy, #6, how?

That's an American.
post 1610576311 07-14-2020, 12:50 PM
-
#19
  1. MaxMaximorum
  2. Banned
  1. MaxMaximorum
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 241
  6. Rep Power: 0
Einstein disagreed.
Originally Posted By Rad203
They hadnt the resources or expertise by the time the war turned against them.
post 1610576611 07-14-2020, 12:52 PM
-
#20
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 209
  6. Rep Power: 0
Russia, and they basically did.
post 1610576771 07-14-2020, 12:54 PM
-
#21
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Posts: 23,424
  5. Rep Power: 87439
Only the US and Japan had the technology and numbers to take on the Germans.

I'm not even sure who would have won as it depends on where the war takes place.
"The manlet is a savage beast that knows no moral bound. After falling in disgrace to a manmore, a ravaged manlet would not hesitate to come from behind and land a sucker punch/ swing with a rock to the back of a manmore's head. They are ruthless and you need to spend some more time in the gutter to even begin trying to comprehend what goes on in their minds."

Hurt by the aleeboy and need to cope? Go here for hugs: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178724011
post 1610576881 07-14-2020, 12:55 PM
-
#22
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By degenmaxxer
Russia, and they basically did.
Read the OP. He said 1 on 1.
post 1610576991 07-14-2020, 12:56 PM
-
#23
  1. suave2000
  1. suave2000
  2. Join Date: Mar 2009
  3. Location: Peru
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 29,077
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 11201
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
Germany was unstoppable if it hadn't been for the International Clique funding the other sides with more money. On a purely one on one war, Germany had the strongest military overall with the exception to their navy.


lol @ Americans claiming "muh atomic bombs". Germany started their nuclear weapons program as early as 1938 (six years before the Manhattan Project that began in 1942) but it was halted when Poland baited Germany (in September 1939) into invading to trigger a World War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German...eapons_program
what do you mean by "international clique" and lol at believeing that Germany invaded Poland because of bait. Lmao Antisemitic loon spotted

To answer ops question not a single nation could have defeated Germany by itself. They had the best military in the world by far. Maybe Russia could have won on a war of attrition because of it's sheer size but It would have been devastating. America had no chance so it's either the soviets or nobody
post 1610577021 07-14-2020, 12:57 PM
-
#24
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 209
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
Read the OP. He said 1 on 1.
I read the OP. Russia could take Germany 1 on 1, and essentially did. If you knew anything about WW2, you'd know the US role in defeating Germany was actually not that huge. We were important in defeating Italy, and helping free France. We certainly played a role, but Germany would have fallen to Russia either way, and it was Russia that took Berlin.
post 1610577041 07-14-2020, 12:57 PM
-
#25
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By suave2000
what do you mean by "international clique" and lol at believeing that Germany invaded Poland because of bait. Lmao Antisemitic loon spotted
Jew spotted.
post 1610577121 07-14-2020, 12:58 PM
-
#26
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 10,877
  6. Rep Power: 68142
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
lol @ stealing Intel
You're doing it wrong bro.
post 1610577171 07-14-2020, 12:59 PM
-
#27
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  1. degenmaxxer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 209
  6. Rep Power: 0
Also, Germany was not close to a nuclear weapon. There isn't much evidence they had plans for anything nastier than a dirty bomb.
post 1610577251 07-14-2020, 01:00 PM
-
#28
  1. suave2000
  1. suave2000
  2. Join Date: Mar 2009
  3. Location: Peru
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 29,077
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 11201
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
Jew spotted.
lol i'm Qechua brah not a jew
post 1610577291 07-14-2020, 01:00 PM
-
#29
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By degenmaxxer
I read the OP. Russia could take Germany 1 on 1, and essentially did. If you knew anything about WW2, you'd know the US role in defeating Germany was actually not that huge. We were important in defeating Italy, and helping free France. We certainly played a role, but Germany would have fallen to Russia either way, and it was Russia that took Berlin.
If you knew anything about the Soviet Union, you would know that they lost a war against Finland in 1940 in three months.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
post 1610577971 07-14-2020, 01:06 PM
-
#30
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  1. Rad203
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 2,304
  6. Rep Power: 5808
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour
If you knew anything about the Soviet Union, you would know that they lost a war against Finland in 1940 in three months.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
lol this. Russia was very heavily helped by us lend lease.

the russians would never have surrended tho to be fair, they would keep fighting till there was no one left which may have worn the axis down but the russians didnt do it all by themselves.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts