Forum
»
MLB just released its positive test results
- Results 1 to 30 of 30
-
Page 1 of 1
07-17-2020, 11:04 AM
-
#1
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,718
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258329
-
-
MLB just released its positive test results
The league collected 10,548 samples over the past week, but just six (0.05 percent) returned as new positives.
So MLB is reporting a staggeringly low 0.05% positive test rate and we’re supposed to believe the reports 1% of the entire general population has tested positive?I’m not talking 1% positive result rate either, I’m talking 1% has been confirmed infected, regardless of testing.
That is a HUGE discrepancy. And before anyone tries to talk about sample size, if you knew anything about statistics you’d know 10,000 is more than representative enough to generalize to the population.
There’s no way you should be seeing such polarizing results.
More evidence to support something is going on with the data we’re being fed.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
07-17-2020, 11:09 AM
-
#2
- BrightThru2014
- Registered User
-
- BrightThru2014
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 33
- Posts: 3,902
- Rep Power: 15332
-
-
Aren't they all in a bubble at this stage? And testing the same people numerous times?
07-17-2020, 11:13 AM
-
#3
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,718
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258329
-
-
Originally Posted By BrightThru2014⏩
A bubble? From what? They all live in their own homes in their own communities. It's not like they're sleeping at the stadium. They're as much in a bubble as the electrician who goes in to work every day.Aren't they all in a bubble at this stage? And testing the same people numerous times?
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
07-17-2020, 11:21 AM
-
#4
07-17-2020, 11:23 AM
-
#5
07-17-2020, 11:24 AM
-
#6
- KurtMussell
- Big Trouble
-
- KurtMussell
- Big Trouble
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Posts: 13,372
- Rep Power: 104117
-
-
Rich people don't go to the grocery store, local protests or wal-mart. lol at thinking they're like the unwashed masses. It's a life of privilege with limited contact beside with other rich people, son.
Doesn't shower with his dad crew
Dat feel when you taste sweat in your mustache crew
This post is copyrighted and encrypted by diana maybrook
It don't matter. None of this matters.
07-17-2020, 11:24 AM
-
#7
Originally Posted By BrightThru2014⏩
dude do you really think some alpha baseball player is being a 8itch and even rometly taking this ''virus'' seriously ?Aren't they all in a bubble at this stage? And testing the same people numerous times?
as op said with such a huge sample, it should directly reflect whats going on in the population, but it dosent in this case
the infection rate is 2 times higher for the pop. this little data gathering basically shows you that the there is something really fishy going on in the population group .
07-17-2020, 11:24 AM
-
#8
- TheBannedBrah
- Registered User
-
- TheBannedBrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2012
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 3,551
- Rep Power: 6756
-
-
you're comparing professional athletes to the general public lmfao goddamn some of you are actually retarded.
07-17-2020, 11:26 AM
-
#9
07-17-2020, 11:26 AM
-
#10
Originally Posted By TheBannedBrah⏩
baseball player , are alpha and probably engage less in social distancing than your average fool, because they arent *******s you know ?you're comparing professional athletes to the general public lmfao goddamn some of you are actually retarded.
it could be the complete opposite of what you say man
07-17-2020, 11:31 AM
-
#11
- grey27
- Registered User
-
- grey27
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,675
- Rep Power: 2668
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
...So MLB is reporting a staggeringly low 0.05% positive test rate and we’re supposed to believe the reports 1% of the entire general population has tested positive?
I’m not talking 1% positive result rate either, I’m talking 1% has been confirmed infected, regardless of testing.
That is a HUGE discrepancy. And before anyone tries to talk about sample size, if you knew anything about statistics you’d know 10,000 is more than representative enough to generalize to the population.
There’s no way you should be seeing such polarizing results.
More evidence to support something is going on with the data we’re being fed.
I’m not talking 1% positive result rate either, I’m talking 1% has been confirmed infected, regardless of testing.
That is a HUGE discrepancy. And before anyone tries to talk about sample size, if you knew anything about statistics you’d know 10,000 is more than representative enough to generalize to the population.
There’s no way you should be seeing such polarizing results.
More evidence to support something is going on with the data we’re being fed.
07-17-2020, 11:32 AM
-
#12
Originally Posted By grey27⏩
Not to mention this is not a random sample. MLB players are a different population from regular people.I agree with the sentiment, but you are not quite right about the statistics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample...f_a_proportion
Scroll down to the "estimation of a proportion" section. To have 95% confidence the proportion is within 2% points would take a sample size of at most 9604 which is close to the 10,548. Notice that 2% variation is pretty significant compared to 1% claimed infected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample...f_a_proportion
Scroll down to the "estimation of a proportion" section. To have 95% confidence the proportion is within 2% points would take a sample size of at most 9604 which is close to the 10,548. Notice that 2% variation is pretty significant compared to 1% claimed infected.
07-17-2020, 11:36 AM
-
#13
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,718
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258329
-
-
Originally Posted By sicklecel⏩
Even if it doesn't, this is a massive discrepancy. What is the actual positive test rate for the general public? I'm posting 1% of the population infected. We're not even bothering with test results.Why do you think MLB represents the public? lol
Granted I admit going off general pop test results will be skewed as more positive because only people feeling ill will likely bother to test. So I didn't bother posting that. But the 1% confirmed of the general pop is lower since asymptomatic aren't likely testing and being counted in the total.
So that 1% of the total general pop is on the low end.
Meanwhile we have 0.05% confirmed test rate in the MLB. Like someone else said this does include being tested multiple times a week, so the actual infection rate is closer to 0.15% total infected since they get tested every other day (meaning roughly 3 times in a week).
This was maybe a bit hard to follow, so let me summarize:
-MLB's total infected rate roughly sits around 0.15%... which is confirmed by testing EVERYONE in the population
-The general pop is reporting 1% confirmed cases
-The general pop doesn't test EVERYONE in the population though like MLB does, so the 1% reported is likely substantially lower if they're being honest
Take all that into account, you actually think the general population is anywhere from 6x - 15x more likely to be infected than MLB players? Occam's Razor... which sounds like a more simple explanation, MLB players are miraculously 15x less likely to contract the virus or we're being fed a bunch of bullsh*t data about the general population.
Which of those sounds easier? LMAO at trying to discredit this.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
07-17-2020, 11:40 AM
-
#14
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,718
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258329
-
-
Originally Posted By grey27⏩
Never has there been a greater bungling of what confidence intervals mean. bahahahaI agree with the sentiment, but you are not quite right about the statistics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample...f_a_proportion
Scroll down to the "estimation of a proportion" section. To have 95% confidence the proportion is within 2% points would take a sample size of at most 9604 which is close to the 10,548. Notice that 2% variation is pretty significant compared to 1% claimed infected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample...f_a_proportion
Scroll down to the "estimation of a proportion" section. To have 95% confidence the proportion is within 2% points would take a sample size of at most 9604 which is close to the 10,548. Notice that 2% variation is pretty significant compared to 1% claimed infected.
I don't even need to respond to this
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
07-17-2020, 11:45 AM
-
#15
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
-
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 23,195
- Rep Power: 26070
-
-
Damn whoever conducts their PED tests needs to be fired!!!
07-17-2020, 12:03 PM
-
#16
- grey27
- Registered User
-
- grey27
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,675
- Rep Power: 2668
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
I edited out the post because I was wrong. Since we have an estimate for p=0.01 we should use the sample sizeNever has there been a greater bungling of what confidence intervals mean. bahahaha
I don't even need to respond to this
I don't even need to respond to this
n=4p(1-p)(Z/W)^2
with p=0.01,W=0.005,Z=2.58 (99% confidence) we get n = 10,543 which is close to MLB sample size 10,548. So with 99% confidence the MLB infection proportion should be in the interval [0.005,0.015] but it isn't, it is 0.0005, so the assumption p=0.01 is wrong or we have sample bias with 99% confidence.
I was wrong, I can admit it.
07-17-2020, 12:07 PM
-
#17
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
-
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 16,615
- Rep Power: 33474
-
-
Originally Posted By dunnie⏩
They're paid millions of dollars for their athleticism and health. They're probably taking it a lot more seriously than you think.dude do you really think some alpha baseball player is being a 8itch and even rometly taking this ''virus'' seriously ?
as op said with such a huge sample, it should directly reflect whats going on in the population, but it dosent in this case
the infection rate is 2 times higher for the pop. this little data gathering basically shows you that the there is something really fishy going on in the population group .
as op said with such a huge sample, it should directly reflect whats going on in the population, but it dosent in this case
the infection rate is 2 times higher for the pop. this little data gathering basically shows you that the there is something really fishy going on in the population group .
RIP Lil Peep
RIP XXXTentacion
RIP Mac Miller
RIP Nipsey Hussle
RIP Juice WRLD
RIP Neil Peart
RIP Kobe Bryant
RIP Pop Smoke
07-17-2020, 12:10 PM
-
#18
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
-
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Posts: 47,761
- Rep Power: 284006
-
-
NBA & MLB starting this month, then tennis mid way through August fuuuuuuaaaaark rocking an explosive boner rn
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
07-17-2020, 12:12 PM
-
#19
07-17-2020, 12:20 PM
-
#20
- northernlights7
- Banned
-
- northernlights7
- Banned
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Posts: 24,527
- Rep Power: 24
-
-
As much as I'm not a panicel, I don't think that's a good arguement. Like someone else said, rich people barely have to do anything in public, if they don't want to. How many MLB (not minor league/farm team) players do you think go out to the grocery store, Walmart, Target, hardware stores, etc. in the first place? Let alone during a pandemic. They might not be in perfect bubbles by sleeping and living exclusively at the stadiums every day, but rich people like them are able to insulate themselves from stuff like this a lot more than the general public can. They can greatly minimize their risk from a catching a virus just like they can drastically reduce their chances of being mugged by street goons by living in gated communities/high end neighborhoods and avoiding the same places I mentioned above that us all normal folks have to go to.
07-17-2020, 12:25 PM
-
#21
- A-man
- Registered User
-
- A-man
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 43
- Posts: 2,434
- Rep Power: 12262
-
-
Originally Posted By northernlights7⏩
I’m going to agree with this.As much as I'm not a panicel, I don't think that's a good arguement. Like someone else said, rich people barely have to do anything in public, if they don't want to. How many MLB (not minor league/farm team) players do you think go out to the grocery store, Walmart, Target, hardware stores, etc. in the first place? Let alone during a pandemic. They might not be in perfect bubbles by sleeping and living exclusively at the stadiums every day, but rich people like them are able to insulate themselves from stuff like this a lot more than the general public can. They can greatly minimize their risk from a catching a virus just like they can drastically reduce their chances of being mugged by street goons by living in gated communities/high end neighborhoods and avoiding the same places I mentioned above that us all normal folks have to go to.
Also we’ve seen that, in general, poorer people are more susceptible to the virus.
07-17-2020, 12:27 PM
-
#22
- KurtMussell
- Big Trouble
-
- KurtMussell
- Big Trouble
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Posts: 13,372
- Rep Power: 104117
-
-
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
NHL training camps started last monday, playoffs start Aug 1. Five games that first day, first one starts at noon, last one starts at 10:30 pm.NBA & MLB starting this month, then tennis mid way through August fuuuuuuaaaaark rocking an explosive boner rn
Doesn't shower with his dad crew
Dat feel when you taste sweat in your mustache crew
This post is copyrighted and encrypted by diana maybrook
It don't matter. None of this matters.
07-17-2020, 12:30 PM
-
#23
- Smithers115
- 6'4 crew
-
- Smithers115
- 6'4 crew
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
- Posts: 24,851
- Rep Power: 81884
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
lots of athletes have contracts that disallows them to do dangerous stuff... Like you wouldnt want a player with a 100 million dollar 5 year deal who likes to go base jumping on the weekendsA bubble? From what? They all live in their own homes in their own communities. It's not like they're sleeping at the stadium. They're as much in a bubble as the electrician who goes in to work every day.
I guarantee pro sports teams have put a strong emphasis on staying safe and healthy with these dudes and they live with the means to have anything they need delivered so their risk from going to the grocery etc is non existent
Great MAGA King status
Bing Chilling
07-17-2020, 12:33 PM
-
#24
- Fozzy13
- unregistered user
-
- Fozzy13
- unregistered user
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 38,659
- Rep Power: 41514
-
-
Lol @ the fkn stupidity.
1) You think an avg MLB player is exposing himself to the general public in the same fashion as everyday people? They stay at home in their mansions, can have whatever they want delivered. They aren't going to fkn walmart buying frozen pizzas.
2) Who do you think is going to be more cautious? The avg wagecel who needs to stand in line at walamart to buy food for the week or an MLB player who has millions to lose if he tests positive for COVID
1) You think an avg MLB player is exposing himself to the general public in the same fashion as everyday people? They stay at home in their mansions, can have whatever they want delivered. They aren't going to fkn walmart buying frozen pizzas.
2) Who do you think is going to be more cautious? The avg wagecel who needs to stand in line at walamart to buy food for the week or an MLB player who has millions to lose if he tests positive for COVID
n4l
Rayaarito
fappin
r32gojirra
07-17-2020, 01:10 PM
-
#25
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Paniccels in 2020: "omg asymptomatic people testing positive, omg so scary"
07-17-2020, 01:33 PM
-
#26
- IsLifeRealLife
- Registered User
-
- IsLifeRealLife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 11,396
- Rep Power: 14520
-
-
lol @ paniccels trying to justify this by saying they're not like normal people.
You're right...these rich celebs are more likely to host parties because they can afford to pay the fineshttps://bleacherreport.com/articles/...spite-covid-19
You're right...these rich celebs are more likely to host parties because they can afford to pay the fineshttps://bleacherreport.com/articles/...spite-covid-19
Big Baller Brand Crew
07-17-2020, 01:47 PM
-
#27
- HockeyBacon18
- Goof loving Jared
-
- HockeyBacon18
- Goof loving Jared
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 17,915
- Rep Power: 90771
-
-
not a panicel, but pro athletes should be expected to show less positive tests because corona spreads best in closed, high density spaces such as public transport. pro athletes how high end cars, and dont take the city bus. they typically live outside of the high density metropolitans and can afford for family members to do the same. AKA no apartment buildings or seniors homes.
Keep mod discussions out of your sig line
Misc 2018 and 2019 NFL Pick Em Champion- Better luck next year fellas
Resident miscer for the Super Bowl 57 CHAMPION LA Rams.
07-17-2020, 01:49 PM
-
#28
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
-
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 16,615
- Rep Power: 33474
-
-
Originally Posted By IsLifeRealLife⏩
Dak also turned down a HUUGGEE contract recently, so I don't think you can really compare.lol @ paniccels trying to justify this by saying they're not like normal people.
You're right...these rich celebs are more likely to host parties because they can afford to pay the fineshttps://bleacherreport.com/articles/...spite-covid-19
You're right...these rich celebs are more likely to host parties because they can afford to pay the fineshttps://bleacherreport.com/articles/...spite-covid-19
RIP Lil Peep
RIP XXXTentacion
RIP Mac Miller
RIP Nipsey Hussle
RIP Juice WRLD
RIP Neil Peart
RIP Kobe Bryant
RIP Pop Smoke
07-17-2020, 02:22 PM
-
#29
- yeshli2nuts
- Registered User
-
- yeshli2nuts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 9,269
- Rep Power: 50332
-
-
Average Joe: "If I don't go work my traddie job in close contact with a bunch of other traddies, I won't get a pay check and be able to buy food."
Average Joe again: "If I don't go into the grocery store to buy groceries (because I can't afford instacart), I won't be able to buy food and I'll starve."
MLB Player: "If I go out in public and catch Covid, I may not be able to play baseball this year and make $10 million."
Yeah, really good sample.
Average Joe again: "If I don't go into the grocery store to buy groceries (because I can't afford instacart), I won't be able to buy food and I'll starve."
MLB Player: "If I go out in public and catch Covid, I may not be able to play baseball this year and make $10 million."
Yeah, really good sample.
Never neg first but always neg back crew
07-17-2020, 02:52 PM
-
#30
- BrightThru2014
- Registered User
-
- BrightThru2014
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 33
- Posts: 3,902
- Rep Power: 15332
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Huh? They're at Spring Training:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ps/3260133001/and isolating. What are you talking about they are absolutely not reflective of the general public.A bubble? From what? They all live in their own homes in their own communities. It's not like they're sleeping at the stadium. They're as much in a bubble as the electrician who goes in to work every day.
Also these aren't antibody tests, these are just "are you currently infected" tests. There are plenty of legitimate coronavirus-related issues to worry about, but this is a pretty nonsensical argument you're making...
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
