go to google translate

https://translate.google.com/?sl=en&tl=la&op=translate


translate the word " quarantine " from english to latin

then translate the result back to english

then translate that back to latin

then translate that back to english

etc

faster way than copy paste is just hit swap language button the left right arrows

you'll see it

Please explain

no, spoon feed me please

It's worth doing, it's pretty entertaining.

wtf lmao

Thx OP, I'm probably on some government watchlist now

Yeah its pretty weird

wtf (srs)

looooooooool repped

everything changed in 2012

tried this one and its spooky too lol

Cliffs for people who aren't entertained by 99% of the boring chit misc posts?

juice

I have been contacted by local agencies as to how such knowledge crossed my path. I pointed them at OP.

holy **** wtf

edit: type in 'salvation'

I'll give you a hint OP.

For a function to be invertible, it must be injective and surjective.

Function: A mapping from a set of inputs to a set of potential outputs such that for every input, there is only one output.
Injective: For every actual output (that is one with a corresponding input), there is only one corresponding input.
Surjective: Each potential output has a corresponding input. That is, each potential output is an actual output.

The number of words and ideas expressed in Latin is less than that of English. So, the mapping cannot be injective. Therefore, translations of words or phrases may not return to their original input value when trying to invert back. Quarantine is one of these words, having been a notion much newer than the language of Latin. A phrase that conveys the notion of quarantine involves several words, and that compounds the chance of an inversion error even more, effectively guaranteeing you won't return to where you started.

Also, lold hard when it started becoming about jews after a few translates somehow lmfao. 10/10 excellent topic for the misc

"Quarantine" becomes "tempus valetudini spectandae praestitutum", which becomes "time to observe their health plan", which somehow becomes "ut Iudaei utantur tempore salutis consilium". Now, "Iudaei" which is Jews in Latin, shows up when the word "observe" does in this context. Why? Probably because Google Translate is assuming you now mean observe in the religious sense somehow. And to religiously observe was likely linked to Judaism in the Latin texts Google translate used in its ML training. The phrase "ut Iudaei utantur" shows up verbatim in the Latin version of the bible in Maccabees 11:31 as “And the Jews shall use their own kind of meats and laws, as before; and none of them any manner of ways shall be molested for things ignorantly done.” This phrase talks directly about the religious dietary laws that jews "observe".

You can try changing "their" to "his" or "her" or "its". You get very different results. Point is that the word "observe" itself is overloaded in English and doesn't translate in a 1:1 manner to Latin. Translate is using "his, her their, its" for context to try to figure out what you are trying to say.

Behold, the unintelligible ramblings of a mad man.

You're right dude. I'm clearly insane. OP is definitely right that it's really God speaking through Google telling you the evil jews with their rothschild space lasers created this quarantine and are going to vaccinate u and turn u into a tranny to drink ur blood and sacrifice you to moloch in a satanic blood orgy. Definitely.

Also, if the definition of an invertible function is unintelligible to you, you should probably castrate yourself.

You guys should go work for Marjorie Taylor Greene. I'm sure you space cadets will come up with some incredible revelations about the jews in your brilliant brainstorm sessions.

MLcel confirmed!


EDIT: To add to that even if the function is invertible (1 to 1) if this constraint is not enforced or incentivized in the training of the algorithm it is not guaranteed to happen on it own. In other words there must be a constraint that stuff cycles back to the original input after you swap twice.

Stop giving him attention.

Interesting. I figured it was something like this, but you've explained it really well.I'm reading the OP now I don't see him saying that anywhere. He's not even implying it, he's just asking how it's happening, which you've explained.