Forum
ยป
Its funny how people rush to defend vaccines because it's created by doctors
- Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Page 1 of 1
08-10-2021, 11:53 PM
-
#1
- Gringo12
- Registered User
-
- Gringo12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Perth, WA, Australia
- Age: 33
- Posts: 16,047
- Rep Power: 64344
-
-
Its funny how people rush to defend vaccines because it's created by doctors
And scientists.
When the third biggest cause of death is due to medical errors lol
Even in Australia,
Covid death count since Dec 2019: 920
Hospital errors: 18,000 per year and up to 50,000 left disabled
When the third biggest cause of death is due to medical errors lol
Even in Australia,
Covid death count since Dec 2019: 920
Hospital errors: 18,000 per year and up to 50,000 left disabled
Fck u james
08-10-2021, 11:56 PM
-
#2
08-10-2021, 11:59 PM
-
#3
- JPF82
- Registered User
-
- JPF82
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 19,869
- Rep Power: 63172
-
-
Originally Posted By MiscMathematician⏩
Not saying you're wrong or right but something to keep in mind.......researchers have access to vastly more data than regular primary care providers. Big Pharma will always have more data to play with and R&D than any other......This is why I cannot under the logic some miscers use to justify these black sheep providers saying this isn't real or this causes this, or whatever.....because they don't have all the data...and denounce doctors and scientists when it seems fit (no revenue)
My trust in big pharma is that in order to make profit you need people to be alive to continue to pay for the product......so with that said usually...."usually" their products keep people alive. Sure they maybe hiding the cure for somethings waiting and getting more money off keeping people alive than curing them......but when all is said and done they're humans too and humans know how to fuk chit up.
08-11-2021, 12:15 AM
-
#4
08-11-2021, 12:39 AM
-
#5
- Peacening
- dadbod on lock
-
- Peacening
- dadbod on lock
- Join Date: Feb 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 10,814
- Rep Power: 90739
-
-
Originally Posted By JPF82⏩
That is a sensible stance to take. The error I think you're making is only analyzing the fact that pharma can't be putting people in the ground prematurely as a reason to assume the drugs they make are effective and safe. There are two reasons for this:Not saying you're wrong or right but something to keep in mind.......researchers have access to vastly more data than regular primary care providers. Big Pharma will always have more data to play with and R&D than any other......This is why I cannot under the logic some miscers use to justify these black sheep providers saying this isn't real or this causes this, or whatever.....because they don't have all the data...
My trust in big pharma is that in order to make profit you need people to be alive to continue to pay for the product......so with that said usually...."usually" their products keep people alive. Sure they maybe hiding the cure for somethings waiting and getting more money off keeping people alive than curing them......but when all is said and done they're humans too and humans know how to fuk chit up.
My trust in big pharma is that in order to make profit you need people to be alive to continue to pay for the product......so with that said usually...."usually" their products keep people alive. Sure they maybe hiding the cure for somethings waiting and getting more money off keeping people alive than curing them......but when all is said and done they're humans too and humans know how to fuk chit up.
1) in the U.S. pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued for vaccines IF the CDC recommends taking them. As soon as they're recommended by the U.S. government then all liability is legally the burden of the U.S. government. Further to this point, those legal cases people file against the government for wrongful harm due to vaccine injury are sealed and not allowed to be made public. There are some small exceptions but as long as the pharma companies put the potential injuries on the vaccine insert then they are legally protected, and vaccine inserts have something like 150 possible injuries listed on their various inserts including death, paralysis, etc. With no legal liability they really don't have much reason to make sure a vaccine is truly safe or truly effective.
2) pharmaceutical companies are the biggest purchasers of advertising with virtually all media outlets in the U.S., which means that they hold sway with the higher ups at these networks, papers, etc. We've all heard stories about news networks having subjects that their "journalists" are not allowed to talk about... There is a huge conflict of interest here that basically most news covering vaccines is just advertising pushing them for the benefits that the pharmaceutical companies claim they have.
Also bonus reason 3) pharmaceutical companies basically fund tons of research departments at schools and hospitals around the country. If a researcher wants to put vaccines to the test independently they would run the risk of getting their institution cut off from that funding so it's very likely that they are simply not allowed to do so. The only safety studies available for most vaccines are the ones that the manufacturers conducted themselves and there are documented cases where these corporations falsified drug safety data (Vioxx, opioids, etc) and still got FDA approval.
So basically you have a system in which pharma is legally immune (lol) for any negative results of their vaccines, the news has great incentive to promote vaccines while denying or ignoring any negative claims others make, and independent research is extremely unlikely to be conducted. Doesn't seem like they have much need for honesty or integrity anymore.
HTC
Proud Dad crew
6'4" height of the gods
08-11-2021, 02:00 AM
-
#6
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
-
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 99,476
- Rep Power: 275015
-
-
Originally Posted By MiscMathematician⏩
No idea about that, but no credible health professional is going to encourage anybody to smoke something that contains thousands of poisons & carcinogens, hardens the arteries & leads to strokes/heart attacks, horrendous lung problems, cancers, amputations, voice boxes, terrible quality of life & a painful, early death-by the end of this century roughly a billion people will have been wiped off the planet from using this garbage.not to mention there's plenty of data to support the hypothesis that smoking defends against covid
wonder why there's no cigarette or nicotine patch mandate
wonder why there's no cigarette or nicotine patch mandate
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts