Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Have online articles always been this bad?
  1. Results 1 to 8 of 8
post 1674488583 01-10-2023, 12:05 AM
-
#1
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 12,855
  5. Rep Power: 166618

Have online articles always been this bad?

Or is it a new phenomenon?

You can’t trust anything you read online now, especially anything relating to the economy

BRB every headline has to use the phrase “soaring” or “plummets” even if the change is tiny or even less than historical norm

BRB every headline uses phrases like “experts are sounding the alarm as…” even if that “expert” is just some rando or even doesn’t exist at all

BRB two articles from the same website will contradict one another that were written a week apart

BRB article covers every scenario so it can’t be wrong. “Analysts say the economy could be in a flat year for 2023, but could also improve or decline based on economic conditions”



Literally everything online now is all this goddam bullchit trash,m. Doesn’t matter if you read it from CNN, Reuters, fox. You name it, it all follows this formulaic garbage
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
post 1674488693 01-10-2023, 12:08 AM
-
#2
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
Zerohedge crew. BRB daily doom porn since like 2013.

The fun part is, now that we have a Fed tightening cycle for the first time in 15 years, chit really IS starting to break down and go doom mode. It's fun.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1674488893 01-10-2023, 12:12 AM
-
#3
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 12,855
  5. Rep Power: 166618
I feel like I’m at the point where if something doesn’t happen right in front of my eyes I’m not believing it

Example Headline: “state of Missouri in shock and panic and wildfire engulfs state”
Reality: One person was burning leaves in their backyard

I’m not reading or listening to any more news or economic material. Srs
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
post 1674489263 01-10-2023, 12:22 AM
-
#4
  1. DargeLick
  2. Moxic Tasculinity
  1. DargeLick
  2. Moxic Tasculinity
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 814
  5. Rep Power: 8489
Standards of journalism have never been as low tbh.
They all just pool stories and then re-word the articles for their own website/news outlet.
Basically journalists now copy-paste and modify. No wonder its gonna be easy for someone to control the entire worlds media input....
post 1674489273 01-10-2023, 12:22 AM
-
#5
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 12,686
  6. Rep Power: 29183
The best is when on something like kitco news the host or a guest intentionally takes a contrary view for the sole purpose of playing devils advocate. Then articles quote them as if that is their actual opinion
Know Justice

Know Peace
post 1674489713 01-10-2023, 12:31 AM
-
#6
  1. demfeelsbro
  2. Jelqbrah
  1. demfeelsbro
  2. Jelqbrah
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 15,441
  5. Rep Power: 127013
I've got yahoo as my homepage (purely for email reasons) and HOLLLEEEFFFUUKKK at some of their articles. Seems like as long as they use words like Allegedly/supposedly/reportedly then they can write whatever the fuk they want!
post 1674491583 01-10-2023, 01:28 AM
-
#7
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 12,855
  5. Rep Power: 166618
Originally Posted By demfeelsbro
I've got yahoo as my homepage (purely for email reasons) and HOLLLEEEFFFUUKKK at some of their articles. Seems like as long as they use words like Allegedly/supposedly/reportedly then they can write whatever the fuk they want!
Yeah this is a big one too. “Sources say…” “experts say…”

I remember CNN posting articles with blatant lies in the headlines with that technique. Like “Sources close to math field say 2 + 2 = 5”. CNN technically didn’t lie.
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
post 1674491883 01-10-2023, 01:35 AM
-
#8
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 12,855
  5. Rep Power: 166618
Originally Posted By DargeLick
Standards of journalism have never been as low tbh.
They all just pool stories and then re-word the articles for their own website/news outlet.
Basically journalists now copy-paste and modify. No wonder its gonna be easy for someone to control the entire worlds media input....
Do you think the problem is that nobody pays for news anymore?


—-

Another one. The word “slammed”

“Arkansas republican slammed by AOC over maternity leave bill”
Actual interaction over twitter: “I’m not going to vote for this” “I’ll vote for this”
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts