Forum
»
Monty Python Life Of Brian Scene Won’t Be Cut Despite Modern Sensitivities
- Results 1 to 13 of 13
-
Page 1 of 1
05-29-2023, 06:55 PM
-
#1
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
-
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 36,953
- Rep Power: 416934
-
-
Monty Python Life Of Brian Scene Won’t Be Cut Despite Modern Sensitivities
https://deadline.com/2023/05/monty-p...ivites-1235382
Monty Python’ Star John Cleese Says ‘Life Of Brian’ Scene Won’t Be Cut Despite Modern Sensitivities
By Bruce Haring
May 28, 2023 2:41pm
The Monty Python crew always looked on the bright side of life when it came to its classic film parody, The Life of Brian.
But Monty Python star John Cleese insists he never said that he would remove a politically incorrect scene from a stage adaptation of Life of Brian, even though the film’s 1979 sensibilities will not draw quite the laughs it once did, owing to the rise of trans issues awareness.
Cleese claims it was “misreported” that he was planning to cut the “Loretta” scene for an upcoming stage adaptation of the religious satire film. Instead, he said he has “no intention” of removing it.
The scene in question features a male character declaring that he wants to be woman named “Loretta,” and wants to have a child. Cleese’s character tells the man that the notion is ridiculous, while another suggets that they all advocate for his right to childbearing.
“I want to be a woman. … It’s my right as a man,” the character claims “I want to have babies… It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.” After Cleese’s protest, the character snaps, “Don’t you oppress me!”
Obviously, times have changed the impact of that humor.
Cleese was reported to have asked American actors at a read-through whether the “Loretta” scene should be dropped. He was allegedly told that the joke was no longer a fit in these times.
“So here you have something there’s never been a complaint about in 40 years, that I’ve heard of, and now all of a sudden we can’t do it because it’ll offend people. What is one supposed to make of that?”
Cleese said in a tweet that his comments were meant to relate what he was advised, not that he would actually do the cut.
“A few days ago I spoke to an audience outside London. I told them I was adapting the Life of Brian so that we could do it as a stage show (NOT a musical ). I said that we’d had a table-reading of the latest draft in NYC a year ago and that all the actors – several of them Tony winners – had advised me strongly to cut the Loretta scene. I have, of course, no intention of doing so.”
By Bruce Haring
May 28, 2023 2:41pm
The Monty Python crew always looked on the bright side of life when it came to its classic film parody, The Life of Brian.
But Monty Python star John Cleese insists he never said that he would remove a politically incorrect scene from a stage adaptation of Life of Brian, even though the film’s 1979 sensibilities will not draw quite the laughs it once did, owing to the rise of trans issues awareness.
Cleese claims it was “misreported” that he was planning to cut the “Loretta” scene for an upcoming stage adaptation of the religious satire film. Instead, he said he has “no intention” of removing it.
The scene in question features a male character declaring that he wants to be woman named “Loretta,” and wants to have a child. Cleese’s character tells the man that the notion is ridiculous, while another suggets that they all advocate for his right to childbearing.
“I want to be a woman. … It’s my right as a man,” the character claims “I want to have babies… It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.” After Cleese’s protest, the character snaps, “Don’t you oppress me!”
Obviously, times have changed the impact of that humor.
Cleese was reported to have asked American actors at a read-through whether the “Loretta” scene should be dropped. He was allegedly told that the joke was no longer a fit in these times.
“So here you have something there’s never been a complaint about in 40 years, that I’ve heard of, and now all of a sudden we can’t do it because it’ll offend people. What is one supposed to make of that?”
Cleese said in a tweet that his comments were meant to relate what he was advised, not that he would actually do the cut.
“A few days ago I spoke to an audience outside London. I told them I was adapting the Life of Brian so that we could do it as a stage show (NOT a musical ). I said that we’d had a table-reading of the latest draft in NYC a year ago and that all the actors – several of them Tony winners – had advised me strongly to cut the Loretta scene. I have, of course, no intention of doing so.”
▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
05-29-2023, 07:15 PM
-
#2
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
-
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 27,183
- Rep Power: 223047
-
-
Soy-fueled Gen Z dopes are already labeling Seinfeld and Friends as "bigoted".
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
- PJ O'Rourke
05-29-2023, 07:24 PM
-
#3
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
It's amazing how they accuse everyone else of being "snowflakes" for not accepting every single leftist viewpoint, meanwhile they feel a need to actively cancel and eliminate any examples or instances of something not siding with their politics.Soy-fueled Gen Z dopes are already labeling Seinfeld and Friends as "bigoted".
05-29-2023, 07:29 PM
-
#4
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
-
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 36,953
- Rep Power: 416934
-
-
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
Soy-fueled Gen Z dopes are already labeling Seinfeld and Friends as "bigoted".
▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
05-30-2023, 01:48 AM
-
#5
- Weightaholic
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 54
- Posts: 34,904
- Rep Power: 82209
-
-
It's funnier today than it was when the movie was released!
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
05-30-2023, 02:04 AM
-
#6
05-30-2023, 02:05 AM
-
#7
- clive
- All the way from the UK
-
- clive
- All the way from the UK
- Join Date: Nov 2003
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 66
- Posts: 10,196
- Rep Power: 246193
-
-
Originally Posted By Weightaholic⏩
Some of it is still very funny, I remember when it came out and the church trying to ban it, they didn't succeed. Just think what would have happed if it was mocking a certain other religion, they would be going much further than simply trying to ban it!It's funnier today than it was when the movie was released!
Tennis balls?...........my Biceps are as big as Grapefruits!
05-30-2023, 07:17 AM
-
#8
- badreligion
- Meh
-
- badreligion
- Meh
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Groton, Connecticut, United States
- Posts: 25,200
- Rep Power: 55006
-
-
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
That's because that is their whole identity. They need to be offended and feel self righteous because otherwise they would realize they are complete dolts who offer nothing and the only validation they get is from social media.Soy-fueled Gen Z dopes are already labeling Seinfeld and Friends as "bigoted".
In Hoots We Trust.
05-30-2023, 07:19 AM
-
#9
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
-
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
- Posts: 8,312
- Rep Power: 331479
-
-
The scene in question features a male character declaring that he wants to be woman named “Loretta,” and wants to have a child. Cleese’s character tells the man that the notion is ridiculous, while another suggets that they all advocate for his right to childbearing.
Because itisridiculous, it's human biology.“I want to be a woman. … It’s my right as a man,” the character claims “I want to have babies… It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.” After Cleese’s protest, the character snaps, “Don’t you oppress me!”
I think the most appropriate way to adapt religious allegory to modern times is actually quite simple:Step 1. Adopt a religion with reincarnation.
Step 2. Find a stool and some rope.
Step 3. ???
Step 4. Prophet!*
*Spoiler!
Disclaimer: The following is a legal disclaimer meant to absolve religions of any claims or responsibility regarding the concept of successful reincarnation.
No Guarantee of Reincarnation: Religions, spiritual beliefs, or any related entities mentioned or referred to in this disclaimer do not guarantee or make any claims regarding the occurrence or success of reincarnation. Reincarnation, if it exists, is a matter of personal belief and faith, and its occurrence cannot be proven or predicted with certainty.
Religions, spiritual beliefs, or any entities associated with them cannot promise successful reincarnation. We can't promise you'll come back as a mermaid or a unicorn.
Individual Beliefs and Experiences: The concept of reincarnation is based on personal beliefs, experiences, and faith. Any claims, anecdotes, or testimonies related to successful reincarnation are personal accounts and should not be construed as representative of the beliefs or practices of a specific religion or spiritual tradition.
No Scientific Evidence: Reincarnation is not supported by scientific evidence or widely accepted within the scientific community. Any claims or assertions related to the scientific validity or proof of reincarnation are outside the realm of religious or spiritual beliefs.
Individual Responsibility: The beliefs, practices, and interpretations regarding reincarnation are personal matters. Individuals who hold such beliefs or engage in practices associated with reincarnation do so at their own discretion and assume full responsibility for their beliefs, actions, and consequences. Religions or spiritual entities cannot be held liable for any personal decisions made based on these beliefs or experiences.
No Warranty on Soul Transfers: Religions and affiliated organizations hereby declare that no warranties or guarantees are provided regarding the seamless transfer of souls between bodies or dimensions. We cannot be held liable for any inter-dimensional hiccups, mix-ups, or unexpected transformations that may occur during the reincarnation process.
Liability Release Form: By engaging in any activities related to reincarnation, including but not limited to meditation, prayer, committing seppuku, or roping, you agree to sign a release form absolving religions and their representatives from any liability for potential mix-ups, embarrassing karmic consequences, or accidental rebirth in the wrong species.
It is important to note that this legal disclaimer is not exhaustive and may not cover all possible scenarios or legal requirements. If you require specific legal advice or have concerns regarding reincarnation or any related matters, it is recommended to seek assistance from a qualified legal professional or consult the relevant laws and regulations in your jurisdiction.
No Guarantee of Reincarnation: Religions, spiritual beliefs, or any related entities mentioned or referred to in this disclaimer do not guarantee or make any claims regarding the occurrence or success of reincarnation. Reincarnation, if it exists, is a matter of personal belief and faith, and its occurrence cannot be proven or predicted with certainty.
Religions, spiritual beliefs, or any entities associated with them cannot promise successful reincarnation. We can't promise you'll come back as a mermaid or a unicorn.
Individual Beliefs and Experiences: The concept of reincarnation is based on personal beliefs, experiences, and faith. Any claims, anecdotes, or testimonies related to successful reincarnation are personal accounts and should not be construed as representative of the beliefs or practices of a specific religion or spiritual tradition.
No Scientific Evidence: Reincarnation is not supported by scientific evidence or widely accepted within the scientific community. Any claims or assertions related to the scientific validity or proof of reincarnation are outside the realm of religious or spiritual beliefs.
Individual Responsibility: The beliefs, practices, and interpretations regarding reincarnation are personal matters. Individuals who hold such beliefs or engage in practices associated with reincarnation do so at their own discretion and assume full responsibility for their beliefs, actions, and consequences. Religions or spiritual entities cannot be held liable for any personal decisions made based on these beliefs or experiences.
No Warranty on Soul Transfers: Religions and affiliated organizations hereby declare that no warranties or guarantees are provided regarding the seamless transfer of souls between bodies or dimensions. We cannot be held liable for any inter-dimensional hiccups, mix-ups, or unexpected transformations that may occur during the reincarnation process.
Liability Release Form: By engaging in any activities related to reincarnation, including but not limited to meditation, prayer, committing seppuku, or roping, you agree to sign a release form absolving religions and their representatives from any liability for potential mix-ups, embarrassing karmic consequences, or accidental rebirth in the wrong species.
It is important to note that this legal disclaimer is not exhaustive and may not cover all possible scenarios or legal requirements. If you require specific legal advice or have concerns regarding reincarnation or any related matters, it is recommended to seek assistance from a qualified legal professional or consult the relevant laws and regulations in your jurisdiction.
Cleese was reported to have asked American actors at a read-through whether the “Loretta” scene should be dropped. He was allegedly told that the joke was no longer a fit in these times.
That's a good way to vet people at least. They would make good catapult ammunition though, that's for sure.“A few days ago I spoke to an audience outside London. I told them I was adapting the Life of Brian so that we could do it as a stage show (NOT a musical ). I said that we’d had a table-reading of the latest draft in NYC a year ago and that all the actors – several of them Tony winners – had advised me strongly to cut the Loretta scene. I have, of course, no intention of doing so.”
That's why he's one of the greatest.The sort of people who actually take offense to such a ridiculous thing should be laughed out into the streets. Such a pathetic state of things in this world where the South Park episode when Stan's dad had transpecies surgery to become a dolphin is genuinely offensive to these imbeciles.
I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die
If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
05-30-2023, 08:13 AM
-
#10
- scamander
- Registered User
-
- scamander
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 50
- Posts: 355
- Rep Power: 3013
-
-
Bit of 'Life of Brian' trivia. A major backer pulled out prior to filming so George Harrison (of the Beatles) stepped in, without him the film wouldn't have gone ahead.
He's in the film as the guy who Brian's manager introduces him to briefly. George's line was dubbed as his accent was considered too strong.
Finally, the Biggus Diccus scene was largely improvised. Those soldiers are genuinely trying not to laugh. Amazing film.
He's in the film as the guy who Brian's manager introduces him to briefly. George's line was dubbed as his accent was considered too strong.
Finally, the Biggus Diccus scene was largely improvised. Those soldiers are genuinely trying not to laugh. Amazing film.
05-30-2023, 08:16 AM
-
#11
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
When a lifelong normal liberal recognizes the insanity that has brewed from the far Left. Ya love to see it. Since it's ridiculing I expect Cleese will get death threats.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
05-30-2023, 08:18 AM
-
#12
- miscinbro
- Registered User
-
- miscinbro
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 43
- Posts: 22,420
- Rep Power: 46435
-
-
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
I saw something going after the original Star Trek as being a “hotbed of toxic masculinity.”Soy-fueled Gen Z dopes are already labeling Seinfeld and Friends as "bigoted".
Meanwhile in the fcking 60s it had the bridge crew as a black lady (who Kirk kissing as the first interracial kiss on network TV in the US) a Japanese (gay though not out at the time - but I bet people knew), a Russian, and an alien.
But cause Kirk slooted around I guess we should hate it now.
05-30-2023, 08:32 AM
-
#13
- DeceasedRussian
- Banned
-
- DeceasedRussian
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,728
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Imagine caring about this.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts