Forum
»
Why do people think all evidence would be made public before a trial?
- Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
Page 1 of 1
06-21-2023, 11:30 AM
-
#1
- navid93
- Registered User
-
- navid93
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 32
- Posts: 11,474
- Rep Power: 25768
-
-
Why do people think all evidence would be made public before a trial?
I’m not saying Andrew Tate is guilty or not. If he’s guilty I hope he’s found guilty, if he’s not guilty I hope he’s found not guilty. Don’t know what else im supposed to say about that.
But why do Tate supporters say “where’s the evidence” “show me the evidence” as if random miscers would have access to evidence obtained by Romanian prosecutors. Just because random laymen don’t have access to the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Obviously there’s evidence or else they wouldn’t take it trial
But why do Tate supporters say “where’s the evidence” “show me the evidence” as if random miscers would have access to evidence obtained by Romanian prosecutors. Just because random laymen don’t have access to the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Obviously there’s evidence or else they wouldn’t take it trial
06-21-2023, 11:32 AM
-
#2
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,741
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 419661
-
-
How many forfeited supercars do you have OP?
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
06-21-2023, 11:33 AM
-
#3
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts