Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Thoughts on NFL RBs complaining about their contracts?
  1. Results 1 to 26 of 26
post 1687065493 07-23-2023, 06:53 PM
-
#1
  1. BrickEX
  2. Registered User
  1. BrickEX
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2017
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 1,963
  6. Rep Power: 20887

Thoughts on NFL RBs complaining about their contracts?

Has someone explained to them the concept of market value?

Someone tell these idiots they are only worth what an owner is willing to pay. Shut up and run the ball.
post 1687069513 07-23-2023, 08:07 PM
-
#2
  1. ohiostate124
  2. Pure-blood
  1. ohiostate124
  2. Pure-blood
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Virginia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,403
  6. Rep Power: 325469
How long until traditional rbs are gone just like fullbacks? Probably won’t be long until all you see are guys like CMAC and Deebo.
post 1687072893 07-23-2023, 09:23 PM
-
#3
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 39,767
  5. Rep Power: 166638
^^^

However long, you'll still be conveniently wearing motorcycle helmets in pictures to cover up that homely face.
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.

That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.
post 1687073853 07-23-2023, 09:46 PM
-
#4
  1. ohiostate124
  2. Pure-blood
  1. ohiostate124
  2. Pure-blood
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Virginia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,403
  6. Rep Power: 325469
Originally Posted By MBisonSon
^^^

However long, you'll still be conveniently wearing motorcycle helmets in pictures to cover up that homely face.
If you’re gonna follow me around, try not to own yourself so hard.

post 1687078193 07-23-2023, 11:37 PM
-
#5
  1. Swept
  1. Swept
  2. Join Date: Jan 2014
  3. Posts: 21,220
  4. Rep Power: 27953
They picked the wrong position
Everything I do is biblical
post 1687083993 07-24-2023, 04:24 AM
-
#6
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,558
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 511065
I miss the old days

Where a wr or qb could get blasted ,rb pounded it


It's been molded for revenue
post 1687084213 07-24-2023, 04:33 AM
-
#7
  1. Murph0408
  2. Registered User
  1. Murph0408
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 16,586
  6. Rep Power: 46206
i roll my eyes at all the complaints about the franchise tag. this was all just negotiated in 2020 with a 10-year agreement. your union agreed to this.

as for RBs specifically, they have done it to themselves with so many of the guys falling on their face right after getting paid. also way too many examples of a backup / lower round pick getting an opportunity and being nearly as productive or more.
post 1687087923 07-24-2023, 06:26 AM
-
#8
  1. Evolutionary1
  2. Registered User
  1. Evolutionary1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 36,489
  6. Rep Power: 115290
Originally Posted By Murph0408
i roll my eyes at all the complaints about the franchise tag. this was all just negotiated in 2020 with a 10-year agreement. your union agreed to this.

as for RBs specifically, they have done it to themselves with so many of the guys falling on their face right after getting paid. also way too many examples of a backup / lower round pick getting an opportunity and being nearly as productive or more.
most recent is Zeke.

Just another reminder to l0l @ cowboys
post 1687090503 07-24-2023, 07:28 AM
-
#9
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By NeverTooLat8
Should have learned to catch
a lot of them can catch, it doesnt matter

RB is over. theres nothing they can do
post 1687090563 07-24-2023, 07:29 AM
-
#10
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By Murph0408
as for RBs specifically, they have done it to themselves with so many of the guys falling on their face right after getting paid.
that isnt why they arent getting paid. they're not getting paid because of analytics telling teams that running doesnt matter nearly as much as passing so why invest in it
post 1687090623 07-24-2023, 07:31 AM
-
#11
  1. tripod29
  1. tripod29
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Posts: 26,103
  4. Rep Power: 452369
Poor ball runners. I feel so bad for them.
post 1687120093 07-24-2023, 04:28 PM
-
#12
  1. akmerle
  2. Registered User
  1. akmerle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Age: 48
  5. Posts: 2,142
  6. Rep Power: 19376
Originally Posted By BigBallsMcgee
that isnt why they arent getting paid. they're not getting paid because of analytics telling teams that running doesnt matter nearly as much as passing so why invest in it
Correct, with all of the offense friendly rule changes / modifications, especially in terms of passing, it doesnt make sense to run a traditional backfield. Easier with higher success rate to have your mobile QB RPO in a designed roll out in short yardage situations. Why have a traditional run game when the yds/play for passing is demonstrably better? I dont see folks crying rivers for traditional MLB's and NT's, and the same market change is happening for them as well, just not as fast.

Its no different than the traditional power forward spot in basketball getting phased out to favor stretch 4's. You will get run off the floor with 2 bigs. The traditional power forward is now called an undersized backup center. Learn to shoot, or you get market corrected.

Same thing is happening in the NFL, RB's need to follow the mold of CMC / Deebo / Cook / etc, because traditional RB's are quickly becoming slow slot WR's / short TE's.


EDIT...... I do however feel bad for them getting franchise tagged, just as I do for any player getting the tag. Its brutal for players, and being grossly abused by the owners. Totally within the rules, but am almost always pro-players vs. ownership, so hate seeing is grossly abused.
post 1687121043 07-24-2023, 04:53 PM
-
#13
  1. LightsXout28c
  2. Brah/Bro/Broskie
  1. LightsXout28c
  2. Brah/Bro/Broskie
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 3,456
  6. Rep Power: 13075
Originally Posted By Swept
They picked the wrong position
Not every RB has the skill set, body type to be a WR. They are two completely different positions. A RB can be NFL caliber but only lower tier D1 at WR.
*LV Golden Knights*
*Carolina Panthers*
*UNC Tarheels*
post 1687121173 07-24-2023, 04:57 PM
-
#14
  1. WHChampion
  1. WHChampion
  2. Join Date: May 2012
  3. Location: Pennsylvania, United States
  4. Posts: 9,616
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 60006
RB production is easily replaceable.

Marketability and jersey sales are the best assets the top RBs bring to their teams.
post 1687124103 07-24-2023, 05:55 PM
-
#15
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By akmerle
Correct, with all of the offense friendly rule changes / modifications, especially in terms of passing, it doesnt make sense to run a traditional backfield. Easier with higher success rate to have your mobile QB RPO in a designed roll out in short yardage situations. Why have a traditional run game when the yds/play for passing is demonstrably better? I dont see folks crying rivers for traditional MLB's and NT's, and the same market change is happening for them as well, just not as fast.

Its no different than the traditional power forward spot in basketball getting phased out to favor stretch 4's. You will get run off the floor with 2 bigs. The traditional power forward is now called an undersized backup center. Learn to shoot, or you get market corrected.

Same thing is happening in the NFL, RB's need to follow the mold of CMC / Deebo / Cook / etc, because traditional RB's are quickly becoming slow slot WR's / short TE's.


EDIT...... I do however feel bad for them getting franchise tagged, just as I do for any player getting the tag. Its brutal for players, and being grossly abused by the owners. Totally within the rules, but am almost always pro-players vs. ownership, so hate seeing is grossly abused.
tag and rookie contract stuff is bs. Takes way too long to get to FA IMO.

Sad to see what has happened to RBs cause they're still some of the most exciting players in the game.
post 1687125573 07-24-2023, 06:24 PM
-
#16
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 34,158
  5. Rep Power: 456085
I hope they all hold out and then sign smaller deals the next year because nobody cares
post 1687135093 07-24-2023, 10:02 PM
-
#17
  1. DirtyD79
  2. Registered User
  1. DirtyD79
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 1,104
  6. Rep Power: 9730
Originally Posted By Murph0408
i roll my eyes at all the complaints about the franchise tag. this was all just negotiated in 2020 with a 10-year agreement. your union agreed to this.

as for RBs specifically, they have done it to themselves with so many of the guys falling on their face right after getting paid. also way too many examples of a backup / lower round pick getting an opportunity and being nearly as productive or more.
Yep, can't blame teams for not wanting to break the bank on a dude who is gonna be out of the league after his 6th or 7th season.
I'm stronger when I'm drunk!
post 1687140633 07-25-2023, 01:01 AM
-
#18
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
It sucks but it is what it is. Offensive line and scheme are more important than RB talent now anyway
post 1687147703 07-25-2023, 06:11 AM
-
#19
  1. jonmcd46
  2. Registered User
  1. jonmcd46
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,612
  6. Rep Power: 84813
it sucks for them because they have a short shelf life, and take a lot of punishment, but it makes sense. Passing is so much more efficient. The difference between a chitty rb and an elite one is about a yard per carry(3.5 vs 4.5).
Why pay Jacobs or Barkley a chit ton of money when you can split the load with a James Robinson, C-Patt, and some 4th round rookie, and do quick screens/reverses to guys like Tyreek Hill or Deebo then have a Justin Fields or Tayson Hill run an option with the threat of a pass.
post 1687153263 07-25-2023, 08:07 AM
-
#20
  1. WestAfrica
  2. Registered User
  1. WestAfrica
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,712
  6. Rep Power: 146366
Originally Posted By jonmcd46
it sucks for them because they have a short shelf life, and take a lot of punishment, but it makes sense. Passing is so much more efficient. The difference between a chitty rb and an elite one is about a yard per carry(3.5 vs 4.5).
Why pay Jacobs or Barkley a chit ton of money when you can split the load with a James Robinson, C-Patt, and some 4th round rookie, and do quick screens/reverses to guys like Tyreek Hill or Deebo then have a Justin Fields or Tayson Hill run an option with the threat of a pass.
Justin Fields Tayson Hill notsureifsrs
NYR NYM NYK UCONN Nebraska AS Roma
post 1687160613 07-25-2023, 10:23 AM
-
#21
  1. WetCoaster
  2. Registered User
  1. WetCoaster
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
  5. Age: 68
  6. Posts: 2,598
  7. Rep Power: 23568
Running back Saquon Barkley has signed his franchise tag with the New York Giants, the team announced Tuesday.

The deal is a one-year, adjusted franchise tag worth $10.1 million fully guaranteed and up to $11 million with incentives, sources told ESPN. The tag was adjusted to add a $2 million signing bonus, as well as the incentives, sources said.

The $909,000 in incentives includes an equal amount paid for three categories: 1,350 rushing yards and a playoff berth, 11 touchdowns and 65 receptions, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter.

The deal does not include a "no franchise tag" clause, sources told ESPN, meaning the Giants can tag him again after this season. This is something Barkley and his team were hoping to receive.

This was quite a concession by Barkley to report on the first day of training camp for veterans. The Pro Bowl running back was already in the building Tuesday before 8 a.m. ET, a source told ESPN.
post 1687222633 07-26-2023, 09:22 AM
-
#22
  1. NorrinRadd12
  2. Registered User
  1. NorrinRadd12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 2,795
  5. Rep Power: 4388
1. NFLPA's fault
2. Somewhat Barkley's fault. In 2018 when he was drafted #2 overall he had the power to flip things in favor of RBs. He could have not signed his rookie deal until they put in a provision that they can't use the franchise tag on him. He had all the leverage then. None now.
post 1687230363 07-26-2023, 11:29 AM
-
#23
  1. bezarker
  2. LIBTARD from KS
  1. bezarker
  2. LIBTARD from KS
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
  5. Posts: 90,864
  6. Rep Power: 714481
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSGTsjkHzM4
post 1687238043 07-26-2023, 01:33 PM
-
#24
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 21,413
  7. Rep Power: 57311
i remember "back in the day" when "old school" coaches taught ground and pound football to control the game. Now QB's be throwing it 40-60 times a game.


now teams are getting RB's on rookie deals and when it comes time for a new contract, draft another RB rookie deal and get similar results
*** Free Thinker Crew ***

*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***

*** HTC ***
post 1687246503 07-26-2023, 03:43 PM
-
#25
  1. Futureone07
  2. Registered User
  1. Futureone07
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Posts: 139
  5. Rep Power: 687
Originally Posted By rocketfish
i remember "back in the day" when "old school" coaches taught ground and pound football to control the game. Now QB's be throwing it 40-60 times a game.


now teams are getting RB's on rookie deals and when it comes time for a new contract, draft another RB rookie deal and get similar results
too many first round RB's just don't work out
post 1687247133 07-26-2023, 03:50 PM
-
#26
  1. Murph0408
  2. Registered User
  1. Murph0408
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 16,586
  6. Rep Power: 46206
Originally Posted By Futureone07
too many first round RB's just don't work out
i don't think that's the case at all. many of them work out great, they just don't last.

even recently. najee harris, zeke, saquon all started out great. i'm sure bijan will be great this year. but nobody's going to want them after they turn 25-26 years old.

saquon's new deal - not really impressed by this at all. he basically needs to have a career year in multiple ways, and would get a 900k bonus. that's a lot of money in real life but not in his life for what he'd be doing to get it.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts