Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Makes me lol when people say BMI is crap
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 50
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: Makes me lol when people say BMI is crap

post 1696529383 01-17-2024, 12:42 PM
-
#1
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953

Makes me lol when people say BMI is crap

Yeah, maybe if you're a part of the extremely small percentage of the population that lifts to build muscle. If you're a part of the vast majority of sedentary humans, BMI is spot on.

When did the average Joe start thinking they were an outlier when it comes to BMI? I think the problem is when the average person is chubby, you being slightly less chubby makes you think you aren't still chubby.





For your chubby time

I'm back, bitches!
post 1696530103 01-17-2024, 12:58 PM
-
#2
  1. MetroBrah
  1. MetroBrah
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 60,352
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 490941
normal BMI crew checkin in


post 1696530153 01-17-2024, 12:59 PM
-
#3
  1. mchabs
  2. Registered User
  1. mchabs
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: San Diego, California, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 12,038
  7. Rep Power: 37820
it IS BS though.

Normal range for someone 5"10" is 130-170LB

Anywhere in that range is twink/concentration camp status.

if you weighed 130LB at 5"10" I'd think you were dying.
post 1696530233 01-17-2024, 01:01 PM
-
#4
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 7,027
  7. Rep Power: 57751
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Yeah, maybe if you're a part of the extremely small percentage of the population that lifts to build muscle. If you're a part of the vast majority of sedentary humans, BMI is spot on.

When did the average Joe start thinking they were an outlier when it comes to BMI? I think the problem is when the average person is chubby, you being slightly less chubby make you think you aren't still chubby.





For your chubby time

It's roughly accurate on a population basis, but there are problems with it. It doesn't, for example, take the distribution of fat into account either, so a slightly overweight person with the majority of fat on their legs and glutes gets lumped in with someone who carries most of the fat on their stomach, even though the latter is far more dangerous.

Waist to height ratio is way better.
post 1696530343 01-17-2024, 01:02 PM
-
#5
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: District Of Columbia, United States
  5. Posts: 8,920
  6. Rep Power: 53570
Apparently I'm obese.
no crew crew
post 1696530433 01-17-2024, 01:04 PM
-
#6
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By mchabs⏩
it IS BS though.

Normal range for someone 5"10" is 130-170LB

Anywhere in that range is twink/concentration camp status.

if you weighed 130LB at 5"10" I'd think you were dying.
No the fuk it isn't. I was around 140 at 5'9 graduating high school. I ran track for years, and fukked around with weights for a few months.

In basic, I ended up in the mid 150's. The weight I'm at now was a concentrated effort to gain weight over years.

A sedentary 5'9 man weighing 170lbs is going to be chunky when that shirt comes off.



Here's a sedentary 5'10 170 vs him after gaining muscle and losing fat at 165lbs over several years. Auschwitz wished they could have had this much mass.

I'm back, bitches!
post 1696530483 01-17-2024, 01:05 PM
-
#7
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By Rebel012⏩
It's roughly accurate on a population basis, but there are problems with it. It doesn't, for example, take the distribution of fat into account either, so a slightly overweight person with the majority of fat on their legs and glutes gets lumped in with someone who carries most of the fat on their stomach, even though the latter is far more dangerous.

Waist to height ratio is way better.
They still have more fat than necessary. It's not an aesthetic calculator, it's a body mass one. Your heart doesn't care where the weight is. All it knows is it's gotta pump and support this weight.
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696530543 01-17-2024, 01:07 PM
-
#8
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918



Yeah, BMI is spot on.. LMAO
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1696530603 01-17-2024, 01:09 PM
-
#9
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 7,027
  7. Rep Power: 57751
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
They still have more fat than necessary. It's not an aesthetic calculator, it's a body mass one. Your heart doesn't care where the weight is. All it knows is it's gotta pump and support this weight.
I agree they both would have more fat than necessary, but studies have been done showing stomach fat is more dangerous because it tends to be visceral fat. That's how you can get people who are technically normal weight according to the BMI but have type 2. Waist to height ratio cuts through that.
post 1696530643 01-17-2024, 01:10 PM
-
#10
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps⏩



Yeah, BMI is spot on.. LMAO
Reading comprehension matters.

Did I not say unless you're a part of the EXTREMELY SMALL portion of the population that lifts to build muscle? Add increatine, and of course this skews the figures more.

For the sedentary population, which is the vast majority of the population, BMI is spot on.

Until we have a bodybuilder epidemic, BMI will matter.
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696530783 01-17-2024, 01:16 PM
-
#11
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Yeah, maybe if you're a part of the extremely small percentage of the population that lifts to build muscle. If you're a part of the vast majority of sedentary humans, BMI is spot on.

When did the average Joe start thinking they were an outlier when it comes to BMI? I think the problem is when the average person is chubby, you being slightly less chubby make you think you aren't still chubby.





For your chubby time

BMI 100% is crap on an individual basis because people have different all kinds of body types. It's cool you were 5'9" 140 in high school. I was 5'9" 170 and was a wrestler who was sucked down to make weight, but I was overweight, even borderline obese, by BMI. That was a bunch of bullchit.

BMI is meant to be a tool to measure a whole population. If the average BMI of a whole population is in obese range or moves up or down in a given time by more than a certain amount, that could constitute a public health issue within that population. I hate that an individual BMI is applied in any way. It's not meaningful that way and was never intended to be used that way.
post 1696530823 01-17-2024, 01:18 PM
-
#12
  1. jonmcd46
  2. Registered User
  1. jonmcd46
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,612
  6. Rep Power: 84813
OP has a legit point, its an easy measurement that probably applies to most people, but people use it as cope.
brb I might be 300lbs but go to the gym and can bench 250 so it's clearly mostly muscle, or I'm just big boned
post 1696530843 01-17-2024, 01:19 PM
-
#13
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By Jayarbie⏩
BMI 100% is crap on an individual basis because people have different all kinds of body types. It's cool you were 5'9" 140 in high school. I was 5'9" 170 and was a wrestler who was sucked down to make weight, but I was overweight, even borderline obese, by BMI. That was a bunch of bullchit.

BMI is meant to be a tool to measure a whole population. If the average BMI of a whole population is in obese range or moves up or down in a given time by more than a certain amount, that could constitute a public health issue within that population. I hate that an individual BMI is applied in any way. It's not meaningful that way and was never intended to be used that way.
You were a wrestler. You gained muscle. How many people participate in strength sports?
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696530873 01-17-2024, 01:19 PM
-
#14
  1. mchabs
  2. Registered User
  1. mchabs
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: San Diego, California, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 12,038
  7. Rep Power: 37820
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
No the fuk it isn't. I was around 140 at 5'9 graduating high school. I ran track for years, and fukked around with weights for a few months.

In basic, I ended up in the mid 150's. The weight I'm at now was a concentrated effort to gain weight over years.

A sedentary 5'9 man weighing 170lbs is going to be chunky when that shirt comes off.



Here's a sedentary 5'10 170 vs him after gaining muscle and losing fat at 165lbs over several years. Auschwitz wished they could have had this much mass.

Show the same guy at 130LB. Would look like he's dying.
post 1696530963 01-17-2024, 01:20 PM
-
#15
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
key point worth repeating again.

"Average Joe"
"start thinking they were an outlier when it comes to BMI?"

If you are not the average new lifter, then he isn't talking about you, simple.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1696531023 01-17-2024, 01:23 PM
-
#16
  1. woofermazing
  2. Registered User
  1. woofermazing
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Austin, Texas, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 3,934
  7. Rep Power: 3201
The people that criticize BMI are typically 300 lb, 5'3" whales, trying to justify their disgusting lifestyle.

They should be ridiculed.
post 1696531043 01-17-2024, 01:23 PM
-
#17
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By mchabs⏩
Show the same guy at 130LB. Would look like he's dying.
The beach in the 50's. Practically on their death beds.






5'10 130-158

I'm back, bitches!
post 1696531093 01-17-2024, 01:24 PM
-
#18
  1. FatLoserNerd
  2. Banned
  1. FatLoserNerd
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2024
  4. Age: 29
  5. Posts: 584
  6. Rep Power: 0
BMI doesn’t even account for gender boyo.
post 1696531233 01-17-2024, 01:26 PM
-
#19
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
And let's not forget we have plastics in our water,10,000 chemicals in our food that Europe bans, hormone disrupters in our processed food, a bunch of chemicals in everything and our average Test number is 300 or almost 3 times less than your grandpa.

Not even close to fair.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1696531243 01-17-2024, 01:26 PM
-
#20
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
You were a wrestler. You gained muscle. How many people participate in strength sports?
I gained some muscle, sure, but I lost a hell of a lot more body fat sucking weight. I was almost cachectic looking, but I have shorter legs and broad shoulders, so I hold a lot of weight for my height regardless of what my body fat percentage is. On the other end, there are people who are tall and skinnyfat who don't even make a blip on BMI but are actually a lot fatter than I was at the time. It really shouldn't be used on an individual basis at all.
post 1696531273 01-17-2024, 01:27 PM
-
#21
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Location: Denmark
  5. Posts: 22,068
  6. Rep Power: 156449


tfw
**Misc. Pureblood Crew**
**No Hymen No Diamond Crew**
**Russia/anti-degen Crew**
**Her anus tint tells you everything you need to about her Crew**

Auto-negging posts with instagram/tiktok links and not embedding a single image
post 1696531403 01-17-2024, 01:31 PM
-
#22
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By FatLoserNerd⏩
BMI doesn’t even account for gender boyo.
Having less muscle mass actually makes it easier for women to fall under the healthy range
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696531593 01-17-2024, 01:35 PM
-
#23
  1. Berries1
  2. Unaesthetic crew
  1. Berries1
  2. Unaesthetic crew
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 3,392
  5. Rep Power: 13635
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Yeah, maybe if you're a part of the extremely small percentage of the population that lifts to build muscle. If you're a part of the vast majority of sedentary humans, BMI is spot on.

When did the average Joe start thinking they were an outlier when it comes to BMI? I think the problem is when the average person is chubby, you being slightly less chubby makes you think you aren't still chubby.





For your chubby time

That chick would have a high BMI lmao
Sydney Brah
Jaguars will finish first AFC South
post 1696532183 01-17-2024, 01:50 PM
-
#24
  1. Visel
  2. Progression
  1. Visel
  2. Progression
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 13,618
  5. Rep Power: 85588
5'10, 169 lbs, 23.4 BMI crew. I have SOME muscle but not a lot. I currently have a gut (no ab definition), love handles, slight fat in the pecs, but rest of the body is mostly fat free. End of December I was 177 lbs, 25.4 BMI, and I felt sluggish and had it even worse. I have to get down to sub 160 levels to begin to see a little ab definition, rid myself of the love handles, and lose most puffiness in the pecs. At 159 I would be 22.8 BMI. So by and large I agree with what you're saying OP.

To be fair, they give a wide generous range in the BMI scale. For 5'10, normal weight is 126 - 174 lbs. Being too close to either extreme makes you look excessive in that direction. The midpoint, which is 150, is about perfect I think. For me at least, as someone who doesn't make weight lifting / bodybuilding his life, is natty, and skips leg day.
post 1696532243 01-17-2024, 01:51 PM
-
#25
  1. Godfrd824
  1. Godfrd824
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: DevilMayRage's Head, Rent Free
  5. Posts: 57,242
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 383141
When I joined the army I was 30lbs over the height and weight limits (190lbs, I was 220) and BMI limits (28, I was 30), but I was under the body fat limit(18%) so I was able to join. I'm average in every way. I'm a great example of why BMI and height and weight are not the best metrics for body composition or overall health, (within logical limits of course, if you're 5'8 and 400lbs there's no way that's healthy even if it is all muscle).
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
post 1696532613 01-17-2024, 02:02 PM
-
#26
  1. 4everalone
  2. Registered User
  1. 4everalone
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 10,980
  7. Rep Power: 41395
Girls with tight stomachs, small waist, wide hips big asses & thick thighs weigh way more than your average girl.
Follows Chestbrah's training routine crew
post 1696532833 01-17-2024, 02:07 PM
-
#27
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By 4everalone⏩
Girls with tight stomachs, small waist, wide hips big asses & thick thighs weigh way more than your average girl.
These women were almost nonexistent when the chart was made. These aren't new genetics, it's just aesthetically favorable fat distribution.
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696533013 01-17-2024, 02:10 PM
-
#28
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,461
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 590351
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
No the fuk it isn't. I was around 140 at 5'9 graduating high school. I ran track for years, and fukked around with weights for a few months.

In basic, I ended up in the mid 150's. The weight I'm at now was a concentrated effort to gain weight over years.

A sedentary 5'9 man weighing 170lbs is going to be chunky when that shirt comes off.



Here's a sedentary 5'10 170 vs him after gaining muscle and losing fat at 165lbs over several years. Auschwitz wished they could have had this much mass.

Gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you OP

At 5’9 1/2 I was competing at welterweight then later at middleweight, which was around 173 lbs IIRC

My breakfast was a glass of water and a 5km run

Literally hours of cardio just to make weight

Tbh it wasn’t the training that got me in the end, that part was enjoyable, it was the increasingly unhealthy habits that were required ti maintain the weight

According to BMI I would have been overweight though
post 1696533083 01-17-2024, 02:12 PM
-
#29
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
Gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you OP

At 5’9 1/2 I was competing at welterweight then later at middleweight, which was around 173 lbs IIRC

My breakfast was a glass of water and a 5km run

Literally hours of cardio just to make weight

Tbh it wasn’t the training that got me in the end, that part was enjoyable, it was the increasingly unhealthy habits that were required ti maintain the weight

According to BMI I would have been overweight though
Did your training involve strength training?
I'm back, bitches!
post 1696533223 01-17-2024, 02:16 PM
-
#30
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,461
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 590351
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Did your training involve strength training?
Maybe some in the off season but very high repetition like 15 reps per set

Mostly running including sprints, plyometric training and sparring

404 muscle not found
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts