Forum
»
D size is overrated
- Results 1 to 1 of 1
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread: D size is overrated
04-27-2024, 03:43 AM
-
#1
- ipunchurgirl
- Registered User
-
- ipunchurgirl
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Age: 34
- Posts: 8,079
- Rep Power: 11926
-
-
D size is overrated
I smashed the hell out of a sloot before with my D being limp. We had sex three times that night. 1st time my D was rock hard I busted in like 7-10 mins. I tried to go again after 30 mins my D was hard, but it started to get soft while I was pounding her in missionary position. I usually never get soft but this 2nd time I wasn’t feeling it, and I also had medical issues at the time. Regardless I continued to smash the hell out of her in missionary even with a limp D. We stopped cause it just wasn’t getting hard. After another 20 mins it got hard af the whole time. After the whole thing the sloot tells me I gave her a sensation she never felt before. She felt the sensation to squirt. She didn’t do it tho, because she didn’t want to make a mess on my bed. She told me she felt it both while I was hard, and softer. My dink must have been like 5.5 inches while soft. I’m around 7 hard.
Moral of the story you can please sloots, and even make them squirt with around 5 inches. Girls don’t actually enjoy huge cocks. Porn has brainwashed young men into thinking you need to be 6.5+ to please a girl.
Moral of the story you can please sloots, and even make them squirt with around 5 inches. Girls don’t actually enjoy huge cocks. Porn has brainwashed young men into thinking you need to be 6.5+ to please a girl.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts