Most of his chit is neckbeard trolling but this is legit:


“Ranking girls 1-10 is subjective and difficult depending which autist is critiquing her, but heres the real scale.
Past 30 doesn't count they should have a child and be out of the game.
Any woman whos past 30 without kids made a mistake and is usually bitter and negative as a person.
Girls aged 18 - 29 can be ranked simply.
If youre a below a 6 you are paying half on a date.
If youre a 6 or a 7 you get free meals, free drinks, maybe a birthday present. You pay half the rent with your loser boyfriend and work a job.
You are on dating apps.
If youre an 8/9 your entire life is free. You dont have dating apps you only meet men on Instagram. You live rent free in your mans house, the car you drive is from him, your spending money is from him. You do precisely zero work. Your job is to be fun and vibes and hot. Thats it.
10s is the same as an 8/9 but with a celebrity.
Thats the scale.
So girls, look at your life.
Thats how hot you are without the filters and bull****.“

What say you misc?

didn't read

if balls don't touch it ain't gay - ghandi

Coming from the guy who would probably give away his entire pay check just to haVe a date with any chic.

If he's ever even had a date.

Even if that were true how does it impact the veracity of his rating scale?

I get that many people dislike Tate, and he has some questionable views, and i understand why people feel this way.. but even you don't really believe this right? His status/fame/money alone guarantees that he will have a steady supply of women should he want it, any claim to the contrary is just pure, jealous cope.

Always makes me lol when people lose all ability to be objective about people they don't like. You don't like Tate, so he must be a loser in every domain of existence, right? lol

The whole scale is subjective anyways so it doesn't matter. What's pretty to some is ugly to others and vice versa.

That’s the exact reason why his scale is so good

It removes the subjective assessment

He points out objectively verifiable facts about the individuals lifestyle and uses that as the framework for assigning a numerical score

Thinking through a few examples it holds up pretty well

Do miscers not know women who are hot but also successful?

stopped here - I never liked chicks under 30, even when I was 23

I've done the whole, "paying for girls entire life" thing, and it's just not worth it. Maybe if they have kids and are a stay at home mom, but you 100% cannot fully support a female who doesn't have kids or purpose nowadays. It's not going to work out for you and is a fuking nightmare.

i don't think you've been with many women in your life. maybe 3 and that includes your fat ugly wife.

It's not worth it because there was too much to unpack.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaah Waaaaaaaaaaaaaah Waaaaaaaaaaaaaah

So even by your count that’s three more than you, incel

Lmao

Back to your Camry

That scale is what a man thinks it should be.

In reality any woman above a 2/10 is probably getting or wanting to get fuked by Chad and would rate themselves above a 7 on average

But are they getting their lives paid for? No.

They are getting pumped by chad sure but he’s not taking them out on dates, and if he is, they’re paying half.

So what you said is consistent with this scale.

He doesn't even have a chin. That's all I gotta say about that.

He definitely a goofy lookin mofo

Bump