Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป What arr your thoughts on the new rules implemented for the upcoming Presidential
  1. Results 1 to 3 of 3
post 1702684531 06-21-2024, 05:27 AM
-
#1
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665

What arr your thoughts on the new rules implemented for the upcoming Presidential

Debate?

First time there is not a live audience and when one candidate is talking the other candidates mic is muted.

Clearly done for Biden if Pres Trump were to interrupt while he was speaking he would likely get lost in his thoughts and not know what he's saying .
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1702684651 06-21-2024, 05:30 AM
-
#2
  1. VegasLifter26
  2. MAGA
  1. VegasLifter26
  2. MAGA
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Posts: 9,040
  5. Rep Power: 27280
im ok with the mic rule, both candidates were interrupting like crazy last time. There does need to be a period where they can go back and forth tho.

For me the most important part is that the moderator stays neutral. Chris Wallace interjected his opinion wayyy too much last debate
(these are my opinions i am not a licensed broker by trade)
post 1702684721 06-21-2024, 05:34 AM
-
#3
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By VegasLifter26
im ok with the mic rule, both candidates were interrupting like crazy last time. There does need to be a period where they can go back and forth tho.

For me the most important part is that the moderator stays neutral. Chris Wallace interjected his opinion wayyy too much last debate
I'm OK with the interruption so long as it'd being done at the right tome for the right reasons and not just being done to be an azz hole it allows the other to call him out if he's spewing billchit, also it is representing of an actual debate. No audience, muted mic. Why even be together in the same room?. It also shows how the other reacts when they get rebuttled on the fly. Instead of being given time to think of some bull chit to cover their azz.
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts