Jack Smith Trial starts today

Judge cannon is starting the 3 day hearing into his possible unlawful appointment. If he is removed the entire case could go all the way back to pre-grand jury.

Back story
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Judge cannon has an oral argument on this subject of disqualifying jack smith (de-facto dropping all the cases) June 21st.

She issues an order today allowing outside parties to participate in the oral argument, including members that wrote the Meese brief.

Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Judge cannon has just issued a ruling extending the Jack Smith disqualification hearing to three days and adding time for Amicus brief attorneys as well.






https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...8652.605.0.pdf
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
A motion was called with our very legitimate possible legal argument-

She is having a hearing

Where is the favoritism?



It's better than the DC judge - If the DC judge wasn't biased - and trying to move in an unconstitutional rush- and had all the fact-finding hearings she should've had in relation to immunity- she could be in trial by now.

Instead she skipped the processes and it's held up.


Cannon is simply having all the appropriate hearings -as she should -on the front end so it doesn't get log jammed stalled on the backend- this is how it should work.

The DC judge should take some lessons here....
Meese brief

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...us%20final.pdf


And.... she's gonna allow outside members that submitted a amicus brief in the oral arguments




More parts of Jack Smith trial coming later this summer, including evidence issues - etc


No phones in courtroom, some most info not available until breaks- and after 5pm.


Hypothetically if ruled against him - she could stay her own order until it goes through appeals with him - if she doesn't the solicitor general will have to do the appeals.