Forum
»
The fence around SCOTUS is because they ruled against the 2A….
- Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
Page 1 of 1
06-21-2024, 10:10 AM
-
#1
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
The fence around SCOTUS is because they ruled against the 2A….
And also probably rule against Trump today.
/winning….
/winning….
As
06-21-2024, 10:11 AM
-
#2
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
06-21-2024, 10:12 AM
-
#3
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for the Court, in which ALITO, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined.
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which KAGAN, J., joined.
GORSUCH, J., KAVANAUGH, J., BARRETT, J., and JACKSON, J., filed concurring opinions.
THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for the Court, in which ALITO, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined.
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which KAGAN, J., joined.
GORSUCH, J., KAVANAUGH, J., BARRETT, J., and JACKSON, J., filed concurring opinions.
THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
As
06-21-2024, 10:13 AM
-
#4
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts