Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป Breaking: 24 story tall London apartment building ablaze (ho lee fuk at photos)
  1. Results 271 to 280 of 280
  2. First
  3. 8
  4. 9
  5. 10
post 1509174011 06-21-2017, 06:04 AM
-
#271
  1. brrealtea
  2. Registered User
  1. brrealtea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Posts: 7,783
  5. Rep Power: 13744
[QUOTE=MiscInformed;1508437091]Mass is mass. Doesn't matter how it's distributed. A 50lb box of feathers is as hard to catch as a 50lb box of bricks. You have the added problem of the impact force when the baby was caught actually breaking their young (weak) bones. You could easily break a child's spine this way I think (MD Brahs can chime in). Anyway, it turns out it was a baby, not a child. Still really improbable, but I suppose it's possible. Gonna be traveling fast from 10 stories up though. If it was balled up real well in blankets, I suppose that helps a bit with the impact.

It will be interesting over the next couple of days to find out if this really happened or not. The guy will come forward and be a hero, or the story will disappear.

PS - Check out the guy in this video who rekt his arm helping to catch a toddler who fell from 5 stories.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/sumgG-pTitw[/youtube]
Survivor crew.
post 1509174481 06-21-2017, 06:11 AM
-
#272
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 35,083
  5. Rep Power: 160146
Sometimes I think about being stuck in a tall building during a huge fire - like when I've been in hotels etc. I can't even imagine the despair and panic. RIP to those caught, what a tragic way to end your life. Ground floor living for me. All it takes is 1 idiot as well. I remember a video with some moron gamer throwing something lit in his trash can while on stream. It burned down the building and killed people as well. Instant rage.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
post 1509175761 06-21-2017, 06:30 AM
-
#273
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,801
  7. Rep Power: 63497
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN
This exact situation I've thought about a hundred times.

- harness
- climbing rope
- repelling lever
- life = saved.
Maybe, if you can get to the side where flames aren't..
I think parachute is best bet from a reasonable height. I know someone BASE jumped from inside St. Paul's cathedral, which can't be more than two or three hundred feet..
2023 bertie awards 2024 nominations

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=184693083
post 1509175781 06-21-2017, 06:30 AM
-
#274
  1. Sezzors
  2. Registered User
  1. Sezzors
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Posts: 5,126
  5. Rep Power: 9013
I wonder what the real death count was

The government response has been **** since the fire has happened wtf
post 1509176621 06-21-2017, 06:43 AM
-
#275
  1. MitchellPhil
  2. Banned
  1. MitchellPhil
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 3,496
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Sezzors
I wonder what the real death count was

The government response has been **** since the fire has happened wtf
79 official. Suspected to be 100's by people from the area. Though I know a death has to be confirmed before its added to the poll, still feels like it is being downplayed. 120 flats with believed up to 600 people living there.
post 1509176711 06-21-2017, 06:45 AM
-
#276
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,801
  7. Rep Power: 63497
Used to work construction and I remember a site manager telling me some new 'cosmopolitan' residents moved into a brand new social house, ripped up the carpets and burnt the furniture.. in the living room.
Not saying this is what happened, but there is zero chance this was an exploding fridge
2023 bertie awards 2024 nominations

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=184693083
post 1509176971 06-21-2017, 06:49 AM
-
#277
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,801
  7. Rep Power: 63497
Update on cladding:

Technically illegal and the result of a mistake by the quantity surveyor/architects OR a cost cutting measure, either way not picked up by building inspector/housing association

HOWEVER

Apparently you can use this stuff, even in tall buildings, if you convince the fire inspector of other suitable fire safety measures.

Corporate manslaughter for sure, although I think it will be down to gross negligence rather than criminal intent. Jail time certain.
2023 bertie awards 2024 nominations

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=184693083
post 1509186651 06-21-2017, 08:40 AM
-
#278
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,801
  7. Rep Power: 63497
Originally Posted By samsbolton
Maybe, if you can get to the side where flames aren't..
I think parachute is best bet from a reasonable height. I know someone BASE jumped from inside St. Paul's cathedral, which can't be more than two or three hundred feet..
112 feet lol

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-1556263.html
2023 bertie awards 2024 nominations

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=184693083
post 1509186891 06-21-2017, 08:43 AM
-
#279
  1. EmmaW4tson
  2. Banned
  1. EmmaW4tson
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 14,340
  6. Rep Power: 0
Its not a mistake by the QS or Architect. Bill of Quantities would have specified the cladding which is fireproof/resistant and the council took one look and said fuk it, get cheaper one because how often does cladding catch fire right guys? Contractor would have agreed too. The fire inspector would be gas lighted over this because additional measures would be sprinkler system, stair escape etc.

They wanted to save 6k, now they will be spending millions on the investigation, compensation, fines, firings, liquidations of contractors and possible demolition of the block if it becomes condemned through safety or no sales/rental market.
post 1509200961 06-21-2017, 10:47 AM
-
#280
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  1. samsbolton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,801
  7. Rep Power: 63497
Originally Posted By EmmaW4tson
Its not a mistake by the QS or Architect. Bill of Quantities would have specified the cladding which is fireproof/resistant and the council took one look and said fuk it, get cheaper one because how often does cladding catch fire right guys? Contractor would have agreed too. The fire inspector would be gas lighted over this because additional measures would be sprinkler system, stair escape etc.

They wanted to save 6k, now they will be spending millions on the investigation, compensation, fines, firings, liquidations of contractors and possible demolition of the block if it becomes condemned through safety or no sales/rental market.
The original planning application did specify fire resistant cladding

Somewhere between there and installation it was changed. I think from something I heard earlier in the week, they had very similar trade names, might, stress might, have been a genuine mistake..

i used to have meetings with qs's in my job as a surveyor but I'm a bit hazy now. Tell me if I'm wrong:

Council instructs architect, architect produces plans, plans submitted for approval.
Contractor chosen, who have their own qs
Qs requisitions the materials..at this point we know the wrong cladding is ordered, deliberately or otherwise
Building/fire safety inspector doesn't notice or ask

OR (as mentioned above) there were other fire safety measures in place that would have allowed the use of the non fire retardant cladding.

I could be wrong on any of that, but I think it's safe to say several people are going down for a while, not to mention living with the deaths of 79 people. One reason I got out of construction years ago, one error..
2023 bertie awards 2024 nominations

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=184693083
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts