For arguments sake, lets say she didn’t have any marijuana in her purse (I agree weed is a BS thing to be imprisoned for). Lets say she was just driving the car of a man with multiple warrants, and had a gun in her car. Was it legally registered to her? What is her association to this wanted man, and why is she in his vehicle? I think we need to know more about this case.

The fact she had a big 'ol neck/chest tattoo is enough to warrant a strong shrug toward her getting shot.

Drug court in Brooklyn where I work is packed all the time and 95% of them fail rehab sadly. Also how else are the cops going to bring them to court to start rehab?

You guys saying you want people to be able to flee without the police using force on non-violent crimes... where is the line for violence? DUI? Burglary certainly isn't nonviolent but I'm sure you'd be pissed if someone broke into your house, stole your chit, and the police just let him walk away.

Trust me, my job as a cop would be a lot easier if this were the case, but the reality is force lets us put millions of people in jail a year, peacefully (the only "force" being grabbing them and putting them in cuffs). There's normally about 10 million arrests a year. Only around 1000 of those end in fatal shootings (vast majority being justified) and only around 10 of those are what people get into a fit about when they see them on YouTube. 10 out of 10,000,000. Literally 1 in a million.

For the "1 is 1 too many" crowd... that's life, just the reality of the situation. It can be better, and generally is getting better, but acting like this is an epidemic of sorts is just stupid.

ok ok u said no racist so it's ok

She dindu nuffen

Low IQ post.
Negged.

Um...



Wincel in your own words you identify as a pro-totalitarian globalist.

Why do you believe that a global totalitarian government will better serve humanity?

The corporatists are not our friends.

Most of that is exactly where we are headed and I 100% support it because people are fuking stupid. Srs.

(Sans the exploitation stuff, media disinformation, etc.)

the collusion among ‘leaders’ of governments of affluent nations and large global corporations to establish “we know better than you” policies that subordinate the interests of the public to those of the ruling group, and the concentration of wealth and power in that group

yes

- the suspension of all rights and freedoms in the interest of being able to maintain order no matter how bad things may get

not all, but mostly yes

- the abandonment by the public of belief in the viability of participative representative democracy, due to constant and egregious abuses of the process by all political parties (once all parties are either controlled or eliminated by the ruling group)

yep too stupid to run urselves

- the control and use of the media to misinform, oppress and terrify citizens to cow them into submission to the ruling group’s authority

actually, the media must be controlled precisely to prevent the massive disinformation we have seen

- a total surveillance state including the suppression of all dissent (of speech and action) under the guise of fighting “terrorism”

If we are gonna be a police state, we might as well stop half assing it and use technology to prevent crime

- financial and military support of, and collusion with, despotic leaders in struggling nations, sufficient to allow continued theft and desolation of their land and resources, the wage enslavement of their citizens, their exploitation as consumers of the ruling group’s corporations’ products and its governments’ weapons, and the usurious “lending” of unrepayable and crushing debts to these nations, the proceeds of which are personally appropriated and offshored by the despots as the price of complicity with these atrocities
the dismantling of all regulations, taxes and organized labour groups that inhibit the unrestricted accumulation of wealth by the ruling group

This is some Marxist bs and some other garbage. International government and collaboration is the best way forward for the species. We can do it in a way that isn't exploitative.

- the denigration of government as an appropriate agency for any purpose other than “security”, military and commercial imperialism, and fear-and-denial propaganda

That seems to be all the GOP thinks it's for. But no, the globalists want to tackle things like climate change, pandemics, energy, etc.

I love oppressive governing, minus all of the oppression.


Honk honk

Holy ****. Wincel really is retarded.

Yea it's actually pretty good.

Censoring disinformation and keeping idiots safe isn't "oppression". Maybe it is to u guys who think wearing a mask is oppression, but rly it isn't.

You guys are just too stupid. You've crossed a threshold of stupidity and can't be trusted.

Fun question. If globalism is so retarded, why do all our leading intellectuals embrace it?

You assume all “intellectuals” are moral and altruistic. They are bought and paid just like everyone else.

Science, like everything else, has been used and manipulated to push narratives. The fact that you are unable to see it speaks to your lack of social intelligence

Given that you’re 30+, white, and jobless, you won’t benefit from globalism tbh. It’ll make your life worse

The true beneficiaries are the immigrants that come to western countries and gain elite status srs

Oh ok all our top intellectuals are bought and paid for and manipulated...by...people...dumber than them...

checks out

the only failure here was that taser - was useless. Needed a tranq dart

Man it amazes me that Police in the US still largely work solo

i c wut u did thar

Been waiting for Taser to make a semi-auto taser of shorts. Like 8 prongs that shoot out individually instead of only having 2 shots max that have a high potential for failure.Having two officers in a unit is super nice but would require many more officers to work, which is hard to justify given the budget increase it would create.

Solo officers can respond to calls quicker, which is generally what the public wants, more visible, etc, is the argument against two man units. The benefits of solo units just outweigh two man cars - for the public. As an officer I would 10000000x rather have two man units. Many more benefits just in officer safety and work load.

Well gee, maybe because he had a bad feeling about the situation, you know, like she could have had a ****ing gun in her car?

Wincel my quoted material above is from a piece about the collapse of civilization working from Dmitry Orlov'sThe Five Stages Of Collapse.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/...es-of-collapse

You aren't a member of the club. The people that are in the club? They don't give a single damn about you, or even "the good of humanity". They are managing the situation as best they can to save their own butts.

There is more than one take on how to cope with this situation. The one I quoted from recommends that you look toward creating a stronger local self-governing community as a bulwark against the impending first 3 levels of collapse [financial, commercial, and political].

https://howtosavetheworld.ca/2013/07...talitarianism/I believe that we are here (complexity subject to diminishing returns). I have mentioned on the forum before that we have an economic system based on growth within a planet with finite resources.Above from Orlov.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/...#other_reviews^^^
From End of Growth

Repped.

I am not part of the club, but I have a lot of faith in many who are in that club. Our best and brightest are the only people capable of solving humanity's problems. If we don't face these issues together as a species, we will fail. It's that simple. Most of you can't stand the idea of someone smarter than you telling you how to live, but it is going to have to happen whether you like it or not.

These idiots couldn't even wear masks. I have no faith in their ability to govern themselves anymore.

What did I say that isn't true you dumb bitch? And lol at negging someone just because you disagree with them. ****ing snowflake.

I’ve known quite a few well-read people with a similar perspective. Misanthropes, in terms of their expectations of the general public (and thus laws must be built upon people failing in any basic interaction involving moral or logical competence). All the while they assume that those with intellect will act in accordance with what benefits humanity. That kind of naivety is quickly corrected when you compete within a realm of your equals, and realize that the world has plenty of smart people, and many of them don’t give a damn about their fellow man.

She lost her life because she was a low IQ moron who shot a police officer. Stupid is as stupid does, but you are a democrat so I wouldn’t expect you to have any common sense.

Agreed well said

You could argue that DUI is violence or the threat of violence. In any case, it is putting other people in danger, so no, someone commiting DUI shouldn't be allowed to flee. Burglary, like you said is violence, regardless of whether a weapon is involved or if someone is physically harmed or not. I'd even say burglary is violence even if nobody but the criminal is in the building due to the potential for violence if someone were. Someone commiting burglary knows it has the potential to put lives in danger, even if they don't plan to physically harm someone, so that wouldn't count either.

This has always been the case. What is the difference now? The immigrants aren't white. That's what you have a problem with.