It’s not natural to be fat, it’s a sickness with no purpose whatsoever. It’s also the result of the food industry and western culture more than anything, you didn’t have Burger King 10,000 years ago, but you did have people having multiple sexual partners.

Another false equivalency.

It’s a flawed analogy, for the reasons I stated in my first response to him.

Consentual sex between two adults isn’t wrong according to most peoples moral compass.

Rape and murder are wrong in the minds of 99.999% of people.

It’s just a childish argument.

That’s a typical flawed argument against it.

No, rape and murder aren’t natural, you don’t go around everyday feeling like raping or murdering do you? The fact you think it is scares me a lot srs.

Its a false equivalency.

It really isn’t. You can’t compare murder and rape to consentual sex between two adults. It’s actually very childish and naive to do so.

It’s a very black and white type of thinking, very close minded.Id expect more critical thinking than that.

There's a difference between equivalency andanalogizing.

bumping for pic as well

That picture does not work, can't see chit.

Skimmed through this thread and can't believe there's 12 pages of this.
You've made it clear you aren't down to settle because monogamy is not for you. Fine, dump the woman and keep chasing kitties left and right. There's plenty of of them willing to give.
No need to try to make yourself feel better for cheating because you're set in stone that it's not "natural". da fuk do you care, just go put your dick somewhere else and deal with the consequences later.

Also, where's the pic?

I bet you could, maybe you just are not ready. Or not.

There are legitimate biological reasons why we feel this way.

you are not limited to being single or a cheater. There is some middle ground there. You just have to find like minded partners.

There are a lot of “free” people in this world and a lot of good looking females are in that community.

Don’t let society tell you you have to live a certain way man. Find the life you want and fuggin do it.

I just recommend brutal honesty with yourself and anyone you get involved with. If the truth results in you losing a thing, you never actually had that thing to begin with anyway.

Good job at posting pics. on r/c. take notes misc.

He doesn’t want to be single. He wants to be married with kids AND have affairs on the side. He wants the best of both worlds.

Many many many men are like this. They want both a stable happy traditional family life AND mistresses on the side.

And contrary to what Blaximus says I believe most wealthy men live that double life simply because they can. When you have money it’s easy to maintain both a wife/kids AND mistresses on the side. Either hookers paid directly or sugar babies paid indirectly with gifts and clothes and trips etc (or maybe even unpaid mistresses too but those are harder to keep silent).

So what Ken wants is really nothing unusual. Do I think it is morally right and a justified goal NO. Do I think it’s common for successful men YES sadly.

He doesn’t want to be single. He wants to be married with kids AND have affairs on the side. He wants the best of both worlds.

Many many many men are like this. They want both a stable happy traditional family life AND mistresses on the side.

And contrary to what Blaximus says I believe most wealthy men live that double life simply because they can. When you have money it’s easy to maintain both a wife/kids AND mistresses on the side. Either hookers paid directly or sugar babies paid indirectly with gifts and clothes and trips etc (or maybe even unpaid mistresses too but those are harder to keep silent).

So what Ken wants is really nothing unusual. Do I think it is morally right and a justified goal NO. Do I think it’s common for successful men YES sadly.

Seems like OP has made up his mind re what he wants to do and is just looking for validation.

Just do what you are going to do OP. But know that you are risking the “happy family life” by doing so and your own children’s happy childhood and future. By cheating you run risk that she leaves or cheats, and home life either becomes broken (divorce) or just super fukked up. But maybe you can do it and not get caught and effectively have your cake and eat it to.

Just a risk you have to assume.

But something tells me that when it all blows up in your face you will be crying and complaining about the consequences like a little bish, instead of owning the consequences of your actions and the risk you assumed like a man.

OP and Uvalde police probably share the same cultural values.

Vast majority of men in my position do exactly the same. Im just honest about it.

There's nothing wrong with wanting other women, what is wrong is what we have been brainwashed to believe for the last century or two, AKA monogamy

I think its immoral to do it behind your woman's back. Thats cheating. If she knows whats up, whats the problem with it? Yeah its going to be hard to find a woman like this in this feminist 2022 retard society but thats a different issue.








Vast majority of men in my position do exactly the same. Im just honest about it.

There's nothing wrong with wanting other women, what is wrong is what we have been brainwashed to believe for the last century or two,AKA monogamy

This is how I know you're lying, or a literal retard, or both

This is how I know you're lying, or a literal retard, or both

If that’s how you feel, that is completely ok. You have my blessings srs

I’ve actually had this discussion before with another miscer who had this arrangement. His username was brbmakingmoney and he used to post in the old tinder threads back in like 2016/2017.

He was married to his longtime love (maybe high school sweethearts not sure) and they have a kid. And he told her upfront before they got married that he would only agree to marriage if she agreed to an open marriage where he could date/bang other women a few nights a week. She agreed to it in order to get him to marry her.

Then during the marriage he would go out with other women on dates and have sex. Some of these were regular dates from online dating and some were paid sugar babies or girls receiving gifts from him.

He said the arrangement worked fine and that it was her choice to agree to it. That it was fair because he told her the deal before they got married.

When I pointed out that she probably agreed to it from a position of weakness, low self esteem and codependency, he could not understand what I meant. He thought the fact she agreed to it like a contract meant he was morally justified. He couldn’t understand that she basically agreed to it under duress because she was desperate to keep him and he had told her that was the only way she could keep him and marry him.

So yes he was correct that she verbally agreed to it. But he could not understand that it was in essence emotionally abusive to pressure her into this arrangement. She was in love with him and terrified of losing him so she agreed out of desperation to keep him.

I don’t believe that is a healthy relationship dynamic at all. One person consenting out of fear and desperation.

Now it would be different if your wife was either sociopathic or didn’t really love you. For example if you marry a golddigger who really dgaf about you but is with you just for money and status. Then yes you could arrange a deal like that because the marriage was already a business transaction to begin with.

But if your wife is genuinely in love with you it’s different. Then you will be hurting her emotionally every single time you see someone else. Even if your wife formally “consents” because she’s afraid to lose you. Do you really want to hurt your wife who is in love with you on a regular intentional basis? It is in essence emotionally abusive imo.

When I pointed out that she probably agreed to it from a position of weakness, low self esteem and codependency, he could not understand what I meant. He thought the fact she agreed to it like a contract meant he was morally justified. He couldn’t understand that she basically agreed to it under duress because she was desperate to keep him and he had told her that was the only way she could keep him and marry him.

So yes he was correct that she verbally agreed to it. But he could not understand that it was in essence emotionally abusive to pressure her into this arrangement. She was in love with him and terrified of losing him so she agreed out of desperation to keep him.

Do you understand how math works? If i consider myself to be top 5%, that means 95% of men cant and wont be able to relate to my experiences. Ill say it again, i dont expect miscers to understand me, thatd be foolish. Im blessed, touched by God at birth srs.