Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Mind Blown - Joe Rogan w/ Dr Robert Malone #1757
  1. Results 451 to 460 of 460
  2. Page 16 of 16
  3. First
  5. 14
  6. 15
  7. 16

Thread: Mind Blown - Joe Rogan w/ Dr Robert Malone #1757

post 1654019793 01-09-2022, 04:27 PM
-
#451
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
What they've written generally aligns with current practice.

"understand how power, privilege and sexism work both by conferring benefits to men and by trapping them in narrow roles"

Understand "how"...understand how power, privilege and sexism work both by conferring benefits to men and by trapping them in narrow roles

Not "assume that" it does.



While most of these are discussed in the text, I don't think the guideline is meant to be a short-course in clinical psychology.

Do you also take issue with their guidelines for working with women and girls?
https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/girls-and-women

While the pandemic introduced many people to journals and scientific institutions, these topics, guidelines, and processes are far from new.
Ok, I guess you don’t have an IQ above a potato. But you have successfully derailed the thread yet again so I’ll just move on unless someone feels like discussing the topic of the thread anymore.
post 1654020083 01-09-2022, 04:33 PM
-
#452
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Ok, I guess you don’t have an IQ above a potato. But you have successfully derailed the thread yet again so I’ll just move on unless someone feels like discussing the topic of the thread anymore.
As usual. I didn't introduce the guideline to the discussion. But since it was brought up, it seemed helpful to offer some explanation as to what it actually represents rather than join the outrage club without context.

They are guidelines for practicing clinicians. That's why they offer CEU's for registered professionals.

People sure find odd stuff to take issue with these days.
post 1654020513 01-09-2022, 04:40 PM
-
#453
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Iron_Chef⏩
Cliffs of this thread:
Semantics.
Not exactly.


More like:

- Apparently, unsubstantiated claims are celebrated, if those unsubstantiated claims demonize vaccines.

- Apparently, such unsubstantiated claims will be celebrated even if the person doing the demonizing has a specific, ego-driven, bone to pick.

- Apparently, sensationalism and fear mongering are good, as long it isn't consensus

- Apparently, anything that runs counter to Misc narrative is all lies.

- Apparently, we should blindly trustsomePharma. But it has to align with the Misc narrative.

- Apparently, people really like being told things they want to hear.

Shocking!

Cool_,Story_Bro.gif
post 1654020533 01-09-2022, 04:40 PM
-
#454
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
It’s just word salad that basically just means “men = bad unless they become soft and submissive”.


What are dominant masculine ideals?

What type of biases should they be aware of?

What is the integrated nature of masculinity?


Why must they just assume(“recognize”) that power, privilege, and sexism always give power to men? Women have lots of benefits over men in society and are much safer statistically speaking.




So again, it’s just a bunch of word salad designed to make practitioners view the world through a certain lens and then push that specific ideology outward through their practice.





Which I’m certain you already understood since you seem to have an IQ above a potato.
It's a waste of time. All the effort you use to break it down into the simplest terms so anyone could understand he just responds like he just did below.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
What they've written generally aligns with current practice.

I'm J.L.C bla bla bla bla bs bs bs bla bla bs bs bla bla


bla bla bla bla bs bs bs bla bla bla dog chit horse chit cawk cawk in my ass bla bla


garbage garbage non sequitur, deflection, artificial ignorance, lies, dishonest position of ignorance, bla bla bla bullchit bullchit


ramble ramble ramble pretending to not know what your saying so when I respond non sequitur I can pretend it's not bla bla bla


bullchit more bullchit, fake ignorance, fake confusion, pretending to not understand what is being said, bullchit cuck cuck chit cawk


bla bla bla bla bullchit yada yada I don't know what you mean look at this out of context quote bla bla bla dogchit


I'm a pha66ot
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Ok, I guess you don’t have an IQ above a potato. But you have successfully derailed the thread yet again so I’ll just move on unless someone feels like discussing the topic of the thread anymore.
Ahh so you do see.
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1654021023 01-09-2022, 04:51 PM
-
#455
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920


Y'all are hilarious
post 1654021423 01-09-2022, 04:57 PM
-
#456
  1. DJKhaled
  2. Another one
  1. DJKhaled
  2. Another one
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 11,686
  5. Rep Power: 26509
Originally Posted By kovalchuk71⏩
You are correct, and it has made me rage for the last 1.75 years.

This isn’t what (good) doctors signed up for. It’s almost as unethical as you can get (outside of purposely killing a patient).

What’s worse is the number of doctors that are blindly abiding and killing patients. If **** hits the fan, do they honestly think hospital administration is going to go to bat for them? LOL. They have their $$$$. They’ll just hire another doctor fresh out of residency, while you end up blacklisted and penniless.

“I was just following orders”. Yeah, good luck with that.
Watch this

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3Oez3F6li5An/

A pharmacist has a moment of realization and gets confronted about "just following orders"

You can see the fear in his eyes.
post 1654022663 01-09-2022, 05:19 PM
-
#457
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Not exactly.


More like:

- Apparently, unsubstantiated claims are celebrated, if those unsubstantiated claims demonize vaccines.
You shoot down any information that doesn't support "safe and effective". Doesn't matter how well documented or qualified the source of information may be.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
- Apparently, such unsubstantiated claims will be celebrated even if the person doing the demonizing has a specific, ego-driven, bone to pick.
Again, you claim anything counter to safe and effective vaccines is "unsubstantiated".
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
- Apparently, sensationalism and fear mongering are good, as long it isn't consensus
Projection.

It is in no way fear mongering to say that vaccine passports and vaccine mandates are unjustified government over reach. It is in no way fear mongering to point out that the normal trial and approval process for a vaccine is 10 years. It is in no way fear mongering to point out that international law is broken when an individual is coerced to submit to a medical procedure, especially without informed consent.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
- Apparently, anything that runs counter to Misc narrative is all lies.
Really rustles you when you get called out for your games, huh?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
- Apparently, we should blindly trustsomePharma. But it has to align with the Misc narrative.
Who has endorsed blindly trusting Pharma? Malone had/has? a small research focused company that was trying to explore existing generic medications to treat zika. Absolutely nothing to do with this interview.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
- Apparently, people really like being told things they want to hear.

Shocking!

Cool_,Story_Bro.gif
Um, yes, confirmation bias. Normal thing.

And just lol at anyone who wants to cast me as some "sheep from the other side".

I initially supported the *first* two week lockdown and supported masks as *possibly helpful* and a minor inconvenience for a long time.

I might get stuff wrong. It happens. But I am capable of considering new information; even information that runs counter to my own preconceptions.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1654022793 01-09-2022, 05:22 PM
-
#458
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 47,820
  6. Rep Power: 241736
^^ brutal mogging
post 1654023063 01-09-2022, 05:27 PM
-
#459
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
You shoot down any information that doesn't support "safe and effective". Doesn't matter how well documented or qualified the source of information may be.
Any examples?
Again, you claim anything counter to safe and effective vaccines is "unsubstantiated".
Malone offered zero references or citations. "Give me some action on my substack" isn't really a reference.
It is in no way fear mongering to say that vaccine passports and vaccine mandates are unjustified government over reach.
I haven't said anything about mandates.

But, I think vaccine mandates are a terrible policy that will do more harm than good. I've been consistent in that view.
It is in no way fear mongering to point out that the normal trial and approval process for a vaccine is 10 years.
The current vaccines align with the same timeline. I thought one of the main points here is that Malone invented this stuff in the late '80's? Isn't that ~30 years ago?

Trials have not taken, and do not take, 10 years to complete.

As I said previously, a lot of people became interested in scientific publications and clinical trials over the course of the pandemic. But these systems and processes are far from new.
It is in no way fear mongering to point out that international law is broken when an individual is coerced to submit to a medical procedure, especially without informed consent.
I didn't say anything about mandates. I was informed prior to consent.
Really rustles you when you get called out for your games, huh?
Still waiting for something that actually addresses an argument rather than name calling.
Who has endorsed blindly trusting Pharma? Malone had/has? a small research focused company that was trying to explore existing generic medications to treat zika. Absolutely nothing to do with this interview.
His whole career has been in, or adjacent to, pharma. That's why he's mad.
Um, yes, confirmation bias. Normal thing.
Agreed
And just lol at anyone who wants to cast me as some "sheep from the other side".

I initially supported the *first* two week lockdown and supported masks as *possibly helpful* and a minor inconvenience for a long time.

I might get stuff wrong. It happens. But I am capable of considering new information; even information that runs counter to my own preconceptions.
It's pretty common for individuals' to become distrustful of science and medicine after a negative personal experience.
post 1654031803 01-09-2022, 07:47 PM
-
#460
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Any examples?

We show you them and you deny. What's the point of showing you again and again and again.

I will give you an example when you blatantly lied.

You accused me of making death threats and provided quotes without said threats as proof. You went radio silent after you understood how dumb it was.






































Also, fist yourself.
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts