12-20-2022, 05:34 PM
#541
Something like $73m was given to politicians for the 2022 midterms. He also gave Biden another $5m in 2020 and who else knows how much else to other politicians in 2020. Looks like it's all gonna get clawed back.
12-21-2022, 04:54 PM
#542
Marty Shkreli, who is familiar with the legal system, breaks down how he thinks SBF is looking at life, based on the points system they use to determine sentencing. But he thinks they could give him 25-30 based on whether he gets a good judge. Interesting video.
12-21-2022, 06:56 PM
#543
The ugly girl and Gary Wang cut a deal.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/22/ftxs...osecutors.html
SDNY releases statement (video):
https://twitter.com/SDNYnews/status/1605745361842327552
Caroline Ellison's plea agreement:
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ss-on-the-case
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/22/ftxs...osecutors.html
SDNY releases statement (video):
https://twitter.com/SDNYnews/status/1605745361842327552
Caroline Ellison's plea agreement:
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ss-on-the-case
12-21-2022, 07:18 PM
#544
SEC Charges Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang with Defrauding Investors in Crypto Asset Trading Platform FTX
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-relea...ce=govdelivery
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-relea...ce=govdelivery
12-21-2022, 07:33 PM
#545
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
SEC Charges Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang with Defrauding Investors in Crypto Asset Trading Platform FTX
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-relea...ce=govdelivery
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-relea...ce=govdelivery
We gotta see what happens with Sam Trabucco next. He was the co-CEO of Alameda with Caroline, but he knew it was time to quit in August 2022. Reading the SEC doc, they are charging her with manipulating the FTT tokens since 2019. Surely he is just as guilty, criminally as well.
12-21-2022, 11:10 PM
#546
Pics of SBF in custody:
Spoiler!
12-22-2022, 03:26 AM
#547
If Caroline Ellison fully cooperates, her charges will be waived and she will only face criminal tax violations related to her charges.
https://www.coindesk.com/business/20...ure-of-assets/
The agreement states that
if Ellison fully cooperates with the SDNY's investigation, as well as any other law enforcement agency designated by the office, she won't be further prosecuted criminally except for possible criminal tax violations with regard to the wire and commodity fraud charges that resulted from commingling funds between FTX and Alameda accounts.
A paragraph of the document has been redacted, removing information about some of the possible charges.
A paragraph of the document has been redacted, removing information about some of the possible charges.
12-22-2022, 03:57 AM
#548
Here is the 38 page SEC complaint against Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/compl...pr2022-234.pdf
This SEC complaint is really where you see how Caroline had cooperated with the feds, it mentions everything she did was at SBF's request, he was in full control. He also lied during his media blitz, as we had all suspected. Gary Wang did build the backdoor in the software to divert money from FTX to Alameda. They threw him under the bus pretty good.
Come to think of it, Caroline and/or Gary Wang were probably cooperating as early as November 13, two days after FTX filed for bankruptcy. Because the back door in the software was first mentioned in a Nov 13 Reuters article.
12 key takeaways from the SEC complaint in this twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/compound248/stat...73427981312000
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/compl...pr2022-234.pdf
This SEC complaint is really where you see how Caroline had cooperated with the feds, it mentions everything she did was at SBF's request, he was in full control. He also lied during his media blitz, as we had all suspected. Gary Wang did build the backdoor in the software to divert money from FTX to Alameda. They threw him under the bus pretty good.
Come to think of it, Caroline and/or Gary Wang were probably cooperating as early as November 13, two days after FTX filed for bankruptcy. Because the back door in the software was first mentioned in a Nov 13 Reuters article.
12 key takeaways from the SEC complaint in this twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/compound248/stat...73427981312000
12-22-2022, 01:28 PM
#549
WTF. He got no money bail? Does this guy get an ankle monitor?
Edit: $250m bond with a non-family co-signer.
Edit: $250m bond with a non-family co-signer.
12-22-2022, 01:33 PM
#550
Looks like the dominoes are being stacked against SBF in an epic way. Dayum.
-Virtue is its own reward
-Survived misc outage 2022 crew
-My old username (Johnez) did not survive outage :-(
12-22-2022, 01:37 PM
#551
Originally Posted By -JR⏩
Yeah Caroline and Gary threw him under the bus big time. He deserves it for lying his ass off while on that whole media blitz. What a scumbag.
Looks like the dominoes are being stacked against SBF in an epic way. Dayum.
I just wanna know who co-signed his bail with $250m collateral?
12-22-2022, 02:02 PM
#552
More CNBC details on his bail. They didn't have to meet the requirements of a full $250m collateral. But 2 other people besides his parents co-signed with considerable assets. He also has to undergo drug treatment (from a coindesk article).
He also has to wear an ankle monitor.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/22/ftx-...lion-bail.html
He also has to wear an ankle monitor.
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried will be released on $250 million bond while awaiting trial for fraud and other criminal charges, a New York federal judge ruled Thursday.
The terms of his personal recognizance bond were agreed to by prosecutors and Bankman-Fried’s lawyers. The 30-year-old will face his next hearing in New York City on Jan. 3. Bankman-Fried was expected to be released from federal custody on Thursday, a prosecutor said.
A recognizance bond is a written commitment from the accused to appear in court when ordered. In return, Bankman-Fried’s camp would not be required to meet the full collateral requirements on the bail.
The bond was secured by equity in his family home, and by the signatures of his parents and two other individuals with “considerable” assets.
In addition to the $250 million package, which prosecutors called “the largest-ever pretrial bond,” the former crypto billionaire would also be required to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet, submit to mental health counseling and restrict himself to the Northern District of California.
Judge Gabriel Gorenstein said Bankman-Fried would require “strict” supervision following his release to his parents’ home in California.
His parents, both Stanford Law professors, were present in the courtroom. Bankman-Fried was flanked by two U.S. marshals, dressed in a suit and tie.
He did not speak except when answering the judge.
The former FTX CEO would also be barred from opening any new lines of credit of more than $1,000 while awaiting trial over what federal regulators have called a “brazen” fraud at his bankrupt crypto empire.
Bankman-Fried was the heart of “a fraud of epic proportions,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos told the court. But he voluntarily returned to the United States, has no history of flight and has significantly reduced financial assets, Roos said.
Bankman-Fried had previously claimed that he was down to a mere $100,000, a steep fall from grace for a man who was once at the head of a $32 billion crypto empire.
Bankman-Fried stands accused of perpetrating a multibillion-dollar fraud on his investors, using customer funds to purchase properties, fund political donations and backstop trades at his hedge fund Alameda Research.
Federal regulators allege over $8 billion in customer funds is missing. FTX filed for bankruptcy protection in Delaware on Nov. 11. Bankman-Fried’s successor, CEO John Ray, said he’d never seen such a “complete failure of corporate control.”
Two of his top lieutenants, Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, pleaded guilty to related fraud charges and are cooperating with law enforcement. Wang’s and Ellison’s plea deals were revealed Wednesday.
Bankman-Fried was indicted by the U.S. District Court in Manhattan on eight counts including securities fraud and money laundering, and was rendered from the Bahamas to New York om Wednesday evening.
Bankman-Fried’s bail dwarfs other federal white-collar bonds. Bernie Madoff posted a $10 million bond while awaiting trial on his multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. Jeff Skilling, former Enron CEO, posted a $5 million bond, while Elizabeth Holmes, Theranos founder, posted a scant $500,000.
The terms of his personal recognizance bond were agreed to by prosecutors and Bankman-Fried’s lawyers. The 30-year-old will face his next hearing in New York City on Jan. 3. Bankman-Fried was expected to be released from federal custody on Thursday, a prosecutor said.
A recognizance bond is a written commitment from the accused to appear in court when ordered. In return, Bankman-Fried’s camp would not be required to meet the full collateral requirements on the bail.
The bond was secured by equity in his family home, and by the signatures of his parents and two other individuals with “considerable” assets.
In addition to the $250 million package, which prosecutors called “the largest-ever pretrial bond,” the former crypto billionaire would also be required to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet, submit to mental health counseling and restrict himself to the Northern District of California.
Judge Gabriel Gorenstein said Bankman-Fried would require “strict” supervision following his release to his parents’ home in California.
His parents, both Stanford Law professors, were present in the courtroom. Bankman-Fried was flanked by two U.S. marshals, dressed in a suit and tie.
He did not speak except when answering the judge.
The former FTX CEO would also be barred from opening any new lines of credit of more than $1,000 while awaiting trial over what federal regulators have called a “brazen” fraud at his bankrupt crypto empire.
Bankman-Fried was the heart of “a fraud of epic proportions,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos told the court. But he voluntarily returned to the United States, has no history of flight and has significantly reduced financial assets, Roos said.
Bankman-Fried had previously claimed that he was down to a mere $100,000, a steep fall from grace for a man who was once at the head of a $32 billion crypto empire.
Bankman-Fried stands accused of perpetrating a multibillion-dollar fraud on his investors, using customer funds to purchase properties, fund political donations and backstop trades at his hedge fund Alameda Research.
Federal regulators allege over $8 billion in customer funds is missing. FTX filed for bankruptcy protection in Delaware on Nov. 11. Bankman-Fried’s successor, CEO John Ray, said he’d never seen such a “complete failure of corporate control.”
Two of his top lieutenants, Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, pleaded guilty to related fraud charges and are cooperating with law enforcement. Wang’s and Ellison’s plea deals were revealed Wednesday.
Bankman-Fried was indicted by the U.S. District Court in Manhattan on eight counts including securities fraud and money laundering, and was rendered from the Bahamas to New York om Wednesday evening.
Bankman-Fried’s bail dwarfs other federal white-collar bonds. Bernie Madoff posted a $10 million bond while awaiting trial on his multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. Jeff Skilling, former Enron CEO, posted a $5 million bond, while Elizabeth Holmes, Theranos founder, posted a scant $500,000.
12-22-2022, 02:08 PM
#553
Who were the two other people with "considerable" assets?
▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
————- No Vax Crew —————-
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 27,407
- Rep Power: 416,934
-
12-22-2022, 02:10 PM
#554
Video footage of SBF leaving courthouse:
https://twitter.com/AutismCapital/st...23735428796417
Looks like they forgot a few zeros in this electronic filing:
Here is the court system's full details of SBF's conditions of release:
https://twitter.com/AutismCapital/st...23735428796417
Looks like they forgot a few zeros in this electronic filing:
Here is the court system's full details of SBF's conditions of release:
12-22-2022, 02:16 PM
#555
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout⏩
You can't ask these questions
Who were the two other people with "considerable" assets?
- kengriffeyjr24
- Registered User
- kengriffeyjr24
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 54
- Posts: 2,816
- Rep Power: 68,493
-
12-22-2022, 03:12 PM
#556
12-22-2022, 03:24 PM
#557
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout⏩
Who were the two other people with "considerable" assets?
12-22-2022, 03:36 PM
#558
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Oh, I believe he is the ring-leader or co-ring-leader. Either way, he will be going to jail for life.
We gotta see what happens with Sam Trabucco next. He was the co-CEO of Alameda with Caroline, but he knew it was time to quit in August 2022. Reading the SEC doc, they are charging her with manipulating the FTT tokens since 2019. Surely he is just as guilty, criminally as well.
I hope his parents are, too.
12-22-2022, 03:51 PM
#559
Originally Posted By Mark1T⏩
Yep. Trabucco should start cooperating before they come get him, if he hasn't already.
Oh, I believe he is the ring-leader or co-ring-leader. Either way, he will be going to jail for life.
I hope his parents are, too.
I hope his parents are, too.
SBF's dad was on payroll for 11 months, and the parents accepted a home in their own name, paid with stolen FTX funds. So hopefully something happens with them, too.
12-22-2022, 04:54 PM
#560
Took Ackman long enough to figure out SBF is a total conman and crook, who lied his ass off throughout his PR media blitz. But what he doesn't realize is that $250m bond is mostly unsecured. Right now, the only thing securing it is the parents' home.
Previously:
Previously:
12-22-2022, 07:56 PM
#561
Who came up with $250m in an instant and bailed him out?
12-22-2022, 08:01 PM
#562
Originally Posted By greenleaf⏩
Supposedly 2 non-family co-signers who still have until Jan 5 to sign the bond. Besides the parents' house, it is mostly unsecured at this time.
Who came up with $250m in an instant and bailed him out?
They gave him a Personal Recognizance Bond - no deposit or collateral required. Talk about a sweetheart deal this kid is getting.
12-22-2022, 08:35 PM
#563
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
What do they get in return for signing? I mean why even bother?
Supposedly 2 non-family co-signers who still have until Jan 5 to sign the bond. Besides the parents' house, it is mostly unsecured at this time.
If I were him I would try to flee srs.
12-22-2022, 08:49 PM
#564
Originally Posted By greenleaf⏩
I have no idea. Personal Recognizance Bond means no deposit or collateral. What non-family member would ever want to sign that after the kid just got done screwing over millions people for billions of dollars? Imagine being on the hook for $250m?
What do they get in return for signing? I mean why even bother?
And the funniest thing is the media is touting it as the largest bail amount ever set - meanwhile they didn't even have to put a nickel down.
Kevin O'Leary said he would invest in him again, I wonder if he is willing to sign his name on to this?
The judge did say he has sufficient notoriety, so he can never really ever escape anywhere. It's a stroke job - the kid got a sweetheart deal.
12-22-2022, 09:09 PM
#565
Full 8 page Appearance Bond:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...90940.14.0.pdf
Looks like he still has access to phones, computer and internet.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...90940.14.0.pdf
Looks like he still has access to phones, computer and internet.
12-22-2022, 09:16 PM
#566
Thanks for keeping this thread updated, OP. Pretty much everything in it is rep-worthy.
Why wouldn't SBF try to leave the US at this point? Sounds like there is nothing to lose except his parents' house (which he bought for them with stolen money anyway), and Polanski'ing out in France beats the chit out of Club Fed.
Why wouldn't SBF try to leave the US at this point? Sounds like there is nothing to lose except his parents' house (which he bought for them with stolen money anyway), and Polanski'ing out in France beats the chit out of Club Fed.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew
"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
12-22-2022, 11:18 PM
#567
"FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried to be released on $250 million bail,
will live with his parents
"
First he smashed an ugly chipmunk. Now this. That's enough punishment for an ex-billionaire srs.
First he smashed an ugly chipmunk. Now this. That's enough punishment for an ex-billionaire srs.
12-23-2022, 12:28 AM
#568
Originally Posted By FA*******⏩
Thanks for keeping this thread updated, OP. Pretty much everything in it is rep-worthy.
Why wouldn't SBF try to leave the US at this point? Sounds like there is nothing to lose except his parents' house (which he bought for them with stolen money anyway), and Polanski'ing out in France beats the chit out of Club Fed.
Why wouldn't SBF try to leave the US at this point? Sounds like there is nothing to lose except his parents' house (which he bought for them with stolen money anyway), and Polanski'ing out in France beats the chit out of Club Fed.
No problem, thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it.
This whole $250m bond doesn't make much sense. If you look at the highlighted text below, it requires 2 other signatures (one non-family) besides the parents - who are all financially responsible. Then it states that the $250m is just secured by the parents' home.
So, from reading the Appearance Bond pdf, it looks like the 2 other signatures will be on the hook for the $250m in the event that he flees, but do they have to post assets in excess of $250m? It doesn't seem like it, other than saying they must be financially responsible. What happens if they do need to collectively post more than $250m assets and he can't find anyone to sign? Do they revoke his bail?
It seems like SDNY threw out this $250m figure more for optics to make it seem like they are giving him bail commensurate to the severity of his crimes, but when you look at the details, with not a nickel down and the only thing securing it is the parents' home, it doesn't really seem like the case.
Here is another thing which makes me question whether the collective 4 signatures need to show assets of $250m. The 4 sig requirement is on line-item 2, which is unsecured (see below).
Line-item 3 says it is secured only by the parents' home. So is the parents' home really the only thing securing $250m?
I'm not really sure how all this works.
12-23-2022, 08:30 AM
#569
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
And the funniest thing is the media is touting it as the largest bail amount ever set - meanwhile they didn't even have to put a nickel down
.
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
This whole $250m bond doesn't make much sense.
So, from reading the Appearance Bond pdf, it looks like the 2 other signatures will be on the hook for the $250m in the event that he flees, but do they have to post assets in excess of $250m? It doesn't seem like it , other than saying they must be financially responsible. What happens if they do need to collectively post more than $250m assets and he can't find anyone to sign? Do they revoke his bail?
It seems like SDNY threw out this $250m figure more for optics to make it seem like they are giving him bail commensurate to the severity of his crimes, but when you look at the details, with not a nickel down and the only thing securing it is the parents' home, it doesn't really seem like the case.
So, from reading the Appearance Bond pdf, it looks like the 2 other signatures will be on the hook for the $250m in the event that he flees, but do they have to post assets in excess of $250m? It doesn't seem like it , other than saying they must be financially responsible. What happens if they do need to collectively post more than $250m assets and he can't find anyone to sign? Do they revoke his bail?
It seems like SDNY threw out this $250m figure more for optics to make it seem like they are giving him bail commensurate to the severity of his crimes, but when you look at the details, with not a nickel down and the only thing securing it is the parents' home, it doesn't really seem like the case.
^^Confirmed. According to this former SDNY US Attorney, the bail package is a total sham. See video below.
-All signatures will be on hook for $250m
-There is no other collateral or assets that have to be posted - it's just the parents' house
-In the event he flees, SDNY won't be able to collect anything but the house
-The $250m was just so they can say they have the highest bail amount ever set
Pics of SBF's $4m home in Palo Alto:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...alifornia.html
12-23-2022, 08:51 AM
#570
- notbadnotbrad
- Registered User
- notbadnotbrad
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 25,166
- Rep Power: 285,269
-
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts