Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Tell me again why you guys think Requiem for a Dream (2000) is a good movie?
  1. Results 31 to 32 of 32
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
post 10000095836 03-21-2026, 07:11 AM
-
#31
  1. AllLifter
  2. Toker
  1. AllLifter
  2. Toker
  3. Join Date: Feb, 2026
  4. Location: Jew S A
  5. Age: 30
  6. Height: 6'2"
  7. Weight: 189 lbs
  8. Posts: 2,310
  9. Subscribers: 2
  10. Rep Power: 1022
raw doggin drugged sloots is hnnnng
“Islam to a man is like rabies to a dog”-Churchill
"I was repelled by the conglomeration of races which the capital showed me, repelled by this whole mixture of Czechs, Poles, Hungarians, Ruthenians, Serbs, and Croats, and everywhere, the eternal mushroom of humanity Jews and more Jews."-Hitler
post 10000098167 03-23-2026, 05:53 PM
-
#32
  1. DonVonDuck
  1. DonVonDuck
  2. Join Date: Aug 2013
  3. Posts: 8,749
  4. Rep Power: 40904
Originally Posted By AbbeBusoni
A month later, I got around to watching it. I think it's actually not too bad. Ellen Burstyn is an all-time great actress. She delivers here. There's a commendable anti-drug message. The filming style conveys a tripping vibe, as intended; but I admit that film kinda overdoes it. I give it a 7.5/10

Full review
.
.
.
NO SPOILERS



I watched 2000’s “Requiem for a Dream” on 03/20/2026 when I saw it available on one of the free apps on my Roku. It has a high score on IMDB, and Burstyn got an Oscar nomination. Thus, I went into the movie with some high expectations. I think it’s a solid movie overall

The movie, at least as I saw it, has a fairly straightforward point about addictions. The four main characters are addicted to drugs (i.e. heroin and diet pills), and they suffer ruination as a result. In that sense, the movie conveys a standard anti-drug message. On another layer, I think the film also explores the motivations for why people become addicted, arguing that low self-esteem, loneliness, escapism, and purposelessness are some of the causes. For example, Burstyn turns to drugs because she’s an overweight, aging widow; and the drugs make her feel better about her body and social status. Leto and Wayans turn to drugs partly because, in the absence of other goals, being a successful dealer is perhaps the only viable material goal to which they can aspire.

To be frank, the message of this movie, while relevant and commendable, is not too original. There are many drug movies out there ... The movie's bigger draw might be the filming style. There’s an intense score. There are many dreamy sequences. There are rapid camera cuts. There are also some Spike Lee-ish scenes of a moving camera right in front of a character’s face as he/she walks forward.

The filming style sometimes had a cool effect, creating a trippy vibe. I felt like I were right in the character’s heads when they were intoxicated. But I have to admit --- I wish the film reined it in. The score and filming style eventually lost effect from over-use, and I began to get so annoyed: I think I even felt the comings of a bad headache because of the score and filming style.

Ellen Burstyn gives a great acting performance. The fat-suit and prosthetics look credible, and she delivers a convincing scene where she talks to Leto about why being on TV is important to her. I think she was deserving of her Oscar nomination. Marlon Wayans does OK in a dramatic role. Leto and Connelly are serviceable.

7.5/10.
I appreciate the review, but I think your love for Ellen Burstyn is clouding your judgement a bit.

Originally Posted By BearyManilowe
Agree with OP. Requiem for a Dream is a bottom tier avant-garde slop film. It has no redeeming qualities.
There is no redeeming quality. I agree, sir.


The entire movie is a slow, but steady decline into the gutter. No different than watching maggots eat away at a dead squirrel. There isn't a single glimmer of hope for any of the characters.
R.I.P. Bert
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts