Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Flat Earth truth- Antarctica and life beyond the ice wall, 1000 year old Buddhist map
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 152
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1478307661 01-09-2017, 09:54 AM
-
#31
  1. mferrandi
  2. Banned
  1. mferrandi
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Posts: 5,402
  5. Rep Power: 0
the earth is flat
post 1478307891 01-09-2017, 09:55 AM
-
#32
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 28,875
  5. Rep Power: 143505
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
Amazing how knowledge that is taken in early enough creates a violent revulsion to opposition in most people.

There are some extremely convincing proofs (as long as you avoid the controlled opposition FE theorists who try to push idiotic theories).

One of the better was from Samuel Rowbothom, who mentions a nearly thousand mile stretch of the Nile in which a foot or so of variance is measured. If this is true, and spherical trigonometry dictates an 8 inch drop per mile squared of distance, a spherical earth would be an impossibility based on the observable characteristics of fluid alone.
See that is actually interesting and something I would read more about. I'm not sure that's what it actually means, but I'm going to try find out more and see.

Edit: couldn't find much about that specific Nile theory, but found him bullchitting about some other stuff so it's not looking good. Will check out the vid you spoke about in my cp sometime though.

One of the big problems with flat earth for me, (as far as stuff I can personally observe goes rather than just stuff that doesn't fit in with science as we know it) is that the diagram of the earth with the sun and Moon rotating above physically can't be true because of where I see the sun rise and set each day. Plus I don't see how that would work with partial moons etc.
post 1478308321 01-09-2017, 09:59 AM
-
#33
  1. ALLUCANEATRIBS
  2. Registered User
  1. ALLUCANEATRIBS
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Posts: 9,862
  5. Rep Power: 12035
what happened to catbrah ?
post 1478310291 01-09-2017, 10:16 AM
-
#34
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Lietuviss
If you ever had a conversation with a buddhist monk or a zen master you would understand that they are not even interested in this kind of things and they would not discuss about it because as buddhist say we are not born to answer these question, it's all about finding inner peace with yourself.

I call it bullchit, true buddhist don't a single phuk about the form of the earth or universe questions.
And what does that have to do with a map from a 1000 years ago in a Buddhist monastery?

You seriously find it odd that people had maps?
post 1478310521 01-09-2017, 10:19 AM
-
#35
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
Amazing how knowledge that is taken in early enough creates a violent revulsion to opposition in most people.

There are some extremely convincing proofs (as long as you avoid the controlled opposition FE theorists who try to push idiotic theories).

One of the better was from Samuel Rowbothom, who mentions a nearly thousand mile stretch of the Nile in which a foot or so of variance is measured. If this is true, and spherical trigonometry dictates an 8 inch drop per mile squared of distance, a spherical earth would be an impossibility based on the observable characteristics of fluid alone.
What do you think of Eric Dubay?

Also that is one of the most interesting facts about drop in rivers or stretchs of land. I think there is a video that discusss the lack of appropriate drop across the state of Kansas.
post 1478310581 01-09-2017, 10:20 AM
-
#36
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By mferrandi
the earth is flat
Agreed
post 1478310741 01-09-2017, 10:21 AM
-
#37
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By cookiefiend
See that is actually interesting and something I would read more about. I'm not sure that's what it actually means, but I'm going to try find out more and see.

Edit: couldn't find much about that specific experiment, but found him bullchitting about some other stuff so it's not looking good. Will check out the vid you spoke about in my cp sometime though.

One of the big problems with flat earth for me, (as far as stuff I can personally observe goes rather than just stuff that doesn't fit in with science as we know it) is that the diagram of the earth with the sun and Moon rotating above physically can't be true because of where I see the sun rise and set each day. Plus I don't see how that would work with partial moons etc.
That's why I say watch the documanteries. There are many similar facts that are presented. The lack of drop in stretchs of land and water is one of many. There are recorded experiments etc
post 1478311051 01-09-2017, 10:24 AM
-
#38
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By cookiefiend
See that is actually interesting and something I would read more about. I'm not sure that's what it actually means, but I'm going to try find out more and see.

Edit: couldn't find much about that specific Nile theory, but found him bullchitting about some other stuff so it's not looking good. Will check out the vid you spoke about in my cp sometime though.

One of the big problems with flat earth for me, (as far as stuff I can personally observe goes rather than just stuff that doesn't fit in with science as we know it) is that the diagram of the earth with the sun and Moon rotating above physically can't be true because of where I see the sun rise and set each day. Plus I don't see how that would work with partial moons etc.
Watch this doc it is good for starter and has many different points that can be investigated individually.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7OLxiWFquus
post 1478311431 01-09-2017, 10:27 AM
-
#39
  1. FIREnICE
  2. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution
  1. FIREnICE
  2. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,922
  6. Rep Power: 13034
when you accidentally rep the op.... fuuuuu

get this retarded troll shiit out of here.
We're All Gonna Make It
***RIP ZYZZ***
post 1478311521 01-09-2017, 10:28 AM
-
#40
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 28,875
  5. Rep Power: 143505
Originally Posted By DDSF1
That's why I say watch the documanteries. There are many similar facts that are presented. The lack of drop in stretchs of land and water is one of many. There are recorded experiments etc
Yeah but you wouldn't actually talk like this guy. Your only persuasion to get us to watch a video which is quite possibly just the same stuff I've already heard from catbrah and is going to end up filling my YouTube feed with crap was repeatedly posting about fear, even when I asked about it.

Is there another theory of what the flat earth looks like apart from the one with the sun and moon rotatingb over the top that catbeah used to post? Since I can see with my own eyes that that one is not true that's a big hurdle to me believing any of this.
post 1478311661 01-09-2017, 10:29 AM
-
#41
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 17,506
  6. Rep Power: 46037
I don't understand how you guys can think the Earth is flat? How is that possible when a passenger jet can take more than ONE direction to go from point A to B.
█ ٩(�̮̮̃�̃)۶ Random Crew ٩ █
█ 1K Club █
█ Official Melanotan 2 Thread (http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=132097293) █
█ PC Master Race Crew http://imgur.com/a/G4uVM & https://pcpartpicker.com/b/qmd6Mp
post 1478312181 01-09-2017, 10:33 AM
-
#42
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 7,153
  5. Rep Power: 19785
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies
I don't understand how you guys can think the Earth is flat? How is that possible when a passenger jet can take more than ONE direction to go from point A to B.
Navigation is based on North, which is a point at the middle of the map. East/west circumnavigation would create a ring around a constant north and work just fine. What would never work is North to South circumnavigation which, coincidentally, has never been accomplished.
post 1478312361 01-09-2017, 10:34 AM
-
#43
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 17,506
  6. Rep Power: 46037
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
Navigation is based on North, which is a point at the middle of the map. East/west circumnavigation would create a ring around a constant north and work just fine. What would never work is North to South circumnavigation which, coincidentally, has never been accomplished.
I know this. Hence why I said there is more than ONE path to take to go from point A to B. If the Earth was flat there would be only one path from point A to B.
█ ٩(�̮̮̃�̃)۶ Random Crew ٩ █
█ 1K Club █
█ Official Melanotan 2 Thread (http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=132097293) █
█ PC Master Race Crew http://imgur.com/a/G4uVM & https://pcpartpicker.com/b/qmd6Mp
post 1478312661 01-09-2017, 10:37 AM
-
#44
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 7,153
  5. Rep Power: 19785
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies
I know this. Hence why I said there is more than ONE path to take to go from point A to B. If the Earth was flat there would be only one path from point A to B.
I'd need an example, not really understanding I guess.
post 1478312811 01-09-2017, 10:38 AM
-
#45
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 28,875
  5. Rep Power: 143505
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies
I know this. Hence why I said there is more than ONE path to take to go from point A to B. If the Earth was flat there would be only one path from point A to B.
this is a big one as well.
post 1478312901 01-09-2017, 10:39 AM
-
#46
  1. chino3
  1. chino3
  2. Join Date: Oct 2012
  3. Posts: 18,554
  4. Rep Power: 134275
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
The flat earth troll threads weren't even funny when cat brah was still around.

RIP in peace cat brah.
what did I miss? Last thing I saw was a "call out" thread about him setting his hair on fire, but nothing else?
"It won't get better, just different."
post 1478313181 01-09-2017, 10:40 AM
-
#47
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 17,506
  6. Rep Power: 46037
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
I'd need an example, not really understanding I guess.
OK here.

█ ٩(�̮̮̃�̃)۶ Random Crew ٩ █
█ 1K Club █
█ Official Melanotan 2 Thread (http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=132097293) █
█ PC Master Race Crew http://imgur.com/a/G4uVM & https://pcpartpicker.com/b/qmd6Mp
post 1478313441 01-09-2017, 10:42 AM
-
#48
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 7,153
  5. Rep Power: 19785
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies
OK here.

You would still be traveling in a circular arc around a north direction established in the middle of the map. You could go east/west or west/east with no problem, other than varying distances.
post 1478313471 01-09-2017, 10:43 AM
-
#49
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Explain this:

post 1478313751 01-09-2017, 10:45 AM
-
#50
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 17,506
  6. Rep Power: 46037
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
You would still be traveling in a circular arc around a north direction established in the middle of the map. You could go east/west or west/east with no problem, other than varying distances.
█ ٩(�̮̮̃�̃)۶ Random Crew ٩ █
█ 1K Club █
█ Official Melanotan 2 Thread (http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=132097293) █
█ PC Master Race Crew http://imgur.com/a/G4uVM & https://pcpartpicker.com/b/qmd6Mp
post 1478314161 01-09-2017, 10:48 AM
-
#51
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  1. celltechbrahz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 7,153
  5. Rep Power: 19785
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies


It's not hard. Imagine travelling either direction along one of the circular rings on the UN's flat earth map. You can go either direction relative to North and get to the same place.
post 1478314771 01-09-2017, 10:54 AM
-
#52
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  1. eXistenceLies
  2. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 17,506
  6. Rep Power: 46037
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz


It's not hard. Imagine travelling either direction along one of the circular rings on the UN's flat earth map. You can go either direction relative to North and get to the same place.
ok ok.....lets say I agree to this...Why haven't you flat earthers ever gone to the edge of the earth and actually have PROOF?
█ ٩(�̮̮̃�̃)۶ Random Crew ٩ █
█ 1K Club █
█ Official Melanotan 2 Thread (http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=132097293) █
█ PC Master Race Crew http://imgur.com/a/G4uVM & https://pcpartpicker.com/b/qmd6Mp
post 1478314991 01-09-2017, 10:55 AM
-
#53
  1. EnderG60
  2. Registered User
  1. EnderG60
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Posts: 13,787
  5. Rep Power: 30868
Originally Posted By Mythenthefang
Believe what you want bro, who cares if it's not true, it makes you happy and you aren't hurting anyone
He is hurting humanity by spreading his stupidity.
post 1478316251 01-09-2017, 11:05 AM
-
#54
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 50,517
  5. Rep Power: 650393
Two questions. I enjoy listening to the very detailed conspiracy theories...

1) what are they hiding and why?

2) what about the hundreds of astronauts, spy plane pilots, etc, and the thousands of pictures that show the curvature of the earth. how would they keep a conspiracy going involving that many people and entities with zero leak?
post 1478320521 01-09-2017, 11:37 AM
-
#55
  1. chino3
  1. chino3
  2. Join Date: Oct 2012
  3. Posts: 18,554
  4. Rep Power: 134275
"It won't get better, just different."
post 1478322401 01-09-2017, 11:53 AM
-
#56
  1. TheReverend
  2. O-Qua Tangin Wann
  1. TheReverend
  2. O-Qua Tangin Wann
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: Orange Park, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 4,844
  6. Rep Power: 92066
So why is almost every single object in the observable universe spherical... and we're flat?

PS. Negged OP, obviously
post 1478323091 01-09-2017, 11:59 AM
-
#57
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 50,517
  5. Rep Power: 650393
Originally Posted By TheReverend
So why is almost every single object in the observable universe spherical... and we're flat?

PS. Negged OP, obviously
they are all flat too. they are just turned precisely so that their round flat side faces the earth perfectly.

all biaviians know this.
post 1478323301 01-09-2017, 12:01 PM
-
#58
  1. UWofPeace
  2. Registered User
  1. UWofPeace
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 2,253
  5. Rep Power: 3866
Originally Posted By DDSF1
I learned that the misc is full of cowards, cuckolds, dirtbags, weirdos and mental retards. There are some good ones, some sunshine, but lots of darkness.
Nobody is making you visit this forum, if you have such an issue with everyone and still stay around that's an indictment of your own stupidity. Also flat earth? So many better and more plausible conspiracies you could have brought to light but you choose to go full catbrah.
post 1478323821 01-09-2017, 12:04 PM
-
#59
  1. UWofPeace
  2. Registered User
  1. UWofPeace
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 2,253
  5. Rep Power: 3866
Originally Posted By eXistenceLies
ok ok.....lets say I agree to this...Why haven't you flat earthers ever gone to the edge of the earth and actually have PROOF?
I mean this is basically the smoking gun, OP your free to sail a boat out to the supposed edge of the Earth. You have a month to post pics or get negs
post 1478324271 01-09-2017, 12:08 PM
-
#60
  1. Aircommander91
  2. Psalm 115:1
  1. Aircommander91
  2. Psalm 115:1
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 8,097
  6. Rep Power: 18745
Originally Posted By celltechbrahz
The following is my mythological response:

Let's start with 2. By NASA's own admission, almost all its curved Earth pictures are CGI composites comprised of ribbons of photographs taken from the 20,000 satellites supposedly orbiting the Earth (despite only CGI renderings of satellites existing in Google images). Additionally, its "official timelapse video" of the rotating earth has no cloud movement over a 24 hour timeframe lol.

The astronauts have a tough job and are often increasingly withdrawn from society and prone to alcoholism over an extended period of time. ISS and other such endeavours are faked using parabolic flight patterns. When outside in space, shots are faked underwater. The moon landing, an obvious hoax, came at a cost of 30b to the public - many people within NASA have sufferred untimely deaths (including 11 or so within 2 years of Apollo 11, 7 of which were "airplane crashes," and 3 included astronauts burned in 100% pure oxygen during a test) and the mathematics around NASA's own exploits make no sense (Mars lander deccelerating from 16,000 mph in several minutes with a parachute in a nearly non-existent atmosphere by earth standards and smoothly landing a device that even during testing looked like utter chit?).

Lol.

1. Imagine how the world react to being told everything they'd learned from birth was essentially a lie. Things would get messy and people might as well remain blue-pilled imo.
not saying the earth is flat or anything like this, but I remember a video of NASA showing the rover and how it's all a bunch of garbage that doesn't work. much less be capable to be dropped from atmosphere and work.

all nasa staff laughed and joked while showing it like it's a big joke.

looked but couldn't find it.
“Sometimes when I'm faced with an atheist, I am tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we have finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook.”
― Ronald Reagan

† Acts 4:12 †
There's salvation only in Christ

† II Corinthians 12:7-10 †
Suffering humbles us, it's truly a bless in disguise
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts