Forum
»
I invented and patented a device for independently performing weighted push-ups (srs)
04-04-2019, 12:45 AM
-
#31
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By Kurial⏩
Push-ups are superior to the bench for reasons listed in the OP. The problem is the loading restrictions for them which is what I set out to solve.There's not much difference between bench and push up. Just the core activation/stabilizers difference... in which case just do bench and dips.
Your body isn’t structurally adapted to pushing against things that are behind your body; it’s unnatural and causes unnecessary shoulder stress. Exercises such as dips should be excluded from your exercise selection unless your shoulders are made of titanium
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 12:46 AM
-
#32
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By LexBrah⏩
Your buddy has a better version? Mind shining some light on this? I'm completely unaware of there being anything even close to what I've created out there. And I hope his has already been patented because if not, and if his idea resembles mine, I'd likely gain rights to it.. srs.I actually like the concept of this and it makes sense not having your back pinned against the bench.
What would be cool would be to incorporate a raise platform for the hands, so that you could get a deeper range of motion, or ability to change incline/decline of it.
I actually met the owner of rogue fitness and his wife on holiday in tulum and stayed in touch with them. Super cool guy and really intelligent too. If you are serious (im pretty high ngl and havent read your thread properly) but I could probably swing an intro for you? They might be interested in you / the product.
nevermind, looks like my buddy already has a better version of your product lol
What would be cool would be to incorporate a raise platform for the hands, so that you could get a deeper range of motion, or ability to change incline/decline of it.
I actually met the owner of rogue fitness and his wife on holiday in tulum and stayed in touch with them. Super cool guy and really intelligent too. If you are serious (im pretty high ngl and havent read your thread properly) but I could probably swing an intro for you? They might be interested in you / the product.
nevermind, looks like my buddy already has a better version of your product lol
edit - I'm assuming you were trolling me.. phucker
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 12:50 AM
-
#33
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
-
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Join Date: May 2018
- Posts: 3,320
- Rep Power: 29920
-
-
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Make the handle attaching the backpack to the bar longer and an open hook at the end. After the back pack is loaded you can strap the back pack on and kind of do a half squat to bring it off the bar. Then two steps back and you could use your device at any squat rack. Would not try to market this with the bar attached. It would be a really difficult sell to any potential gym owner or manager, you'd get complaints about it taking up excess space, using a barbell when a lot of gyms are limited and safety. Would possibly flare the ends of the pack up if possible to allow easier roll outs if you get stuck. Still a cool idea OP would probably try if my gym had one of theseThat's the thing - I wouldn't recommend doing a weight that you cant perform at least 4 reps with. If you do want to do that, at least have a spotter that can remove the plates in case you fail. Just how it's not recommended to max out on bench without a spot as well.
Hmmm, how would you still be able to perform it independently though without the barbell? This device is still usable without the barbell, but you'd need a partner to load on the plates as getting on a backpack over 100 lbs by yourself off of the floor or wherever else is extremely difficult.
Hmmm, how would you still be able to perform it independently though without the barbell? This device is still usable without the barbell, but you'd need a partner to load on the plates as getting on a backpack over 100 lbs by yourself off of the floor or wherever else is extremely difficult.
We are all self made but only the successful will admit it. -Earl Nightingale
04-04-2019, 12:57 AM
-
#34
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
-
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Join Date: May 2018
- Posts: 3,320
- Rep Power: 29920
-
-
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Make the hook a single metal piece in black. It would look like a cobras head not a question mark. If you can do a push up with 90 lbs on your back you can definitely squat it.load\unload would be easy and the small amount of space it takes would be another key selling point to a gym.Contemplated this exact idea before brah. The problem is that the hooks would need to be so long that the barbell is way above your head making it very difficult to unrack and re-rack, and the device will rotate to an even higher degree and the bench would be harder to set-up in front of it, and then this would also get attacked for vanity because you'd like like an ornament or that you'd have question marks above your head. But I do srs appreciate the suggestion brah
We are all self made but only the successful will admit it. -Earl Nightingale
04-04-2019, 01:00 AM
-
#35
04-04-2019, 01:00 AM
-
#36
- BostonRockets
- Flâneur
-
- BostonRockets
- Flâneur
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 16,681
- Rep Power: 31297
-
-
Is this a srs thread?
Death is impossible for us to fathom: it is so immense, so frightening, that we will do almost anything to avoid thinking about it. Society is organized to make death invisible, to keep it several steps removed. That distance may seem necessary for our comfort, but it comes with a terrible price: the illusion of limitless time, and a consequent lack of seriousness about daily life. We are running away from the one reality that faces us all.
04-04-2019, 01:02 AM
-
#37
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By Mmjk1500⏩
Same thing would apply though mane. The rotation issue and the barbell needing to be placed higher and the un-racking/re-racking issue would still remain.Make the hook a single metal piece in black. It would look like a cobras head not a question mark. If you can do a push up with 90 lbs on your back you can definitely squat it.load\unload would be easy and the small amount of space it takes would be another key selling point to a gym.
Originally Posted By Kiop⏩
ty mennice srs
Originally Posted By BostonRockets⏩
yes.Is this a srs thread?
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 01:02 AM
-
#38
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Ya, saw that right after I made the post. Your contraption would be much more attractive if it didn't require an incline bench and not just a barbell, but a rack to hold it. Ya, every gym has them and ALWAYS in use and people waiting to use it. INB4 " some **** was using the squat rack to do push ups"Yes, see my response above. It's literally impossible to use that for weighted push-ups, let alone independent weighted push-ups. I use to have one myself and gave it away after I couldn't find any use for it
Kinda outside the subject here, but never seen this before. Pretty interesting
Spoiler!
Wish my gym had this thing
☆☆☆USA �яєω☆☆☆
Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier
☆☆☆Perfectly Imperfect �яєω☆☆☆
☆☆☆What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? �яєω☆☆☆
☆☆☆SuperStraight �яєω☆☆☆
☆☆☆snailsrus �яєω☆☆☆
☆☆☆High Five �яєω☆☆☆
04-04-2019, 01:04 AM
-
#39
- BostonRockets
- Flâneur
-
- BostonRockets
- Flâneur
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 16,681
- Rep Power: 31297
-
-
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Have you thought of this?yes.
0:20
Much more practical IMO and you don't have to deal with the awkward feeling of having the weights sitting and shifting on your back.
Death is impossible for us to fathom: it is so immense, so frightening, that we will do almost anything to avoid thinking about it. Society is organized to make death invisible, to keep it several steps removed. That distance may seem necessary for our comfort, but it comes with a terrible price: the illusion of limitless time, and a consequent lack of seriousness about daily life. We are running away from the one reality that faces us all.
04-04-2019, 01:05 AM
-
#40
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By Casca⏩
Agreed. This device requiring only a power rack and incline bench makes it universally usable though. I saw that push-up machine vid a while back, that thing is awesome. You can also do weighted push-ups on a pitshark machine or a booty builder machine but all 3 of those cost like $7k-$10k each and virtually zero gyms have them unfortunatelyYa, saw that right after I made the post. Your contraption would be much more attractive if it didn't require an incline bench and not just a barbell, but a rack to hold it. Ya, every gym has them and ALWAYS in use and people waiting to use it. INB4 " some **** was using the squat rack to do push ups"
Kinda outside the subject here, but never seen this before. Pretty interesting
Spoiler!
Kinda outside the subject here, but never seen this before. Pretty interesting
Spoiler!
Wish my gym had this thing
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 01:06 AM
-
#41
- GravityLee
- Curls for the girls
-
- GravityLee
- Curls for the girls
- Join Date: Jan 2014
- Posts: 21,444
- Rep Power: 146473
-
-
Youre close to something great. Mirin ingenuity at such a young age
04-04-2019, 01:07 AM
-
#42
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By BostonRockets⏩
Yes, and the problem is that those are unstable with the weights constantly swinging during the movement, and going past 100 lbs on that would be an absolute bish. But if you're going with 90 lbs or less then that's a pretty effective method.Have you thought of this?
0:20
Much more practical IMO and you don't have to deal with the awkward feeling of having the weights sitting and shifting on your back.
0:20
Much more practical IMO and you don't have to deal with the awkward feeling of having the weights sitting and shifting on your back.
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 01:09 AM
-
#43
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
-
- Mmjk1500
- In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Join Date: May 2018
- Posts: 3,320
- Rep Power: 29920
-
-
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Nah man you're overcomplicating it. You would never have to set the bar above eye height. If it were a single open hook you just walk forward and squat to unrack once the hook hits the barSame thing would apply though mane. The rotation issue and the barbell needing to be placed higher and the un-racking/re-racking issue would still remain
We are all self made but only the successful will admit it. -Earl Nightingale
04-04-2019, 01:17 AM
-
#44
04-04-2019, 01:33 AM
-
#45
04-04-2019, 01:40 AM
-
#46
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
-
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Posts: 47,648
- Rep Power: 280053
-
-
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
Then don't worry about the multi spike. To my mind, you need to get rid of the barbell. An easier solution would be to extend the hook so the full sized plates don't get in the way when you're unracking. Then you don't need to keep the barbell attached to your back as if you're Jesus carrying the cross, nomsayin?Thanks man. You can still use the smaller plates with this/microload it. This device is much less awkward than it looks as well, it's very comfortable to use.
I'm a bit confused on the multi-spike though. Would that make it more practical than how it currently is? I'm just having a hard time imagining it I guess
I'm a bit confused on the multi-spike though. Would that make it more practical than how it currently is? I'm just having a hard time imagining it I guess
Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
04-04-2019, 01:44 AM
-
#47
04-04-2019, 01:46 AM
-
#48
- jazi
- Registered User
-
- jazi
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 16,984
- Rep Power: 22970
-
-
really cool.
barbell and the need to rack on a power rack is a big hindrance though. if that was addressed it could be great for getting a sick minimalist workout in or for travel.
barbell and the need to rack on a power rack is a big hindrance though. if that was addressed it could be great for getting a sick minimalist workout in or for travel.
***No Breathe Crew (test levels through the roof)***
***No Eat Crew***
***0 test crew (up from negative)***
04-04-2019, 01:49 AM
-
#49
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Great initial concept, m8.
That could be a great product with further engineering.
That could be a great product with further engineering.
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
04-04-2019, 02:03 AM
-
#50
- smeelmybut
- itz only smeels
-
- smeelmybut
- itz only smeels
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Location: United States
- Posts: 2,074
- Rep Power: 16098
-
-
lol'd hard
04-04-2019, 02:45 AM
-
#51
- Vampirelol
- oof
-
- Vampirelol
- oof
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Posts: 4,554
- Rep Power: 43344
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
seriously thought this when op started saying dips were gonna kill your shoulders lmaoHeavy weight+wide "grip"+flared out elbows= Goodnight sweet shoulders

Views expressed on this domain are fictitious and represent the opinion of no entity whatsoever
04-04-2019, 03:20 AM
-
#52
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
Heavy weight+wide "grip"+flared out elbows= Goodnight sweet shoulders

Originally Posted By Vampirelol⏩
the powerlifting practice of tucking the elbows is generally safer, but it does not recruit the pecs nearly as well as flaring the elbows out to the side. This is really mainly an issue on the bench press though because the shoulder blades are not free to move, whereas with push-ups they can move freely - rendering the exercise much, much more shoulder friendly allowing you to significantly flare your elbows out without much concern.seriously thought this when op started saying dips were gonna kill your shoulders lmao
Dips are in a whole other league of their own when it comes to shoulder issues
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 03:26 AM
-
#53
- Mang1er
- bruh
-
- Mang1er
- bruh
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: Detroit, Michigan, United States
- Posts: 1,638
- Rep Power: 13328
-
-
This is interesting. I recently invented a similar device. Much more effective though. I've also acquired a patent. Since my design has taken years and years of research and development, I would be willing to sell you the design if the price was right. Here is an actual photo of the device being used by a professional power lifter.

Notice the key functions of this device.
A custom designed "weight pack" with an eyelet on top.
The low profile, space alloy power cantilever with exhaustion hook
This allows the user to load weight, hook weight onto cantilever and then crawl under and unrack weight himself.

Notice the key functions of this device.
A custom designed "weight pack" with an eyelet on top.
The low profile, space alloy power cantilever with exhaustion hook
This allows the user to load weight, hook weight onto cantilever and then crawl under and unrack weight himself.
04-04-2019, 11:29 AM
-
#54
- cojones539
- Registered User
-
- cojones539
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Posts: 4,857
- Rep Power: 24883
-
-
Bump
RIP Zyzz and Greg Plitt
Bench - 345x1
OHP - 195x5
Chin-ups - 117.5x5
Squat - 365x1 (feelsokman)
04-04-2019, 11:48 AM
-
#55
- Comply_or_Die
- ★★★★★
-
- Comply_or_Die
- ★★★★★
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Age: 36
- Posts: 7,192
- Rep Power: 55710
-
-
ill just whip my pen0r out and sling it round onto my back and that'll be 20kg
Laughing at your team since 2008.
04-04-2019, 11:54 AM
-
#56
- BigChief3000
- brb squatting
-
- BigChief3000
- brb squatting
- Join Date: Dec 2008
- Age: 37
- Posts: 2,673
- Rep Power: 4771
-
-
your bench numbers are the same as your squat numbers. maybe you should use that squat rack for more....squatting
Tottenham Hotspur
04-04-2019, 11:58 AM
-
#57
- povertyphaggot
- notsrs
-
- povertyphaggot
- notsrs
- Join Date: May 2013
- Posts: 1,413
- Rep Power: 1956
-
-
sorry breh but it wont sell
people go to gym to bench and not do an exercise you can easily perform at home, even if its weighted
people go to gym to bench and not do an exercise you can easily perform at home, even if its weighted
04-04-2019, 12:09 PM
-
#58
Originally Posted By cojones539⏩
then you should come up with another device besides a barbell to load and unload it. barbell looks goofy af. more money in another device tooContemplated this exact idea before brah. The problem is that the hooks would need to be so long that the barbell is way above your head making it very difficult to unrack and re-rack, and the device will rotate to an even higher degree and the bench would be harder to set-up in front of it, and then this would also get attacked for vanity because you'd like like an ornament or that you'd have question marks above your head. But I do srs appreciate the suggestion brah
Originally Posted By poverty*******⏩
lol plenty of people do basic chit at the gym, the setting and environment at home is just not the same. fuk working out in my own living room like some poor sad kunt. either way selling devices for people to use at home is probably a bigger market than for gyms onlysorry breh but it wont sell
people go to gym to bench and not do an exercise you can easily perform at home, even if its weighted
people go to gym to bench and not do an exercise you can easily perform at home, even if its weighted
04-04-2019, 12:16 PM
-
#59
04-04-2019, 12:18 PM
-
#60
- devin45k
- Segabrah
-
- devin45k
- Segabrah
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 32,255
- Rep Power: 213481
-
-
Originally Posted By 401Delta⏩
It's all fun and games until her crack sweat makes her slide onto the back of your head and crushes it like a watermelon between her cheeks.Wouldn't it be easier to just date a fat girl and have her sit on your back while you do them?
NDSU Crew
Kansas City Royals Crew
Winnipeg Blue Bombers Crew
Over the Top is the GOAT Movie Crew
HTC 4 life brother!!!
"If you don't have skid marks on your underwear after a leg workout, then you aren't training hard enough" - Big Lenny
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts