Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Castle Bravo - biggest nuke ever detonated by US
  1. Results 31 to 43 of 43
  2. Page 2 of 2
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2

Thread: Castle Bravo - biggest nuke ever detonated by US

post 1612288891 08-01-2020, 01:47 PM
-
#31
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
Lol hypersonics ain't all that. Think about it. If it goes hypersonic, then the warhead will have to be smaller. In that case, your looking at a regular missile, not sum fkn crazy ass nuke.

As for nukes, I would not place so much stock on it as a deterrent or war winner.
They can still carry enough for an incredible yield thermonuclear fusion device dude.
post 1612289151 08-01-2020, 01:51 PM
-
#32
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
climberbrah post is horsechit

China wouldn't use ballistic missiles since that is old tech and we have defenses, and they have defenses against ballistics. And Russia would totally join in and attack us because they would stand to gain everything. They were the ones who helped China get hypersonic tech.
post 1612289431 08-01-2020, 01:55 PM
-
#33
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Height: 6'1"
  5. Weight: 225 lbs
  6. Posts: 29,429
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 571788
Hey guys - how is wincel wrong about absolutely everything?

I mean, just LOL @ his coronavirus predictions. Complete disaster lmfao
Always Neg Back Crew.
post 1612289451 08-01-2020, 01:56 PM
-
#34
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
climberbrah post is horsechit

China wouldn't use ballistic missiles since that is old tech and we have defenses, and they have defenses against ballistics. And Russia would totally join in and attack us because they would stand to gain everything. They were the ones who helped China get hypersonic tech.
They don't have the capability get more than 10-20 nukes to the USA in a first strike scenario before the USA completely obliterates all nuclear sites they have.


Russia would stay out as they have nothing to gain as well (BRB lets hop into a nuclear war as an outsider which will destroy my own country because we want to help china, who we actually hate as well). Not gonna happen. If they stay away they actually have a chance to emerge from the war as a potential dominant hegemony as the USA will take years to build back up some of our destroyed military assets during China's first exchange.
post 1612289471 08-01-2020, 01:56 PM
-
#35
  1. Ravishing_Rick
  2. A Registered Mesomorph
  1. Ravishing_Rick
  2. A Registered Mesomorph
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Posts: 115,847
  5. Rep Power: 279082
Terrible what America did
also lying to the natives
*۩*legendary misc status*۩*
No Sloot Can Hurt A Man With Options~ Ravishing_Rick
all my bishes foreign PSN Ravishing_Rick
*No Porn Crew*
onlyfans/ricosmoovey
post 1612289481 08-01-2020, 01:56 PM
-
#36
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By climberbrah⏩
They don't have the capability get more than 10-20 nukes to the USA in a first strike scenario before the USA completely obliterates all nuclear sites they have.


Russia would stay out as they have nothing to gain as well (BRB lets hop into a nuclear war as an outsider which will destroy my own country because we want to help china, who we actually hate as well). Not gonna happen.
It takes less than 6 mins for them to annihilate all our major cities.

They aren't mass producing these weapons because they don't want to provoke us. But they could totally fuk us up. On every major wargame sim by our military, nuclear enabled or otherwise, we lose to China.

Our goal should be to deter a war with them. Make it painful and not in their interest to fight us.
post 1612289801 08-01-2020, 02:01 PM
-
#37
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
It takes less than 6 mins for them to annihilate all our major cities.

They aren't mass producing these weapons because they don't want to provoke us. But they could totally fuk us up. On every major wargame sim, nuclear enabled or otherwise, we lose to China.
Ok so they destroy 5-10 major cities. We then destroy EVERY single military and nuclear asset that have. (and our military is untouched since China went full idiot and decided to use their first strike capability on civilian targets which are far away from our military bases).


So war ends, US has 5-10 destroyed cities, military is untouched.

Sounds like a big win for US. We can rebuild those cities. We have ton of our population which doesnt live in major cities. Also, the entire democrat party is destroyed as their voter base no longer exists.
post 1612290681 08-01-2020, 02:13 PM
-
#38
  1. R3L3NTL3SS
  2. Is a Czechnologist.
  1. R3L3NTL3SS
  2. Is a Czechnologist.
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 37,632
  5. Rep Power: 170298
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
On every major wargame sim by our military, nuclear enabled or otherwise, we lose to China.
Lmao
post 1612291021 08-01-2020, 02:18 PM
-
#39
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,346
  9. Subscribers: 5
  10. Rep Power: 415541
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
There is very little possibility of a Chinese warhead detonating on US soil. There would have to be some sort of unknown technology that would be able to beat the weapon systems designed to intercept the missiles. In that case, this argument works for both sides considering the US could have big swinging dik defense that we dont know about.
You referring to the missile defense system never fully created in the 60’s and only had a 50% success rate back then?

That missile defense system?
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1612291161 08-01-2020, 02:20 PM
-
#40
  1. BeginnerGainz
  2. Registered User
  1. BeginnerGainz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10,142
  6. Rep Power: 46984
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
lmao. Koreans are Chinese people, dummy!
Pretty sure Koreans are Korean
Age: 30

"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants"
-Sir Isaac Newton
post 1612291221 08-01-2020, 02:21 PM
-
#41
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Posts: 1,889
  5. Rep Power: 15100
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
You referring to the missile defense system never fully created in the 60’s and only had a 50% success rate back then?

That missile defense system?
yes, that one.
Software Eng Crew
Alabama Crimson Tide
*** Alabama 205 Crew ***
*** New Jersey 732 Crew ***
*** MWC ***
PRs : S: 455 / D: 545 / B: 340
CTS-V - Built motor, BTR stg2 cam, ported heads, Magnuson 2650, 85mm upper, 9.45 lower, 30gph meth
C6 Z06 - Heads ; Pfadt & Akrapovič full exhaust ; LG G2 coilovers & swaybars, corner balanced. Other misc HPDE minded mods ; 490/450 on mustang dyno.

Past Vehicles: Bolt on Focus RS ; Built/Turbo 03 Mach 1 ; ATS-V manual sedan
post 1612292001 08-01-2020, 02:33 PM
-
#42
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By R3L3NTL3SS⏩
Lmao
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bus...s-2019-3%3famp

Sad how uninformed and arrogant our public is.

As I said, we can't realistically expect to win wars with these countries, but we can change the game so they have no interest in war with us and it would be painful for them to go to war with us.
post 1612300461 08-01-2020, 04:37 PM
-
#43
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,766
  7. Rep Power: 77972
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
You referring to the missile defense system never fully created in the 60’s and only had a 50% success rate back then?

That missile defense system?
It’s pretty advanced now actually. But still out of 10 icbms launched if 1 or 2 hit their intended target that’s a completely devastating loss.

The ruskis are still the biggest threat to usa in terms of nuclear war.

The first one to develop a sure fire way of stopping all icbm warheads will be the victor in all this.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts