Forum
»
Reddit shuts down AMA of NSA whistleblower exposing Russiagate
08-25-2020, 07:52 PM
-
#31
08-25-2020, 09:02 PM
-
#32
- FinBra
- Registered User
-
- FinBra
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,666
- Rep Power: 46532
-
-
To the bruh saying its not a coup, you need to read up:https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-sp...jacked-americaandhttps://taibbi.substack.com/p/our-man-in-cambridge-93f
Tiabbi and Schrage have committed to posting more articles leading up to the election outlining how the FBI, Obama admin, and the security apparatus falsified info to get past the FISA courts and tried to effectively sabotage the trump campaign. IE a straight up political hit on the incoming admin. Thats a ****ing coup. Further, the left media then co opted the conspirators and put them on air as sources to push this charade on the country.
This debacle has now given trump the credibility to call the lib news sources covering him 'fake news.' I'm not a trump supporter, but if you need more proof of the shenanigans, Greenwald does a good job outlining the biased coverage here:https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/...iterated-them/
Again, Greenwald and Tiabbi used to be considered Democrats, though I doubt they'd align themselves with the party anymore, so these sources are about as good as they get.
Tiabbi and Schrage have committed to posting more articles leading up to the election outlining how the FBI, Obama admin, and the security apparatus falsified info to get past the FISA courts and tried to effectively sabotage the trump campaign. IE a straight up political hit on the incoming admin. Thats a ****ing coup. Further, the left media then co opted the conspirators and put them on air as sources to push this charade on the country.
This debacle has now given trump the credibility to call the lib news sources covering him 'fake news.' I'm not a trump supporter, but if you need more proof of the shenanigans, Greenwald does a good job outlining the biased coverage here:https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/...iterated-them/
Again, Greenwald and Tiabbi used to be considered Democrats, though I doubt they'd align themselves with the party anymore, so these sources are about as good as they get.
08-25-2020, 09:23 PM
-
#33
- elterrible987
- Banned
-
- elterrible987
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 51,859
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
08-25-2020, 10:15 PM
-
#34
08-27-2020, 03:09 PM
-
#35
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
-
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
- Join Date: Aug 2019
- Posts: 12,139
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 146252
-
-
New sticky on /r/conspiracy if anyone is interested.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/..._the_russians/
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/..._the_russians/
08-27-2020, 03:33 PM
-
#36
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
-
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
- Join Date: Aug 2019
- Posts: 12,139
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 146252
-
-
Interesting answer related to faking Russian involvement
The answer is no. The gaps in the 5 July data are filled with the 1 September data. All of this is Guccifer 2.0's data, that you're talking about. When you look only at minutes, seconds, and milliseconds.There's more here.
I can post the files here, and edit the OP. They have also been submitted to the lawyers in the court cases.
edit: Our researchers in the UK have found five items that Guccifer 2.0 posted on 15 June 2016 that had Russian signatures. They also found these five same items in the Podesta emails posted by Wikileaks. In the Wikileaks posting, there were no Russian signatures.
This is proof that Guccifer 2.0 was inserting Russian signatures, making it look like the Russians did it. This implies that the CIA Marble Framework program, which according to Vault 7, was used once in 2016, was probably used here. That program allowed the CIA to make it look like someone else did the attack, like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and certain Arab countries.
edit 2:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/
https://theforensicator.wordpress.co...-fingerprints/
I can post the files here, and edit the OP. They have also been submitted to the lawyers in the court cases.
edit: Our researchers in the UK have found five items that Guccifer 2.0 posted on 15 June 2016 that had Russian signatures. They also found these five same items in the Podesta emails posted by Wikileaks. In the Wikileaks posting, there were no Russian signatures.
This is proof that Guccifer 2.0 was inserting Russian signatures, making it look like the Russians did it. This implies that the CIA Marble Framework program, which according to Vault 7, was used once in 2016, was probably used here. That program allowed the CIA to make it look like someone else did the attack, like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and certain Arab countries.
edit 2:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/
https://theforensicator.wordpress.co...-fingerprints/
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts