Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Hey *******s, Cops Aren’t Supposed to Kill Guilty People Either...
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 114
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1614952061 08-28-2020, 09:08 PM
-
#31
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  3. Join Date: Jan 2020
  4. Posts: 28,124
  5. Rep Power: 262372
Cliffs:

>couldn't read the OP because it's dark green on a black background(smooth brain tactics)

>atomic sloot is once again virtue signaling for black in-laws and pretending systemic racism exists like it's 1852
*Tolerance is the lube that slides the dildo of dysfunction into the ass of civilized society*

*We didn't deserve snailsrus*

As always: not medical advice but medical opinion crew
post 1614952111 08-28-2020, 09:08 PM
-
#32
  1. MetroBrah
  1. MetroBrah
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Posts: 60,353
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 490941
What would you have liked for the police officers to do? srs question. If you don't comply with orders and reach into your car, you get shot. That's just how it is srs. The police officers have to protect themselves and make sure they come home to their families as well.

Regardless of the perps background...99% of police shooting is justified dedsrs
post 1614952231 08-28-2020, 09:10 PM
-
#33
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 12,213
  6. Rep Power: 130180
Originally Posted By blissful88
Cliffs:

>couldn't read the OP because it's dark green on a black background(smooth brain tactics)

>atomic sloot is once again virtue signaling for black in-laws and pretending systemic racism exists like it's 1852
LOL imagine being rustled because I said police shouldn't play judge, jury and executioner including for clansman. But sure love, whatever makes you feel better <3
***Anime Crew***
***Horror Crew***
***Hentai for the plot crew***
***Poverty Sketching Crew***
Broken Sandwich maker
post 1614952241 08-28-2020, 09:10 PM
-
#34
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 5,670
  5. Rep Power: 33213
Originally Posted By outfoxxed
No one wants cops to kill people you dumb fuk.
go to the r&p section
O|||||||O

white supremacist
post 1614952281 08-28-2020, 09:10 PM
-
#35
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 22,267
  6. Rep Power: 86921
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
LOL everyone deserves their fair trial, even klansmen, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Yeah and how are you going to arrest him and give him a fair trial if he is reaching for a weapon in his car? You just going to let the criminal take shots at the officer until he gets tired and lets himself get arrested.

You are literally retarded
post 1614952371 08-28-2020, 09:11 PM
-
#36
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 22,267
  6. Rep Power: 86921
Originally Posted By stfudonny
go to the r&p section
lmao, shouldn't you be saying that to OP you retard?
post 1614952411 08-28-2020, 09:12 PM
-
#37
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,644
  6. Rep Power: 33541
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
LOL everyone deserves their fair trial, even klansmen, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Let me slow down. And give you a working example:

Cops attempt to detain a man

Man resists arrest and either has a weapon or goes for a weapon.

Now my question to you:

At what point does cop discontinue the thought of “fair trial” and begin the thought of “I need to shoot this man before he gets to his weapon”?

I’m trying to clarify YOUR point as you mentioned klansmen in your post insinuating racism with respect to op. But as you know,

killing a black man is not racist but it is themotivethat creates that act which is racist.

In other words, cops killing a black man is not racist but it would be racist if they killed him solely because he is black.
Jesus, kang of kangs, accept me into your heart and kangdom.
Amxn.
post 1614952481 08-28-2020, 09:13 PM
-
#38
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Posts: 21,333
  6. Rep Power: 96920
Originally Posted By GaryCarnivals
only a LOW IQ criminal thug would think it's a good idea to resist arrest, run to his car and reach into it to grab something.

normal IQ people don't get killed by the cops because they don't FIGHT the cops. They don't RESIST arrest. They don't put themselves in dangerous positions.

Stupid rapist thug is lucky to be alive.
This these are the facts as we know them directly from the DOJ report

Blake was wanted for 3rd degree Sexual Assault. He also was armed with a knife, which precludes an officer from closing the distance and going hands on. Officers deployed less lethal options, twice, in an attempt to subdue the suspect.

While their tactics are questionable, they met all parameters to use deadly force in this case

Blake had the ability and opportunity to cause serious bodily injury or death to not only the officers but the children in the car

The officer felt imminent jeopardy for if not his life the lives of the children in the vehicle.

And they met preclusion by previously trying to physically restrain him which he resisted as mentioned also deploying a taser twice.

What more do you want? That’s a pretty clearly justified use of deadly force if you ask me
No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.

-Socrates
post 1614952511 08-28-2020, 09:13 PM
-
#39
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 12,213
  6. Rep Power: 130180
Originally Posted By outfoxxed
Yeah and how are you going to arrest him and give him a fair trial if he is reaching for a weapon in his car? You just going to let the criminal take shots at the officer until he gets tired and lets himself get arrested.

You are literally retarded
Oh yeah sure, because that's the ONLY scenario that ever plays, right? The only retard here is the one that is so desensitized on people dying by cop for no reason, because they forget they have tasers or other modes of restraint. But ok. Since the police can't see your hands at all times you should be shot and killed. LOL
***Anime Crew***
***Horror Crew***
***Hentai for the plot crew***
***Poverty Sketching Crew***
Broken Sandwich maker
post 1614952751 08-28-2020, 09:16 PM
-
#40
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Posts: 21,333
  6. Rep Power: 96920
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Oh yeah sure, because that's the ONLY scenario that ever plays, right? The only retard here is the one that is so desensitized on people dying by cop for no reason, because they forget they have tasers or other modes of restraint. But ok. Since the police can't see your hands at all times you should be shot and killed. LOL
WTF Do you mean “No reason” you’re brainwashed they already tried using those means and they were ineffective

EDIT: I’d like to see you walk up to someone with a knife and try to restrain them GTFO out of here
No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.

-Socrates
post 1614952761 08-28-2020, 09:16 PM
-
#41
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,644
  6. Rep Power: 33541
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Oh yeah sure, because that's the ONLY scenario that ever plays, right? The only retard here is the one that is so desensitized on people dying by cop for no reason, because they forget they have tasers or other modes of restraint. But ok. Since the police can't see your hands at all times you should be shot and killed. LOL
Jacob Blake was tased. Twice.
Jesus, kang of kangs, accept me into your heart and kangdom.
Amxn.
post 1614952791 08-28-2020, 09:16 PM
-
#42
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  3. Join Date: Jan 2020
  4. Posts: 28,124
  5. Rep Power: 262372
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
LOL imagine being rustled because I said police shouldn't play judge, jury and executioner including for clansman. But sure love, whatever makes you feel better <3
Imagine believing it's physically possible to rustle someone like me.

My point was you're a prime example of why women shouldn't have the right to speak about important matters, you naturally react out of emotion and are devoid of logical thought process.
*Tolerance is the lube that slides the dildo of dysfunction into the ass of civilized society*

*We didn't deserve snailsrus*

As always: not medical advice but medical opinion crew
post 1614952801 08-28-2020, 09:16 PM
-
#43
  1. homersexual
  2. Registered User
  1. homersexual
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Posts: 5,848
  5. Rep Power: 43792
Opie sounds like one of those ******* armchair quarterbacks who would say that the cops should just ask perps nicely to comply or, worse case scenario, simply shoot the weapon out of their hands.
-SF Gigantes y SF 49ers-
post 1614952941 08-28-2020, 09:18 PM
-
#44
  1. homersexual
  2. Registered User
  1. homersexual
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Posts: 5,848
  5. Rep Power: 43792
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Oh yeah sure, because that's the ONLY scenario that ever plays, right? The only retard here is the one that is so desensitized on people dying by cop for no reason, because they forget they have tasers or other modes of restraint. But ok. Since the police can't see your hands at all times you should be shot and killed. LOL
You're stupid and I can't believe we allow people like you to vote. Before you open your mouth maybe get acquainted with the details first. The scumbag WAS tasered.
-SF Gigantes y SF 49ers-
post 1614953031 08-28-2020, 09:19 PM
-
#45
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 12,213
  6. Rep Power: 130180
Originally Posted By JoshLV
Let me slow down. And give you a working example:

Cops attempt to detain a man

Man resists arrest and either has a weapon or goes for a weapon.

Now my question to you:

At what point does cop discontinue the thought of “fair trial” and begin the thought of “I need to shoot this man before he gets to his weapon”?

I’m trying to clarify YOUR point as you mentioned klansmen in your post insinuating racism with respect to op. But as you know,

killing a black man is not racist but it is themotivethat creates that act which is racist.

In other words, cops killing a black man is not racist but it would be racist if they killed him solely because he is black.
Other countries do good in restraining armed suspects, but we always shoot first ask questions later (if even possible) and when I made my statement I was referring to another miscers reply. IDC what color a criminal is, everyone knows most officers, and people in general aren't racist. What I'm referring to is that there should be other steps to be taken to capture people alive. IN GENERAL. Idk about this Blake dude, or any new other ones that OP might be referring to, in general, killing a criminal should be last resort, if that is the last step that officer could take, then thats it. But we know is not the case. Otherwise why the hell do we have a due process? Why do we have a judge and a jury if they're not gonna receive a trail and sit in front of a jury? That's my point.
***Anime Crew***
***Horror Crew***
***Hentai for the plot crew***
***Poverty Sketching Crew***
Broken Sandwich maker
post 1614953271 08-28-2020, 09:22 PM
-
#46
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Posts: 21,333
  6. Rep Power: 96920
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Other countries do good in restraining armed suspects, but we always shoot first ask questions later (if even possible) and when I made my statement I was referring to another miscers reply. IDC what color a criminal is, everyone knows most officers, and people in general aren't racist. What I'm referring to is that there should be other steps to be taken to capture people alive. IN GENERAL. Idk about this Blake dude, or any new other ones that OP might be referring to, in general, killing a criminal should be last resort, if that is the last step that officer could take, then thats it. But we know is not the case. Otherwise why the hell do we have a due process? Why do we have a judge and a jury if they're not gonna receive a trail and sit in front of a jury? That's my point.
He had a knife... and was attempting to get inside or grab something else out of a vehicle where children were present...

Said vehicle also capable of being used as a deadly weapon...
No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.

-Socrates
post 1614953301 08-28-2020, 09:22 PM
-
#47
  1. MustardTiger17
  1. MustardTiger17
  2. Join Date: Dec 2012
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 38,603
  5. Subscribers: 7
  6. Rep Power: 238919
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Oh yeah sure, because that's the ONLY scenario that ever plays, right? The only retard here is the one that is so desensitized on people dying by cop for no reason, because they forget they have tasers or other modes of restraint. But ok. Since the police can't see your hands at all times you should be shot and killed. LOL
They used their tasers. Do you even watch these videos and read up on it or do you just get emotional and spout nonsense?
Not in the AM
post 1614953451 08-28-2020, 09:24 PM
-
#48
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  1. blissful88
  2. Somebody's Fox
  3. Join Date: Jan 2020
  4. Posts: 28,124
  5. Rep Power: 262372
Originally Posted By blissful88
My point was you're a prime example of why women shouldn't have the right to speak about important matters, you naturally react out of emotion and are devoid of logical thought process.
Originally Posted By homersexual
You're stupid and I can't believe we allow people like you to vote. Before you open your mouth maybe get acquainted with the details first
Originally Posted By MustardTiger17
They used their tasers. Do you even watch these videos and read up on it or do you just get emotional and spout nonsense?
Ding ding ding, aware
*Tolerance is the lube that slides the dildo of dysfunction into the ass of civilized society*

*We didn't deserve snailsrus*

As always: not medical advice but medical opinion crew
post 1614953781 08-28-2020, 09:27 PM
-
#49
  1. Soonerjohn
  2. Registered User
  1. Soonerjohn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 8,725
  5. Rep Power: 27852
Hostile suspect that had wrestled with the police and been tasered.

When he reached in the vehicle it became a training scenario in which the police reaction takes longer than the suspects actions if they wait for a weapon to be shown. Thus, they use lethal.

In the actual scenario the training worked because there was a knife.
post 1614953941 08-28-2020, 09:30 PM
-
#50
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,982
  6. Rep Power: 14106
As a midget you are definitely the last person to be offering advice about handling criminals. You'd struggle trying to detain an inflated blow-up doll.
Blue eyed aphrodisiac
post 1614953961 08-28-2020, 09:30 PM
-
#51
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 12,213
  6. Rep Power: 130180
Originally Posted By CherryPopinski
He had a knife... and was attempting to get inside or grab something else out of a vehicle where children were present...

Said vehicle also capable of being used as a deadly weapon...
Like I said, if that was the last resort the officer could take then that's it. I'm not arguing that deadly force should be used if NECESSARY, which if that was the case with this guy, then that's it. I'm not referring to any specific person or mainstream story. I'm saying in general it should be last resort. But some of the other miscers don't care about that due process or to give them a fair trial. That's my point, idk how much simpler I can put it.
***Anime Crew***
***Horror Crew***
***Hentai for the plot crew***
***Poverty Sketching Crew***
Broken Sandwich maker
post 1614954031 08-28-2020, 09:32 PM
-
#52
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  1. SoutheastBeast1
  2. Join Date: Mar 2013
  3. Age: 39
  4. Posts: 63,758
  5. Subscribers: 6
  6. Rep Power: 258893
Have you loaned your wife out to a black bull yet this week op?
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
post 1614954061 08-28-2020, 09:32 PM
-
#53
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 5,670
  5. Rep Power: 33213
Originally Posted By CherryPopinski
He had a knife... and was attempting to get inside or grab something else out of a vehicle where children were present...

Said vehicle also capable of being used as a deadly weapon...
yes he had a knife....and the cops had guns and by your own admission stay at a safe distance. seems like the perp was the one in danger (and clearly he was). the other things you mention are what if nonsense and dont justify murder. what if a million other things? we just killing people now because what if? is that all it takes? think im gonna stop jogging because what if i get hit by a car? i refuse to believe the only two possible scenarios when dealing with cops are comply or die.
O|||||||O

white supremacist
post 1614954321 08-28-2020, 09:35 PM
-
#54
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,982
  6. Rep Power: 14106
Originally Posted By atomicbbgum
Like I said, if that was the last resort the officer could take then that's it. I'm not arguing that deadly force should be used if NECESSARY, which if that was the case with this guy, then that's it. I'm not referring to any specific person or mainstream story. I'm saying in general it should be last resort. But some of the other miscers don't care about that due process or to give them a fair trial. That's my point, idk how much simpler I can put it.
3 children in the backseat, scum deserved it as soon as he opened the driver side door
Blue eyed aphrodisiac
post 1614954491 08-28-2020, 09:37 PM
-
#55
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  1. atomicbbgum
  2. omae wa mou shindeiru
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 12,213
  6. Rep Power: 130180
Originally Posted By stfudonny
yes he had a knife....and the cops had guns and by your own admission stay at a safe distance. seems like the perp was the one in danger (and clearly he was). the other things you mention are what if nonsense and dont justify murder. what if a million other things? we just killing people now because what if? is that all it takes? think im gonna stop jogging because what if i get hit by a car? i refuse to believe the only two possible scenarios when dealing with cops are comply or die.
Exactly.
***Anime Crew***
***Horror Crew***
***Hentai for the plot crew***
***Poverty Sketching Crew***
Broken Sandwich maker
post 1614954671 08-28-2020, 09:39 PM
-
#56
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Posts: 21,333
  6. Rep Power: 96920
Originally Posted By stfudonny
yes he had a knife....and the cops had guns and by your own admission stay at a safe distance. seems like the perp was the one in danger (and clearly he was). the other things you mention are what if nonsense and dont justify murder. what if a million other things? we just killing people now because what if? is that all it takes? think im gonna stop jogging because what if i get hit by a car? i refuse to believe the only two possible scenarios when dealing with cops are comply or die.
The mental gymnastics in this post I can’t even lol

The use of force in this specific case is text book yet you still try and refute it. There’s no getting through to you people.
No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.

-Socrates
post 1614954851 08-28-2020, 09:42 PM
-
#57
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  1. JoshLV
  2. Emperor of Antarctica
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,644
  6. Rep Power: 33541
Originally Posted By stfudonny
yes he had a knife....and the cops had guns and by your own admission stay at a safe distance. seems like the perp was the one in danger (and clearly he was). the other things you mention are what if nonsense and dont justify murder. what if a million other things? we just killing people now because what if? is that all it takes? think im gonna stop jogging because what if i get hit by a car? i refuse to believe the only two possible scenarios when dealing with cops are comply or die.
What is it that is so hard to understand about if a cop tells you to sit the **** down and put your hands behind your back, you just do it? Is it not painfully obvious that if you flee from cops, who are tasing you, to reach into your drivers seat, THAT IT WILL APPEAR AS A HOSTILE ACTION AND IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT YOU ARE GOING TO BE SHOT?

What do you think would have happened if the cops said "sit the **** down and put your hands behind your back" and the suspect complied?
Idiot's answer: They would have shot him because they shoot first and ask questions later
Non-idiot's answer: They would have arrested him and taken him to jail and.....drum roll.....DUE PROCESS

Ho

Lee

Fuk
Jesus, kang of kangs, accept me into your heart and kangdom.
Amxn.
post 1614954871 08-28-2020, 09:42 PM
-
#58
  1. Soonerjohn
  2. Registered User
  1. Soonerjohn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 8,725
  5. Rep Power: 27852
Originally Posted By stfudonny
yes he had a knife....and the cops had guns and by your own admission stay at a safe distance. seems like the perp was the one in danger (and clearly he was). the other things you mention are what if nonsense and dont justify murder. what if a million other things? we just killing people now because what if? is that all it takes? think im gonna stop jogging because what if i get hit by a car? i refuse to believe the only two possible scenarios when dealing with cops are comply or die.
Couple of things:

1. The suspect was hostile and had already fought with the police.
2. The suspect was not shot until he was attempting to enter/reach into the vehicle.
3. Kids were in the vehicle.

The police showed ample restraint in using lethal force. They gave him every chance to comply.
post 1614954941 08-28-2020, 09:43 PM
-
#59
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  1. CherryPopinski
  2. Registered Gym Rat
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Posts: 21,333
  6. Rep Power: 96920
Originally Posted By Soonerjohn
Couple of things:

1. The suspect was hostile and had already fought with the police.
2. The suspect was not shot until he was attempting to enter/reach into the vehicle.
3. Kids were in the vehicle.

The police showed ample restraint in using lethal force. They gave him every chance to comply.
They’re too stupid to understand this though
No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.

-Socrates
post 1614955291 08-28-2020, 09:49 PM
-
#60
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 5,670
  5. Rep Power: 33213
Originally Posted By CherryPopinski
The mental gymnastics in this post I can’t even lol

The use of force in this specific case is text book yet you still try and refute it. There’s no getting through to you people.
speaking of mental gymnastics, "cant blame me that law has my back". that is why people are calling for reform. they want the LAWS that protect cops in these situations to change. unaccountable murder shouldnt be text book.
O|||||||O

white supremacist
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts