Thread: Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?
12-06-2020, 04:46 PM
-
#31
12-06-2020, 04:46 PM
-
#32
- Jestbrah
- Registered User
-
- Jestbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Age: 37
- Posts: 28,748
- Rep Power: 170226
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
they used a contiuum transfunctionerAnyone know how the sensors for the guidance systems were calibrated?
**worthless college major crew**
*Always picks 4 Crew*
**HTC**
12-06-2020, 04:49 PM
-
#33
12-06-2020, 04:52 PM
-
#34
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By Jestbrah⏩
Huge if truethey used a contiuum transfunctioner
The Continuum Transfunctioner is all that stands between the universe and completely violent destruction. Where the Continuum Transfunctioner was constructed, and how it got to Godville are part of the mysteriousness of this item. It is rumored to attract alien life forms who seek to control its random powers.
As
12-06-2020, 04:54 PM
-
#35
12-06-2020, 04:55 PM
-
#36
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
-
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 9,748
- Rep Power: 54369
-
-
There was an analysis done on the shadows, and it would not be possible to recreate those in a setting or edit the footage to make it seem real. The shadows are indicative of a small light source from an extremely far distance away, which would not be repeatable. We def went to the moon, and we haven't been back because it's not practical to do so, nor would anyone else. It would be extremely expensive to run tests that have already been run, and no value would come of it. The only real next option you have is to go to Mars and see what you can do there. But at some point there's only so much you can do with our current rocket propulsion technology and fuel consumption. Until we solve that conundrum, we'll just put satellites into orbit and send people to the ISS to flop our dicks around.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*
"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
12-06-2020, 04:58 PM
-
#37
- pandaboy89
- Registered User
-
- pandaboy89
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,718
- Rep Power: 3402
-
-
As real as rich pianos tits since Hollywood bankrupted the soviets
12-06-2020, 05:01 PM
-
#38
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used, but newly restored copies of the original broadcast look even better, NASA officials said on Thursday.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile....56F5MK20090720Why would they record over the original footage? What could have been better than man walking on the moon for the first time?
As
12-06-2020, 05:18 PM
-
#39
Originally Posted By Jestbrah⏩
It isn't plausible because he demonstrated complete ignorance of the subject he is trying to argue against.that doesnt really argue against anything he is saying.
Saying what someone doesnt know doesnt dispute the very plausible arguments he presented there in the least.
Saying what someone doesnt know doesnt dispute the very plausible arguments he presented there in the least.
12-06-2020, 05:22 PM
-
#40
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
I don't think you have the slightest clue of how that got there. If you did the research you would know, it's a well documented subject with real science behind it.I just don't see how people are so confident this thing flew 238k miles into space and landed on extra-terrestial land and lifted back up to return to earth on first try
There's no proof we even went
There's no proof we even went
12-06-2020, 05:28 PM
-
#41
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
-
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,834
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By JayJ350⏩
Watch the Stanley Kubrick video where he says he shot all of the moon landings in Hollywood and London.Anyone who thinks it's fake is a low IQ conspiracy theorist. It's just some lie brought on by commies because they are forever mad at how the USSR didn't do it.
I have no idea why a guy like that would lie about such a thing.
So take that for what it's worth.
12-06-2020, 05:35 PM
-
#42
- AWillis
- Social Media Influencer
-
- AWillis
- Social Media Influencer
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: Trump Towers
- Height: 6'0"
- Weight: 175 lbs
- Posts: 40,348
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 196950
-
-
Originally Posted By CallMeBrofessor⏩
did that autist forget the film was running? and drop it? zero gravity wut?a bit like the ballot counters pulling out those 5 suitcases to commit polling fraud in Georgia. lol and not knowing the video is running the whole time
autists gonna autist
Cobra Kai Crew
srs
12-06-2020, 05:38 PM
-
#43
Originally Posted By JayJ350⏩
We may have but there is no proof. Just people saying chit.I don't think you have the slightest clue of how that got there. If you did the research you would know, it's a well documented subject with real science behind it.
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
12-06-2020, 05:38 PM
-
#44
- InfoSuperHwy
- Banned
-
- InfoSuperHwy
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 566
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
If they're claiming they went to the moon, then they have the burden of proof because they are making a positive assertion.
I'm just saying, looking at all the evidence, I am not convinced that they went. There was also a massive incentive to FAKE it in a hurry to win the space race, and knowing the US governments lies lies and more lies in the past.... why trust them.
I'm just saying, looking at all the evidence, I am not convinced that they went. There was also a massive incentive to FAKE it in a hurry to win the space race, and knowing the US governments lies lies and more lies in the past.... why trust them.
12-06-2020, 05:38 PM
-
#45
- Wh1teDyn0mite
- Registered User
-
- Wh1teDyn0mite
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: Croydon, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 18,736
- Rep Power: 62758
-
-
Originally Posted By JStrez⏩
How much they paying you to say this fella?There was an analysis done on the shadows, and it would not be possible to recreate those in a setting or edit the footage to make it seem real. The shadows are indicative of a small light source from an extremely far distance away, which would not be repeatable. We def went to the moon, and we haven't been back because it's not practical to do so, nor would anyone else. It would be extremely expensive to run tests that have already been run, and no value would come of it. The only real next option you have is to go to Mars and see what you can do there. But at some point there's only so much you can do with our current rocket propulsion technology and fuel consumption. Until we solve that conundrum, we'll just put satellites into orbit and send people to the ISS to flop our dicks around.
1/4 Jamaican
1/4 Polish
1/4 Irish
1/4 Welsh
12-06-2020, 05:40 PM
-
#46
12-06-2020, 06:15 PM
-
#47
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
The strange thing is when we went to the moon the moon was apparently outside of our atmosphere, but scientists today say the moon is in our atmosphere.
I'm not a rocket scientist but I feel this change in understanding would effect the science of rockets.
I'm not a rocket scientist but I feel this change in understanding would effect the science of rockets.
As
12-06-2020, 06:19 PM
-
#48
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
We are more linked to the Moon than we've realized. It turns out that the outer part of the Earth's atmosphere stretches considerably past the lunar orbit. In fact, it goes as far as twice the distance to the Moon.Feb 24, 2019
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bigthin...udy-2629879660
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bigthin...udy-2629879660
As
12-06-2020, 06:20 PM
-
#49
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Perhaps it was real. Perhaps we did put men on the moon. (But for some reason have made nothing but excuses as to why we haven't again, even with a million times the computing power)
One thing I can tell you with almost absolute certainty -- the footage was faked.
There is just so much evidence against it that NASA completely disregards and tries to laugh off, even though they can't dispute any of it. So much of it, it's overwhelming. It's like 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Las Vegas shooting.
I think most conspiracies are ridiculous and the average person is pretty gullible and/or really wants to believe in conspiracies, but this is one that I've looked into for years from a young man to an adult, as my mind and world view expanded, and I've never found more evidence to suggest it was real vs. the outstanding mountain of evidence against it.
One thing I can tell you with almost absolute certainty -- the footage was faked.
There is just so much evidence against it that NASA completely disregards and tries to laugh off, even though they can't dispute any of it. So much of it, it's overwhelming. It's like 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Las Vegas shooting.
I think most conspiracies are ridiculous and the average person is pretty gullible and/or really wants to believe in conspiracies, but this is one that I've looked into for years from a young man to an adult, as my mind and world view expanded, and I've never found more evidence to suggest it was real vs. the outstanding mountain of evidence against it.
U aware?
12-06-2020, 06:21 PM
-
#50
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Remember in 1969 scientists claimed
A low fat diet was healthy, however modern science now says that was false.
A low fat diet was healthy, however modern science now says that was false.
As
12-06-2020, 06:22 PM
-
#51
- DrewDarden
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Posts: 23,016
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 508098
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Well thank God for that. Future generations can rest easy knowing that your “feelings” on the matter are documented here on the Misc.The strange thing is when we went to the moon the moon was apparently outside of our atmosphere, but scientists today say the moon is in our atmosphere.
I'm not a rocket scientist but I feel this change in understanding would effect the science of rockets.
I'm not a rocket scientist but I feel this change in understanding would effect the science of rockets.
By the way, anytime you agree with EOD, you should really think hard about the position you’re taking. Serious.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)
12-06-2020, 06:22 PM
-
#52
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By OptimistPrime11⏩
I believe the footage was faked, I'm in alliance with you -- but the videos your referring to are totally fake and are not of Stanley Kubrick.Watch the Stanley Kubrick video where he says he shot all of the moon landings in Hollywood and London.
I have no idea why a guy like that would lie about such a thing.
So take that for what it's worth.
I have no idea why a guy like that would lie about such a thing.
So take that for what it's worth.
U aware?
12-06-2020, 06:29 PM
-
#53
- STLbuilder
- Registered User
-
- STLbuilder
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Age: 45
- Posts: 2,731
- Rep Power: 17297
-
-
i think it was real
STL Cardinals
STL Blues
12-06-2020, 06:51 PM
-
#54
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By S0Jack3d⏩
Because we can spy on the entire world through their cell phones.Why have we not set up a giant spy telescope on the moon to spy on the entire world?
As
12-06-2020, 07:14 PM
-
#55
12-06-2020, 07:16 PM
-
#56
12-06-2020, 07:18 PM
-
#57
Originally Posted By Sophus⏩
This. I'd love to see some evidence though. I can't even find any moon conspiracy stuff on Reddit anymore 99% of the responses are pro moon landing.It was fake
/thread
/thread
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
12-06-2020, 07:20 PM
-
#58
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Try to find out how the guidance systems sensors were calibrated.This. I'd love to see some evidence though. I can't even find any moon conspiracy stuff on Reddit anymore 99% of the responses are pro moon landing.
Space travel is more difficult than you may think.
As
12-06-2020, 07:25 PM
-
#59
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
I'd love to see a copy of the schematic for this guidance system, but its probably still labeled as top secret for obvious reasons.Try to find out how the guidance systems sensors were calibrated.
Space travel is more difficult than you may think.
Space travel is more difficult than you may think.
As
12-06-2020, 07:30 PM
-
#60
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
If you have a powerful telescope, you can zoom all the way in and look at the garbage left on the landing site.
Are those holograms or...?
Are those holograms or...?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
