Forum
»
Nobel prize winner warns against mass vaccination
08-21-2021, 04:49 PM
-
#31
- 1hardgainer
- Registered User
-
- 1hardgainer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2004
- Posts: 18,084
- Rep Power: 144300
-
-
Thanks for posting, I haven't seen that article before. Makes sense why we're seeing such a hyooge spike in covid infection, especially the delta variant, shortly after a large amount of people have been getting vaccinated.
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh1VU-_OF98
08-21-2021, 05:15 PM
-
#32
- ventriloquizing
- Registered User
-
- ventriloquizing
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 462
- Rep Power: 693
-
-
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
I guess I need to say this again.
1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
Nothing controversial here.
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same orhigher levelsthan if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
No evidence to support this claim.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected,your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high- remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
Compared to what?
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
No evidence to support this claim.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
The same can be said for people who have already been infected naturally...
@RWMaloneMD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
I guess I need to say this again.
1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
Nothing controversial here.
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same orhigher levelsthan if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
No evidence to support this claim.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected,your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high- remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
Compared to what?
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
No evidence to support this claim.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
The same can be said for people who have already been infected naturally...
08-21-2021, 05:16 PM
-
#33
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
-
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 24,811
- Rep Power: 163138
-
-
Originally Posted By ItsWhatIDo⏩
Dude. Polio was eradicated because it is not zoonotic. It doesn't matter if covid-19 was a lab leak, it's still zoonotic.He said vaccinations cause variants. Nothing about type of virus. I thought covid was a Chinese lab leak not zoonotic? Are you saying polio isn’t an RNA virus that mutates? Only coronavirus can?
Delta variant was way before the vaccination levels you quoted.
Sigh. Look at my earlier quote…. He didn’t say it.
Sad
Delta variant was way before the vaccination levels you quoted.
Sigh. Look at my earlier quote…. He didn’t say it.
Sad
Forever alone? Attraction and keeping the girl chasing you - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=131498033
You will never know your limits, unless you push yourself past the imaginary lines you have drawn in the sand.
Knee Dragger - '06 GSX-R750
08-21-2021, 05:50 PM
-
#34
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout⏩
1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same or higher levels than if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high - remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
He's misleading or wrong on several of his points.1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same or higher levels than if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high - remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
1) It's possible, but we don't know that
2) No one said they were. 50% reduction in infection is great (it's actually closer to 40%). Can't transmit if you're not infected (outside of just being a mechanical vector).
3) A study found similar loads of viral RNA in nasal secretion specimens. Another, larger study, did not find this result. The verdict is still out. On top of that I've seen no study which suggests the rates of replication are higher in vaccinated hosts; he pulled that entirely out of his ass. More importantly those results are exclusively from the upper respiratory tract. To say that sarscov2 replicates equally in both groups is misleading. It is highly unlikely that the vaccine is protecting against severe disease to the degree that it is, while not controlling replication in the LRT. We saw in animal studies this exact effect -- no significant difference in replicating virus in nasal specimens but significantly lower levels in the lungs, which is why it protected against severe disease outcomes.
4) And if you aren't vaccinated, your risk of initial infection is higher.
5) Factually wrong because when adjusted for age, even when a breakthrough infection occurs you are less likely to die if vaccinated. And again, the odds of that initial infection are already lower for those who are vaccinated.
6) This is his one good point. But even then, transmission rates are lower in highly vaccinated populations, so if this is occurring, it doesn't seem to outweigh the reductions in transmission from vaccination.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 05:58 PM
-
#35
- entropy91
- Registered User
-
- entropy91
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,309
- Rep Power: 21093
-
-
Originally Posted By ventriloquizing⏩
Wow you managed to contribute absolutely nothing of value to the conversation.Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
I guess I need to say this again.
1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
Nothing controversial here.
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same orhigher levelsthan if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
No evidence to support this claim.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected,your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high- remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
Compared to what?
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
No evidence to support this claim.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
The same can be said for people who have already been infected naturally...
@RWMaloneMD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
I guess I need to say this again.
1) Delta has an Ro of about 8, about 3x that of the Alpha (ref- CDC). With these leaky vaccines, if we were to have 100% vaccine uptake and perfect mask use we cannot stop the spread of Delta (ref- CDC).
Nothing controversial here.
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
3) If you are vaccinated and become infected ("breakthrough"), the virus will replicate at the same orhigher levelsthan if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
No evidence to support this claim.
4) If you are vaccinated and then become infected,your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high- remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
Compared to what?
5) If you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
No evidence to support this claim.
6) Therefore, if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you are less likely to show disease. This has not been measured, but it should be.
The same can be said for people who have already been infected naturally...
Congrats.
08-21-2021, 06:00 PM
-
#36
- entropy91
- Registered User
-
- entropy91
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,309
- Rep Power: 21093
-
-
Originally Posted By Reliance012⏩
Repped for good postHe's misleading or wrong on several of his points.
1) It's possible, but we don't know that
2) No one said they were. 50% reduction in infection is great (it's actually closer to 40%). Can't transmit if you're not infected (outside of just being a mechanical vector).
3) A study found similar loads of viral RNA in nasal secretion specimens. Another, larger study, did not find this result. The verdict is still out. On top of that I've seen no study which suggests the rates of replication are higher in vaccinated hosts; he pulled that entirely out of his ass. More importantly those results are exclusively from the upper respiratory tract. To say that sarscov2 replicates equally in both groups is misleading. It is highly unlikely that the vaccine is protecting against severe disease to the degree that it is, while not controlling replication in the LRT. We saw in animal studies this exact effect -- no significant difference in replicating virus in nasal specimens but significantly lower levels in the lungs, which is why it protected against severe disease outcomes.
4) And if you aren't vaccinated, your risk of initial infection is higher.
5) Factually wrong because when adjusted for age, even when a breakthrough infection occurs you are less likely to die if vaccinated. And again, the odds of that initial infection are already lower for those who are vaccinated.
6) This is his one good point. But even then, transmission rates are lower in highly vaccinated populations, so if this is occurring, it doesn't seem to outweigh the reductions in transmission from vaccination.
1) It's possible, but we don't know that
2) No one said they were. 50% reduction in infection is great (it's actually closer to 40%). Can't transmit if you're not infected (outside of just being a mechanical vector).
3) A study found similar loads of viral RNA in nasal secretion specimens. Another, larger study, did not find this result. The verdict is still out. On top of that I've seen no study which suggests the rates of replication are higher in vaccinated hosts; he pulled that entirely out of his ass. More importantly those results are exclusively from the upper respiratory tract. To say that sarscov2 replicates equally in both groups is misleading. It is highly unlikely that the vaccine is protecting against severe disease to the degree that it is, while not controlling replication in the LRT. We saw in animal studies this exact effect -- no significant difference in replicating virus in nasal specimens but significantly lower levels in the lungs, which is why it protected against severe disease outcomes.
4) And if you aren't vaccinated, your risk of initial infection is higher.
5) Factually wrong because when adjusted for age, even when a breakthrough infection occurs you are less likely to die if vaccinated. And again, the odds of that initial infection are already lower for those who are vaccinated.
6) This is his one good point. But even then, transmission rates are lower in highly vaccinated populations, so if this is occurring, it doesn't seem to outweigh the reductions in transmission from vaccination.
08-21-2021, 07:45 PM
-
#37
- Achilles87
- Registered User
-
- Achilles87
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 25,971
- Rep Power: 34030
-
-
Originally Posted By Reliance012⏩
Wat5) Factually wrong because when adjusted for age, even when a breakthrough infection occurs you are less likely to die if vaccinated. And again, the odds of that initial infection are already lower for those who are vaccinated.
That's literally what he said.
Vaccinated people get less sick/don't die as often therefore they can become super spreaders.
A young bull and an old bull were standing atop a hill looking at a bunch of heifers in a field below.
The young bull says "Let's run down this hill and fuk one of those heifers."
The old bull replies "No. Let's walk down there, and fuk them all."
08-21-2021, 08:06 PM
-
#38
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Achilles87⏩
I think by better he means greater.Wat
That's literally what he said.
Vaccinated people get less sick/don't die as often therefore they can become super spreaders.
That's literally what he said.
Vaccinated people get less sick/don't die as often therefore they can become super spreaders.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 08:32 PM
-
#39
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
This chit is fuken nuts.
Some system is corrupt. Not sure which system or its origination..
But def. A fuked up system out there
Some system is corrupt. Not sure which system or its origination..
But def. A fuked up system out there
08-21-2021, 08:36 PM
-
#40
- Achilles87
- Registered User
-
- Achilles87
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 25,971
- Rep Power: 34030
-
-
Originally Posted By Reliance012⏩
No he doesnt.I think by better he means greater.
If he did then point 6 makes zero sense.
"if you are vaccinated and then become infected, you MAY have a higher risk of becoming a "superspreader" because you areless likely to show disease."
A young bull and an old bull were standing atop a hill looking at a bunch of heifers in a field below.
The young bull says "Let's run down this hill and fuk one of those heifers."
The old bull replies "No. Let's walk down there, and fuk them all."
08-21-2021, 08:36 PM
-
#41
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Oh, you must’ve conveniently missed my post just before that. Feel dumb? Good.There is no such thing as a "breakthrough infection".
It's called "vaccine failure".
Edit :
It's called "vaccine failure".
Edit :
My post:
“Against infection, symptomatic disease, severe disease or death? Generally speaking, when the term effectiveness is used without clarification, it is referring to symptomatic disease.”
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 08:45 PM
-
#42
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You’re quoted so everyone can see. You tried to pull another “gotcha” and again, look like an idiot. Next time think.I quoted directly, didn't change anything in the posts. And that is your first post ITT.
You're arguing in bad faith as usual, par for the course.
You're arguing in bad faith as usual, par for the course.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 08:57 PM
-
#43
08-21-2021, 09:30 PM
-
#44
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Anach… my dude. Stop digging the grave. Honestly feel bad for you sometimes srs.Funny how he disappeared after this.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 09:31 PM
-
#45
So are we up to 3 kinda big experts now who are [or have been] speaking out publicly against the vaccine?
French Virologist Luc Montagnier:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc_Montagnier
Belgian Virologist Vanden Bossche DVM, PHD, & Peter McCullough, MD, MPH:
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/
Robert Malone MD, inventor of mRNA vaccines:
https://scholar.google.com/citations...ApYAAAAJ&hl=en
From OP's initial link:
ETA: That second bold bit is controversial. Montagnier may not be the only one with this hypothesis, but that's all it is, not something that has been confirmed.
French Virologist Luc Montagnier:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc_Montagnier
Belgian Virologist Vanden Bossche DVM, PHD, & Peter McCullough, MD, MPH:
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/
Robert Malone MD, inventor of mRNA vaccines:
https://scholar.google.com/citations...ApYAAAAJ&hl=en
From OP's initial link:
In America, routinely recommended vaccines do not cause ADE. If they did, they would be removed from circulation.Phase III clinical trials of new vaccines are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before the vaccine is approved for use. Typically, it takes 2-4 years to assess whether a vaccine is safe,but with COVID-19 vaccines, manufacturers are spending around six months or less for testing.
According to the Cambridge University, ADE occurs in SARS-CoV-1, MERS, HIV, Zika, and Dengue virus infection and vaccination.
Data from around the world confirms ADE occurs in SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, says Montagnier. “You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths. I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated.”
It will be interesting to see what he publishes re:these experiments.According to the Cambridge University, ADE occurs in SARS-CoV-1, MERS, HIV, Zika, and Dengue virus infection and vaccination.
Data from around the world confirms ADE occurs in SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, says Montagnier. “You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths. I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated.”
ETA: That second bold bit is controversial. Montagnier may not be the only one with this hypothesis, but that's all it is, not something that has been confirmed.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
08-21-2021, 10:05 PM
-
#46
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
This is why you’re not taken seriously. Instead of saying “hey Reliance, you’re right, those quotes I pulled from the other thread of you don’t contradict the one in here. I didn’t read them properly. Sorry” you try this half assed attempt to save face.So you're saying there is a post ITT before the post I quoted?
Quote the post.
Quote the post.
The quotes you pulled of mine regarding effectiveness weren’t from this thread. In your attempted ‘gotcha’ you went and found them herehttps://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...0509173&page=4…the same place you conveniently missed my other comment.
See ya tomorrow.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 10:32 PM
-
#47
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I’m sorry. But I had to quote this before you delete it. Absolute gold of a comment and I couldn’t pass. Just lol.You literally just admitted that you think vaccinated people are more likely to spread the virus, without realizing that you have done so.
40% reduction in infections, but an 85% reduction in symptomatic disease - heck of a lot of infected vaccinated people walking around spreading this chit without realizing it.
Feel dumb?
Good.
40% reduction in infections, but an 85% reduction in symptomatic disease - heck of a lot of infected vaccinated people walking around spreading this chit without realizing it.
Feel dumb?
Good.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 10:37 PM
-
#48
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I can’t help it. I have to quote it again 😂You literally just admitted that you think vaccinated people are more likely to spread the virus, without realizing that you have done so.
40% reduction in infections, but an 85% reduction in symptomatic disease - heck of a lot of infected vaccinated people walking around spreading this chit without realizing it.
Feel dumb?
Good.
40% reduction in infections, but an 85% reduction in symptomatic disease - heck of a lot of infected vaccinated people walking around spreading this chit without realizing it.
Feel dumb?
Good.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 10:42 PM
-
#49
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Uh buddy, it’s not the numbers. It’s your math.This is where the numbers came from:
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 10:50 PM
-
#50
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Next time you get cute I’ll just direct people to this thread. Wouldn’t want them to miss out on the statistical genius that is Anachron.Ah, so you're grasping at straws that I gave you to grasp on.
Ok fuk I feel kinda bad.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
08-21-2021, 11:22 PM
-
#51
- EagleOfWar
- Registered User
-
- EagleOfWar
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2011
- Posts: 15,643
- Rep Power: 107090
-
-
Originally Posted By dave.mc⏩
No I haven’t seen that. If that’s the case that’s as looney as denying a transgender male should be in the ufc fighting women and not having to let them know they were trans first.Have you seen the posts in the R&P section regarding vaccines, those guys are desperate for mass deaths from the vaccines, it's genuinely disturbing reading some of that ****.
I was hesitant at first as well but ended up getting the Pfizer jab, got Covid a month later and was fine. I have no problem with people that are hesitant and cautious about the vaccine, my comment was aimed at the people on here that "want" the vaccine to be harmful.
I was hesitant at first as well but ended up getting the Pfizer jab, got Covid a month later and was fine. I have no problem with people that are hesitant and cautious about the vaccine, my comment was aimed at the people on here that "want" the vaccine to be harmful.
I see the ugly side of both. Right now there’s a mass push from vaxcels to join almost cult like behavior. Let’s be real, it’s creepy.
To anyone who thinks for themselves there’s something being pushed on you that you aren’t convinced is safe. That doesn’t mean you hate gay people. We need srs discussion without feelings and let’s see raw data and who supplies that data and so on.
I just want the truth. If that leads to taking a vaccine then so be it. I’ve had Covid early on once already. This new variant put my cuz in the hospital and he’s about 3 yrs younger than me. I’m around people constantly and don’t wear a mask. Most of them don’t either.
This body holding me, be my reminder here that I am not alone.
Makes me feel eternal, all this Pain is an Illusion.
08-21-2021, 11:51 PM
-
#52
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
-
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Roseville, California, United States
- Posts: 20,549
- Rep Power: 149080
-
-
Originally Posted By dave.mc⏩
It's more about being aware of information that is OUTSIDE of what CNN and other media sites are forcing down your throat. Doing research on both sides of the coin is a good thing and showing skepticism is alot more intelligent than blindly trusting an entirely unapproved and untested vaccineWhy are the anti vax crowd so desperate for these jabs to be harmful? The Misc has always been a toxic place but you guys really have some issues that need to be looked at, get help before you shoot up a school or something!
I can't count the amount of fuks I have to explain that masks are absolutely useless, they argue that I'm wrong, I shove a bunch of studies down their throat and right there is the point they realize they have done absolutely ZERO research of their own, just regurgitation of MSM hyperbole.
The irony is most of em usually just stick their head in the sand afterwards which is awful to realize most people don't actually want to educate themselves
Thanks for your input, you frauding fat slampig-Sirfapsalot '20
Certified Jimmy Rustler
!!Misc Firearms Crew😌!!
Fuarked Crew
Tradie Crew
LOL @ Tradies Crew
Toxic Male Energy Crew
JayDawg is a ****git Crew
Sock with slip on Sandals Crew
08-21-2021, 11:54 PM
-
#53
- CaliSuperSport
- Mercenary. Non-negotiable
-
- CaliSuperSport
- Mercenary. Non-negotiable
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Sacramento, California, United States
- Posts: 47,223
- Rep Power: 275363
-
-
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy⏩
This just follows the axiom of leftist projection: whatever they accuse you of, they are the culprit. Hence the propaganda that "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated".14:20
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hiTLkIyJMOap/
"It is the vaccinated that are driving the development of escape mutants".
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hiTLkIyJMOap/
"It is the vaccinated that are driving the development of escape mutants".
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
08-21-2021, 11:56 PM
-
#54
- AncientYouth
- Registered User
-
- AncientYouth
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 62
- Posts: 22,213
- Rep Power: 65479
-
-
Now Uk gubmint will start to offer antibody tests..........signs the vax BS is coming undone?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58293249
about 12 months too fckn late
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58293249
about 12 months too fckn late
08-22-2021, 04:56 AM
-
#55
- ventriloquizing
- Registered User
-
- ventriloquizing
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 462
- Rep Power: 693
-
-
Originally Posted By entropy91⏩
Legitretard, don't quote my posts unless you have a refute.Wow you managed to contribute absolutely nothing of value to the conversation.
Congrats.
Congrats.
08-22-2021, 05:35 AM
-
#56
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By dave.mc⏩
LoldI was hesitant at first as well but ended up getting the Pfizer jab, got Covid a month later and was fine.
Got the jab and then got COVID
But you all should take the vaccine like I did!!! It’s fine!!
08-22-2021, 09:42 AM
-
#57
- entropy91
- Registered User
-
- entropy91
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,309
- Rep Power: 21093
-
-
Originally Posted By ventriloquizing⏩
I stopped reading here:Legitretard, don't quote my posts unless you have a refute.
2) The current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
Your post is enough to let everyone know you're not to be taken seriously.Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, not infection. Hmm strange that the inventor of modern medicine does not know this... *rolleyes*
Brutal.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts