why hide there identities and records??

is there ever a time this happens when people are shot? Theres been plenty of shootings and the victims are always pictured and broadcast

yes, someone sued mcdonalds for hot coffee, hence the hot warning, people are stupid and take advantage

Bingo

Sandy hook was one of the more blatant/ sloppy false flags

Nobody died in Newton that year according to FBI statistics

Trust the science

I don't know, but using crisis actors seems pretty risky. Most actors want to make it and have big profiles, so eventually it would be revealed.

spicy

I’m all for questioning things, but I when it comes to lawsuits, it’s hard to read into “why would they not allow xyz, what do they have to hide???”

When your involved in a lawsuit, you do a lot of things that don’t make sense to the outside observer, but you have to do to protect your case.

Both side fight eachother on the most basic things just to not give an inch to the opposition. It’s just kinda the way things are done

Not gonna be in a position to do any documentary watching for a bit, can someone throw some cliffs about why this one was so sloppy of a false flag etc

Mirin freedom Merica bros

Here's what you need to know:
-No surveillance photos of shooter or anything
-No crime scene photos indicating a shooting except one picture of a shattered window iirc
-No wounded survivors (unheard of in a mass shooting, that literally never happens)
-An autistic kid supposedly gunned down a classroom full of children (27 casualties) in approximately 5 mins... that's a difficult feat with reloading, accuracy, moving targets, etc
-Everyone announced dead at the scene, no hospitalizations at all iirc
-Ambulances blocked in at shooting scene by parents cars (Wtf)
-Poor acting skills of parents (Robbie Parker)
-Obviously photoshopped/doctored pics of children (And parents admitting they were shopped)
-Not allowed to question shooting or you will get sued and deplatformed (e.g. Alex Jones got cucked by this debacle)
-School was supposedly shutdown for months for renovations prior to shooting
- THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASED HOMES FOR "VICTIMS" FAMILIES ON A HOLIDAY THE YEAR BEFORE THE SHOOTING srs

This is all I can think of off the top. I'm sure there's a lot more

Btw, I posted about these discrepancies in a comment section on youtube using an alias name (i.e. "John Smith"). I received texts and calls on a daily basis for around 3-4 years after, often asking for this fake alias name I only used for that purpose srs. When I'd call back, it'd be line disconnected or some weirdo fuking with me, not trying to sell me anything ever. Weird chit. The daily calls only diminished after I posted about them on the misc around 2 months ago

Interesting, but heavy on "questions" and light on conclusions. I'm halfway through and I wonder if the "exif data" points are a result of time/date issues on the cameras, or time zone differences or some other technical thing. The cache time stamps are interesting, but how can one be sure that the photos of said time stamps aren't manipulated themselves by CTers? Unfortunately there's no way to check now as the crawlers have already gone through the sites and updated the caches stamps. The woman chronicling Rick Thorne was a complete waste of time when she mentions everything she's said is null and void because she was tracking down a Rick Thorne with a different number of kids. The Ryan Lanza segment was also a total waste of time, totally worthless. Gene Rosen is a weirdo, and probably senile and nothing of value in that segment. Regarding the testimony and witness statements, lmao at expecting consistent stories every single time. If this was actually a shooting, I would expect details missing, or out of order-trama does weird chit to the brain and memory. Regarding the DNA evidence, I have not viewed all the documents or files so I cannot conclude on that, but that is the only truly interesting part of the video for me. Perhaps the details in the reports are being extrapolated or pulled out if context though, it's best to read the actual reports to form conclusions.

I went in watching with a truly open mind, I wanted to give these guys the benefit of the doubt but there is simply zero hard evidence. Their smoking guns are minute details that could be explained any number of ways. The thing to take away from the whole event IMO is the fact that citizens are willing to bend over and take it up the ass when it comes to giving away their rights. You're fellow citizens are your worst enemy. They will sacrifice YOUR rights so they feel warm and cozy. The laws passed with regards to FOIA and gun rights are enough to disturb me without a grand conspiracy. Focus on what you can see and control and take action based that. I think the Sandy Hook conspiracy itself is at best retarded, at worse a psyop to make anyone wanting to defend their rights look like a whack job.

Raped. Thanks brah. I remember looking into it briefly years ago and thinking it wasn’t right. Gonna look up some more when I have time. YouTube is totally fkkked now though. I’ve tried to look into all sorts of things lately and it just won’t even come back with results.

You were the person who got me curious about this whole thing. Why is none of this crap present up front in the beginning of "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook"? Any sources for this stuff?

By the way, I hope you're feeling better. I remember your thread and was worried man. I would suggest you focus on things at the end of my last post, even if we disagree here, I think it's wise to understand we might not get answers but we can act in our best interests.

Np. Agreed, yt is fuked for finding esoteric things, like JFK's speech on secret societies. You won't find it on youtube anymore, possibly through google with some digging. Same with videos questioning Sandy hook etc

It's difficult, even on YouTube alternative sites... The doc mentioned earlier (which I bagged on lol) is pretty far down in Google search, bit still there.

If you look into mass shootings on the web, especially at a school, there's usually evidence, crime scene photos, wounded survivors, surveillance tape, etc. Sandy hook has no evidence a shooting took place, just a bunch of weird mofos saying one did. I watched a lot of vids on the shooting, news coverage, witness recants, a couple conspiracy vids etc. It doesn't add up. They took down some of the good/simple conspiracy videos on it on yt, I wouldn't know how to find them now. But if you look at the evidence, you realize there is none that a shooting actually took place.

And I'm fine, thanks brah.

I understand not wanting to spread false information but it seems like scrubbing websites and/or the internet entirely of any opposing ideas would look bad. That amount of censorship def hurts the cause

used to be on youtube, but obv wiped now
kid in yellow hoodie walks in circles around the scene

the whole scene is off, very Truman Show-ish
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x35cag8

^ Notice also how the ambulances have no way to exit. They're blocked in by other cars

When camera zooms out around 1:50, you can see the people are just walking around the building leaving one exit and entering another entrance

Biden lifted the restriction on suing firearm companies for shootings. The point was to bankrupt them. Before the ban, people were suing firearm companies every week. It was despicable and disgusting because all it is is it emotional response and looking for someone else to blame that can pay money.

Of course this is wrong, but when it comes the agenda, the left doesn’t care about the constitution, the right to private business, protection of firearms… this new regime is “at all cost” for the agenda.

Sounds like a neat exact copy of the port Arthur shootings in australia. Except the gun grab worked here

Functioning retard manages to single handedly kill 35 people and disable fleeing vehicles with delta force level accuracy

I've laughed hysterically at bad news. Shock will do weird things. Jfl if this is your 'evidence'

Never heard of that shooting before srs. Interesting. Will look into

At least there was 23 wounded survivors, which indicates it was a real shooting.

Sandy Hook, however, had 27 casualties andZEROwounded survivors after only 5 mins and this is the official timeline:
Adam enters the school, guns down a classroom full of 20 children along with 6 staff members with 0 survivors, and kills himself in 5 minutes flat.

Pretty impressive shooting skills for a barely functioning autist who never leaves the basement

Vid contradicts itself, you're seeing what you want to see.
Vid claims yellow guy endlessly walking around in circles, but half way through the video he's gone somewhere else. So which is it?
Looks to me like he's either walking around in shock, looking/waiting for someone, or waiting until he's asked to help out in some way. IIRC it was cold af on that day so he might even be walking just to keep warm. So many legit explanations, but conspiracycels will jump straight to the least likely explanation jfl

You're a shill

Because money brings people back to life, brah

Ignorant AF.

The skin literally melted off the 79 year old womans legs. The court winnings civered medical expenses and stay at home nursing.

I home remington wipes the floor with those retards for trying to profit off the deaths of their own dead kids with frivolous lawsuits.

I believe sandy hook happened because anyone who as been around 5yo kids in a school setting will understand two things:

1) they don't understand what's happening

2) they blindly obey everything

Honestly someone who has never shot a weapon or attended safety classes on the subject will likely not appreciate the true mortality of the situation. There's a concept with regards to the psychology of crises where the people involved cannot comprehend the full gravity of what is occurring simply because they have not encountered it before. I doubt Adam Lanza had the faculties to fully grasp that killing 5yos to get revenge on his mother didn't make sense. Clearly, he didn't. And a key reason why he didn't is because he didn't fully understand the act of killing in the first place...which made him very dangerous. He lacked the ability to understand what other people go through and could not understand that his superficial feelings to lash out were disproportional to the effect they would have. He had a sense that HIS MOM thought it would be disproportional, which is exactly why he carried it out.

Some people are emotionally retarded, Adam was a very handicapped individual. Once he carried out the act, he grasped what he had done and he killed himself and unknowingly reconnected himself with reality for a brief moment. This is a pattern we've seen many times over. Individuals lose control because they lost understanding a long, long time ago...or never had it.

That being said....there are tons of gun mfg. Remington's involvement was arbitrary and based off the availability of the weapon from Adam's mother. She is the sole provider of said weapon. I am completely surprised this case didn't just thrown out, but hopefully it sets precedence for future cases.

i bet that guy was on every pill that his doctor could legally give him. these doctors are paid to prescribe the ****. psycho lookin muddafugga