Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » How come a US woman's life is 10x easier than a male's but they complain 10x as much?
  1. Results 31 to 36 of 36
  2. Page 2 of 2
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2

Thread: How come a US woman's life is 10x easier than a male's but they complain 10x as much?

post 1649097823 10-17-2021, 11:18 AM
-
#31
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Big Arm, Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 49,924
  6. Rep Power: 287644
It's really just attractive women though.

Ugly women can't get by on their tits and ass, which is why dykes exist.
Motorcycle crew
Army veteran crew
One Meal a day crew
post 1649098733 10-17-2021, 11:36 AM
-
#32
  1. GaryRidgway
  1. GaryRidgway
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 46,812
  5. Subscribers: 11
  6. Rep Power: 333470
If you're asking why do women do ______? The answer is always attention.
post 1649099513 10-17-2021, 11:52 AM
-
#33
  1. Savux
  2. Registered User
  1. Savux
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 2,671
  6. Rep Power: 18095
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
10X easier?

You can't be srs.

There are only a few mixed advantages I can think of:

- no selective service registration
- more likely to get government bennies, but it's because of single motherhood
- less likely to be pushed into physically dangerous jobs or sports
- can profit from looks/sexif willing

Downsides:

- only desirable for reproduction a relatively brief time
- extra mental/physical BS due to menstruation/perimenopause
- physically weaker, more at risk for assault
- still viewed as "less than" by a large segment of society
- constantly bombarded with messages re: other peoples' expectations for appearance, mannerisms, and life choices
- still underrepresented in health and medical research

Things are tough all over bb.
cons:
Smaller brains
post 1649100633 10-17-2021, 12:16 PM
-
#34
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By robertbaggiojr⏩
Maybe your generation (boomer gen?)

But for young women these days things couldn't be easier
Could be. Gen X.
Originally Posted By Freeman3737⏩
They dont realize they are almost worshiped by society.

For a man to be worth anything he must be able to produce and contribute something.

A woman does not have to do anything to be seen as extremely valuable. She doesn't have to be able to produce anything, she doesnt even have to cook the food today or have kids and she is still seen as the highest value person in society.

Cant imagine what a shock most female to male trans experience. When treated like dirt until proven able to produce for the better survival or the rest of society.
Can't relate.
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Breast cancer research funding is ~16 billion
Prostate cancer research is ~12 billion

and manlets are also at risk for assault if it's due to physical size.

Just LOL at manlets.
Slightly different issue.
Researchers decided to revisit a study conducted 10 years ago that found females were excluded from most biomedical research based on fears of female hormonal variation complicating the findings. To see if that practice persisted after the government issued new research guidelines, the team from Northwestern University and Smith College — including a co-author of the original study — examined more than 700 scientific journal articles from nine fields published in 2019. They looked to see how well males and females were represented as subjects in research, from animals in lab experiments to people in clinical trials. Then they checked whether scientists discussed results for each sex in scholarly publications describing the work.

Compared to 2009, the number of studies that included females grew to 49%, up from 28%. But the second half of the answer was disappointing: In eight of the nine fields studied, the proportion of studies that analyzed study results by sex did not improve. And in pharmacology, the trend was actually downward, from 33% to 29%.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/09/...lyses-of-data/

It seems very likely that the ideal dosage and side effects of a drug could be different for women than for men, but often women are left out because it is easier for researchers.

I think that a smaller dosage of the mRNA vaccines *might* be better for younger people and people with less body mass, but AFAIK it wasn't really considered until the "under 12 years old" group.
Originally Posted By CrimsonSteel⏩
The problem isn't man vs woman, or black vs white, or straight vs homo vs lesbo. The problem is the elite leveraging these differences and driving a wedge between segments of society when it's all BS. Hell, climate activism is just thinly veiled anti-human rhetoric. They're borderline genocidal in their speech about carbon emissions. If you think abortions are murder (I'm starting to lean heavily in that camp) you would already consider them blatantly genocidal. I know I do.
Clipped for length, but agree that the divisiveness wouldn't be promoted if it weren't beneficial to some groups with the money to push it.
Originally Posted By Soonerjohn⏩
You have to understand that the average miscer considers having sex to be the main driver of success. In that context, OP is probably correct.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1649100783 10-17-2021, 12:19 PM
-
#35
  1. ZeroPercentTip
  2. Banned
  1. ZeroPercentTip
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 6,653
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
Could be. Gen X.



Can't relate.



Slightly different issue.



https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/09/...lyses-of-data/

It seems very likely that the ideal dosage and side effects of a drug could be different for women than for men, but often women are left out because it is easier for researchers.

I think that a smaller dosage of the mRNA vaccines *might* be better for younger people and people with less body mass, but AFAIK it wasn't really considered until the "under 12 years old" group.



Clipped for length, but agree that the divisiveness wouldn't be promoted if it weren't beneficial to some groups with the money to push it.



negged
post 1649100843 10-17-2021, 12:20 PM
-
#36
  1. p7nk
  2. Registered Goyim
  1. p7nk
  2. Registered Goyim
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Location: Applebee's
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 66,796
  7. Subscribers: 2
  8. Rep Power: 237510
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
10X easier?

You can't be srs.

There are only a few mixed advantages I can think of:

- no selective service registration
- more likely to get government bennies, but it's because of single motherhood
- less likely to be pushed into physically dangerous jobs or sports
- can profit from looks/sexif willing

Downsides:

- only desirable for reproduction a relatively brief time
- extra mental/physical BS due to menstruation/perimenopause
- physically weaker, more at risk for assault
- still viewed as "less than" by a large segment of society
- constantly bombarded with messages re: other peoples' expectations for appearance, mannerisms, and life choices
- still underrepresented in health and medical research

Things are tough all over bb.
💋👨🏽‍🍳🇨🇴
AP4 Crew
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts