Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Vax-cels: the consequences will never be the same...
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 211
  2. Page 2 of 8
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Vax-cels: the consequences will never be the same...

post 1653147343 12-25-2021, 04:50 AM
-
#31
  1. Shysty021
  2. Registered User
  1. Shysty021
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 26,058
  6. Rep Power: 209290
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
Weird thing is, no individual age group is showing fully vaxxed eclipsing unvaxxed for case counts. I wonder what's going on here? England showing the same thing. They forget to massage the numbers?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Must be.
Yea i dont get this…wtf is going on here?
post 1653148023 12-25-2021, 05:41 AM
-
#32
  1. Sterilite
  2. Banned
  1. Sterilite
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,060
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Same source:




Imagine not questioning what you are posting...
post 1653152493 12-25-2021, 09:09 AM
-
#33
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Same source:




Lol typical retard covidcel. Take one pic a few months back and one other one of a specific set of the data. Searching desperately to prove the conclusion you already reached before looking at any evidence.

Meanwhile Chad Anachron takes a screenshot of the page with no filtering of data and utterly buttblasts you.
post 1653152613 12-25-2021, 09:13 AM
-
#34
  1. CrimsonSteel
  1. CrimsonSteel
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,808
  6. Rep Power: 162304
Just call it by the clinical term. Genocide.
post 1653152693 12-25-2021, 09:17 AM
-
#35
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Sterilite⏩
Imagine not questioning what you are posting...
Imagine posting a pic proving the point of the OP(terrible efficacy after 3 months) and posting as if you’re countering it. Just lmfao. Then again, this is the same guy who still says Omicron is just as severe as other variants and that someone who gets one injection has the same risk of an adverse effect as someone who gets 100.
post 1653153773 12-25-2021, 09:49 AM
-
#36
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By yewotm8⏩
Lol typical retard covidcel. Take one pic a few months back and one other one of a specific set of the data. Searching desperately to prove the conclusion you already reached before looking at any evidence.

Meanwhile Chad Anachron takes a screenshot of the page with no filtering of data and utterly buttblasts you.
It's not filtered. It's the same data. I provided the link where it all originates.

No screenshots necessary, the page provides the buttons.

The aforementioned poster refused to provide a link.

If ignoring scale and interpreting these as risk is what you wanna do, have at it. Merry Christmas!
post 1653153923 12-25-2021, 09:51 AM
-
#37
  1. GODself
  1. GODself
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: Not, In, Korea
  5. Posts: 13,226
  6. Rep Power: 1428
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
The beavercels are reporting similar:

where did you get the data? wanna check something
post 1653154253 12-25-2021, 10:02 AM
-
#38
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 47,820
  6. Rep Power: 241736
Originally Posted By GODself⏩
where did you get the data? wanna check something
https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/cas...ers-and-spread
post 1653154443 12-25-2021, 10:09 AM
-
#39
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It's not filtered. It's the same data. I provided the link where it all originates.

No screenshots necessary, the page provides the buttons.

The aforementioned poster refused to provide a link.

If ignoring scale and interpreting these as risk is what you wanna do, have at it. Merry Christmas!
You sorted back to a specific age range and specific date to get photos.

Gradually, I began to hate them.
post 1653155043 12-25-2021, 10:19 AM
-
#40
  1. SwagMorris
  2. ProudOfYourBoy
  1. SwagMorris
  2. ProudOfYourBoy
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Posts: 17,346
  5. Rep Power: 39915
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Same source:




Way to prove new data wrong with old data. While also cherry picking specific age groups. Follow the money… I mean science.
post 1653155063 12-25-2021, 10:19 AM
-
#41
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By yewotm8⏩
You sorted back to a specific age range and specific date to get photos.

Gradually, I began to hate them.
No. There was no sorting, no different date range, no photos. It's all right here:https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/cas...ers-and-spread

They don't have stratified numbers up to the same date, yet.

Merry Christmas! It's unfortunate you're feeling hate.
post 1653155383 12-25-2021, 10:26 AM
-
#42
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Keep lying.
Merry Christmas!
post 1653155553 12-25-2021, 10:29 AM
-
#43
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Nice deflection, but you already posted that in the post I quoted.

Then again, the vax does seem to have an effect on short term memory.
Still wishing you a Merry Christmas!
post 1653155943 12-25-2021, 10:37 AM
-
#44
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 10,200
  5. Rep Power: 40578
Originally Posted By 5x10⏩
Not the first time we’ve seen negative efficacy

The uk data has shown that for the last few months, with more vaccinated being infected than unvaxxed. And the data was per capita, so the % vaxxed vs unvaxxed doesn’t matter
Yet England has only just introduced vax passports, who are the superspreaders?
post 1653156173 12-25-2021, 10:44 AM
-
#45
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By Shysty021⏩
Yea i dont get this…wtf is going on here?
Look at the dates. The age specific data only goes back to October. The "all ages" data is more recent. Thanks goes to youwotm8 for pointing this out.


Just fukking LMAO at covidcels using those age specific shots.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1653156233 12-25-2021, 10:46 AM
-
#46
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By yewotm8⏩
Lol typical retard covidcel. Take one pic a few months back and one other one of a specific set of the data. Searching desperately to prove the conclusion you already reached before looking at any evidence.

Meanwhile Chad Anachron takes a screenshot of the page with no filtering of data and utterly buttblasts you.
Reps on recharge bro.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1653156303 12-25-2021, 10:49 AM
-
#47
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I didn't want to point it out, to let the vaxcuck have more rope.
Well now they can't attack the source being they used the source in their own failed argument lol.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1653156353 12-25-2021, 10:50 AM
-
#48
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 30,900
  6. Rep Power: 79002
Getting harder and harder for vaccine shills to shape the narrative as more time goes on. The next step will be, "We've decided to stop collecting data on COVID."
#FreeCryptoBandit
post 1653156583 12-25-2021, 10:56 AM
-
#49
  1. WHChampion
  1. WHChampion
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 9,616
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 60006
Originally Posted By wickedman⏩
Getting harder and harder for vaccine shills to shape the narrative as more time goes on. The next step will be, "We've decided to stop collecting data on COVID."
Didn't they stop testing people who were vaccinated for much of this year?
post 1653157053 12-25-2021, 11:07 AM
-
#50
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
It seems odd to collapse across ages, but if it works for ya, go ahead.



https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/cas...ers-and-spread
post 1653157113 12-25-2021, 11:08 AM
-
#51
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just so people really understand how intellectually dishonest the beavercel vaxcuck is in this post...

This is the date range he posted, outlined by the red rectangle:



It's almost like the scale of the y-axis is different.

Is age-specific data available for the same range of dates at the link we both used?

Are you suggesting I manually selected that range? lol
post 1653157143 12-25-2021, 11:09 AM
-
#52
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just so people really understand how intellectually dishonest the beavercel vaxcuck is in this post...

This is the date range he posted, outlined by the red rectangle:



I keep telling you that JLC is a cnt
post 1653157323 12-25-2021, 11:12 AM
-
#53
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩
I keep telling you that JLC is a cnt
I can understand why you want an accessible target for your anger.

Merry Christmas!
post 1653157493 12-25-2021, 11:15 AM
-
#54
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Hmmm...



You meant to say " it's really interesting how the chart really changes when you change the dates of the data".

You shared the source right? Now you're claiming I changed the dates?

Can you share the stratified data for the same date range from that source? If you don't mind, please correct the charts I posted.

I understand the campaign, glad I can be an outlet.
post 1653157603 12-25-2021, 11:18 AM
-
#55
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You literally claimed that what you posted was the age breakdown for the data I posted:



It's the age breakdown from the source. The buttons beside the "All ages" button you selected. Same source site.

I didn't literally claim anything. You quoted me asking a question. I asked why you didn't post the age breakdown - see the question mark?

There are large differences by age group, so the stratification seems relevant. But perhaps not as compelling to some?

It's cool though. Campaigning against me is harmless, so go for it.
post 1653157773 12-25-2021, 11:21 AM
-
#56
  1. envisu
  2. why are you gay
  1. envisu
  2. why are you gay
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 9,438
  6. Rep Power: 392014
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It's the age breakdown from the source. The bottons beside the "All" button you selected to support your narrative. I just asked why you didn't post the age breakdown - see the question mark?

It's cool though. Campaigning against me is harmless, so go for it.
i'm not sure what you're arguing here

it clearly shows in your upload that you've selected specific (old) dates and age groups

time to cop the L and log out bro
post 1653157793 12-25-2021, 11:21 AM
-
#57
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Anachron, I don't think he selected the date range, I came up with the same charts. It's lolworthy enough on it's own to use old data to refute up to date data.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1653157953 12-25-2021, 11:24 AM
-
#58
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By envisu⏩
i'm not sure what you're arguing here

it clearly shows in your upload that you've selected specific (old) dates and age groups

time to cop the L and log out bro
Go to the link.

You can chooses ages. The dates are automatically filled. You can't select the end date.

Have a Merry Christmas
post 1653158003 12-25-2021, 11:25 AM
-
#59
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Actually, he didn't select it. Clicking on those buttons take you to the newest age specific data, which happens to be what he posted.

He just didn't realize it did that - and posted it because it supported his narrative and he thought he found his gotcha.



I know, but it's still funny how he posted them thinking they were in the same date range.
Which narrative is supported by the collapsed across ages data that you selected and posted?
post 1653158163 12-25-2021, 11:29 AM
-
#60
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Supporting narrative is something pseudo intellectuals do. Like yourself.
I see.

Here's to continuing your campaign in 2022!
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts