In my opinion, it should be legal and should be decided between a woman and her doctor, not dictated by lawmakers in Washington.

In fantasy land maybe this would happen

Pro lifers are Fuking retarded if they think this will actually make people act responsibly. Won’t change a thing. All that will happen is there will be more mouths to feed on welfare.

Can’t wait

This. Your body belongs to nobody; neither does your face.

Which is why I expected similar uproar when people were telling people to cover their face. That is your choice, not mandatory.

You do realize the people in Washington decide what is legal, right?This is silly. You obviously don't have unlimited body anatomy. This isn't Canada.

Don’t let liberals sugar coat what abortion really is. Like I said. Most are unattractive people so they don’t to worry about the choice.

But let’s be honest with what the hell abortion is and how really, deep down, is pretty disgusting.

*obviously there is expectations*. But I hate when people dont acknowledge the whole abortion process.

Fuking this. Thank you. Finally someone has the balls
To acknowledge what the fuk abortion is. Fuk these people, they think it’s an attack on women.

And they’re such cowards they’ll never watch a damn video of the process. They’re snakes. Losers, really. Fuk them

There’s a legit abortion video on YouTube the liberals won’t watch but here’s a cartoon, maybe they’ll watch finally: I doubt it

https://youtu.be/WKv5ABgqPTw

Absolutely repulses me people defend this on a emotional
Level. Just disgusting

So if the baby has a heartbeat at 6 weeks, can feel pain at 8 weeks, has full pain receptors and apparently the same as a fully developed human at 20-23 weeks.

This would mean that a mid-late term abortion is the process of ripping a baby, limb from limb, so that it can fit through the vaginal canal, whilst its in absolute pain.

Now what I said above is debatable, but that’s precisely it, it’s debatable. So if it’s debatable, should we not err on the side of not mass murdering babies?

And the argument is not then about “choice” but rather is it a life or not. Someone else’s life trumps your “choice” to murder that person.

That’s why I find pro-choice argument to be so weak. You can’t simply go by the choice argument and win that argument when the opposing side thinks it’s life, it renders that argument completely childish. You need to argue why it’s not life.

And the pro-choice people can never fully convince or prove to a pro-life person that it isn’t life, nor that it doesn’t feel pain. So reverting back to “my body my choice” mantra is just showing lack of accountability, to a pro life that argument is almost like saying “so what if I’m murdering a baby, it’s inside my body, I can murder it if it’s an inconvenience to me”. Yep, very strong argument.

IMO the argument and the research should Center around WHEN it becomes a human, and we need to agree on what those parameters are. Heartbeat? Arms and legs? A somewhat developed brain? Pain receptors?

The pro-lifers argument has at least been more consistent with the issue, they’re arguing that it’s a life. The pro-choice just argues that it’s a choice which is beyond ridiculous a stance.

And my rationalisation and what I think will work in practice is different from my moral stance on this. Morally, I think it’s just plain wrong, 5 weeks in, it shouldn’t be allowed. BUT in practice, wtf knows what should really happen, do I really want these scum baby murderers to be having children anyways?

I cant imagine hearing my sons heartbeat the first time and wanting my girlfriend to get an abortion. It was surreal and special moment

Like i said, most pro choice people are really young and emotional and/or angry, ugly and fat. This is there rallying cry. And fuk them.

Abortion should be legal, nobody wants a bunch of welfare babies running around.

Liberals use stupid arguments though “hurr durr rape baby” the chances of a woman getting raped, then pregnant are about 000000001.%

Elephants step on their retarded kids and I don't see anyone giving them a hard time about it.

I know...an aborted baby isn't retarded, but after being vacuumed up out of the womb it may as well be.

*Fixed?

Because you have a conscience. Hysterical liberals know nothing but hedonism and virtue signalling.

It isn't a slippery slope though, based on the principle that you cannot kill another human life whether it's inside your body or not.

The real debate is at what point we deem the fetus a human life.

I think you should focus on this point, because your current argument is weak.

The prospect of not being able to kill their unborn child is enough to make them think twice about unprotected sex with strangers lmao. Who are they kidding though, sloots will always sloot.

There's no difference whatsoever; if anything I'm loving this turn of events because it's showing me who the truly soy boy cuck miscers are

There is literally zero reason to kill a human baby, none; not even rape justifies it

how don't y'all realize sloots who abort go on and max out their womb anyway with 5 kids

only this time the documented grief and mental illness from the abortion makes them even chittier mothers, and the damaged uterus makes more for birth defects

i get the argument for 'greater good', but there's no accurate data for which is the greater good

Lol at forcing women to do anything

There is no such thing as a woman or man they are just social constructs like gender

And anyone who disagrees can suck Rachel Levines Cawk