Forum
»
Sloot's $130000 call w/ J high on poker god Garrett Adelstein's bluff (Cheating)
09-30-2022, 10:00 PM
-
#31
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
-
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 15,406
- Rep Power: 77939
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
He still would have made an elaborate video about it, even if he thought she was innocent.No I did watch the video actually you just don’t like that someone has a functioning brain to form a different opinion than Doug Polk.
Also Doug Polk has 350k subscribers. You don’t think he cares what type of content he puts out or is benefiting from the content he puts out in some way? You really are stupid as f*ck. Why do you think he has the channel? Just for fun? Get a clue bro.
Also Doug Polk has 350k subscribers. You don’t think he cares what type of content he puts out or is benefiting from the content he puts out in some way? You really are stupid as f*ck. Why do you think he has the channel? Just for fun? Get a clue bro.
It just so happens that his reasoning and analysis lead him to the conclusion that she was most likely cheating. You're suggesting he is being disingenuous simply to generate views, where's I'm suggesting his poker credentials are far more superior compared to yours, therefore his opinion on the situation is going to be more accurate, especially since he has literally played against someone cheating at high stakes poker.
You are chitting on Polk's integrity because you think he is simply lying for monetary gain, but any suggestion that this chick might be cheating for monetary gain is retarded?
09-30-2022, 10:07 PM
-
#32
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Edit: responding to slamt for reference in this post
All Polk did in his analysis of that video is claim that the decision making is something you would “never do” at certain points of the hand.
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him. That’s why his entire assessment doesn’t mean jack sh*t.
And your explanation that she was being signaled in the hand is even worse. If that’s the case she’s not even cheating effectively. Just being ahead but not knowing the odds is a sure fire way to have the cheating totally backfire on you.
That’s your explanation though.
Also if that’s the case and she was ahead that makes her minimum re-raise even more peculiar. You’re up on the turn, being signaled that you’re up, he raises and you min re-raise? Why not just take the pot right there with a harder push? There was already a decent pot in there.
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Wow that’s how not to cheat effectively if that’s what you’re trying to tell me.
I mean actually read your explanation and think that through for a second.
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
All Polk did in his analysis of that video is claim that the decision making is something you would “never do” at certain points of the hand.
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him. That’s why his entire assessment doesn’t mean jack sh*t.
And your explanation that she was being signaled in the hand is even worse. If that’s the case she’s not even cheating effectively. Just being ahead but not knowing the odds is a sure fire way to have the cheating totally backfire on you.
That’s your explanation though.
Also if that’s the case and she was ahead that makes her minimum re-raise even more peculiar. You’re up on the turn, being signaled that you’re up, he raises and you min re-raise? Why not just take the pot right there with a harder push? There was already a decent pot in there.
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Wow that’s how not to cheat effectively if that’s what you’re trying to tell me.
I mean actually read your explanation and think that through for a second.
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:09 PM
-
#33
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Ahhh yes, there it is.All Polk did in his analysis of that video is claim that the decision making is something you would “never do” at certain points of the hand.
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him. That’s why his entire assessment doesn’t mean jack sh*t.
And your explanation that she was being signaled in the hand is even worse. If that’s the case she’s not even cheating effectively. Just being ahead but not knowing the odds is a sure fire way to have the cheating totally backfire on you.
That’s your explanation though.
Also if that’s the case and she was ahead that makes her minimum re-raise even more peculiar. You’re up on the turn, being signaled that you’re up, he raises and you min re-raise? Why not just take the pot right there with a harder push? There was already a decent pot in there.
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Wow that’s how not to cheat effectively if that’s what you’re trying to tell me.
I mean actually read your explanation and think that through for a second.
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him. That’s why his entire assessment doesn’t mean jack sh*t.
And your explanation that she was being signaled in the hand is even worse. If that’s the case she’s not even cheating effectively. Just being ahead but not knowing the odds is a sure fire way to have the cheating totally backfire on you.
That’s your explanation though.
Also if that’s the case and she was ahead that makes her minimum re-raise even more peculiar. You’re up on the turn, being signaled that you’re up, he raises and you min re-raise? Why not just take the pot right there with a harder push? There was already a decent pot in there.
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Wow that’s how not to cheat effectively if that’s what you’re trying to tell me.
I mean actually read your explanation and think that through for a second.
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
"It must be Doug Polk and miscers who have never played poker before and the ones with retarded conclusions, not me!!"
Miscer autism and delusion on full display.
Go touch grass.
09-30-2022, 10:14 PM
-
#34
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
I’m the dumb one yet your explanation was she was signaled that she was ahead at the turn and all she did was min re-raise with two flush draws and a straight draw on the board. None of which she had any piece of.So because he has subscribers, that means his poker opinion, his reads on how people behave at the table, how she was tanking her hands, how those hands usually play out, etc are invalid?
You really are a *******.
Didn't even watch the video, just read the cliffs off a miscer, and then went straight to posting subhuman takes while calling other miscers dumb.
lmao
You really are a *******.
Didn't even watch the video, just read the cliffs off a miscer, and then went straight to posting subhuman takes while calling other miscers dumb.
lmao
Yeah im the dumb one… not your theory at all.
You have the critical thinking skills of an ape. Polk is a smart guy and he can have his opinion just fine. I can tell you don’t have any unique thought on the situation that’s your own though.
Who’s right between Polk and myself is irrelevant at this point. You could easily argue I’ve made just as much of a compelling counter argument that he’s made for her cheating (you won’t admit that of course because you don’t have a brain cell and let Polk do all of your thinking) in a situation that no one actually has definitive proof.
What is clear out of this thread and isn’t debatable is how ****ing stupid you are.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:16 PM
-
#35
- dyee4613
- Registered User
-
- dyee4613
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 35
- Posts: 4,522
- Rep Power: 12706
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Doug Polk was the top HU NL player online for years. He also went deep in one drop. He is not getting the majority of his income from youtube, be serious. I'm pretty sure he was also heavily invested in crypto before it took off. His opinion can be dog**** but let's not pretend he's doing it for $$No I did watch the video actually you just don’t like that someone has a functioning brain to form a different opinion than Doug Polk.
Also Doug Polk has 350k subscribers. You don’t think he cares what type of content he puts out or is benefiting from the content he puts out in some way? You really are stupid as f*ck. Why do you think he has the channel? Just for fun? Get a clue bro.
Also Doug Polk has 350k subscribers. You don’t think he cares what type of content he puts out or is benefiting from the content he puts out in some way? You really are stupid as f*ck. Why do you think he has the channel? Just for fun? Get a clue bro.
Edit: I forgot that most people don't know what one drop is. This is a 1m buy-in tournament.
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
I feel like the fish angle doesn't make much sense here since she's beating a pretty damn competitive game. Also, this was far and away the greatest poker decision she has ever made in her life and a life changing amount of money. Why would she would just give it all back? This is a really weak argument, IMO.All Polk did in his analysis of that video is claim that the decision making is something you would “never do” at certain points of the hand.
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him.
He’s basically just applying his own logic to something he thinks isn’t logical. Problem is, this woman is not good. She’s not going to think like him.
09-30-2022, 10:18 PM
-
#36
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
-
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 15,406
- Rep Power: 77939
-
-
Originally Posted By dyee4613⏩
And again, he still would have made a video about it/made money off the event even if he thought she was innocent.Doug Polk was the top HU NL player online for years. He also won one drop. He is not getting the majority of his income from youtube, be serious. I'm pretty sure he was also heavily invested in crypto before it took off.
This dude is saying Doug Polk is deliberately being misleading/disingenuous because doing so is going to gain him a significant amount of money which doesn't make any sense.
09-30-2022, 10:19 PM
-
#37
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
If she knew exactly what he had at the turn, her min raise was probably trying to string him along for a bit more on his draw while getting to see the river for a relatively cheap sum(she probably should've just called his raise), but like you said, she's retarded.I’m the dumb one yet your explanation was she was signaled that she was ahead at the turn and all she did was min re-raise with two flush draws and a straight draw on the board. None of which she had any piece of.
Yeah im the dumb one… not your theory at all.
You have the critical thinking skills of an ape. Polk is a smart guy and he can have his opinion just fine. I can tell you don’t have any unique thought on the situation that’s your own though.
Who’s right between Polk and myself is irrelevant at this point. You could easily argue I’ve made just as much of a compelling counter argument that he’s made for her cheating (you won’t admit that of course because you don’t have a brain cell and let Polk do all of your thinking) in a situation that no one actually has definitive proof.
What is clear out of this thread and isn’t debatable is how ****ing stupid you are.
Yeah im the dumb one… not your theory at all.
You have the critical thinking skills of an ape. Polk is a smart guy and he can have his opinion just fine. I can tell you don’t have any unique thought on the situation that’s your own though.
Who’s right between Polk and myself is irrelevant at this point. You could easily argue I’ve made just as much of a compelling counter argument that he’s made for her cheating (you won’t admit that of course because you don’t have a brain cell and let Polk do all of your thinking) in a situation that no one actually has definitive proof.
What is clear out of this thread and isn’t debatable is how ****ing stupid you are.
She probably didn't expect him to shove her 110k into a pot of 40k, but at that point, she knew it was still a coin flip so she went full retard and called since she already committed $25k.....
Imagine typing all of that drivel and can't even get to this line of thinking.
Absolute retard.
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
The other guy was not folding his straight flush draw no matter how much she re-raised, so there was no way she was taking it right then and there, so all of this is irrelevant and you're still retarded.Also if that’s the case and she was ahead that makes her minimum re-raise even more peculiar. You’re up on the turn, being signaled that you’re up, he raises and you min re-raise? Why not just take the pot right there with a harder push? There was already a decent pot in there.
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
You think she’s trying to string him along with Jack high just because she’s currently “up” on the turn that had two flush draws and a straight draw sitting out there?
Signaled you have the better hand on the turn, the other person bets into you and all you do is min raise with all those draws sitting out there to burn you. If you’re cheating and you know they’re bluffing you want to take down the pot right there. Not leave the door open for it to backfire on you by stringing them along hoping they call and get to see another card.
I can tell you don’t play poker whatsoever. Or if you do, you don’t win much. Because you have the same level of poker instinct she has
09-30-2022, 10:26 PM
-
#38
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Also I did a bit more digging on Polk and it sounds like he’s in part trying to defend Garrett
So even if it’s not money related, he has something to be gained with his platform. Garrett is clearly someone he respects and potentially even considers a friend. It makes sense he’d want to make a point that Garrett confronting her was justified.
For a guy who supposedly retired and wanted to be done with professional poker 4 years ago he sure does seem invested in its ongoings, that’s for sure.
This dude also has a video back on May shooting allegations toward Phil Helmuth that he scammed an amateur player as well. Even goes on to say Helmuth shouldn’t be allowed to play at future showcases that are similar. You can tell he lets his emotions come into play in his analyses and he has clear sides for who he does and does not like in the industry.
So what exactly is David Polk’s deal. Some of you clearly follow this guy more closely. Wants to retired (and also unretires temporarily to play Negranu) yet has multiple videos analyzing other players saying they’re cheating?
Irrelevant to whether the girl cheated but that in itself is weird behavior since we’re on the topic of weird behavior from people.
And yeah I probably just insulted slamt’s idol again and he’s gonna be offended… my bad…
So even if it’s not money related, he has something to be gained with his platform. Garrett is clearly someone he respects and potentially even considers a friend. It makes sense he’d want to make a point that Garrett confronting her was justified.
For a guy who supposedly retired and wanted to be done with professional poker 4 years ago he sure does seem invested in its ongoings, that’s for sure.
This dude also has a video back on May shooting allegations toward Phil Helmuth that he scammed an amateur player as well. Even goes on to say Helmuth shouldn’t be allowed to play at future showcases that are similar. You can tell he lets his emotions come into play in his analyses and he has clear sides for who he does and does not like in the industry.
So what exactly is David Polk’s deal. Some of you clearly follow this guy more closely. Wants to retired (and also unretires temporarily to play Negranu) yet has multiple videos analyzing other players saying they’re cheating?
Irrelevant to whether the girl cheated but that in itself is weird behavior since we’re on the topic of weird behavior from people.
And yeah I probably just insulted slamt’s idol again and he’s gonna be offended… my bad…
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:28 PM
-
#39
- dyee4613
- Registered User
-
- dyee4613
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 35
- Posts: 4,522
- Rep Power: 12706
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Wanted to be done with poker? He runs a professional poker training site and has a youtube channel explicitly about poker lolAlso I did a bit more digging on Polk and it sounds like he’s in part trying to defend Garrett
So even if it’s not money related, he has something to be gained with his platform. Garrett is clearly someone he respects and potentially even considers a friend. It makes sense he’d want to make a point that Garrett confronting her was justified.
For a guy who supposedly retired and wanted to be done with professional poker 4 years ago he sure does seem invested in its ongoings, that’s for sure.
This dude also has a video back on May shooting allegations toward Phil Helmuth that he scammed an amateur player as well. Even goes on to say Helmuth shouldn’t be allowed to play at future showcases that are similar. You can tell he lets his emotions come into play in his analyses and he has clear sides for who he does and does not like in the industry.
So what exactly is David Polk’s deal. Some of you clearly follow this guy more closely. Wants to retired (and also unretires temporarily to play Negranu) yet has multiple videos analyzing other players saying they’re cheating?
Irrelevant to whether the girl cheated but that in itself is weird behavior since we’re on the topic of weird behavior from people.
And yeah I probably just insulted slamt’s idol again and he’s gonna be offended… my bad…
So even if it’s not money related, he has something to be gained with his platform. Garrett is clearly someone he respects and potentially even considers a friend. It makes sense he’d want to make a point that Garrett confronting her was justified.
For a guy who supposedly retired and wanted to be done with professional poker 4 years ago he sure does seem invested in its ongoings, that’s for sure.
This dude also has a video back on May shooting allegations toward Phil Helmuth that he scammed an amateur player as well. Even goes on to say Helmuth shouldn’t be allowed to play at future showcases that are similar. You can tell he lets his emotions come into play in his analyses and he has clear sides for who he does and does not like in the industry.
So what exactly is David Polk’s deal. Some of you clearly follow this guy more closely. Wants to retired (and also unretires temporarily to play Negranu) yet has multiple videos analyzing other players saying they’re cheating?
Irrelevant to whether the girl cheated but that in itself is weird behavior since we’re on the topic of weird behavior from people.
And yeah I probably just insulted slamt’s idol again and he’s gonna be offended… my bad…
Edit: His youtube is called Doug Polk Poker
09-30-2022, 10:28 PM
-
#40
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Oh no… you specifically said she was probably just being signaled that she was ahead and knew nothing more about the specifics.If she knew exactly what he had at the turn, her min raise was probably trying to string him along for a bit more on his draw while getting to see the river for a relatively cheap sum(she probably should've just called his raise), but like you said, she's retarded.
She probably didn't expect him to shove her 110k into a pot of 40k, but at that point, she knew it was still a coin flip so she went full retard and called since she already committed $25k.....
Imagine typing all of that drivel and can't even get to this line of thinking.
Absolute retard.
The other guy was not folding his straight flush draw no matter how much she re-raised, so there was no way she was taking it right then and there, so all of this is irrelevant and you're still retarded.
She probably didn't expect him to shove her 110k into a pot of 40k, but at that point, she knew it was still a coin flip so she went full retard and called since she already committed $25k.....
Imagine typing all of that drivel and can't even get to this line of thinking.
Absolute retard.
The other guy was not folding his straight flush draw no matter how much she re-raised, so there was no way she was taking it right then and there, so all of this is irrelevant and you're still retarded.
So which is it slamt? You change your story more than she does at this point. Maybe take an evening and think your story through and we can talk more tomorrow. I’d hate to continue embarrassing you like this repeatedly
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:31 PM
-
#41
- LinuxJon
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 49,073
- Rep Power: 325966
-
-
I have no idea if she cheated. But I've seen enough bizarre hands by inexperienced players to know that anything is possible, no matter how weird.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP
Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032
Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
09-30-2022, 10:32 PM
-
#42
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
You were asking why she would play that hand like she did, and when somebody tries to explain it from the point of view of how a cheat would play, you say they're changing the story.Oh no… you specifically said she was probably just being signaled that she was ahead and knew nothing more about the specifics.
So which is it slamt? You change your story more than she does at this point. Maybe take an evening and think your story through and we can talk more tomorrow. I’d hate to continue embarrassing you like this repeatedly
So which is it slamt? You change your story more than she does at this point. Maybe take an evening and think your story through and we can talk more tomorrow. I’d hate to continue embarrassing you like this repeatedly
Are you actually retarded?
If you know what the other person has, your #1 goal is to see all the cards come out as you would know exactly where you stand, except the other guy did something she probably didn't expect and overbet with a shove of 110k into a 40k pot.
That probably made too much sense so now you have to go on a tangent.
Retarded *******.
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
How many inexperienced players are buying in hundreds of thousands of dollars to play with the best of the best with negative edge and ev?I have no idea if she cheated. But I've seen enough bizarre hands by inexperienced players to know that anything is possible, no matter how weird.
She's clearly a terrible poker player, can't even explain her own line of reasoning for that hand. If she's that retarded would you stake her unless you knew she would come out green?
09-30-2022, 10:36 PM
-
#43
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Actually I take this back. I re-read your post and it’s more confusing than ever. Here let’s break it down together and you can understand my confusionOh no… you specifically said she was probably just being signaled that she was ahead and knew nothing more about the specifics.
So which is it slamt? You change your story more than she does at this point. Maybe take an evening and think your story through and we can talk more tomorrow. I’d hate to continue embarrassing you like this repeatedly
So which is it slamt? You change your story more than she does at this point. Maybe take an evening and think your story through and we can talk more tomorrow. I’d hate to continue embarrassing you like this repeatedly
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
#1 and #2 basically contradict each other.1) She knows what he has
2) She got the signal that her hand was technically ahead at the turn
3) That's enough for this bimbo to make the call
that's basically it.
2) She got the signal that her hand was technically ahead at the turn
3) That's enough for this bimbo to make the call
that's basically it.
Did she know specifically what he had? Or was she getting signaled that her hand was technically better?
If she knew exactly what he had she wouldn’t need to be signaled that her hand was better at the turn. She would already know it was better.
So what in the actual f*ck are you trying to say you dumb mother f*cker?
Clarify now. You can see why I’m utterly confused talking with you though. You seriously make about as much sense as the woman trying to explain away her terrible decisions.
“That’s basically it”
Lol what’s basically it? Posting a bunch of contradictory nonsense that doesn’t make sense? Yeah I guess that basically is it. Sums up your entire post history itt ****ing retard.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:36 PM
-
#44
- dyee4613
- Registered User
-
- dyee4613
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 35
- Posts: 4,522
- Rep Power: 12706
-
-
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
She has been playing since 2015 in recorded games and just won a 2k buy-in event (split). She cashed in the ME.I have no idea if she cheated. But I've seen enough bizarre hands by inexperienced players to know that anything is possible, no matter how weird.
09-30-2022, 10:38 PM
-
#45
- bicmane123
- Banned
-
- bicmane123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,078
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
jack high is too weak for anyone to make a min raise there. no, you can't possibly be THAT stupid. be real man.Also how do you justify it wasn’t a coin flip?
did you watch that interview at the end? she tried to strengthen her decision making there by saying she THOUGHT she had the low pair. (lol if you believe that)
the only way someone makes the call there, is if she knows what he has, and knew he could only win on the river.
09-30-2022, 10:39 PM
-
#46
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Just #2 could explain it all if you rub a few brain cells together, try it.Actually I take this back. I re-read your post and it’s more confusing than ever. Here let’s break it down together and you can understand my confusion
#1 and #2 basically contradict each other.
Did she know specifically what he had? Or was she getting signaled that her hand was technically better?
If she knew exactly what he had she wouldn’t need to be signaled that her hand was better at the turn. She would already know it was better.
So what in the actual f*ck are you trying to say you dumb mother f*cker?
Clarify now. You can see why I’m utterly confused talking with you though. You seriously make about as much sense as the woman trying to explain away her terrible decisions.
“That’s basically it”
Lol what’s basically it? Posting a bunch of contradictory nonsense that doesn’t make sense? Yeah I guess that basically is it. Sums up your entire post history itt ****ing retard.
#1 and #2 basically contradict each other.
Did she know specifically what he had? Or was she getting signaled that her hand was technically better?
If she knew exactly what he had she wouldn’t need to be signaled that her hand was better at the turn. She would already know it was better.
So what in the actual f*ck are you trying to say you dumb mother f*cker?
Clarify now. You can see why I’m utterly confused talking with you though. You seriously make about as much sense as the woman trying to explain away her terrible decisions.
“That’s basically it”
Lol what’s basically it? Posting a bunch of contradictory nonsense that doesn’t make sense? Yeah I guess that basically is it. Sums up your entire post history itt ****ing retard.
It's only confusing if you're a retarded *******...
It's clearly this:
1) She has a butt plug that gives off vibrations whenever she's ahead from somebody on the production team with camera view.
2) She knew she was ahead at that turn, so she did retarded chit with the min raise knowing she was ahead. Once the river comes out, she could get more butt plug vibrations telling her she's ahead or not.
3) Other guy unexpectedly shoves all in(OVERBET 110k into 40k) because he knew his outs would be technically a coin flip at the river at worst with a straight flush draw
4) She knew she was technically ahead on the turn so she called because she already committed 25k. Didn't know how bad it would look.
But yes, a lot of this is coming to light because she is a terrible poker player and can't even cheat properly. So I guess you were technically right.
09-30-2022, 10:49 PM
-
#47
Don't give a single fuk about whether she cheated with a vibrating ring on her finger or bluetooth anal beads but I'm howling at miscers getting so heated trying to convince each other they are right lmaoooo.
09-30-2022, 10:54 PM
-
#48
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Yeah I did ask you what you thought she was doing during that hand and you tried to explain and failed to explain it like a dipsh*t giving me two different explanations.You were asking why she would play that hand like she did, and when somebody tries to explain it from the point of view of how a cheat would play, you say they're changing the story.
Are you actually retarded?
If you know what the other person has, your #1 goal is to see all the cards come out as you would know exactly where you stand, except the other guy did something she probably didn't expect and overbet with a shove of 110k into a 40k pot.
That probably made too much sense so now you have to go on a tangent.
Retarded *******.
How many inexperienced players are buying in hundreds of thousands of dollars to play with the best of the best with negative edge and ev?
She's clearly a terrible poker player, can't even explain her own line of reasoning for that hand. If she's that retarded would you stake her unless you knew she would come out green?
Are you actually retarded?
If you know what the other person has, your #1 goal is to see all the cards come out as you would know exactly where you stand, except the other guy did something she probably didn't expect and overbet with a shove of 110k into a 40k pot.
That probably made too much sense so now you have to go on a tangent.
Retarded *******.
How many inexperienced players are buying in hundreds of thousands of dollars to play with the best of the best with negative edge and ev?
She's clearly a terrible poker player, can't even explain her own line of reasoning for that hand. If she's that retarded would you stake her unless you knew she would come out green?
See the other post above. Did she know what he had or was she just being signaled that she had the better hand? There’s no reason for both to be happening so I don’t know why you’re listing both in your explanation.
I originally read it that she was just being signaled. But if you want to switch up your explanation to the one saying she knew what he had it still doesn’t make sense.
Now she knows he has all those outs. Before if she was only being signaled there was at least some speculation that maybe she would think he wouldn’t have a lead on any of those draws. It’s a weak as f*ck argument but sure why not.
Now you’re telling me she knew what he had, so she knows he has two draws there.
And still she min re-raised? Your explanation being she wants to see the final card to know she has it? Why re-raise if that’s the play? Your explanation there is she was dumb and should have just called and not min re-raised
So let me get this straight. She’s smart enough to be cheating and tank previous hands to set people up to give off the appearance of “playing dumb”, but she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in a situation where she should have just called to make sure she had the hand won before taking in her prize
This is your explanation.
I don’t know how you can think she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in that situation if she were cheating but it’s preposterous to think she’s just dumb enough to be playing that bad all around.
I mean that min re-raise is about the dumbest thing you could possibly do on the turn there if you’re cheating. Even you agree to it. You said specifically said she should have called in her cheating scheme and the re-raise was illogical. She should have been wanting to see the river herself to ensure the win.
But she didn’t. She re-raised. So she’s obviously dumb as f*ck. So why is it hard for you to believe she’s just dumb as f*ck with the rest of her decisions that hand?
You see you goof’d here. I’m at least consistent in my theory. My theory is she’s just dumb as f*ck all the way through.
You on the other hand have decided to cherry pick certain situations. First she’s cheating. But then she’s also really really dumb to explain away the odd re-raise that doesn’t mesh with your cheating theory.
Do you see yet? Or are you still going to push back on me?
My theory has no holes. Your theory does. If you have to flip to the other side by saying she’s dumb in that one instance in order to have your cheating theory stand up it’s a very shaky argument.
No one knows the truth, but only one of us has a theory with no holes and that’s me.
/thread
Thanks for playing though.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 10:55 PM
-
#49
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
When did the money go in? Post flop he's drawing to the nuts and way ahead.
Did she 4bet shove bluff? What was his 3 bet %?
I'm not getting enough info but she could just be a donkey.
Dealing with a hurricane and internet spotty in for later.
Did she 4bet shove bluff? What was his 3 bet %?
I'm not getting enough info but she could just be a donkey.
Dealing with a hurricane and internet spotty in for later.
U
09-30-2022, 10:55 PM
-
#50
- whitepaper
- Registered User
-
- whitepaper
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Posts: 20,840
- Rep Power: 55720
-
-
Can someone explain how she would cheat/when? Everything is recorded like crazy, from all angles...
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
2014 Misc Resolution: Negging no pics (screen captures of text don't count as pics)
HairyWBush Reps for life - Hamster Compassion: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181804893
09-30-2022, 10:59 PM
-
#51
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
No #2 doesn’t explain itJust #2 could explain it all if you rub a few brain cells together, try it.
You yourself said the min re-raise o no the turn was weird if she was cheating and she should have just called.
That play is chalked up to her being dumb but not the rest of it. The rest of it was cheating rather than dumb play. Why? Why is that one play dumb but the rest not? Because you have no logical explanation for it?
Your story is inconsistent.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 11:01 PM
-
#52
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By whitepaper⏩
Yep that’s the only thing consistent. That she’s retarded.Can someone explain how she would cheat/when? Everything is recorded like crazy, from all angles...
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
Slamt is convinced she’s smart enough to be cheating but dumb enough to re-raise on the turn when that contradicts what someone would do if cheating.
All because Polk released a video defending Garrett by questioning that she was cheating.
Slamt confirmed retard.
Now who is dumber, slamt or the sloot? This is a question that will truly have no clear answer.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 11:02 PM
-
#53
Originally Posted By whitepaper⏩
She has many rings on her finger and other jewelry around the neck for distraction. One of the bigger rings has a vibrating bluetooth motor inside it. When Jake Paul's sleazeball manager sends a signal that vibrates once, that means she's ahead. When the ring vibrates twice, she's behind and should fold. This is live so the manager sees everything real time or should I say a minute later because live streams always have a small delay. That's why she is taking a long time to act with every hand.Can someone explain how she would cheat/when? Everything is recorded like crazy, from all angles...
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
I legitimately think she's retarded, and she's retarded for returning the money...the consistency in being retarded
09-30-2022, 11:03 PM
-
#54
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Didn't read a single word srsYeah I did ask you what you thought she was doing during that hand and you tried to explain and failed to explain it like a dipsh*t giving me two different explanations.
See the other post above. Did she know what he had or was she just being signaled that she had the better hand? There’s no reason for both to be happening so I don’t know why you’re listing both in your explanation.
I originally read it that she was just being signaled. But if you want to switch up your explanation to the one saying she knew what he had it still doesn’t make sense.
Now she knows he has all those outs. Before if she was only being signaled there was at least some speculation that maybe she would think he wouldn’t have a lead on any of those draws. It’s a weak as f*ck argument but sure why not.
Now you’re telling me she knew what he had, so she knows he has two draws there.
And still she min re-raised? Your explanation being she wants to see the final card to know she has it? Why re-raise if that’s the play? Your explanation there is she was dumb and should have just called and not min re-raised
So let me get this straight. She’s smart enough to be cheating and tank previous hands to set people up to give off the appearance of “playing dumb”, but she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in a situation where she should have just called to make sure she had the hand won before taking in her prize
This is your explanation.
I don’t know how you can think she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in that situation if she were cheating but it’s preposterous to think she’s just dumb enough to be playing that bad all around.
I mean that min re-raise is about the dumbest thing you could possibly do on the turn there if you’re cheating. Even you agree to it. You said specifically said she should have called in her cheating scheme and the re-raise was illogical. She should have been wanting to see the river herself to ensure the win.
But she didn’t. She re-raised. So she’s obviously dumb as f*ck. So why is it hard for you to believe she’s just dumb as f*ck with the rest of her decisions that hand?
You see you goof’d here. I’m at least consistent in my theory. My theory is she’s just dumb as f*ck all the way through.
You on the other hand have decided to cherry pick certain situations. First she’s cheating. But then she’s also really really dumb to explain away the odd re-raise that doesn’t mesh with your cheating theory.
Do you see yet? Or are you still going to push back on me?
My theory has no holes. Your theory does. If you have to flip to the other side by saying she’s dumb in that one instance in order to have your cheating theory stand up it’s a very shaky argument.
No one knows the truth, but only one of us has a theory with no holes and that’s me.
/thread
Thanks for playing though.
See the other post above. Did she know what he had or was she just being signaled that she had the better hand? There’s no reason for both to be happening so I don’t know why you’re listing both in your explanation.
I originally read it that she was just being signaled. But if you want to switch up your explanation to the one saying she knew what he had it still doesn’t make sense.
Now she knows he has all those outs. Before if she was only being signaled there was at least some speculation that maybe she would think he wouldn’t have a lead on any of those draws. It’s a weak as f*ck argument but sure why not.
Now you’re telling me she knew what he had, so she knows he has two draws there.
And still she min re-raised? Your explanation being she wants to see the final card to know she has it? Why re-raise if that’s the play? Your explanation there is she was dumb and should have just called and not min re-raised
So let me get this straight. She’s smart enough to be cheating and tank previous hands to set people up to give off the appearance of “playing dumb”, but she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in a situation where she should have just called to make sure she had the hand won before taking in her prize
This is your explanation.
I don’t know how you can think she’s dumb enough to min re-raise in that situation if she were cheating but it’s preposterous to think she’s just dumb enough to be playing that bad all around.
I mean that min re-raise is about the dumbest thing you could possibly do on the turn there if you’re cheating. Even you agree to it. You said specifically said she should have called in her cheating scheme and the re-raise was illogical. She should have been wanting to see the river herself to ensure the win.
But she didn’t. She re-raised. So she’s obviously dumb as f*ck. So why is it hard for you to believe she’s just dumb as f*ck with the rest of her decisions that hand?
You see you goof’d here. I’m at least consistent in my theory. My theory is she’s just dumb as f*ck all the way through.
You on the other hand have decided to cherry pick certain situations. First she’s cheating. But then she’s also really really dumb to explain away the odd re-raise that doesn’t mesh with your cheating theory.
Do you see yet? Or are you still going to push back on me?
My theory has no holes. Your theory does. If you have to flip to the other side by saying she’s dumb in that one instance in order to have your cheating theory stand up it’s a very shaky argument.
No one knows the truth, but only one of us has a theory with no holes and that’s me.
/thread
Thanks for playing though.
Refer to this:
It's clearly this:
1) She has a butt plug that gives off vibrations whenever she's ahead from somebody on the production team with camera view.
2) She knew she was ahead at that turn, so she did retarded chit with the min raise knowing she was ahead.It actually doesn't even matter what she does here, but she did go with the worst option since she's a terrible poker player.Once the river comes out, she could get more butt plug vibrations telling her she's ahead or not.
3) Other guy unexpectedly shoves all in(OVERBET 110k into 40k) because he knew his outs would be technically a coin flip at the river at worst with a straight flush draw
4) She knew she was technically ahead on the turn so she called because she already committed 25k. Didn't know how bad it would look.
Also this:
But yes, a lot of this is coming to light because she is a terrible poker player and can't even cheat properly. So I guess you were technically right.
You can be both terrible at the game and a cheat. It's not mutually exclusive that you're either dumb or you're a cheat.
09-30-2022, 11:09 PM
-
#55
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By bicmane123⏩
What does the end of the interview prove?jack high is too weak for anyone to make a min raise there. no, you can't possibly be THAT stupid. be real man.
did you watch that interview at the end? she tried to strengthen her decision making there by saying she THOUGHT she had the low pair. (lol if you believe that)
the only way someone makes the call there, is if she knows what he has, and knew he could only win on the river.
did you watch that interview at the end? she tried to strengthen her decision making there by saying she THOUGHT she had the low pair. (lol if you believe that)
the only way someone makes the call there, is if she knows what he has, and knew he could only win on the river.
Imagine playing like an absolute retard and being exposed for being a retard. An excuse that she had the low pair covers up her being a retard. That story at the end was a weak attempt to make it appear she knew what she was doing and just misread her cards.
I’ve already dissected in depth to slamt why someone who’s cheating there isn’t min re-raising if they know what the other person has.
Get your head out of your ass before I embarrass you as bad as slamt.
Imagine you’re cheating for a second.
What would you want to do if you knew someone was chasing two draws on the turn? Would you want to min re-raise and string them along?
No. Either you’d come over the top hard and put the pressure on them and end the hand there to keep them from chasing OR you would call their bet, see what the river results in and know you won the hand.
The last thing you’re doing is min re-raising then calling them pushing you in and hope they don’t catch.
Honestly if that’s how you cheat you need to learn how to cheat better, no lie.
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 11:11 PM
-
#56
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,742
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258893
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Didn’t read a single word but posts a novel of his own and expects me to read his.Didn't read a single word srs
Refer to this:
It's clearly this:
1) She has a butt plug that gives off vibrations whenever she's ahead from somebody on the production team with camera view.
2) She knew she was ahead at that turn, so she did retarded chit with the min raise knowing she was ahead.It actually doesn't even matter what she does her, but she did go with the worst option since she's a terrible poker player.Once the river comes out, she could get more butt plug vibrations telling her she's ahead or not.
3) Other guy unexpectedly shoves all in(OVERBET 110k into 40k) because he knew his outs would be technically a coin flip at the river at worst with a straight flush draw
4) She knew she was technically ahead on the turn so she called because she already committed 25k. Didn't know how bad it would look.
Also this:
But yes, a lot of this is coming to light because she is a terrible poker player and can't even cheat properly. So I guess you were technically right.
You can be both terrible at the game and a cheat. It's not mutually exclusive that you're either dumb or you're a cheat.
Refer to this:
It's clearly this:
1) She has a butt plug that gives off vibrations whenever she's ahead from somebody on the production team with camera view.
2) She knew she was ahead at that turn, so she did retarded chit with the min raise knowing she was ahead.It actually doesn't even matter what she does her, but she did go with the worst option since she's a terrible poker player.Once the river comes out, she could get more butt plug vibrations telling her she's ahead or not.
3) Other guy unexpectedly shoves all in(OVERBET 110k into 40k) because he knew his outs would be technically a coin flip at the river at worst with a straight flush draw
4) She knew she was technically ahead on the turn so she called because she already committed 25k. Didn't know how bad it would look.
Also this:
But yes, a lot of this is coming to light because she is a terrible poker player and can't even cheat properly. So I guess you were technically right.
You can be both terrible at the game and a cheat. It's not mutually exclusive that you're either dumb or you're a cheat.
Nope.
You really are stupid. I’m not reading yours until I know you’ve read mine. I’ve already check mated you hard as f*ck and anyone who does read my post will see that.
Probably shouldn’t have started your post with didn’t read a single word of you wanted me to read anything beyond it that you posted.
Peace bitch
(In b4 didn’t read but makes another post to me)
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
09-30-2022, 11:11 PM
-
#57
Originally Posted By Schnitzl⏩
I was just winging it with the ring vibrating signalling device but looks like that's might ACTUALLY be the case lol.She has many rings on her finger and other jewelry around the neck for distraction. One of the bigger rings has a vibrating bluetooth motor inside it. When Jake Paul's sleazeball manager sends a signal that vibrates once, that means she's ahead. When the ring vibrates twice, she's behind and should fold. This is live so the manager sees everything real time or should I say a minute later because live streams always have a small delay. That's why she is taking a long time to act with every hand.
I'll be in my office when you need more mysteries solved.
- Hercule "Schnitzl" Poirot
vid of her fidgeting with the vibrating ring after getting caught (she didn't remove it like the video claims, just turned it facing the palm):
09-30-2022, 11:13 PM
-
#58
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
Didn't read a single word srsDidn’t read a single word but posts a novel of his own and expects me to read his.
Nope.
You really are stupid. I’m not reading yours until I know you’ve read mine. I’ve already check mated you hard as f*ck and anyone who does read my post will see that.
Probably shouldn’t have started your post with didn’t read a single word of you wanted me to read anything beyond it that you posted.
Peace bitch
(In b4 didn’t read but makes another post to me)
Nope.
You really are stupid. I’m not reading yours until I know you’ve read mine. I’ve already check mated you hard as f*ck and anyone who does read my post will see that.
Probably shouldn’t have started your post with didn’t read a single word of you wanted me to read anything beyond it that you posted.
Peace bitch
(In b4 didn’t read but makes another post to me)
Refer to this:
It's clearly this:
1) She has a butt plug that gives off vibrations whenever she's ahead from somebody on the production team with camera view.
2) She knew she was ahead at that turn, so she did retarded chit with the min raise knowing she was ahead. It actually doesn't even matter what she does here, but she did go with the worst option since she's a terrible poker player. Once the river comes out, she could get more butt plug vibrations telling her she's ahead or not.
3) Other guy unexpectedly shoves all in(OVERBET 110k into 40k) because he knew his outs would be technically a coin flip at the river at worst with a straight flush draw
4) She knew she was technically ahead on the turn so she called because she already committed 25k. Didn't know how bad it would look.
Also this:
But yes, a lot of this is coming to light because she is a terrible poker player and can't even cheat properly. So I guess you were technically right.
You can be both terrible at the game and a cheat. It's not mutually exclusive that you're either dumb or you're a cheat.
09-30-2022, 11:15 PM
-
#59
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By Schnitzl⏩
oh lawdddI was just winging it with the ring vibrating signalling device but looks like that's might ACTUALLY be the case lol.
I'll be in my office when you need more mysteries solved.
- Hercule "Schnitzl" Poirot
vid of her fidgeting with the vibrating ring after getting caught (she didn't remove it like the video claims, just turned it facing the palm):
I'll be in my office when you need more mysteries solved.
- Hercule "Schnitzl" Poirot
vid of her fidgeting with the vibrating ring after getting caught (she didn't remove it like the video claims, just turned it facing the palm):
shame it wasn't a butt plug
would've been a better story
09-30-2022, 11:19 PM
-
#60
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
-
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 46,748
- Rep Power: 174067
-
-
Originally Posted By Schnitzl⏩
Seems totally legit bro, my guess is she just wanted to take the ring off. The toxic masculinity in this thread is alarming, and bluepilled. We finally have a woman adding representation to poker, which is rare, and she's being assaulted with harsh words and ill intentions, so much so she gave away the money she earned.I was just winging it with the ring vibrating signalling device but looks like that's might ACTUALLY be the case lol.
I'll be in my office when you need more mysteries solved.
- Hercule "Schnitzl" Poirot
vid of her fidgeting with the vibrating ring after getting caught (she didn't remove it like the video claims, just turned it facing the palm):
I'll be in my office when you need more mysteries solved.
- Hercule "Schnitzl" Poirot
vid of her fidgeting with the vibrating ring after getting caught (she didn't remove it like the video claims, just turned it facing the palm):
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts