Forum
»
NY AG Letitia James to host ‘Drag Story Hour’ for kids in NYC
03-15-2023, 12:25 PM
-
#31
03-15-2023, 12:36 PM
-
#32
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
-
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,157
- Rep Power: 204849
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Is that supposed to be salient? The very nature of drag queens is different from the very nature of catholics.
Brush up on who is responsible for what.
03-15-2023, 12:40 PM
-
#33
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
I mean...are you trying to suggest homos and paedos who have used the church (which has actively preaches against that stuff) to carry out their nefarious deeds, would also probably use this drag shyt (which actually openly glorifies degeneracy) to do the same?Is that supposed to be salient? The very nature of drag queens is different from the very nature of catholics.
Brush up on who is responsible for what.
Brush up on who is responsible for what.
That's a very crazy and bigoted thought (if that is indeed what you're suggesting).
Additionally, the fact that child abuse happened via the Catholic Church clearly suggests that we should fully embrace drag queen performers around children.
03-15-2023, 12:49 PM
-
#34
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
How many cases of child abuse are on the books for one group vs the other?Is that supposed to be salient? The very nature of drag queens is different from the very nature of catholics.
Brush up on who is responsible for what.
Brush up on who is responsible for what.
03-15-2023, 12:52 PM
-
#35
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The Catholic Church has been around for many centuries and has been incredibly wide spread during that time. Comparing the two in this manner is beyond silly (and to be clear I don't even defend/support/advocate for the Catholic Church at all) as is using that comparison to justify all of this tranny shyt now going on.How many cases of child abuse are on the books for one group vs the other?
03-15-2023, 12:57 PM
-
#36
03-15-2023, 01:01 PM
-
#37
- iamanalphamale
- NEG ME HARDER, DADDY
-
- iamanalphamale
- NEG ME HARDER, DADDY
- Join Date: Apr 2021
- Posts: 4,770
- Rep Power: 22835
-
-
So, Pat didn't last long responding to one of these threads, again.
JFLOL.
JFLOL.
03-15-2023, 01:06 PM
-
#38
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
For sure. It's okay that the Catholic Church has abused kids because they've been around for along time.The Catholic Church has been around for many centuries and has been incredibly wide spread during that time. Comparing the two in this manner is beyond silly (and to be clear I don't even defend/support/advocate for the Catholic Church at all) as is using that comparison to justify all of this tranny shyt now going on.

03-15-2023, 01:11 PM
-
#39
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I think you mean two groups, don't you?
Gotta ask, what drives you so hard to try and normalize drag queensaround children? Were they to stay in their own lane, then who cares, let people live their lives and do whatever it is they want with other consenting adults... but that's clearly not good enough for some of them and rather than try and die on the hill of defending them being in front of children as normal and fine, you should be damning any who would but defending any who do not sexually dress up and act around kids.
You're not making me (or anyone else) okay with the idea of drag queens being around children, you're just making me think you've lost the plot when it comes to this issue.
JLC, it's not normal and it's not appropriate around children, period. I don't care about cheerleaders or Elvis or Catholics, none of that has any impact on this at all.
If you're into this, if you have a loved one into this, whatever, you should be defending them to be free as adults but you come off as almost wanting them around children and I find that abhorrent. Forget Elvis for a moment, why would you want any child around this?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
03-15-2023, 01:17 PM
-
#40
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
A child around what? Priests who have a very long history of abusing children under the guise of helping people? Or drag queens who aren't hiding that they are impersonating another gender?I think you mean two groups, don't you?
Gotta ask, what drives you so hard to try and normalize drag queensaround children? Were they to stay in their own lane, then who cares, let people live their lives and do whatever it is they want with other consenting adults... but that's clearly not good enough for some of them and rather than try and die on the hill of defending them being in front of children as normal and fine, you should be damning any who would but defending any who do not sexually dress up and act around kids.
You're not making me (or anyone else) okay with the idea of drag queens being around children, you're just making me think you've lost the plot when it comes to this issue.
JLC, it's not normal and it's not appropriate around children, period. I don't care about cheerleaders or Elvis or Catholics, none of that has any impact on this at all.
If you're into this, if you have a loved one into this, whatever, you should be defending them to be free as adults but you come off as almost wanting them around children and I find that abhorrent. Forget Elvis for a moment, why would you want any child around this?
Gotta ask, what drives you so hard to try and normalize drag queensaround children? Were they to stay in their own lane, then who cares, let people live their lives and do whatever it is they want with other consenting adults... but that's clearly not good enough for some of them and rather than try and die on the hill of defending them being in front of children as normal and fine, you should be damning any who would but defending any who do not sexually dress up and act around kids.
You're not making me (or anyone else) okay with the idea of drag queens being around children, you're just making me think you've lost the plot when it comes to this issue.
JLC, it's not normal and it's not appropriate around children, period. I don't care about cheerleaders or Elvis or Catholics, none of that has any impact on this at all.
If you're into this, if you have a loved one into this, whatever, you should be defending them to be free as adults but you come off as almost wanting them around children and I find that abhorrent. Forget Elvis for a moment, why would you want any child around this?
03-15-2023, 01:49 PM
-
#41
03-15-2023, 01:59 PM
-
#42
- DumpsterFire
- Registered User
-
- DumpsterFire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,496
- Rep Power: 44258
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
TrueStill would rather have her in charge than Trump because I'm a massive pussy.
Not even joking.
Not even joking.
**Drinks colon cleanse for fun crew**
03-15-2023, 02:37 PM
-
#43
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don't like the Catholic Church, I do not like how they cover for gay priests who abuse or rape children. I do not like the Vatican and think it's insane how they wield so much power over the world. I do not like the current Pope. Bad.A child around what? Priests who have a very long history of abusing children under the guise of helping people? Or drag queens who aren't hiding that they are impersonating another gender?
... but can you talk about this issue without bringing up other things? I said it: Forget the Church, Elvis or cheerleaders for moment, what is it about these specific drag Queens and you wanting to normalize them being around children? Why?
Why would any child be around adults behaving in a sexual and aberrant manner? To make them think it's okay?
If this was about teaching tolerance and inclusivity, then it would be about raising awareness with older people, honestly probably full-bore adults and not even older teenagers. So it's not that. It's something specific here about a small minority of people, of which I am disappointed to include you, that somehow thinkchildrenshould be around this, because everything you've done is attempt to make this act seem like it's not wrong.
Comparing it, often in ludicrous ways, to other things of varying levels of morality to somehow justify this current act. Even when specifically asked not to bring up other situations, you immediately went back to this (desperate) tactic.
It's wrong. Just say it. Again, I really want to know: What is it about this one that is so personal to you? I don't give a fuk if you are into this, if your best friend is into this, if you have sibling or loved one into this -- honestly, fortheirsake you should be singing another tune -- one where you get on board with this being sick to expose children to but how grown ass adults should be free to be themselves.
I have no problem with the later of those two, but the former is a major problem and there will be no "in 10 years it's aokay!" like gay marriage, not for me and not for most people. Most people do not care what adults do, whether it's something we understand, care about or find it strange or not. Live your own life, but you stick your body part in a kid's face and there will be zero acceptance or tolerance on that issue.
None.
Not an inch.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
03-15-2023, 02:41 PM
-
#44
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
-
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
- Posts: 8,312
- Rep Power: 331479
-
-
Apparently it never occurred to them that there are countless exaggerated and eccentric subjects like anthropomorphic animals that could read to children overdrag queens.
It speaks volumes about the perversion of those who came up with this, never mind the participants.
Neither. The word isneither. It is okay forneitherof the kunts.
It speaks volumes about the perversion of those who came up with this, never mind the participants.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
A child around what? Priests who have a very long history of abusing children under the guise of helping people? Or drag queens who aren't hiding that they are impersonating another gender?
Neither. The word isneither. It is okay forneitherof the kunts.
I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die
If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
03-15-2023, 02:49 PM
-
#45
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
I just don't think drag queens are inherently sexual or have any interest in abusing children.I don't like the Catholic Church, I do not like how they cover for gay priests who abuse or rape children. I do not like the Vatican and think it's insane how they wield so much power over the world. I do not like the current Pope. Bad.
... but can you talk about this issue without bringing up other things? I said it: Forget the Church, Elvis or cheerleaders for moment, what is it about these specific drag Queens and you wanting to normalize them being around children? Why?
Why would any child be around adults behaving in a sexual and aberrant manner? To make them think it's okay?
If this was about teaching tolerance and inclusivity, then it would be about raising awareness with older people, honestly probably full-bore adults and not even older teenagers. So it's not that. It's something specific here about a small minority of people, of which I am disappointed to include you, that somehow thinkchildrenshould be around this, because everything you've done is attempt to make this act seem like it's not wrong.
Comparing it, often in ludicrous ways, to other things of varying levels of morality to somehow justify this current act. Even when specifically asked not to bring up other situations, you immediately went back to this (desperate) tactic.
It's wrong. Just say it. Again, I really want to know: What is it about this one that is so personal to you? I don't give a fuk if you are into this, if your best friend is into this, if you have sibling or loved one into this -- honestly, fortheirsake you should be singing another tune -- one where you get on board with this being sick to expose children to but how grown ass adults should be free to be themselves.
I have no problem with the later of those two, but the former is a major problem and there will be no "in 10 years it's aokay!" like gay marriage, not for me and not for most people. Most people do not care what adults do, whether it's something we understand, care about or find it strange or not. Live your own life, but you stick your body part in a kid's face and there will be zero acceptance or tolerance on that issue.
None.
Not an inch.
... but can you talk about this issue without bringing up other things? I said it: Forget the Church, Elvis or cheerleaders for moment, what is it about these specific drag Queens and you wanting to normalize them being around children? Why?
Why would any child be around adults behaving in a sexual and aberrant manner? To make them think it's okay?
If this was about teaching tolerance and inclusivity, then it would be about raising awareness with older people, honestly probably full-bore adults and not even older teenagers. So it's not that. It's something specific here about a small minority of people, of which I am disappointed to include you, that somehow thinkchildrenshould be around this, because everything you've done is attempt to make this act seem like it's not wrong.
Comparing it, often in ludicrous ways, to other things of varying levels of morality to somehow justify this current act. Even when specifically asked not to bring up other situations, you immediately went back to this (desperate) tactic.
It's wrong. Just say it. Again, I really want to know: What is it about this one that is so personal to you? I don't give a fuk if you are into this, if your best friend is into this, if you have sibling or loved one into this -- honestly, fortheirsake you should be singing another tune -- one where you get on board with this being sick to expose children to but how grown ass adults should be free to be themselves.
I have no problem with the later of those two, but the former is a major problem and there will be no "in 10 years it's aokay!" like gay marriage, not for me and not for most people. Most people do not care what adults do, whether it's something we understand, care about or find it strange or not. Live your own life, but you stick your body part in a kid's face and there will be zero acceptance or tolerance on that issue.
None.
Not an inch.
It's advertised as a drag show. If someone doesn't want their kid to attend, they should not take their kid.
I feel the same about church. I don't think Sunday school should be banned.
The latter has a history and evidence of direct child abuse.
03-15-2023, 02:51 PM
-
#46
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By leafs43⏩
Come on now, you can't have kids seeing a woman's boob or something. That'd just be wrong..Always drag story time but never stripper story time.
Why is that?
Why is that?
Of course it's different if you want to show them some middle aged dude's boobs.


In after JLC
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 02:56 PM
-
#47
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Sillie tried that angle too, so I'll tell you the same thing we all told his no colon having ass.
Nobody defended Catholic priest ped0s. More to the point, we all said they all should hang.
So now with that failed "gotcha" attempt out of the way, do you have anything else to add?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:00 PM
-
#48
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
He didn't say it was ok you fuking simpleton. You asked.....For sure. It's okay that the Catholic Church has abused kids because they've been around for along time.


Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
And he answered.How many cases of child abuse are on the books for one group vs the other?
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Catholic church clearly has more since they've been around for eons, and transformers are kind of a new surgical invention in the grand scheme of shiit.The Catholic Church has been around for many centuries and has been incredibly wide spread during that time. Comparing the two in this manner is beyond silly (and to be clear I don't even defend/support/advocate for the Catholic Church at all) as is using that comparison to justify all of this tranny shyt now going on.
One more time though. Nobody said it was ok.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:01 PM
-
#49
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
-
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 40,552
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 404801
-
-
Tish is a dyke so it’s no surprise she’s promoting this disgusting chit.
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
She was literally elected for no reason other than to prosecute Donald J. Trump. That’s what she ran on. That’s what the people elected her to do. It’s fkin pathetic. You’d think there would be more pressing issues that hurt the people of New York than the former president allegedly paying money to a horse face hooker. Who cares? AG James has the worst case of TDS maybe anywhere. I watched Trumps deposition and he was a total gentleman, smiling at her and asking how she was doing even though she hates his guts. She couldn’t even extend the same human decency that he did. She’s a classless piece of chit just like Hochul.It did, when the post was used to fight organized crime and violence here. She is using her post as a political platform for tomfoolery.
03-15-2023, 03:01 PM
-
#50
Originally Posted By nkiritsis13⏩
If you also think church services should also be age restricted, then I'm good with that. It's not my view, but at least it's consistent.Neither. The word isneither. It is okay forneitherof the kunts.
03-15-2023, 03:11 PM
-
#51
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I'm an atheist and don't do church, but are there a lot of middle aged men dressed as Celiene Dion shaking their tits and twerking at church services?If you also think church services should also be age restricted, then I'm good with that. It's not my view, but at least it's consistent.

If so then yeah.. Age restrict the shiit out of them.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:19 PM
-
#52
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
I think you mean two groups, don't you?
Gotta ask, what drives you so hard to try and normalize drag queensaround children? Were they to stay in their own lane, then who cares, let people live their lives and do whatever it is they want with other consenting adults... but that's clearly not good enough for some of them and rather than try and die on the hill of defending them being in front of children as normal and fine, you should be damning any who would but defending any who do not sexually dress up and act around kids.
You're not making me (or anyone else) okay with the idea of drag queens being around children, you're just making me think you've lost the plot when it comes to this issue.
JLC, it's not normal and it's not appropriate around children, period. I don't care about cheerleaders or Elvis or Catholics, none of that has any impact on this at all.
If you're into this, if you have a loved one into this, whatever, you should be defending them to be free as adults but you come off as almost wanting them around children and I find that abhorrent.Forget Elvis for a moment, why would you want any child around this?
Gotta ask, what drives you so hard to try and normalize drag queensaround children? Were they to stay in their own lane, then who cares, let people live their lives and do whatever it is they want with other consenting adults... but that's clearly not good enough for some of them and rather than try and die on the hill of defending them being in front of children as normal and fine, you should be damning any who would but defending any who do not sexually dress up and act around kids.
You're not making me (or anyone else) okay with the idea of drag queens being around children, you're just making me think you've lost the plot when it comes to this issue.
JLC, it's not normal and it's not appropriate around children, period. I don't care about cheerleaders or Elvis or Catholics, none of that has any impact on this at all.
If you're into this, if you have a loved one into this, whatever, you should be defending them to be free as adults but you come off as almost wanting them around children and I find that abhorrent.Forget Elvis for a moment, why would you want any child around this?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Now we're getting somewhere!A child around what? Priests who have a very long history of abusing children under the guise of helping people?Or drag queens who aren't hiding that they are impersonating another gender?

Your tranny and drag freaks. Now tell us why they want to perform for children.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:27 PM
-
#53
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
No, but there are priests who abuse children.I'm an atheist and don't do church, but are there a lot of middle aged men dressed as Celiene Dion shaking their tits and twerking at church services?
If so then yeah.. Age restrict the shiit out of them.

If so then yeah.. Age restrict the shiit out of them.
Are there middle aged men dressed as Celine Dion shaking their tits and twerking at story hour?
03-15-2023, 03:34 PM
-
#54
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Ayup.No, but there are priests who abuse children.
Are there middle aged men dressed as Celine Dion shaking their tits and twerking at story hour?
Are there middle aged men dressed as Celine Dion shaking their tits and twerking at story hour?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Come on now, you can't have kids seeing a woman's boob or something. That'd just be wrong..
Of course it's different if you want to show them some middle aged dude's boobs.



In after JLC
Of course it's different if you want to show them some middle aged dude's boobs.



In after JLC
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:38 PM
-
#55
03-15-2023, 03:39 PM
-
#56
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
-
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 73,334
- Rep Power: 713784
-
-
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
03-15-2023, 03:40 PM
-
#57
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
ROTFLMFAOOOO!!!! Semantics AF!Those pics don't appear to be from a library.

JFC dude, you don't honestly think geography is relevant to anything do you?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-15-2023, 03:43 PM
-
#58
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
-
- Mark1T
- High Plains Lifter
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Location: USA
- Posts: 37,839
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 715693
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That kid isn't a midget.Those pics don't appear to be from a library.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
03-15-2023, 03:46 PM
-
#59
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,358
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698380
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
No, but there are priests who abuse children.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
And I'm betting there have been priests who molested kids in some other place besides a church.. Care to share your geographic thoughts on that??Those pics don't appear to be from a library.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
