Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Star wars jedi survivor clocking in at 155gb
  1. Results 31 to 40 of 40
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
post 1680548063 04-10-2023, 04:07 PM
-
#31
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Originally Posted By angelfire2005
What the hell are you talking about. Here's my m.2 benchmarked, you know, running one application.



Custom OS? The PS5 runs freeBSD. They use it because it's free, just lmao at thinking it's some NASA space tech stuff. It's just a Unix OS. They also switched to a x86 architecture, which was a good move after how terrible the cell engine was for the PS3. It's basically a mini-PC at this point, one that is getting forever slower as soon as it launches. It can't even run native 4k except on 1-2 games.

Nevermind the ps5 only has 16gb of shared GPU/system memory. Do you even know how a computer works? Just stick to consoles bro and having daddy Sony help you not brick your stuff. Don't forget to pay your $70 just to be able to go online just lmao.


They're more than likely using a 4090 so yeah, mine can. PS5 is only two generations behind now.


That's just it man, you can have that single player experience on PC too. Only you can run native 4k, 144hz, use whatever controller you want, etc. I beat Elden Ring first on PS5, then again on PC. No comparison, PC was better. More stable frame-rate, better fidelity; I also have an overpriced DAC/amp + headphone setup so that adds to it too.

My favorite thing about the PS5 isn't the graphics, it's that I can play it on the couch and with other people. I've beaten Ghost of Sushi, FF7 remake, etc. all on PS5. Would they be better on PC? Maybe, but sometimes you just wanna hang out on the couch and play.
Now run that test with a game running, you'll get a fraction of the speed. It's all in the custom controller that only PS5 has which utilises the SSD with 100% efficacy, and an OS which is so streamlined it just instantly loads and loads games far faster than your pathetic nerd tower can
post 1680549263 04-10-2023, 04:30 PM
-
#32
  1. freeburn
  1. freeburn
  2. Join Date: Nov 2010
  3. Posts: 40,703
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 326524
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats
Now run that test with a game running, you'll get a fraction of the speed. It's all in the custom controller that only PS5 has which utilises the SSD with 100% efficacy, and an OS which is so streamlined it just instantly loads and loads games far faster than your pathetic nerd tower can
You think if I have a game open my pc is slow? Just ****in lol. I can watch 4k movies on Netflix while maintaining 200 fps in apex legends, still loading in faster than the other people on my team, while using recording/streaming software, while also running half a dozen applications to monitor my lighting and various software for my devices attached to my pc.

The PS5 has two jobs, run an OS, and run a game. These 'blazing fast custom ssd controller speeds' are not any faster than pc loads. You think you get some big real time speed but you don't, consoles just now can load a game as fast as a PC. It's not any faster, nor is pc that much faster if at all. Quick resume is pretty solid, and def something pc doesn't have, but for multiplayer games you have to refresh or reload anyways. And really it ends up being like a 30 second difference between quick resume and just booting up a game.
post 1680549723 04-10-2023, 04:38 PM
-
#33
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Posts: 56,588
  5. Rep Power: 653846
Originally Posted By freeburn
You think if I have a game open my pc is slow? Just ****in lol. I can watch 4k movies on Netflix while maintaining 200 fps in apex legends, still loading in faster than the other people on my team, while using recording/streaming software, while also running half a dozen applications to monitor my lighting and various software for my devices attached to my pc.

The PS5 has two jobs, run an OS, and run a game. These 'blazing fast custom ssd controller speeds' are not any faster than pc loads. You think you get some big real time speed but you don't, consoles just now can load a game as fast as a PC. It's not any faster, nor is pc that much faster if at all. Quick resume is pretty solid, and def something pc doesn't have, but for multiplayer games you have to refresh or reload anyways. And really it ends up being like a 30 second difference between quick resume and just booting up a game.
I'd highly doubt the PS5 speeds would beat the best PC speeds but can we not admit how crazy good the speeds are on PS5 based on what you pay for? The console is just optimized to do one thing and it works really well.


Also can anyone answer why the PC version of this game is 155GB but the PS5 version is less than 100?
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
......................
post 1680550113 04-10-2023, 04:46 PM
-
#34
  1. Strawng
  2. Registered User
  1. Strawng
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 11,553
  6. Rep Power: 176209
Are you brahs actually excited for this? I love the original trilogy and happily stayed with it until the sequels to Force Awakens, but I feel like Star Wars has gotten so damn stale at this point. Were people really demanding another Star Wars game?
post 1680550343 04-10-2023, 04:51 PM
-
#35
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Originally Posted By freeburn
You think if I have a game open my pc is slow? Just ****in lol. I can watch 4k movies on Netflix while maintaining 200 fps in apex legends, still loading in faster than the other people on my team, while using recording/streaming software, while also running half a dozen applications to monitor my lighting and various software for my devices attached to my pc.

The PS5 has two jobs, run an OS, and run a game. These 'blazing fast custom ssd controller speeds' are not any faster than pc loads. You think you get some big real time speed but you don't, consoles just now can load a game as fast as a PC. It's not any faster, nor is pc that much faster if at all. Quick resume is pretty solid, and def something pc doesn't have, but for multiplayer games you have to refresh or reload anyways. And really it ends up being like a 30 second difference between quick resume and just booting up a game.
cope
post 1680550443 04-10-2023, 04:52 PM
-
#36
  1. freeburn
  1. freeburn
  2. Join Date: Nov 2010
  3. Posts: 40,703
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 326524
Originally Posted By Coal
I'd highly doubt the PS5 speeds would beat the best PC speeds but can we not admit how crazy good the speeds are on PS5 based on what you pay for? The console is just optimized to do one thing and it works really well.


Also can anyone answer why the PC version of this game is 155GB but the PS5 version is less than 100?
Of course it's impressive, xbox and ps5 both, quick resume and load speeds are great for a 500 dollar console. But it's not some amazing feat. Pcs been fast booting and loading quick for a while now. But, The fact that you can throw the same high end fast m.2 into a ps5 or a PC is legit af. I literally have an extra m.2 in my pc i could take out and put in my ps5 or vice versa, I wouldn't need to spend any extra money to upgrade my ps5 storage. That's honestly cool af for someone like me. (sorry Xbox you fukin goofd on storage).

But it's time for certain people to stop pretending it's somehow lightyears faster than pc, it's all virtually the same. Since cross play has existed I have watched my console teammates load in slow as ****, that gap is finally closed.

As for the game size on pc, could be optimization, or audio chit, or 8k textures for pc or some dumb chit. Most likely just mediocre optimizing.
post 1680551523 04-10-2023, 05:11 PM
-
#37
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By Coal
Also can anyone answer why the PC version of this game is 155GB but the PS5 version is less than 100?
Kraken compression for the PS5

The PlayStation 5 has one of the smallest storage sizes of any console over the last decade, but it's not as bad as it seems. Sony is reportedly using a specialized data compression technology that can shrink game file sizes by as much as 60%. This would more than compensate for 825GB of storage on the console.

Twisted Voxel reported that the survival game Subnautica has just a 5GB file size on the PS5. Compare this to 14GB on the PlayStation 4 and you're saving more than 60% of storage space.

TechRadar reports that Control: Ultimate Edition also benefits significantly from Sony's compression tech, coming in at just 25.79GB on the PS5 compared to 42.5GB on the Xbox Series X. That's a 39% reduction in file size.


https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ps...en-compression
post 1680571423 04-11-2023, 12:59 AM
-
#38
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble
Kraken compression for the PS5

The PlayStation 5 has one of the smallest storage sizes of any console over the last decade, but it's not as bad as it seems. Sony is reportedly using a specialized data compression technology that can shrink game file sizes by as much as 60%. This would more than compensate for 825GB of storage on the console.

Twisted Voxel reported that the survival game Subnautica has just a 5GB file size on the PS5. Compare this to 14GB on the PlayStation 4 and you're saving more than 60% of storage space.

TechRadar reports that Control: Ultimate Edition also benefits significantly from Sony's compression tech, coming in at just 25.79GB on the PS5 compared to 42.5GB on the Xbox Series X. That's a 39% reduction in file size.


https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ps...en-compression
B-b-b-ut the PS5 OS and custom controlled SSD is nothing we can't get on PC!!11
post 1680596363 04-11-2023, 11:14 AM
-
#39
  1. ScramFranklin
  2. Registered User
  1. ScramFranklin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 19,925
  6. Rep Power: 147928
Originally Posted By Coal
Also can anyone answer why the PC version of this game is 155GB but the PS5 version is less than 100?
And the Xbox version. 43.98 GB
-Engineering Crew
-Self Improvement Crew
-Third Position Crew
-Keith Woods Crew
-Consolecel Crew
-Dr. Edward Dutton Crew
post 1680602413 04-11-2023, 12:32 PM
-
#40
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  2. Join Date: Sep 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 73,290
  6. Rep Power: 273505
Originally Posted By Strawng
Are you brahs actually excited for this? I love the original trilogy and happily stayed with it until the sequels to Force Awakens, but I feel like Star Wars has gotten so damn stale at this point. Were people really demanding another Star Wars game?
I have already gotten over the loss of good Star Wars games, much like how I got over the loss of good Star Wars movies. I just don't give a chit anymore, what used to be a cool setting has left me completely disinterested due to the way it's been ruined ever since it's ownership changed hands. Heck it's like I was never that big on the last one, and this new one is supposed to be all woke, so it's like I just don't even give a chit to keep up with it. It's one of those things where if it shows up free as a part of a service one day I might give it a go, but I'm not going to pay for it, and I am definitely in no rush.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts