Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Texas plan to put chaplains in public schools is latest move to inject Christianity
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 158
  2. Page 2 of 6
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Texas plan to put chaplains in public schools is latest move to inject Christianity

post 1682491493 05-11-2023, 08:40 AM
-
#31
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget⏩
it's better than peacocking gender pretender story hour.
that is for sure.
Yep. I'm not too sure that I agree with this, but I'm certainly not strongly opposed to it either. Even though I don't believe in the Theological stuff, Christianity generally advocates good morals and conduct.
post 1682492233 05-11-2023, 08:51 AM
-
#32
  1. ToxMasculinity
  2. Registered Goomba
  1. ToxMasculinity
  2. Registered Goomba
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Posts: 3,748
  5. Rep Power: 27939
Strong retards ITT who are against having someone enforce a moral high ground with the next generation, when American culture is filled with vices and degeneracy. Even if you're against religion itself, this is a good step in the right direction to help children select the right path and stay disciplined towards a life with good morals. and ethics. Chaplains also are great just to talk and vent to, as they are very receptive and can talk to troubled kids who have it bad at home. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
Toxic Masculinity

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

United States Army Veteran

White Conservative Heterosexual Male who is not a White Supremecist (Ded fkn Srs)
post 1682492673 05-11-2023, 08:57 AM
-
#33
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
When my wife and I went back to the church, I started to meet some of the most genuine Christians. Not the ones the left screeches about. A lot of really good people. The most surprising about them is their strength of character. Very difficult to anger, generally good with others, well mannered, and make you feel good every time you see them. They remember your name, they approach you or acknowledge you when they see you. They talk to you like they have known you forever.
It's odd that you think one needs to be Christian in order be a rational, thoughtful, and considerate person. Too bad 99% of the "Christians" on this board are the opposite of that.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1682493033 05-11-2023, 09:02 AM
-
#34
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Yep. I'm not too sure that I agree with this, but I'm certainly not strongly opposed to it either. Even though I don't believe in the Theological stuff, Christianity generally advocates good morals and conduct.
The "I have a good moral compass and don't subscribe to any Christian ideologies, but everyone else should be indoctrinated with Christianity to be more like me" line is always hilarious, son.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1682493253 05-11-2023, 09:05 AM
-
#35
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
It's odd that you think one needs to be Christian in order be a rational, thoughtful, and considerate person. Too bad 99% of the "Christians" on this board are the opposite of that.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1682493423 05-11-2023, 09:07 AM
-
#36
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Is that Chris Rock dressed in drag?
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1682493853 05-11-2023, 09:14 AM
-
#37
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
the biggest mistake Christians made and allowed was separating state and religion. the founders should have made amendments in order to preserve Christianity, or have been made to add such provisions.

the results of which you see today. secularism/liberalism/what ever is considered progressive is always going to be the "dominant religion" of the present. and it's always going to clash with religious traditions as a threat to progress. even if said "progress" is now denying what a man and a woman is.

The declaration of independence while it did guarantee freedoms ironically was the nail in the coffin for Christianity. It did nothing to preserve it so they signed their own eventual death warrant. Only just allowed it to exist in a secular/liberal framework. It's basically a slow erosion and burn over the course of 250+ years that will culminate in self-extinction.

Christians got cucked by the provision of separating state and religion.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1682494233 05-11-2023, 09:21 AM
-
#38
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By sooby⏩
the biggest mistake Christians made and allowed was separating state and religion. the founders should have made amendments in order to preserve Christianity, or have been made to add such provisions.

the results of which you see today. secularism/liberalism/what ever is considered progressive is always going to be the "dominant religion" of the present. and it's always going to clash with religious traditions as a threat to progress. even if said "progress" is now denying what a man and a woman is.

The declaration of independence while it did guarantee freedoms ironically was the nail in the coffin for Christianity. It did nothing to preserve it so they signed their own eventual death warrant. Only just allowed it to exist in a secular/liberal framework. It's basically a slow erosion and burn over the course of 250+ years that will culminate in self-extinction.

Christians got cucked by the provision of separating state and religion.
You can read a lot of comments by the Founding Fathers about religion to understand it was intentional. Had something to do with that little thing about having a nation built on freedom.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1682494933 05-11-2023, 09:31 AM
-
#39
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
The "I have a good moral compass and don't subscribe to any Christian ideologies,but everyone else should be indoctrinated with Christianity to be more like me" line is always hilarious, son.
Please cite where I've said that.
post 1682495073 05-11-2023, 09:32 AM
-
#40
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By sooby⏩
the biggest mistake Christians made and allowed was separating state and religion. the founders should have made amendments in order to preserve Christianity, or have been made to add such provisions.

the results of which you see today. secularism/liberalism/what ever is considered progressive is always going to be the "dominant religion" of the present. and it's always going to clash with religious traditions as a threat to progress. even if said "progress" is now denying what a man and a woman is.

The declaration of independence while it did guarantee freedoms ironically was the nail in the coffin for Christianity. It did nothing to preserve it so they signed their own eventual death warrant. Only just allowed it to exist in a secular/liberal framework. It's basically a slow erosion and burn over the course of 250+ years that will culminate in self-extinction.

Christians got cucked by the provision of separating state and religion.
Conservatives are in a losing battle because of an understanding of values and principles. We know something is bad, not because it has already happened, but because our values and principles help us understand WHY something is bad. Explaining this to the leftist is like trying to prove a negative. You can’t always prove it, but you know “2+2=4”.

75%+ of revolutionists and extremists are the youth. Uncoincidentally, they make up a vast majority of the poor too. Unwise, uneducated, poor, worthless, severe Dunning Krueger…this is why election standards matter. Why being responsible before you can vote matters.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1682495343 05-11-2023, 09:35 AM
-
#41
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
You can read a lot of comments by the Founding Fathers about religion to understand it was intentional. Had something to do with that little thing about having a nation built on freedom.
which is my point

build a nation upon "maximum freedom" and "liberal values" and it will all fall into complete degeneracy.

founding fathers cucked Christianity. just lol. even more cucked is Christians not believing in a statehood for religion if their goal is to call as many people to Jesus Christ as possible and have them follow it. What you got now is the majority of Christians only Christian by name, embracing secularism/liberalism and live by general statements like "love thy neighbour" but really the interpretation of this depends on the flavour of the day and teaches to tolerance of everything. Even blue-haired drag queen wackos teaching kids in public school.

just lol soyo
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1682495503 05-11-2023, 09:37 AM
-
#42
  1. hendrixfreak70
  2. My eyes are up here.
  1. hendrixfreak70
  2. My eyes are up here.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 29,337
  6. Subscribers: 16
  7. Rep Power: 746753
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
It's odd that you think one needs to be Christian in order be a rational, thoughtful, and considerate person. Too bad 99% of the "Christians" on this board are the opposite of that.
1%er checking in.
post 1682495623 05-11-2023, 09:38 AM
-
#43
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
so we did this thread about 2-3 weeks ago in the ov35 forum.
cliffs:
It ignores other religions
It is against texas law( someone found the law)
Why is the single religion chosen to follow?

I was for it .......because it sets a cultural standard or code of conduct to be a basic human being, but only a place like Texas could get away with trying it.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1682496083 05-11-2023, 09:45 AM
-
#44
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 43,261
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Yep. I'm not too sure that I agree with this, but I'm certainly not strongly opposed to it either. Even though I don't believe in the Theological stuff, Christianity generally advocates good morals and conduct.
the 1st 4 commandments are a little hokey out side of the church.
but the remaining 6 are solid and a good way to live your life.
post 1682496103 05-11-2023, 09:45 AM
-
#45
  1. Leonydus
  2. Registered User
  1. Leonydus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 23,260
  6. Rep Power: 156188
Originally Posted By suave2000⏩
Something wrong, child molester?
the projection is strong with you, rabbi
post 1682496143 05-11-2023, 09:45 AM
-
#46
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By sooby⏩
which is my point

build a nation upon "maximum freedom" and "liberal values" and it will all fall into complete degeneracy.

founding fathers cucked Christianity. just lol. even more cucked is Christians not believing in a statehood for religion if their goal is to call as many people to Jesus Christ as possible and have them follow it. What you got now is the majority of Christians only Christian by name, embracing secularism/liberalism and live by general statements like "love thy neighbour" but really the interpretation of this depends on the flavour of the day and teaches to tolerance of everything. Even blue-haired drag queen wackos teaching kids in public school.

just lol soyo
What do you think the right is going to do when Democrats destroy the nation? Nothing left to lose? More people will come to God and the state will become non secular again. The key will be reigning in and putting a tight leash on the bureaucratic bodies, which is where the dictatorial powers are stemming from.

The congress and judicial branch are working on this right now. BRB, already saying the pledge of allegiance in congress again.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1682497103 05-11-2023, 10:01 AM
-
#47
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Lack of God, whether it's real/fake/whatever, leads society to some dark places.

At the same time, too much God, or too much power and influence of the Church, is likewise just asking for trouble (trouble in this case being children getting diddled by creeps).

I think society has strayed too far from God for sure, so taking measures to bring it back are not offensive to me. Keep in mind, I do not care whether God is real or not. I think Christian values help fortify the family and society, but hey, I'd take Buddhism and at times open to Islam - if the alternative is Clown World. Again, I am not overly concerned with any of it actually being real. A Godless family and society is worse off than the alternative.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1682497113 05-11-2023, 10:01 AM
-
#48
  1. tyqb4
  2. Registered User
  1. tyqb4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 4,461
  6. Rep Power: 12989
the only purpose of religion in a modern context is to control people and it only works if you keep them dumb enough to believe fantastical things.

state sponsored indoctrination of children is bad in all scenarios.
post 1682497363 05-11-2023, 10:05 AM
-
#49
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By x-trainer
so we did this thread about 2-3 weeks ago in the ov35 forum.
cliffs:
it ignores other religions
it is against texas law( someone found the law)
why is the single religion cosen to follow

I was for it .......because it sets a cultural standard or code of conduct to be a basic human being, but only a place like Texas could get away with trying it.
It also violates the 1st amendment.
post 1682499463 05-11-2023, 10:41 AM
-
#50
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It also violates the 1st amendment.
I don't think we need Canadians trying to tell us what the 1st amendment includes (especially one that advocates for adult nudity in front of children, because...Hooters and NFL cheerleaders).
post 1682499503 05-11-2023, 10:41 AM
-
#51
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
I don't think we need Canadians trying to tell us what the 1st amendment means (especially one that advocates for adult nudity in front of children, because...Hooters and NFL cheerleaders).
Cool. Then you already know this violates the 1st amendment
post 1682499633 05-11-2023, 10:45 AM
-
#52
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Cool. Then you already know this violates the 1st amendment
The presence of a Chaplain does not "violate the 1st amendment". OP mentioned dedicated (not compulsory - though perhaps it would be) prayer time, but that has not actually been proposed or legislated.

Try again.
post 1682499743 05-11-2023, 10:48 AM
-
#53
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
The presence of a Chaplain does not "violate the 1st amendment". OP mentioned dedicated (not compulsory - though perhaps it would be) prayer time, but that has not actually been proposed or legislated.

Try again.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
post 1682500153 05-11-2023, 10:55 AM
-
#54
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"Congressshall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
So...where's "Congress" in all of this? Also a Chaplain = "establishment of religion" is a massive stretch, one that I would expect from a Beavercel who moves decimals 2 places to support his argument.
post 1682501093 05-11-2023, 11:09 AM
-
#55
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
So...where's "Congress" in all of this? Also a Chaplain = "establishment of religion" is a massive stretch, one that I would expect from a Beavercel who moves decimals 2 places to support his argument.
I don't think States are supposed to violate the Constitution. IMO, this won't really be a thing unless it's challenged in court.

What I find interesting is the hypocrisy of the right.

Since this is all well and good, I imagine those in support would also be cool with installing Imams in public schools. That's growth

Personally, I'm opposed to religious representation in public schools. Here we have Catholic schools for those who want religion as part of the children's education.
post 1682501833 05-11-2023, 11:18 AM
-
#56
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don't think States are supposed to violate the Constitution. IMO, this won't really be a thing unless it's challenged in court.

What I find interesting is the hypocrisy of the right.

Since this is all well and good, I imagine those in support would also be cool with installing Imams in public schools. That's growth

Personally, I'm opposed to religious representation in public schools. Here we have Catholic schools for those who want religion as part of the children's education.
So does "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" enter into this discussion?

Also, Chaplains are more like counselors who have a religion (and...at least in the Military they can be NON Christian) but aren't there to aggressively push it or proselytize.
post 1682504433 05-11-2023, 11:45 AM
-
#57
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don't think States are supposed to violate the Constitution. IMO, this won't really be a thing unless it's challenged in court.

What I find interesting is the hypocrisy of the right.

Since this is all well and good, I imagine those in support would also be cool with installing Imams in public schools. That's growth

Personally, I'm opposed to religious representation in public schools. Here we have Catholic schools for those who want religion as part of the children's education.
According to Democrats, if the people will it, it is constitutional. That is the only parameter that matters. What good is a constitution if the Democrats don't want it? What good does it do us to play by the rules, when the Democrats play by no one's rules/laws

Think about this for a moment; the federal government has taken over every aspect of our lives through bureaucracies and are violating federal law on behalf of the left. These bureaucracies do not follow the any legal and constitutional process. Democrat run cities and states, including their businesses, are hiring on the basis of race. The left has deemed eugenics "good" and created a billion dollar industry. School boards and teachers unions are implementing extremist values that violate the constitution.

All the speak of what is constitutional and unconstitutional based simply on ideas is moot. What matters is action. Who is actually breaking the law on a massive scale right now? Then you went to lecture conservatives as they oppose all of these unconstitutional laws?

You are possessed. I mean that psychologically and biblically
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1682506813 05-11-2023, 12:12 PM
-
#58
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,700
  5. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
According to Democrats, if the people will it, it is constitutional. That is the only parameter that matters. What good is a constitution if the Democrats don't want it? What good does it do us to play by the rules, when the Democrats play by no one's rules/laws

Think about this for a moment; the federal government has taken over every aspect of our lives through bureaucracies and are violating federal law on behalf of the left. These bureaucracies do not follow the any legal and constitutional process. Democrat run cities and states, including their businesses, are hiring on the basis of race. The left has deemed eugenics "good" and created a billion dollar industry. School boards and teachers unions are implementing extremist values that violate the constitution.

All the speak of what is constitutional and unconstitutional based simply on ideas is moot. What matters is action. Who is actually breaking the law on a massive scale right now? Then you went to lecture conservatives as they oppose all of these unconstitutional laws?

You are possessed. I mean that psychologically and biblically
You shouldn't dignify him with such lengthy responses. He will find one little thing to nipick, while ignoring all of the rest.

Meanwhile, he still hasn't even found that vile of comirnaty.
post 1682506983 05-11-2023, 12:14 PM
-
#59
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
According to Democrats, if the people will it, it is constitutional. That is the only parameter that matters. What good is a constitution if the Democrats don't want it? What good does it do us to play by the rules, when the Democrats play by no one's rules/laws

Think about this for a moment; the federal government has taken over every aspect of our lives through bureaucracies and are violating federal law on behalf of the left. These bureaucracies do not follow the any legal and constitutional process. Democrat run cities and states, including their businesses, are hiring on the basis of race. The left has deemed eugenics "good" and created a billion dollar industry. School boards and teachers unions are implementing extremist values that violate the constitution.

All the speak of what is constitutional and unconstitutional based simply on ideas is moot. What matters is action. Who is actually breaking the law on a massive scale right now? Then you went to lecture conservatives as they oppose all of these unconstitutional laws?

You are possessed. I mean that psychologically and biblically
This is precisely the hypocrisy to which I referred.

I also mentioned it's rather meaningless unless/until challenged in court.

The government here routinely violates our Charter and laws. My view is that it's better to challenge them in court than to give a free pass to the opposing party to do the same thing. In my view, politicians are sh!t regardless of which banner they fly.

In my opinion, if a country has a Constitution or Charter, it should be used to hold the government of the day to account - regardless of party.
post 1682508003 05-11-2023, 12:27 PM
-
#60
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
This is precisely the hypocrisy to which I referred.

I also mentioned it's rather meaningless unless/until challenged in court.

The government here routinely violates our Charter and laws. My view is that it's better to challenge them in court than to give a free pass to the opposing party to do the same thing. In my view, politicians are sh!t regardless of which banner they fly.

In my opinion, if a country has a Constitution or Charter, it should be used to hold the government of the day to account - regardless of party.
Ideas mean nothing if you can't recognize pattern behavior and know what causes good and evil. People are generally good when left alone. Your complaint is about the reaction when it should be about the cause. In other words, you are trying to cure a symptom while ignoring the disease. There is only one time than an extremist right rose up, and it was in reaction to the far left. We have one example. Other examples would include oppressed groups rising up against they're supposed oppressor. In other words, if the left overthrows the right, the right will overthrow the left again, it's only a matter of time

If rule of law was reestablished, you would see conservatives all but disappear again. They are more worried about their personal lives than they are coercing their neighbor through political means.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts