Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Misc homeowners: should I buy my first house on full cash?
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 76
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. Last
post 1686643353 07-16-2023, 08:43 PM
-
#31
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts
Because the discussion on this board is rarely scientific enough. It's much better over at Bogleheads.

Here large, sweeping comments are made about entire countries without a care for the basic principle in property investments: location, location, location.

It's how you can separate the LARPers from the actual property investors, btw. Rather easily.
I've talked to lot of people about this and nobody ever considers taxes, cash flow or risk


I think because paying off a house early is not cool or sexy. It's the plain, boring way to do things


In reality, paying off your house at say 45 and maxing out your 401k at a young age is all you need to live very very comfortably. Most people fail at finances because they try to be too cutesy. One of my old co workers was a 50 year old black guy whose broke. He's a maxed out 600 credit score despite making 100K+ for the majority of his life. He's always done one stupid thing after another. If he just lived conservatively, he could have been in a great position
post 1686643523 07-16-2023, 08:49 PM
-
#32
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 6,959
  7. Rep Power: 6854
Originally Posted By ATB161
I've talked to lot of people about this and nobody ever considers taxes, cash flow or risk


I think because paying off a house early is not cool or sexy. It's the plain, boring way to do things


In reality, paying off your house at say 45 and maxing out your 401k at a young age is all you need to live very very comfortably. Most people fail at finances because they try to be too cutesy. One of my old co workers was a 50 year old black guy whose broke. He's a maxed out 600 credit score despite making 100K+ for the majority of his life. He's always done one stupid thing after another. If he just lived conservatively, he could have been in a great position
it's an interesting prospect for sure, paying off a home early. I'd imagine if I bought a $1M home by 40 and put $500k down, could probably pay off the home by the time I was 45. At that point if combined income is $300k or so, we would have kids that are between 5-10 years old, with house paid off.. all that income would pretty much go to savings.

Thing is, I've never been a fan of early retirement. We aren't meant to sit around rotting and taking things easy, humans are meant to chase goals. I know people who started poor and paid off their $1M homes in their 40s but are still working in their 50s.

What happens if there's a freak accident and the house burns down or there's a tornado or something? Does insurance pay out? One more thing to think about. If not, all that equity is a waste.
post 1686643703 07-16-2023, 08:52 PM
-
#33
  1. Bando
  1. Bando
  2. Join Date: Jun 2007
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 41,447
  5. Rep Power: 467819
Originally Posted By sam212
All three credit scores are over 800. Zero debt and decently high income.
I have zero debt and zero credit score. I'm pretty sure you can't have a high credit score and be debt free, a credit score is based on your ability to repay debt, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.
Don't put that on me Ricky Bobby, don't you ever put that on me.
post 1686643773 07-16-2023, 08:53 PM
-
#34
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 6,959
  7. Rep Power: 6854
Originally Posted By Bando
I have zero debt and zero credit score. I'm pretty sure you can't have a high credit score and be debt free, a credit score is based on your ability to repay debt, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.
he pays off his revolving debt on time
post 1686643833 07-16-2023, 08:54 PM
-
#35
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
it's an interesting prospect for sure, paying off a home early. I'd imagine if I bought a $1M home by 40 and put $500k down, could probably pay off the home by the time I was 45. At that point if combined income is $300k or so, we would have kids that are between 5-10 years old, with house paid off.. all that income would pretty much go to savings.

Thing is, I've never been a fan of early retirement. We aren't meant to sit around rotting and taking things easy, humans are meant to chase goals. I know people who started poor and paid off their $1M homes in their 40s but are still working in their 50s.

What happens if there's a freak accident and the house burns down or there's a tornado or something? Does insurance pay out? One more thing to think about. If not, all that equity is a waste.
Of course house insurance pays everything. Why else have insurance? That's a very dumb question, no offense
post 1686643893 07-16-2023, 08:54 PM
-
#36
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Bando
I have zero debt and zero credit score. I'm pretty sure you can't have a high credit score and be debt free, a credit score is based on your ability to repay debt, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.
Not true


Have credit cards and just pay everything on time with 0 balance. You'll have 800 score
post 1686643913 07-16-2023, 08:55 PM
-
#37
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 6,959
  7. Rep Power: 6854
Originally Posted By ATB161
Of course house insurance pays everything. Why else have insurance? That's a very dumb question, no offense
insurance will find any reason to not pay out. there are always clauses in there that fuk over the policy holder. not a dumb question.

look at car insurance, medical insurance, life insurance, etc.. all try to find reasons to not pay out.
post 1686644043 07-16-2023, 08:58 PM
-
#38
  1. OliverHeldens
  1. OliverHeldens
  2. Join Date: Oct 2014
  3. Age: 33
  4. Posts: 43,126
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 131286
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
it's an interesting prospect for sure, paying off a home early. I'd imagine if I bought a $1M home by 40 and put $500k down, could probably pay off the home by the time I was 45. At that point if combined income is $300k or so, we would have kids that are between 5-10 years old, with house paid off.. all that income would pretty much go to savings.

Thing is, I've never been a fan of early retirement. We aren't meant to sit around rotting and taking things easy, humans are meant to chase goals. I know people who started poor and paid off their $1M homes in their 40s but are still working in their 50s.

What happens if there's a freak accident and the house burns down or there's a tornado or something? Does insurance pay out? One more thing to think about. If not, all that equity is a waste.
Yeah, the average wagecel isn't really intended to "retire early". If a person has been an entrepreneur their entire life, it's dooable as they typically have different business ventures that can be maintained during later years while still working fewer hours.

But a person used to punching a clock for 40 years all of a sudden doing nothing? It's a lot of golf.
post 1686644283 07-16-2023, 09:02 PM
-
#39
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,138
  6. Rep Power: 36310
Originally Posted By Bando
I have zero debt and zero credit score. I'm pretty sure you can't have a high credit score and be debt free, a credit score is based on your ability to repay debt, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.
Do you have a credit card? Do you use it? I do, I use it and pay it immediately.
post 1686644343 07-16-2023, 09:04 PM
-
#40
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By ATB161
I've talked to lot of people about this and nobody ever considers taxes, cash flow or risk


I think because paying off a house early is not cool or sexy. It's the plain, boring way to do things


In reality, paying off your house at say 45 and maxing out your 401k at a young age is all you need to live very very comfortably. Most people fail at finances because they try to be too cutesy. One of my old co workers was a 50 year old black guy whose broke. He's a maxed out 600 credit score despite making 100K+ for the majority of his life. He's always done one stupid thing after another. If he just lived conservatively, he could have been in a great position
"Nobody ever"? I can assure you that successful Lords of the Land do.

There are two schools of thought on 'paying off a house early', between the "I'm comfortable leveraging debt" and the "I benefit psychologically from not carrying loans". It's a subjective discussion in a sense but the latter category has a normative force there - if folks' health suffers when having a loan, then the benefit from paying off the loan earlier outweighs other considerations, including associated penalties. For the "leveraging debt" crew, it becomes easy to put X deposit down and take Y loan, and calculate a rental price (having researched this thoroughly) which will pay off the loan amount, income tax (e.g.) on rental income, upkeep/maintenance, etc.

And the fact that some on this forum assume that this is impossible is the coping mechanism I refer to. And most fail at finances because they never really think it through. They were born and raised to make excuses rather than to try to overcome. They fundamentally lack the resilience and emotional maturity to progress.
post 1686645033 07-16-2023, 09:25 PM
-
#41
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts
"Nobody ever"? I can assure you that successful Lords of the Land do.

There are two schools of thought on 'paying off a house early', between the "I'm comfortable leveraging debt" and the "I benefit psychologically from not carrying loans". It's a subjective discussion in a sense but the latter category has a normative force there - if folks' health suffers when having a loan, then the benefit from paying off the loan earlier outweighs other considerations, including associated penalties. For the "leveraging debt" crew, it becomes easy to put X deposit down and take Y loan, and calculate a rental price (having researched this thoroughly) which will pay off the loan amount, income tax (e.g.) on rental income, upkeep/maintenance, etc.

And the fact that some on this forum assume that this is impossible is the coping mechanism I refer to. And most fail at finances because they never really think it through. They were born and raised to make excuses rather than to try to overcome. They fundamentally lack the resilience and emotional maturity to progress.
The leveraging game is finished. Leveraging was great when you could get a 2.5% mortgage for 30 years, not at 7%. It makes zero sense

Now there's no excuse to carry debt unless you absolutely have to

And it's not like you can make a profit in buying a house now and renting it out. Rental payments are way cheaper than mortgage payments
post 1686645083 07-16-2023, 09:26 PM
-
#42
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
insurance will find any reason to not pay out. there are always clauses in there that fuk over the policy holder. not a dumb question.

look at car insurance, medical insurance, life insurance, etc.. all try to find reasons to not pay out.
The odds of having some catastrophic event is very very low but good insurance will always pay out. I've had clients at work with very expensive cars get smashed and insurance always pays properly
post 1686645203 07-16-2023, 09:29 PM
-
#43
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By ATB161
The leveraging game is finished. Leveraging was great when you could get a 2.5% mortgage for 30 years, not at 7%. It makes zero sense

Now there's no excuse to carry debt unless you absolutely have to

And it's not like you can make a profit in buying a house now and renting it out. Rental payments are way cheaper than mortgage payments
Sigh.
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts
Because the discussion on this board is rarely scientific enough. It's much better over at Bogleheads.

Here large, sweeping comments are made about entire countries without a care for the basic principle in property investments: location, location, location.

It's how you can separate the LARPers from the actual property investors, btw. Rather easily.
Edit: It's carsalesman, I feel like negging myself for not noticing it, lol. Carry on.
post 1686645373 07-16-2023, 09:37 PM
-
#44
  1. Schnitzl
  2. calf of peace
  1. Schnitzl
  2. calf of peace
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 20,067
  5. Rep Power: 183416
Originally Posted By sam212
Budget is between 700k-1.2mil. Looking at couple of areas. Probably around 3000 sqft
.
It will probably depend on location a lot. You can research the areas and see the house prices. If the graph looks like this, you are better off waiting a bit, if not, go for it. Gambling that you can make a fraction more in bonds or ETFs is riskier than owning a house outright.

post 1686646383 07-16-2023, 10:03 PM
-
#45
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 6,959
  7. Rep Power: 6854
If you're an MD pulling $400k+ why would you settle for a $700-1.2M home? You could afford more. That's the type of home a dual income household would buy that makes $300k or so.
post 1686646543 07-16-2023, 10:06 PM
-
#46
  1. Godfrd824
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Join Date: Oct 2008
  3. Location: DevilMayRage's Head, Rent Free
  4. Posts: 57,343
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 385379
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
If you're an MD pulling $400k+ why would you settle for a $700-1.2M home? You could afford more. That's the type of home a dual income household would buy that makes $300k or so.
You're supposed love below your means.
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
post 1686646773 07-16-2023, 10:10 PM
-
#47
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  1. Crazy_Desi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 6,959
  7. Rep Power: 6854
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
If you're an MD pulling $400k+ why would you settle for a $700-1.2M home? You could afford more. That's the type of home a dual income household would buy that makes $300k or so.
Also, where you looking OP? South Barrington?
post 1686646963 07-16-2023, 10:14 PM
-
#48
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,138
  6. Rep Power: 36310
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
If you're an MD pulling $400k+ why would you settle for a $700-1.2M home? You could afford more. That's the type of home a dual income household would buy that makes $300k or so.
Making more than 400k, just not looking to buy something too extravagant. Something nice and practical. Both me and the wife come from humble background, so we’re happy with that. We’d like to live in a nice walkable community with great schools. Rather not say where I live to remain anonymous.
post 1686647133 07-16-2023, 10:19 PM
-
#49
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Crazy_Desi
If you're an MD pulling $400k+ why would you settle for a $700-1.2M home? You could afford more. That's the type of home a dual income household would buy that makes $300k or so.
Why do you need something more than that? I have a buddy with a 5000 sqr foot house and he uses maybe half of it


Anything more than 3000 square feet is typically overkill and half used
post 1686647193 07-16-2023, 10:20 PM
-
#50
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts
Sigh.



Edit: It's carsalesman, I feel like negging myself for not noticing it, lol. Carry on.
Nothing I said is incorrect


"Leveraging" now when rates are astronomical is complete stupidity
post 1686647203 07-16-2023, 10:21 PM
-
#51
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,516
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 595865
Yes but wait until the 60% price crash



post 1686647293 07-16-2023, 10:23 PM
-
#52
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Schnitzl
It will probably depend on location a lot. You can research the areas and see the house prices. If the graph looks like this, you are better off waiting a bit, if not, go for it. Gambling that you can make a fraction more in bonds or ETFs is riskier than owning a house outright.

Sigh. Another person who has no clue


How would bonds pay more than the 6.5%? Keep in mind bonds growth gets taxed where savings on mortgage interest is untaxed. You would need 10+% for it to make sense
post 1686647453 07-16-2023, 10:28 PM
-
#53
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
....
post 1686647473 07-16-2023, 10:29 PM
-
#54
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
[QUOTE=r32gojirra post_id=1686647203]Yes but wait until the 60% price crash

[imttps://imagecdn.bodybuilding.com/gallery-photo/29855246/e91d03dfe76d4e79b51124a971f3bbe7-610xh.jpg[/img]

]https://imagecdn.bodybuilding.com/gallery-photo/29855246/e9751384850345f3a011d3ce5fb286a0-610xh.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
A lot of people saw what happened in 2007 and assumed it's inevitable it will happen again


In reality the current market factors are driven so to where another crash is extremely unlikely. How are people gonna default on a house when they know the Rent payment will be triple otherwise if they are evicted? Most people either bought or refied in 2020 so you have a bunch of people with 1200 payments in an era when rent payment would be 2500 a month...


These people will hold on to these mortgages like their life depended on it and will let a car get repoed before anything else
post 1686647563 07-16-2023, 10:32 PM
-
#55
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Posts: 8,607
  5. Rep Power: 55368
I would buy the house in cash. No mortgage, no monthly payments. It would make for a lovely life.

With that said, at the present moment I would wait a year or so simply because the housing market is exhibiting bubble behavior. At the very least I would get a six-month apartment lease with the intention of buying right at the end of that.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glow, glow, glow your boat
post 1686647613 07-16-2023, 10:33 PM
-
#56
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LurkoLantern
I would buy the house in cash. No mortgage, no monthly payments. It would make for a lovely life.

With that said, at the present moment I would wait a year or so simply because the housing market is exhibiting bubble behavior. At the very least I would get a six-month apartment lease with the intention of buying right at the end of that.
Anybody who claims they can read or predict the house market is full of chit

Wasting another 16K on an apartment for 6 months is nonsense. Buy a house as soon as you can
post 1686647653 07-16-2023, 10:34 PM
-
#57
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  1. ATB161
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,143
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy
Sure he could afford more, but does he need more? What value will having more add? He could just live extremely comfortable and invest the rest.
0 value

Anything bigger than 3000 sqr feet is not even close to being fully used, unless maybe u have 5 kids and 3 dogs
post 1686648163 07-16-2023, 10:50 PM
-
#58
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 54,085
  5. Rep Power: 321216
Dude you’re 40 without a home wtf
Losers let it happen, winners make it happen.

Nonsense Army Crew.
post 1686648223 07-16-2023, 10:53 PM
-
#59
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  1. sam212
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,138
  6. Rep Power: 36310
Originally Posted By Nonsense916
Dude you’re 40 without a home wtf
What’s the big deal boyo?
post 1686648463 07-16-2023, 11:00 PM
-
#60
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
Buying a house cash may give you a sense of personal security because you won't have a debt that you owe, you'll just be responsible for your property taxes and HOA if applicable

Buying a house with leverage means you can have the rest of that cash available for investing which *should* net you more in the long run. Especially when you consider you can write off mortgage interest on your taxes

It's up to you and if you need that sense of personal security or not OP
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts