You and I seem to be arguing about two very different things and maybe even concepts. You were the one who went on a tangent about chromosomes. Your argument implies that because women don't have the Y chromosome that their differences are significant to men. Chromosomes are more responsible for physical appearance than an actual difference in terms of interests or desires. Therefore, chromosomes don't and can't really prove that men and women are that much different. If you take the male and female brain you'll have a hard time saying it's all that significantly different.

Find me a study that claims that the male and female brain has the same level of differences as their chromosomes. Genetics are much more complicated than just X and Y chromosomes. Just because a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina doesn't mean we are that much different. If we look at all the chromosome base pairs within a human body, then our genders are only 1.8% different. So much for the Y chromosome being that much different, which is kind of pointless to argue because the X chromosome is there for both genders.

https://www.thetech.org/ask-a-geneti...5%20the%20same.

1. They aren't dating. Dating is for a purpose of eventual bf/gf and/or marriage. If it is is just fun, they it is basically prostitution
2. If I were the 55 year old, I would have to be a Chad to do it. If I were Chris Christie doing it, and I knew she was repulsed, I would feel guilty and embarrassed.o would have to know she was attracted

No, you didn't say it directly, but you did agree with SS and that's what SS wrote, btw. Both men and women notice the physical appearance first. Men are more prone to just going full physical and women mental, but that doesn't mean that there aren't men who don't like older women and younger women who don't prefer older men. That was SS argument and I disagreed with it. None of this changes the fact that I have encountered plenty of women who don't fit the emotional stimulation narrative. You'd think men and women were the same based on how many women these days strictly care about looks and will only have sex with guys who look hot to them. Which pretty much goes against what SS said with the whole "women want money and attention." and claimed that men and women are completely different.

They simp

When did I ever claim that male and female brains have the "same level of differences" as their chromosomes? I used "chromosomes" as an important factor, WITHOUT necessarily equating the level of sameness between chromosome differences and brain structural differences. There's scientific studies showing that the brain structures of males and females are quite different. People who yell that men and women are the same mentally and brain structure wise are so d*mb and scientifically illiterate.

1. if that's your definition of prostitution, then most dating is prostitution because usually it involves men paying for dinner or giving her a little gift etc etc.
2. "If I were the 55 year old, I would have to be a Chad to do it. " -> Yes, any 55 year old business man with charisma dating a beautiful 20 year old girl smashing her is a Chad.

Oh so you're ADMITTING that I didn't say it. LOL. and then you're saying I "agreed with SS" who said it.. but guess what? When I said " I agree with SS", I meant that I agree with his OTHER comments, not the specific comment that you're referring to.So... you agree with me then. Yes, men are MUCH more focused on physical aspect while women are MUCH more focused on mental/emotional aspects "in general". Yes there are exceptions but I said "in general". And no, a young man "in general" would not be attracted to a 70 year old granny, NO. It's not that hard to understand.

We're not arguing about the generals, though. At least, I'm not. It's like this: If there are men who are attracted to older women, then there are likewise women who are attracted to older men. SS disagreed with that, hence my response. How am I supposed to know which parts you agreed or disagreed with? Again, I never said there were no differences between men or women only that it's fake as chit to assume they are completely different, which is what SS claimed.

The average westernized woman is vain and corrupted by feminism. That's part of the social engineering. What I mean by that is that many things that boys and girls are taught from a young age shape their interests and desires later on in life. For example, how many women would prefer the color pink if they weren't constantly surrounded with it since infancy?

You know the story: girls are given dolls to play with from a very young age and boys are given toy cars. But would those boys care half as much about cars if they never were around them? The fact that I've encountered women who were no less self-aware and observant of the world than men, tells me that it's not all clear-cut.

Non-westernized women have more going on in their brains than just petty face value chit. Women can be very manipulative just like men, but they do it in slightly different ways and they use their feminine charms to their advantage. You talk to enough men and women on a personal level and you start to see how much of what you were taught about the sexes is bs.

That so-called "dumb blonde" meme I see everywhere is laughably wrong. Those chicks aren't actually stupid, they are precise in their manipulation. Everything they do is either for attention or to get what they want from the simps. This does not really prove the differences in gender. If a man were born a woman and had the same opportunity he'd do the same damn thing, because it's the easy way out and few wouldn't take it if they had the ability.

Generalities are kind of pointless when considering how much of it is actually due to nurture and upbringing instead of biological differences. I've met enough tomboys and strange metrosexual guys to scratch my head, because they don't seem to fit in with the so-called "heteronormative behavior patterns." Some of it is because of the media and LGBT + cultural Marxism and yet there are also those who weren't really brainwashed and are still weird.

If I was a billionaire I would go for 16-18 year olds exclusively.

Again with your feminist logic. Generalities do matter a lot and there are significant differences between men and women biologically and mentally. Stop saying men are women and women are men by picking rare cases from fringe groups.That's why you feminists have been saying that black kids pick the white doll over black doll because of racist nurturing. Right... so like you said, all those black parents are teaching their kids to prefer the white doll. You're literally d*mb as f*ck.

Nice. But explain to me why most miscers would call you evil and pathetic and try to imprison you if you do that.

People get mad at this and act like the girl has no free will or anything. She is choosing to be with an older man. So what?

No idea wtf you are talking about. You're talking smack at this point. Both extremes are incorrect. Racial differences are not the same as gender differences. The problem is you clearly believe that the 1950s were superior to what we have now, but post-WWII was already corrupt. You don't even have to say it, but it's evident that you think life before the 1960s was superior to the modern era. Here's the thing: cars weren't even around until the the late 19th century. Did boys instantly choose carriages and chariots as their favorite toys before then? Both Marxism and the nuclear family idea were part of social engineering, except for completely different reasons. Until the end of the middle ages the difference in the clothes men and women wore weren't extremely different. Wealthy men used to wear weird feminized clothes with tights and powdered their faces just like women.

Both men and women once wore multicolored robes including various red colors. By the 18th century both male and female aristocrats wore pink clothes and it wasn't considered gay or weird. Nowadays the differences in fashion between the sexes is much more evident. Everything is very extreme these days. You are either a super leftist Marxist or a far right Fascist according to the average pleb. That's how the modern world sees everything and neither side is fully correct. All of this is done not to make a clear distinction between men and women, but to turn men and women against each other as though we are not part of the whole. Read what I'm actually saying and not what you assume I'm saying.

Is there a difference between the genders? Of course there is. For one thing women are naturally submissive and men are dominant. Women tend to fall in line more and are better at adapting to social norms than men. Women also follow whereas men are natural born leaders, even if it's just their own community or household. A typical woman prefers that a man be confident and courts her instead of the other way around. Other than feminists, women don't really want to be the boss. I'm aware of these things about the genders and don't deny them. However, our interests tend to align even if it's from slightly different angles. Opposites attract does not mean we are completely different, it just means we have different genders and the differences I mentioned. If someone of the opposite sex is completely different from you, then sooner or later they'll annoy you and you'll want nothing to do with them.

The average man does not actually want a wet towel for a wife or a frigid woman. They think they do because of the social engineering, but they actually want a woman who is capable of taking care of herself when the man is at work. In an ideal society, men know they could rely on their women to have a stable house with obedient children, etc. No man wants a woman who falls apart emotionally over every little thing. That's the kind of bs that was shown during the Hayes Code and it's a false understanding of how the sexes work. Tempted to neg for being so obtuse.

No idea wtf you are talking about. You're talking smack at this point. Both extremes are incorrect. Racial differences are not the same as gender differences. The problem is you clearly believe that the 1950s were superior to what we have now, but post-WWII was already corrupt. You don't even have to say it, but it's evident that you think life before the 1960s was superior to the modern era. Here's the thing: cars weren't even around until the the late 19th century. Did boys instantly choose carriages and chariots as their favorite toys before then? Both Marxism and the nuclear family idea were part of social engineering, except for completely different reasons. Until the end of the middle ages the difference in the clothes men and women wore weren't extremely different. Wealthy men used to wear weird feminized clothes with tights and powdered their faces just like women.

Both men and women once wore multicolored robes including various red colors. By the 18th century both male and female aristocrats wore pink clothes and it wasn't considered gay or weird. Nowadays the differences in fashion between the sexes is much more evident. Everything is very extreme these days. You are either a super leftist Marxist or a far right Fascist according to the average pleb. That's how the modern world sees everything and neither side is fully correct. All of this is done not to make a clear distinction between men and women, but to turn men and women against each other as though we are not part of the whole. Read what I'm actually saying and not what you assume I'm saying.

Is there a difference between the genders? Of course there is. For one thing women are naturally submissive and men are dominant. Women tend to fall in line more and are better at adapting to social norms than men. Women also follow whereas men are natural born leaders, even if it's just their own community or household. A typical woman prefers that a man be confident and courts her instead of the other way around. Other than feminists, women don't really want to be the boss. I'm aware of these things about the genders and don't deny them. However, our interests tend to align even if it's from slightly different angles. Opposites attract does not mean we are completely different, it just means we have different genders and the differences I mentioned. If someone of the opposite sex is completely different from you, then sooner or later they'll annoy you and you'll want nothing to do with them.

The average man does not actually want a wet towel for a wife or a frigid woman. They think they do because of the social engineering, but they actually want a woman who is capable of taking care of herself when the man is at work. In an ideal society, men know they could rely on their women to have a stable house with obedient children, etc. No man wants a woman who falls apart emotionally over every little thing. That's the kind of bs that was shown during the Hayes Code and it's a false understanding of how the sexes work. Tempted to neg for being so obtuse.

aw fuk bye

No different than these girls becoming lesbians and putting their every move on tic toc. Nothing is moral anymore. If you can get a girl that makes you happy you should do it.