Forum
»
Carson on American Communist Manifesto from Congress
09-18-2023, 03:12 PM
-
#31
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
That wasn’t an answer. That was a non answer.A good answer is to not elect a con artist like Trump. That's a start.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-18-2023, 03:51 PM
-
#32
- MasterMorality
- Registered User
-
- MasterMorality
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,880
- Rep Power: 7074
-
-
Marxism/Communism and socialism in general, at least in America, are nothing more than a neoliberal psyop, or more properly, a high finance, banking, and industrialist psyop. Those predatory capitalists seem to always come out clean and even with more profit and power whenever something "socialist" takes place economically or politically. The recent covid pandemic (so-called) was an example. Who came out with more money and power? The highest levels of capitalists and their shabbos goyim in a variety of nations (who dominate other nations in a simple yet brutal hierarchy) made money, did what they wanted throughout, and have more power than ever on a global scale.
Pro-Palestine, Pro-China, Pro-Iran, Pro-Russia, Pro-Venezuela
09-18-2023, 04:00 PM
-
#33
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 65
- Posts: 11,675
- Rep Power: 83841
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
You voted for Clinton and for Biden and you voted for Newsom.....A good answer is to not elect a con artist like Trump. That's a start.
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
09-18-2023, 04:03 PM
-
#34
- Noliberals4
- Registered User
-
- Noliberals4
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Location: United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 34,396
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By freeheeler⏩
Tell me why you support Trump. Give specific/concrete reasons and examples why.You voted for Clinton and for Biden and you voted for Newsom.....
I will wait.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong
Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
09-18-2023, 04:07 PM
-
#35
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
-
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: United States
- Age: 11
- Posts: 11,242
- Rep Power: 49990
-
-
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Aside from the last one (divorce rate) marxist/anarchist travelers had those fields infiltrated and dominated by the early 1900's.Cliffs;
#15- Take control of one or both political parties. Democrat party happened first, but RINOs are the socialists in sheep’s clothing. So essentially they have both parties at this point.
#17- Gain control of the schools. “Soften the curriculum” with propaganda and dumb down education to make the youth more easily controlled. Gain control of teacher’s associations.
#20- Infiltrate the press. Implement propaganda in books, textbooks, and media. Gain a key role in shows and movies.
#32- Push any and all socialist agendas and ideas to gain control over the culture; Social agencies, MENTAL HEALTH…
#40- Discredit the family and the institution of marriage. Promote promiscuous behavior. Make divorce easier, and find ways to get children away from parents. Suppress the influence of parents.
Drive a wedge based on anything social; religion, race, age, income, gender, political affiliation…
Now look at those among us who push these agendas on the forums, and in our lives. Help them see that we are not the enemy. That the ideas of communism and the politicians who push them are the real enemy.
#15- Take control of one or both political parties. Democrat party happened first, but RINOs are the socialists in sheep’s clothing. So essentially they have both parties at this point.
#17- Gain control of the schools. “Soften the curriculum” with propaganda and dumb down education to make the youth more easily controlled. Gain control of teacher’s associations.
#20- Infiltrate the press. Implement propaganda in books, textbooks, and media. Gain a key role in shows and movies.
#32- Push any and all socialist agendas and ideas to gain control over the culture; Social agencies, MENTAL HEALTH…
#40- Discredit the family and the institution of marriage. Promote promiscuous behavior. Make divorce easier, and find ways to get children away from parents. Suppress the influence of parents.
Drive a wedge based on anything social; religion, race, age, income, gender, political affiliation…
Now look at those among us who push these agendas on the forums, and in our lives. Help them see that we are not the enemy. That the ideas of communism and the politicians who push them are the real enemy.
See the chit George Orwell had to go through just to get Animal Farm published.
Boston sports crew
Live Free or Die 603 crew
Ex-Howard Stern crew
1974 crew
***Connoisseur: Les Derrieres de Femmes ***
09-18-2023, 04:20 PM
-
#36
Originally Posted By HaiMeesk⏩
Orwell was a socialist.Aside from the last one (divorce rate) marxist/anarchist travelers had those fields infiltrated and dominated by the early 1900's.
See the chit George Orwell had to go through just to get Animal Farm published.
See the chit George Orwell had to go through just to get Animal Farm published.
09-18-2023, 04:22 PM
-
#37
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Socialism advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.Socialism is defined as “State control over the means of production”. The state is also defined as the public sector, AKA, collective. Capitalism is the private individual, not a collective.
09-18-2023, 04:23 PM
-
#38
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
-
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: United States
- Age: 11
- Posts: 11,242
- Rep Power: 49990
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
He wasn't the right type of socialist.Orwell was a socialist.
Boston sports crew
Live Free or Die 603 crew
Ex-Howard Stern crew
1974 crew
***Connoisseur: Les Derrieres de Femmes ***
09-18-2023, 04:26 PM
-
#39
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
Lol @ dipchit here ignoring facts as always, proving once again he knows nothing..typical lib. Has to jump to Trump when he realizes he is the Commie.Trump spent more money per year than Obama did.
09-18-2023, 04:34 PM
-
#40
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
no one has any incentive to produce anything in a communist system. it's been tried dozens of times.Socialism advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
And before you say, “but China”..China is an capitalist country that happens to have an autocratic ruling party that has ‘communist’ in its name. That is all. China capitalizes on the international market and needs other countries to survive via imports and exports.
09-18-2023, 04:40 PM
-
#41
- bluebeltATT
- Registered User
-
- bluebeltATT
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 26,943
- Rep Power: 141774
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
Absolute pathetic low IQ moran hereA good answer is to not elect a con artist like Trump. That's a start.
You are quickly becoming more of a moron than NYPat is.
The fact that you have no idea that the things that Biden have done/are doing over shadows anything Trump could ever do
Trump was already a billionaire when he got into politics, Biden enriched himself because of politics and the fact that you can't even identify that as a problem just negates any and all arguments you have about literally anything
ABSOLUTE FKNG GOOFABSOLUTE FKNG GOOF
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu purple belt
guns
god
jiu jitsu
09-18-2023, 04:41 PM
-
#42
Originally Posted By Paul
Mixing and matching terms, definitions, and philosophies is something one can dono one has any incentive to produce anything in a communist system. it's been tried dozens of times.
And before you say, “but China”..China is an capitalist country that happens to have an autocratic ruling party that has ‘communist’ in its name. That is all. China capitalizes on the international market and needs other countries to survive via imports and exports.
And before you say, “but China”..China is an capitalist country that happens to have an autocratic ruling party that has ‘communist’ in its name. That is all. China capitalizes on the international market and needs other countries to survive via imports and exports.

09-18-2023, 04:44 PM
-
#43
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Not understanding what those terms, definitions & philosophies mean is something you can do.Mixing and matching terms, definitions, and philosophies is something you can do


09-18-2023, 04:50 PM
-
#44
Originally Posted By Paul
Can, yes. But didn'tNot understanding what those terms, definitions & philosophies mean is something you can do.


I provided a primary tenet of socialism, which Kraken misrepresented. Then you responded with communism and capitalist china stuff

09-18-2023, 04:53 PM
-
#45
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Because socialism is a slippery slope to communism, just like when we said gay marriage rights is a slippery slope to p3doism..understand now?Can, yes. But didn't
I provided a primary tenet of socialism, which Kraken misrepresented. Then you responded with communism and capitalist china stuff

I provided a primary tenet of socialism, which Kraken misrepresented. Then you responded with communism and capitalist china stuff

09-18-2023, 05:00 PM
-
#46
Originally Posted By Paul
No.Because socialism is a slippery slope to communism, just like when we said gay marriage rights is a slippery slope to p3doism..understand now?
But, your style of argument and logic are nearly impossible to follow.
09-18-2023, 05:06 PM
-
#47
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
What socialists believe and what socialism is in reality can be two different things.Socialism advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
The theory is that it’s the collective, or the public sector, that takes control over the means of production. Ultimately the state always gets involved, because socialism always fails, and the state must step in to keep it alive. Your definition is based on the lack of applied evidence; the real world processes and end. The definition I gave is the most accurate based on evidence of application, and encompasses the whole of socialism. State = public sector, collectives, and government = socialism. Private = individual = capitalism.
Basing definitions on the idea is Marxist, because Marxism is purely dialectical, and not based on reality. A real scientist/economist bases definitions on reality and everything we know.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-18-2023, 05:07 PM
-
#48
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Only because your posts do not follow any logic.No.
But, your style of argument and logic are nearly impossible to follow.
But, your style of argument and logic are nearly impossible to follow.
09-18-2023, 05:19 PM
-
#49
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
It's not my definition. What I provided was a primary tenet of the philosophy.What socialists believe and what socialism is in reality can be two different things.
The theory is that it’s the collective, or the public sector, that takes control over the means of production. Ultimately the state always gets involved, because socialism always fails, and the state must step in to keep it alive. Your definition is based on the lack of applied evidence; the real world processes and end. The definition I gave is the most accurate based on evidence of application, and encompasses the whole of socialism. State = public sector, collectives, and government = socialism. Private = individual = capitalism.
Basing definitions on the idea is Marxist, because Marxism is purely dialectical, and not based on reality. A real scientist/economist bases definitions on reality and everything we know.
The theory is that it’s the collective, or the public sector, that takes control over the means of production. Ultimately the state always gets involved, because socialism always fails, and the state must step in to keep it alive. Your definition is based on the lack of applied evidence; the real world processes and end. The definition I gave is the most accurate based on evidence of application, and encompasses the whole of socialism. State = public sector, collectives, and government = socialism. Private = individual = capitalism.
Basing definitions on the idea is Marxist, because Marxism is purely dialectical, and not based on reality. A real scientist/economist bases definitions on reality and everything we know.
These concepts are philosophical not scientific. Ideas, thoughts, theories, and philosophies. If anything that hasn't been realized in practice is meaningless, how can one advocate for a free market economy?
09-18-2023, 06:31 PM
-
#50
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don’t use propaganda as my basis of definitions and arguments.It's not my definition. What I provided was a primary tenet of the philosophy.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Scientific methods.If anything that hasn't been realized in practice is meaningless, how can one advocate for a free market economy?
Breakdown groups in to individuals. Track their decisions.
Collect data of economic markers.
Compare policy affects before and after, being mindful of length and points of time measured.
No policy = more free market
Policy = less free market
America is the social experiment of free market vs totalitarianism/socialism. So far, the results are heavily in favor of the free market. Almost every complaint that the socialist has about our economy is actually the result of government intervention, NOT capitalism, but Marxists/socialists believe we are still capitalist purely based on private ownership and complete disregard for government intervention.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-18-2023, 06:37 PM
-
#51
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
I dunno why you're trying to appeal to science. Weird flex, but okay.I don’t use propaganda as my basis of definitions and arguments.
Scientific methods.
Breakdown groups in to individuals. Track their decisions.
Collect data of economic markers.
Compare policy affects before and after, being mindful of length and points of time measured.
No policy = more free market
Policy = less free market
America is the social experiment of free market vs totalitarianism/socialism. So far, the results are heavily in favor of the free market. Almost every complaint that the socialist has about our economy is actually the result of government intervention, NOT capitalism, but Marxists/socialists believe we are still capitalist purely based on private ownership and complete disregard for government intervention.
Scientific methods.
Breakdown groups in to individuals. Track their decisions.
Collect data of economic markers.
Compare policy affects before and after, being mindful of length and points of time measured.
No policy = more free market
Policy = less free market
America is the social experiment of free market vs totalitarianism/socialism. So far, the results are heavily in favor of the free market. Almost every complaint that the socialist has about our economy is actually the result of government intervention, NOT capitalism, but Marxists/socialists believe we are still capitalist purely based on private ownership and complete disregard for government intervention.
A free market economy has never existed.
By the presented logic, free market economies should thus not be considered nor discussed as options for society.
09-18-2023, 06:39 PM
-
#52
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Is this an episode of Dumb and Dumber, The Communist Years?
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
09-18-2023, 06:42 PM
-
#53
09-18-2023, 07:03 PM
-
#54
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
More commie speak.I dunno why you're trying to appeal to science. Weird flex, but okay.
A free market economy has never existed.
By the presented logic, free market economies should thus not be considered nor discussed as options for society.
A free market economy has never existed.
By the presented logic, free market economies should thus not be considered nor discussed as options for society.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-18-2023, 07:10 PM
-
#55
09-18-2023, 07:22 PM
-
#56
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Commie using big words to sound intelligent. JLC is obviously suffering from Dunning Kruger, and to hide it, he’s using subterfuge and ideological nonsense. Marx would be proud.If that helps you rationalize the hypocrisy or assuage the cognitive dissonance, I'm cool with it

One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-18-2023, 07:26 PM
-
#57
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Great points!Commie using big words to sound intelligent. JLC is obviously suffering from Dunning Kruger, and to hide it, he’s using subterfuge and ideological nonsense. Marx would be proud.
Such demonstration of free market instantiation

09-18-2023, 07:32 PM
-
#58
- swoleyo
- Registered User
-
- swoleyo
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 10,948
- Rep Power: 48507
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Which still means state-controlled production. Do you think factories are just going to have no upper management and run purely by the people?Socialism advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Mod neg Cry-Baby Crew
NEG ONLYFANS THREADS CREW
EPSTEIN DIDN'T KILL HIMSELF CREW
RAW DOG CREW - PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY
09-18-2023, 07:34 PM
-
#59
Originally Posted By swoleyo⏩
No.Which still means state-controlled production. Do you think factories are just going to have no upper management and run purely by the people?
Unless you think community = state.
Are capital holders considered the state?
As I've said previously, the current state of human nature makes communism and anarchism untenable.
09-18-2023, 07:44 PM
-
#60
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
It is. To the commie, everything is just ideas and dialect. Spit some facts, and they respond with insults and deflections.Is this an episode of Dumb and Dumber, The Communist Years?
Marx stated that science could never explain society, nor the economy, so Marxists disregard the idea of science in economics. Socioeconomics, sociology, psychology, praxeology...they're all a product of capitalist propaganda. If the socialist applied science to his ideology, it would all break down, so he must deny its legitimacy.
Praxeology is the scientific approach to economics: it is the antithesis of Marxism.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts