Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Supreme Court revisiting Chevron
  1. Results 31 to 38 of 38
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
post 1702347931 06-13-2024, 06:48 AM
-
#31
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 50,517
  5. Rep Power: 650393
Originally Posted By Seatard
It would shift authority away from agency bureaucrats... back to congress.

Be careful what you ask for because the options could be to codify even broader authority to the agencies, or to micro manage the country with a myriad of new laws.

After a bunch of pointless bickering I'd guess we'd end up in the exact same spot as now.
maybe so. but a shift in power from unelected bureaucrats to elected politicians is more in line with the concepts this country was founded upon. No matter how much almost all of those elected politicians suck these days.
post 1702351851 06-13-2024, 08:50 AM
-
#32
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
No ruling today possibly tomorrow morning or next Thursday.
post 1702353681 06-13-2024, 09:52 AM
-
#33
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 65
  6. Posts: 11,675
  7. Rep Power: 83841
Originally Posted By Kraken
This is good news. As pointed out several times now, the supreme court has been on a freedom streak with rolling back decisions that they now realize were wrong decisions.

The Chevron decision enabled the federal government to massively regulate natural resources, which most of us understand should have been unconstitutional in the first place. It has allowed the climate agenda to spiral out of control. If they overturn this decision, it will be over for the climate fascists and we will see lots of competition and freedom in our market again. This means the price of energy coming down, which means the price of everything will come down, making things much more affordable, including the cost of living.

Chevron decision was actually part of a socialist revolution that the courts allowed.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/0...hange-00094670
Are you fully prepared for the liberal screaming if Chevron win?????


Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
post 1702353811 06-13-2024, 09:56 AM
-
#34
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 65
  6. Posts: 11,675
  7. Rep Power: 83841
Originally Posted By Procta
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson spells out the legal chaos that will arise when the right-wing Roberts Court overturns the 1984 Chevron doctrine, which for 40 years has allowed federal agencies to make reasonable interpretations of undefined terms in federal statutes.





government tryingto retain the power they shouldnt have to begin with
From a woman that can’t even define what a woman is. Shouldn’t even be making decisions on something so important
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
post 1702354031 06-13-2024, 10:01 AM
-
#35
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,150
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98570
Originally Posted By Retoaded
maybe so. but a shift in power from unelected bureaucrats to elected politicians is more in line with the concepts this country was founded upon. No matter how much almost all of those elected politicians suck these days.
I agree. Just that congresswillfuk it up. More accurately, some congressional intern who writes up a law using chatgpt will fuk it up by not considering any unintended consequences.
post 1702354061 06-13-2024, 10:02 AM
-
#36
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Just to be clear - this case isn't involved with chevron company

Its a monitors for fisherman case

https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/03/s...-be-overruled/

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-file...es-v-raimondo/



Its realized to what is knows as "The Chevron doctrine" from a 1984 chevron case
post 1702975971 06-28-2024, 08:58 AM
-
#37
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Chevron is dead

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...2-451_7m58.pdf
post 1702988841 06-28-2024, 04:01 PM
-
#38
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161
Originally Posted By gachase21
Badass. The EPA and ATF can both burn in hell.
"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts