"I just got DM from the guy."


False - no such DM or PM was sent at all.

It's a ruse to try and score reps from the MAGA cult and act like one of them. If you need evidence of this, just ask OP what I did to him personally. Literally nothing, and therein lies the key.

Tough times out there for the Bodhster.

All I know is he finished writing his PhD thesis over 2.5 years ago and he still hasn't received his PhD.

I think his university found out he is a shіt smearing tranny fuсker and negged him hard af.

I speak for everyone when I say bodhy, we are here for you.

NEGGED.

Also going to find bodhy and neg him too, this is the new neg bodhy and EireGunner thread

He is mathematically intelligent but that’s about it. His reasoning abilities are terrible, and further hindered by his inability to consider new information and adjust his perspective.


Let’s take the Covid injections for example, and I’ll try to streamline this as much as possible.

- we’ve never successfully created a vaccine for a coronavirus

- we’ve never successfully created a safe and effective mRNA vaccine.


Using reasoning, those two alone are enough to seriously doubt whether the Covid jabs would be successful. When betting on whether or not something will happen for the first time, the safe bet is always no because it’s so rare. After all, things only happen for the first time once. There were many reasons we’d never been able to do those things.


But let’s go further. Pharmaceutical companies have an extremely extensive history of corruption and prioritizing profits over health. In fact, they basically always prioritize profits over health. So… with that history to reference, now consider that we created a much larger reward(billions of dollars) for bad behavior and remove the punishment for bad behavior (immunity to being held libel for harm). This is guaranteed to drastically increase the likelihood of fukkery, in fact it basically guarantees it.

The we were told all this bullsh!t like “it stops infection” and “it stops the spread”… which Wincel readily parroted while being called out on it. Then when they were proven wrong for years, they just moved goal posts and continued to lie more. The examples are too extensive to streamline but we all remember them.


Fast forward three years…despite the fact that almost the entire world has moved on, Wincel still thinks children should get mRNA boosters every year. This is CLEARLY not a solid line of reasoning, as you claim he has. He is either just completely brainwashed to the point he’s incapable of any type of meaningful thought, or he’s so resentful towards the world that he knows it’s harmful but pushes it anyway because he wants the system to fall apart as quickly as possible. Either way, it’s not the sign of someone with sound reasoning.




And bodhy is pretty much the exact same way.

"I just got DM from the guy."


False - no such DM or PM was sent at all.

Tough times out there for the Bodhster.

All I know is he finished writing his PhD thesis over 2.5 years ago and he still hasn't received his PhD.

I think his university found out he is a shіt smearing tranny fuсker and negged him hard af.

This post ironically highlights poor reasoning abilities. Throwing your own logic at you, consider this:

"We've never successfully cured cancer."

True statement, yet new developments are emerging every day, and should the breakthrough arrive, it would be foolish to immediately "doubt it works" based on the absence of previous breakthroughs. It's warranted to be cautious, of course, but then you have to look at the studies, etc.

This isn't support for the jab, btw, just highlighting why that reasoning is weak.

Mudblood is from Harry Potter you mug

Is this some 4d chess way of bullying him more?

This post ironically highlights poor reasoning abilities. Throwing your own logic at you, consider this:

"We've never successfully cured cancer."

True statement, yet new developments are emerging every day, and should the breakthrough arrive, it would be foolish to immediately "doubt it works" based on the absence of previous breakthroughs. It's warranted to be cautious, of course, but then you have to look at the studies, etc.

This isn't support for the jab, btw, just highlighting why that reasoning is weak.