08-16-2024, 05:47 PM
#31
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
pat, your lame picture doesn't bother me at all. I was untrained, I fixed it.
Can you fix you being stupid? Not so easily.
p.s. You owe Gainzzz $100, pay the man, bitch. Rather, overweight bitch.
Can you fix you being stupid? Not so easily.
p.s. You owe Gainzzz $100, pay the man, bitch. Rather, overweight bitch.
08-16-2024, 05:50 PM
#32
pat, why does it matter that in 2006 I was untrained when *here-and-now* I am twice your size, leaner and in good shape? Like you are too retarded to understand dabbs', I guess I am too intelligent to understand the moronic point you're trying to make. Pretend you're not an imbecile for a moment and explain, if you can.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
08-16-2024, 05:51 PM
#33
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
pat, why does it matter that in 2006 I was untrained when *here-and-now* I am twice your size, leaner and in good shape? Like you are too retarded to understand dabbs', I guess I am too intelligent to understand the moronic point you're trying to make. Pretend you're not an imbecile for a moment and explain, if you can.
pat, why does it matter that in 2006 I was untrained when *here-and-now* I am twice your size, leaner and in good shape? Like you are too retarded to understand dabbs', I guess I am too intelligent to understand the moronic point you're trying to make. Pretend you're not an imbecile for a moment and explain, if you can.
08-16-2024, 05:53 PM
#34
people finally see what an idiot she is.
- Babayagawick85
- Force of nature
- Babayagawick85
- Force of nature
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 11,505
- Rep Power: 40,245
-
08-16-2024, 05:53 PM
#35
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
pat, why does it matter that in 2006 I was untrained when *here-and-now* I am twice your size, leaner and in good shape? Like you are too retarded to understand dabbs', I guess I am too intelligent to understand the moronic point you're trying to make. Pretend you're not an imbecile for a moment and explain, if you can.
also lmao at the combo of white shorts with ankle socks.
pat, why does it matter that in 2006 I was untrained when *here-and-now* I am twice your size, leaner and in good shape? Like you are too retarded to understand dabbs', I guess I am too intelligent to understand the moronic point you're trying to make. Pretend you're not an imbecile for a moment and explain, if you can.
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2023
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,200
- Rep Power: 64,857
-
08-16-2024, 05:53 PM
#36
Originally Posted By Babayagawick85⏩
This. Only a matter of time
people finally see what an idiot she is.
- Einsatzgruppen
- Registered User
- Einsatzgruppen
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 256
- Rep Power: 3,103
-
08-16-2024, 06:11 PM
#37
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Bs it’s libtard orge who posts every single poll that comes out. I’ve never once said polls are fake. Posting the polls are necessary to combat the fake liberal narrative designed to drive down turnout. Or that idiot above who thinks a 3 point lead means something when Biden and Clinton were winning by 7 points at the same period, only to lose and narrowly win. The same idiots put words in my mouth, I have never said Trump will win and it would be stupid to say either candidate will win at this point. I don’t make predictions on who wins.. I simply post what the data says.
Derp. The vast majority of morons on this site immediately scream the polls are fake as soon as they show a Dem is winning and Trump is losing… yet make threads like this the second they show anything positive for Trump.
Weird how you say nothing to them yet come at me for pointing it out.
Weird how you say nothing to them yet come at me for pointing it out.
The data has Trump is his best position ever, by far and it’s not even close. I have not made one prediction about who’s winning
The data said Trump would lose in 2020 if the polls were off in exactly the same way they were in 2016. I said that and got negged by almost everyone. Will the polls be off in trump’s favor like in the last 2 elections? Nobody knows but it’s already happened twice and there’s no good reason to believe it won’t happen again. They haven’t changed how they poll , anyone right now can go on app called eureka and fill out a poll for $.50 and answer a poll with completely fake answers, I’ve done the same poll multiple times on different apps. Now combine that with the fact that Trump is polling the best he ever has.
First off all Trump can lose by 3 or 4 points and still easily win the electoral college. Factor that with the polls already being of anywhere from 2-5 points or more in trumps favor in the past.
If you want trump to win you should feel very good about his odds unless his down by 5+ point. Even if trump is down 2 points nationally and the polls are correct.. he still wins most time losing by 2 points nationally. If Trump is within 1 point of Kamala nationally his odds 90% to win.
08-16-2024, 06:14 PM
#38
Lmao now they're claiming they never call polls fake news. You can't make this chit up.
08-16-2024, 06:15 PM
#39
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Keep coping chubbs
Lmao now they're claiming they never call polls fake news. You can't make this chit up.
- Einsatzgruppen
- Registered User
- Einsatzgruppen
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 256
- Rep Power: 3,103
-
08-16-2024, 06:18 PM
#40
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Once again you are a liar and you have absolutely nothing to say to the information laying out. Because you are a shilling f aggot low t moron.
Lmao now they're claiming they never call polls fake news. You can't make this chit up.
Go ahead and find a post of me calling polls fake I’ll wait
08-16-2024, 06:19 PM
#41
Originally Posted By Einsatzgruppen⏩
Fatty can't grasp the simple concept of someone thinking the polls somewhat favor Democrats. Sad. I literally think he's a Corky at this point.
Keep coping chubbs
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
08-16-2024, 06:36 PM
#42
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
So you can't address anything I said other than to somehow hold me responsible for policing what other people say.
Derp. The vast majority of morons on this site immediately scream the polls are fake as soon as they show a Dem is winning and Trump is losing… yet make threads like this the second they show anything positive for Trump.
Weird how you say nothing to them yet come at me for pointing it out.
Weird how you say nothing to them yet come at me for pointing it out.
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 55,467
- Rep Power: 712,788
-
08-16-2024, 08:36 PM
#43
Probably had something to do with her dumbass economic policy of putting price caps on goods. Probably sent shivers down independents and moderate Dems spine. Nobody wants to dive face first into socialism. This ****’s policy may have gift wrapped the election for Trump JFLOL! She would have been better off just copying Trump like the slutty Indian American parrot that she is.
Trump 2024, 2028, and 2032.
Still a pure blood. Mudbloods seething rn.
- TallTigerTwo
- Registered User
- TallTigerTwo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 4,775
- Rep Power: 73,525
-
08-17-2024, 04:15 AM
#44
The truth is, in 3 election cycles Trump has never been in a stronger position to win than he is right now.
This is why the libs and establishment are so desperate to hype Kamala.
This is why the libs and establishment are so desperate to hype Kamala.
08-17-2024, 07:17 AM
#45
Chris
@chriswithans
Right. Last week the Times/Headline was "Harris leads by 4 across 3 rust belt states with Likely Voters, even better in the full-field." And then you look at the sample and it's Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly.
Today the Times polls are "Trump and Harris tied across 4 states that were about Biden +1 in 2020 overall, with more mixed results than last week." Samples in every state still Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly, especially in Arizona where it's absurd.
✔️ Times still polling with Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly samples, suggesting some of the same errors they made in favor of Democrats in 2020.
✔️ On actual preference, voters show much less preference for Harris in swing states than just one week ago
@chriswithans
Right. Last week the Times/Headline was "Harris leads by 4 across 3 rust belt states with Likely Voters, even better in the full-field." And then you look at the sample and it's Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly.
Today the Times polls are "Trump and Harris tied across 4 states that were about Biden +1 in 2020 overall, with more mixed results than last week." Samples in every state still Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly, especially in Arizona where it's absurd.
✔️ Times still polling with Biden 2020 and D-Lean friendly samples, suggesting some of the same errors they made in favor of Democrats in 2020.
✔️ On actual preference, voters show much less preference for Harris in swing states than just one week ago
Official misc attaché to the Kremlin
Наше дело правое.
Враг будет разбит.
Победа будет за нами!
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts