Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » The Haggening (new app exposes girls w/o makeup) (GTFIH) (PICS)
  1. Results 781 to 810 of 1340
  2. Page 27 of 45
  3. First
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28
  9. 29
  11. Last

Thread: The Haggening (new app exposes girls w/o makeup) (GTFIH) (PICS)

post 1534741661 11-16-2017, 07:58 AM
-
#781
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 19,668
  6. Rep Power: 49395
I'm not even sure why they think their face looks better with foundation caked on and all shiny and pasty looking, compared to it just being clean and natural looking....
I never try anything I just do it!
post 1534741701 11-16-2017, 07:58 AM
-
#782
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Maximus93⏩
Let's be honest though, the after is more accurate of how a woman looks without makeup compared to them WITH makeup.
Can't deny that
post 1534742051 11-16-2017, 08:01 AM
-
#783
  1. Ml16121
  2. Banned
  1. Ml16121
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 1,355
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Yeah but if it can't recognize makeupless photos how can we trust it to turn makeup photos into accurate makeupless photos?
It is possible that the app can predict what most people look like under makeup, while totally screwing up faces that are not wearing makeup at all. It was never designed to run on people without makeup. Running it incorrectly proves nothing.

That said, it's obvious that the app isn't accurate in a lot of cases, adds years meth abuse to faces, and that it's being taken far too seriously.
post 1534742371 11-16-2017, 08:05 AM
-
#784
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Okay yes. That's true and obvious. But it sounds like lots of people are using the app to actually see what certain women in particular look like without makeup, which isn't a very good or accurate way to do so.
Maybe, depends on the base photo used by IMO it looks like a lot of the results are very close to what reality would be.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1534743291 11-16-2017, 08:15 AM
-
#785
  1. Buzzabrah
  2. Registered User
  1. Buzzabrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2015
  4. Location: INDEPENDENT GB, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 184
  7. Rep Power: 575
post 1534743781 11-16-2017, 08:21 AM
-
#786
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 21,395
  7. Rep Power: 112562
Originally Posted By Buzzabrah⏩
**MFC**
**Barbara Palvin is my 10/10 crew**
post 1534744001 11-16-2017, 08:24 AM
-
#787
  1. WestAfrica
  2. Registered User
  1. WestAfrica
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,712
  6. Rep Power: 146366
Idk why this is 27 pages.
NYR NYM NYK UCONN Nebraska AS Roma
post 1534744821 11-16-2017, 08:33 AM
-
#788
  1. Mumra
  2. Registered User
  1. Mumra
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 13,510
  6. Rep Power: 69443
Originally Posted By Buzzabrah⏩
https://tinyurl.com/y72csbkn
bend her over. dat ass still 10/10
MuscleTech Supporter

APC/GPA, SPF 220
http://americanpowerliftingcommittee-usa.com/
Raw 216lbs bw
Meet#/Gym#
Squat 660bs/700lbs
Bench 405lbs/415lbs
DL 650/same
post 1534744901 11-16-2017, 08:35 AM
-
#789
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By WestAfrica⏩
Idk why this is 27 pages.
User CP > General Settings > Change to 50 posts per page
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1534745071 11-16-2017, 08:36 AM
-
#790
  1. Lord_Lemon
  2. MAGA
  1. Lord_Lemon
  2. MAGA
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: Brandon, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 8,494
  6. Rep Power: 28462
post 1534745261 11-16-2017, 08:38 AM
-
#791
  1. MoeBettuh
  2. Golden boy
  1. MoeBettuh
  2. Golden boy
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,468
  6. Rep Power: 142304
Not going through this whole thread, but did someone do heykiddo?
MFC

drum, it holds fifty, uh
post 1534746541 11-16-2017, 08:54 AM
-
#792
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 10,731
  5. Rep Power: 89931
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Finally downloaded IOS 11 and the app. I really don't think I trust that it doesn't make people look far worse without makeup than they actually do without makeup if it can't even tell when someone's not wearing any makeup in the first place. I'm uploading bare faced pics of me and it's making me look disgusting. It's giving me yellow rings around my eyes and getting rid of my eyelashes lol. Needs work, but it has potential.
You are so fukin stupid that I would punch your grandpas dentures in for siring the piece of chit that sired you.

Women spend chit loads of money and hours per day and also pay professional make up artists for a reason.

Because they look like chit without properly applied makeup.

The app assumes you have makeup on and enhances the imperfections to estimate what your face looks like without foundation. You're not gaming the app using it on yourself; you're proving that you are a fukkin dumb piece of chit.
post 1534746741 11-16-2017, 08:57 AM
-
#793
  1. Roldz
  2. Sexual Tyrannosaurus
  1. Roldz
  2. Sexual Tyrannosaurus
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 37,862
  6. Rep Power: 735122
Originally Posted By WestAfrica⏩
Idk why this is 27 pages.
Idk why you're a limp wristed cuck
FL > PA
post 1534746811 11-16-2017, 08:58 AM
-
#794
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By ChewYourFood⏩
You are so fukin stupid that I would punch your grandpas dentures in for siring the piece of chit that sired you.

Women spend chit loads of money and hours per day and also pay professional make up artists for a reason.

Because they look like chit without properly applied makeup.

The app assumes you have makeup on and enhances the imperfections to estimate what your face looks like without foundation. You're not gaming the app using it on yourself; you're proving that you are a fukkin dumb piece of chit.
I know it assumes you have makeup on, I'm just saying the fact that it has to do this and can't recognize bare faces makes me skeptical of the how accurately it represents one's bare face from an original photo with makeup on. You really don't need to call me a "fukkin dumb piece of chit".
post 1534747611 11-16-2017, 09:07 AM
-
#795
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 19,668
  6. Rep Power: 49395
Creator said he was going to fix the issue with adding blemishes etc. Some fine tuning needed but not very far off.
I never try anything I just do it!
post 1534748291 11-16-2017, 09:13 AM
-
#796
  1. Carbonfibre
  2. Rubber Banding
  1. Carbonfibre
  2. Rubber Banding
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Location: State / Province, Canada
  5. Posts: 15,122
  6. Rep Power: 53107
Originally Posted By Buzzabrah⏩
the accuracy is impressive.


I guess thats what happens when you wear pounds of chemicals day in day out



real pic for comparison

post 1534748561 11-16-2017, 09:15 AM
-
#797
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Carbonfibre⏩
the accuracy is impressive.


I guess thats what happens when you wear pounds of chemicals day in day out



real pic for comparison

Impressive really? I think she looks her age in the bottom pic and 45+ in the top right.
post 1534748681 11-16-2017, 09:16 AM
-
#798
  1. AWillis
  2. Social Media Influencer
  1. AWillis
  2. Social Media Influencer
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: Trump Towers
  5. Height: 6'0"
  6. Weight: 175 lbs
  7. Posts: 40,382
  8. Subscribers: 4
  9. Rep Power: 197859
Originally Posted By Vayne⏩
I'm not even sure why they think their face looks better with foundation caked on and all shiny and pasty looking, compared to it just being clean and natural looking....
because most of these dumb females are complimenting each other on how beautiful they look even thou with the makeup on they look like clowns 80% of the time.
Cobra Kai Crew

srs
post 1534749691 11-16-2017, 09:23 AM
-
#799
  1. Buzzabrah
  2. Registered User
  1. Buzzabrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2015
  4. Location: INDEPENDENT GB, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 184
  7. Rep Power: 575
post 1534750461 11-16-2017, 09:29 AM
-
#800
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 31,602
  6. Rep Power: 241807
Originally Posted By BeigeJumang⏩
Does she have makeup on her shirt as well?

IDK how accurate this app is? We all know theres big differences between woman all made up, especially celebrities with $500 and hour make up artists compared to going bare, but this app seems to be a little on the extreme side.
post 1534750641 11-16-2017, 09:31 AM
-
#801
  1. ectobruh
  1. ectobruh
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Weight: 180 lbs
  6. Posts: 19,982
  7. Rep Power: 98282
Post deleted by user
FLAT: 225x15 INCLINE DB 100x15 incline bench 225x8 deadlift: [RETIRED!! OUTTA HERE] FS: 225X14
post 1534750921 11-16-2017, 09:34 AM
-
#802
  1. DualBandWiFi
  2. Operating at 5.2 GHz
  1. DualBandWiFi
  2. Operating at 5.2 GHz
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Posts: 2,258
  5. Rep Power: 18759
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
I know it assumes you have makeup on, I'm just saying the fact that it has to do this and can't recognize bare faces makes me skeptical of the how accurately it represents one's bare face from an original photo with makeup on. You really don't need to call me a "fukkin dumb piece of chit".
How many times does this have to be explained to you.This app is based on MACHINE LEARNINGIt's algorithms are not designed to check if makeup is on or not, but to exaggerate or dull likely areas of makeup application. Pictures don't have layer data in them, so how would some code in a program know if there is makeup applied or not. It literally scans the color, contrast and vibrancy of each pixel to approximate what edits to make.

Imagine you are using a powerful pressure washer or sandblaster to clean a dirty surface. Sure it can remove the dirt and make it look like it normally does, but hold it long enough and eventually you will damage the paint and possibly the surface.
Agar.io Crew - Cell Tech Poverty Gains Liberal Agenda
Repped by RICHSTRONG TWICE crew
post 1534751891 11-16-2017, 09:44 AM
-
#803
  1. deepfat
  2. A Great American
  1. deepfat
  2. A Great American
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 12,755
  6. Rep Power: 73593
Originally Posted By RIKTER⏩
Does she have makeup on her shirt as well?

IDK how accurate this app is? We all know theres big differences between woman all made up, especially celebrities with $500 and hour make up artists compared to going bare, but this app seems to be a little on the extreme side.
She's also a smoker which will kill her looks at an accelerated rate.

Groce.
*SillieBazzillie isn't that bad of a guy Crew*
*STEM Master Race*
*Fly Navy Crew*
*Always Pick 5 Crew*
*STL Cardinals/Blues/MIZ-ZOU Crew*
post 1534753361 11-16-2017, 09:58 AM
-
#804
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DualBandWiFi⏩
How many times does this have to be explained to you.This app is based on MACHINE LEARNINGIt's algorithms are not designed to check if makeup is on or not, but to exaggerate or dull likely areas of makeup application. Pictures don't have layer data in them, so how would some code in a program know if there is makeup applied or not. It literally scans the color, contrast and vibrancy of each pixel to approximate what edits to make.

Imagine you are using a powerful pressure washer or sandblaster to clean a dirty surface. Sure it can remove the dirt and make it look like it normally does, but hold it long enough and eventually you will damage the paint and possibly the surface.
I know it can't. And because of that, I don't think I can trust it to accurately represent what a person really looks like underneath their makeup. That picture of Emma Watson on the first page? She looks nothing like that without makeup. We've all seen pictures of her on the streets. She doesn't have practically white fukking lips and 0 eyelashes and dark under eye bags.

That picture that Buzzabrah posted? That pic thinks she has red and irritated skin without makeup because the lighting in the background had like a red tint to it, so it saw some red undertones on her face and turned her whole face red when it generated the no makeup pic.

I know it's a machine, I know it's based on algorithms, I know all this chit. I know the app has no capabilities to walk up to someone and wipe their face with a wetnap to see if there's even makeup on in the first place. Why tf would I think that?

I was under the impression that this app's intention was to represent what a woman's skin and face would ACTUALLY look like in REAL life if they weren't wearing makeup in the pic chosen, and I think it fails to do so. Idk why miscers get so upset whenever I even lightly criticize this app and what I thought were its intentions. If its intentions aren't to be as accurate as possible then what tf is the point?
post 1534753391 11-16-2017, 09:59 AM
-
#805
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 28,875
  5. Rep Power: 143505
Originally Posted By Vayne⏩
Creator said he was going to fix the issue with adding blemishes etc. Some fine tuning needed but not very far off.
The creator also said all women are beautiful, with or without make up.












Fking lol
post 1534753581 11-16-2017, 10:01 AM
-
#806
  1. iWantSome629
  2. Registered User
  1. iWantSome629
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 33
  6. Rep Power: 0
How would a human know if a girl in a photo has natural looking makeup on or not? Is that human designed flawed?
post 1534754341 11-16-2017, 10:09 AM
-
#807
  1. Ml16121
  2. Banned
  1. Ml16121
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 1,355
  6. Rep Power: 0
Remember that OKcupid study, where women rated 80% of men as "below average" in attractiveness, while men rated 50% of women as such? An excerpt:

"But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her"

I wonder what those numbers would look like if makeup was taken out of the picture. I'm assuming this take makeup off thing is based on FA bitterness from stuff like that

https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-loo...x-8715c0f1561e
post 1534754791 11-16-2017, 10:14 AM
-
#808
  1. Waldganger
  2. Registered User
  1. Waldganger
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2017
  4. Age: 58
  5. Posts: 276
  6. Rep Power: 772
Originally Posted By Ml16121⏩
Remember that OKcupid study, where women rated 80% of men as "below average" in attractiveness, while men rated 50% of women as such? An excerpt:

"But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her"

I wonder what those numbers would look like if makeup was taken out of the picture.

https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-loo...x-8715c0f1561e
Could just be the "math is hard" phenomenon.
He not busy being born is busy dying. - Bob Dylan
post 1534755091 11-16-2017, 10:17 AM
-
#809
  1. StinkholePatrol
  2. Former obese brah
  1. StinkholePatrol
  2. Former obese brah
  3. Join Date: Jun 2015
  4. Posts: 5,428
  5. Rep Power: 26389
Originally Posted By WestAfrica⏩
Idk why this is 27 pages.
Needs to be 270 pages, the triggering is gold. This will never get old.
post 1534760201 11-16-2017, 10:58 AM
-
#810
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 10,731
  5. Rep Power: 89931
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
I know it assumes you have makeup on, I'm just saying the fact that it has to do this and can't recognize bare faces makes me skeptical of the how accurately it represents one's bare face from an original photo with makeup on. You really don't need to call me a "fukkin dumb piece of chit".
You can't fix stupid. The app makes one and only one assumption - the person you have submitted in the photo has makeup on.

Use this app on your azzhole and watch your face will magically appear.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts