Forum
»
Guys who are married/getting married or have a long term relationship GTFIH
05-23-2016, 12:54 PM
-
#61
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
I explained why in post #45 and for some reason he can't seem to understand....Yeah bro, not only is that study like 10-15 years old, it is primarily filled with women not in your generation, and also probably full of liars. The women from that study range from 30+ to 70+ now....
Asking women how many partners they have had has been domanstrably aterribleway to determine how many partners they have had.
Plus if you filter out the women that are just unfukable and skewing results the average will shift as well.
so, basically it is useless.
Asking women how many partners they have had has been domanstrably aterribleway to determine how many partners they have had.
Plus if you filter out the women that are just unfukable and skewing results the average will shift as well.
so, basically it is useless.
05-23-2016, 12:54 PM
-
#62
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
-
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,933
- Rep Power: 174320
-
-
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
such is misc.I explained why in post #45 and for some reason he can't seem to understand....
**Georgia Crew**
**Mechanical Engineering Crew**
**2018 Aesthetics Crew**
01/02/2018 - 202.2 lb.
Current - 181.4 lb. (1/23/18)
05-23-2016, 12:56 PM
-
#63
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
-
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,933
- Rep Power: 174320
-
-
Originally Posted By Lawlstud⏩
Also mirin potato conjugation and grammarThis shows you are deliriously deluded and out of touch with reality the average miscer is
**Georgia Crew**
**Mechanical Engineering Crew**
**2018 Aesthetics Crew**
01/02/2018 - 202.2 lb.
Current - 181.4 lb. (1/23/18)
05-23-2016, 01:07 PM
-
#64
Originally Posted By devin45k⏩
Absolutely pisseningITT OP is a pilgrim
Everyone should have a scarlet letter
I knew of some broad that did a similar thing. She seems really cool and sane but then you hear of the slooty things she has done and you are like "WTF."
She slept with her now husband's best man. They both never told him but have told numerous people though. She is like "it's kinda awkward." She is now pregnant with her husband's kid. He will flip chit when her learns about it.
Everyone should have a scarlet letter
I knew of some broad that did a similar thing. She seems really cool and sane but then you hear of the slooty things she has done and you are like "WTF."
She slept with her now husband's best man. They both never told him but have told numerous people though. She is like "it's kinda awkward." She is now pregnant with her husband's kid. He will flip chit when her learns about it.
05-23-2016, 01:07 PM
-
#65
- BetalusGAINSm8
- Registered User
-
- BetalusGAINSm8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2016
- Age: 47
- Posts: 143
- Rep Power: 211
-
-
Op I witnessed my wife birth two children out of her FUK hole and the sweet little sugary poosy is still goat. So how ever the FUK she got good at pleasing me I'm cool with. I rolled my cawk on the table many many times with rando sloot after rando sloot so no hypocrite here boyo.
05-23-2016, 01:24 PM
-
#66
- TheWolfieFox
- Registered User
-
- TheWolfieFox
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 330
- Rep Power: 279
-
-
no hymen no diamond
05-23-2016, 01:30 PM
-
#67
- LikeAMachine
- Known Browns Fan
-
- LikeAMachine
- Known Browns Fan
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Posts: 24,099
- Rep Power: 52838
-
-
These threads are always pathetic. This one was no different.
(っ◕‿◕)っ
05-23-2016, 02:05 PM
-
#68
Originally Posted By Lawlstud⏩
Lol at you disappearing when you are faced with decent arguments.Oh so instead of linking to to studies you just cited in your original post, you want to attack the source I used?
You just cited sources in your post, let's see them. Unless of course you were bull****ting and pulling fabricated information out of your ass to try and strengthen your argument
You just cited sources in your post, let's see them. Unless of course you were bull****ting and pulling fabricated information out of your ass to try and strengthen your argument
05-23-2016, 02:09 PM
-
#69
- Lawlstud
- Dr.Phil of Misc.
-
- Lawlstud
- Dr.Phil of Misc.
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 15,880
- Rep Power: 68010
-
-
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
You don't seem very smart, so I'll make this very simple for you to understand.
1. My numbers come from an expert's observations (the nurse in STD clinic), I never said I pulled those number from a study.
2. The study you presented and all those studies investigating # of sexual partners suffer from strong biases and are level 5 scientific evidence (google the meaning of this)
3. A poorly designed study is as good as an expert's opinion.
4. You post a paragraph without presenting us the methodology for us to appreciate the validity of your study. In other words, you didn't bring anything to the table.
To make it even simpler for you to understand, your study doesn't mean anything and is as good as any miscer's personal anecdote.
1. My numbers come from an expert's observations (the nurse in STD clinic), I never said I pulled those number from a study.
2. The study you presented and all those studies investigating # of sexual partners suffer from strong biases and are level 5 scientific evidence (google the meaning of this)
3. A poorly designed study is as good as an expert's opinion.
4. You post a paragraph without presenting us the methodology for us to appreciate the validity of your study. In other words, you didn't bring anything to the table.
To make it even simpler for you to understand, your study doesn't mean anything and is as good as any miscer's personal anecdote.

This is 100% blowing my mind that you're actually sitting there claiming, "I have a friend who is a x" as justifiable evidence of a claim. Level 5 scientific evidence lmao yet you don't even know the methodology.
Only on the misc with an armchair "expert" will you see someone claiming the National Health Statistics Report by the CDC isn't a justifiable source. ****in misc never gets old. You will find the statistics on Page 13, with the Methodology on Page 2. I have no doubt you will rebuttal this with some argument you think rebuttals the CDC.
What a joke
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
Ah so you literally fabricated scenerios to invalidate a study you never looked at . You literally just made baseless claims with absolutely no proof and are patting yourself on the back like a complete tool. The survey took into account the very situations you're invalidating the survey for not doing.Yeah bro, not only is that study like 10-15 years old, it is primarily filled with women not in your generation, and also probably full of liars. The women from that study range from 30+ to 70+ now....
Asking women how many partners they have had has been domanstrably aterribleway to determine how many partners they have had.
Plus if you filter out the women that are just unfukable and skewing results the average will shift as well.
so, basically it is useless.
Asking women how many partners they have had has been domanstrably aterribleway to determine how many partners they have had.
Plus if you filter out the women that are just unfukable and skewing results the average will shift as well.
so, basically it is useless.
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
I explained why in post #45 and for some reason he can't seem to understand....
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
You mean people circle jerking with no knowledge on the subject they are running their mouths about? Agreed.such is misc.
Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
05-23-2016, 02:13 PM
-
#70
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
-
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 5,300
- Rep Power: 18485
-
-
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
Not that I disagree with you at all but for future reference anecdotal evidence means absolutely nothing...You don't seem very smart, so I'll make this very simple for you to understand.
1. My numbers come from an expert's observations (the nurse in STD clinic), I never said I pulled those number from a study.
2. The study you presented and all those studies investigating # of sexual partners suffer from strong biases and are level 5 scientific evidence (google the meaning of this)
3. A poorly designed study is as good as an expert's opinion.
4. You post a paragraph without presenting us the methodology for us to appreciate the validity of your study. In other words, you didn't bring anything to the table.
To make it even simpler for you to understand, your study doesn't mean anything and is as good as any miscer's personal anecdote.
1. My numbers come from an expert's observations (the nurse in STD clinic), I never said I pulled those number from a study.
2. The study you presented and all those studies investigating # of sexual partners suffer from strong biases and are level 5 scientific evidence (google the meaning of this)
3. A poorly designed study is as good as an expert's opinion.
4. You post a paragraph without presenting us the methodology for us to appreciate the validity of your study. In other words, you didn't bring anything to the table.
To make it even simpler for you to understand, your study doesn't mean anything and is as good as any miscer's personal anecdote.
One day scientists are going to kill us all.
05-23-2016, 02:20 PM
-
#71
- 1slo5oh
- Maximum Gainz
-
- 1slo5oh
- Maximum Gainz
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Posts: 9,739
- Rep Power: 122987
-
-
Meh!! its already been said... how can I judge what she may or may not have done knowing the kind of debauchery I've experienced....Now when we first started dating I did ask around as we know a lot of the same people and have for a long time.. just somehow never crossed paths... Always heard she was hard to get and they never saw her do anything slooty... does that mean she didn't? fk no... just means she has enough class to keep it to herself vs letting the whole world know she a freak doh....
No STD's
No fk trophies ( I am a hypocrite on this as I have a kid from a previous relationship)
No Ex husbands
No public knowledge of her being a whore
AYYYY fk it... lets see what happens...
No STD's
No fk trophies ( I am a hypocrite on this as I have a kid from a previous relationship)
No Ex husbands
No public knowledge of her being a whore
AYYYY fk it... lets see what happens...
6'2" @ 247lbs
05-23-2016, 02:32 PM
-
#72
Originally Posted By CptClean⏩
That's exactly my point, for those who can get it. Anecdotal evidence is on the same level as a badly designed study who suffer from biases (the study he was showing us)Not that I disagree with you at all but for future reference anecdotal evidence means absolutely nothing...
05-23-2016, 02:34 PM
-
#73
- Lawlstud
- Dr.Phil of Misc.
-
- Lawlstud
- Dr.Phil of Misc.
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 15,880
- Rep Power: 68010
-
-
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
3 post up. The study was conducted by the CDC further evidence you haven't a clue what you're talking about.That's exactly my point, for those who can get it. Anecdotal evidence is on the same level as a badly designed study who suffer from biases (the study he was showing us)
Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
05-23-2016, 02:34 PM
-
#74
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
-
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 5,300
- Rep Power: 18485
-
-
Originally Posted By DarkOmen⏩
Sourcing as a whole is pretty fukked up considering "here's my information from the government so it must be 100% correct" is an accepted view point.That's exactly my point, for those who can get it. Anecdotal evidence is on the same level as a badly designed study who suffer from biases (the study he was showing us)
One day scientists are going to kill us all.
05-23-2016, 02:36 PM
-
#75
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
-
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, Cuck, Sweden
- Age: 42
- Posts: 342
- Rep Power: 264
-
-
my gf was with 1 other guy before me for like 3 months. when we first banged she was so awkward it was pretty much like banging a virgin, took her like a solid month before sex didnt hurt for her. so yeah nice try op, not everyone dates whores.
#feelthebern (in my anus)
05-23-2016, 02:38 PM
-
#76
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
-
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, Cuck, Sweden
- Age: 42
- Posts: 342
- Rep Power: 264
-
-
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
age: 22Easy, my fiancewas a virgin, she's never had anyone's cum on her face, not even mine....yet. Never seen anyone else's dink, either. feelz good.
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
nope.
#feelthebern (in my anus)
05-23-2016, 02:40 PM
-
#77
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
-
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,933
- Rep Power: 174320
-
-
Originally Posted By RectalDreams⏩
age: 32age: 22
nope.
nope.
you're 10 years my senior and I've still locked down a good woman before you. Seems to me I am doing it right
**Georgia Crew**
**Mechanical Engineering Crew**
**2018 Aesthetics Crew**
01/02/2018 - 202.2 lb.
Current - 181.4 lb. (1/23/18)
05-23-2016, 02:45 PM
-
#78
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
in b4 op marries a massive whore. its destiny
05-23-2016, 02:47 PM
-
#79
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
22 and married. See ya in 10 years.Easy, my fiance was a virgin, she's never had anyone's cum on her face, not even mine....yet. Never seen anyone else's dink, either. feelz good.
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
05-23-2016, 02:47 PM
-
#80
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
-
- RectalDreams
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, Cuck, Sweden
- Age: 42
- Posts: 342
- Rep Power: 264
-
-
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
before me? im dating a 25 yr old atm.age: 32
you're 10 years my senior and I've still locked down a good woman before you. Seems to me I am doing it right
you're 10 years my senior and I've still locked down a good woman before you. Seems to me I am doing it right
#feelthebern (in my anus)
05-23-2016, 02:54 PM
-
#81
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
-
- Jacobcapra
- AAS Free since '93
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,933
- Rep Power: 174320
-
-
Originally Posted By Lawlstud⏩
This is 100% blowing my mind that you're actually sitting there claiming, "I have a friend who is a x" as justifiable evidence of a claim. Level 5 scientific evidence lmao yet you don't even know the methodology.
Only on the misc with an armchair "expert" will you see someone claiming the National Health Statistics Report by the CDC isn't a justifiable source. ****in misc never gets old. You will find the statistics on Page 13, with the Methodology on Page 2. I have no doubt you will rebuttal this with some argument you think rebuttals the CDC.
What a joke
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
Ah so you literally fabricated scenerios to invalidate a study you never looked at . You literally just made baseless claims with absolutely no proof and are patting yourself on the back like a complete tool. The survey took into account the very situations you're invalidating the survey for not doing.
I didn't fabricate scenarios, the study mentioned that the information was gathered from anonymous women from 2001 to 2003. And I didn't review the methodology because it wasn't available because you googled
This is 100% blowing my mind that you're actually sitting there claiming, "I have a friend who is a x" as justifiable evidence of a claim. Level 5 scientific evidence lmao yet you don't even know the methodology.
Only on the misc with an armchair "expert" will you see someone claiming the National Health Statistics Report by the CDC isn't a justifiable source. ****in misc never gets old. You will find the statistics on Page 13, with the Methodology on Page 2. I have no doubt you will rebuttal this with some argument you think rebuttals the CDC.
What a joke
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
Ah so you literally fabricated scenerios to invalidate a study you never looked at . You literally just made baseless claims with absolutely no proof and are patting yourself on the back like a complete tool. The survey took into account the very situations you're invalidating the survey for not doing.
'average number of partners for a woman'
and literally screenshot the response at the top of the google return page. If you go to the source of the info you get this link:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/37853719/n...ex-statistics/
And they did not post a link to the study, nor did they mention how many people were studied, or the method in which the information was gathered. Not to mention the inherent issues associated with asking objective responses on sexually charged questions.
But way to try to look like what you posted isn't completely skewed, and you know what you're talking about.
also, the study you posted?
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
^^ that one?
has no conclusions about the number of sexual partners.
Results—Sexual behaviors among males and females aged 15–44 based on
the 2006–2008 NSFG were generally similar to those reported based on the 2002
NSFG. Among adults aged 25–44, about 98% of women and 97% of men ever
had vaginal intercourse, 89% of women and 90% of men ever had oral sex with
an opposite-sex partner, and 36% of women and 44% of men ever had anal sex
with an opposite-sex partner. Twice as many women aged 25–44 (12%) reported
any same-sex contact in their lifetimes compared with men (5.8%). Among
teenagers aged 15–19, 7% of females and 9% of males have had oral sex with an
opposite-sex partner, but no vaginal intercourse. Sexual attraction and identity
correlates closely but not completely with reports of sexual behavior. Sexual
behaviors, attraction, and identity vary by age, marital or cohabiting status,
education, and race and Hispanic origin.
Did you even read the abstract, or conclusion??the 2006–2008 NSFG were generally similar to those reported based on the 2002
NSFG. Among adults aged 25–44, about 98% of women and 97% of men ever
had vaginal intercourse, 89% of women and 90% of men ever had oral sex with
an opposite-sex partner, and 36% of women and 44% of men ever had anal sex
with an opposite-sex partner. Twice as many women aged 25–44 (12%) reported
any same-sex contact in their lifetimes compared with men (5.8%). Among
teenagers aged 15–19, 7% of females and 9% of males have had oral sex with an
opposite-sex partner, but no vaginal intercourse. Sexual attraction and identity
correlates closely but not completely with reports of sexual behavior. Sexual
behaviors, attraction, and identity vary by age, marital or cohabiting status,
education, and race and Hispanic origin.
**Georgia Crew**
**Mechanical Engineering Crew**
**2018 Aesthetics Crew**
01/02/2018 - 202.2 lb.
Current - 181.4 lb. (1/23/18)
05-23-2016, 03:05 PM
-
#82
- DatDereVert
- Registered User
-
- DatDereVert
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Age: 34
- Posts: 728
- Rep Power: 652
-
-
Current gf had one long term boyfriend before me, literally I'm the 2nd guy she has ever even kissed. Feelsgoodman tbh cus I know she likes it rough and I know her ex was doing that to her but that obv doesn't bother me,thats what you do in a relationship. But now im with her and she loves me so, ya idk he never came inside her so I will be the first to do that, also does whatever I tell her to do in bed, love that little sloot, feel like I got lucky getting her
05-23-2016, 03:45 PM
-
#83
- JooceNasty
- Registered User
-
- JooceNasty
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 34
- Posts: 1,335
- Rep Power: 1199
-
-
ive only ever had sex with 1 girl , who is my current girlfriend now - ive gotten a bj once from a whale in high school but as far as sex goes thats it
pretty depressing - honestly i think im retarded (srs) - like when i look in the mirror or facetime theres something off with my face
pretty depressing - honestly i think im retarded (srs) - like when i look in the mirror or facetime theres something off with my face
The best activities for your health are pumping and humping.
*{GLOW GANG}*
05-23-2016, 03:47 PM
-
#84
- Bigdumogre
- ✅ verified account
-
- Bigdumogre
- ✅ verified account
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 39,457
- Rep Power: 839620
-
-
Been together with my wife for 20 years now
Feels good man
Feels good man
50% of my posts are 100% factual
05-23-2016, 03:53 PM
-
#85
- FreshlySnipes
- Registered User
-
- FreshlySnipes
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 841
- Rep Power: 9127
-
-
Good luck to all the guys dating or hoping to date virgins and thinking that makes them innocent and loyal. I believed the same thing until I showed my virgin then-gf what sex felt like. Her inner sloot was finally unleashed and she cheated so she could see what other cawks felt like too.
I'd rather have someone who doesn't have too slooty of a past, but has had a few partners and tried different things sexually and knows she is ready to commit to you.
I'd rather have someone who doesn't have too slooty of a past, but has had a few partners and tried different things sexually and knows she is ready to commit to you.
*Too nervous to talk to SIRI crew*
*Steal easily affordable things to avoid talking to cashier crew*
*So ugly people get whiplash from looking away crew*
*Enter gym through fire exit to avoid talking to receptionist crew*
*Not allowed within 50 feet of a school crew*
*Went within 50 feet of a school crew*
*House arrest crew*
05-23-2016, 04:03 PM
-
#86
05-23-2016, 04:19 PM
-
#87
05-23-2016, 04:44 PM
-
#88
- low blow
- Registered Camel Eater
-
- low blow
- Registered Camel Eater
- Join Date: Sep 2004
- Posts: 5,385
- Rep Power: 5973
-
-
Originally Posted By Lawlstud⏩
You don't understand bias - just because it's a "study" doesn't mean it is correct. Asking women or men what sexual partner count assumes people tell the truth and unfortunately there is no "study" out there for proving sloots gon sloot and guys lie about their numbers. His friends anecdotal evidence is literally on the same level - both are poor sources of evidence. If you could somehow remove said bias in your quoted study (note: you can't unless you can read minds in this case) then you can either believe the stated facts of the study (believing that people always tell the truth) or acknowledge that their might be confounding motives behind the numbers in your study. Either way neither you or DarkOmen will ever "prove" who is right..
Also just because the study is performed by the CDC doesn't mean anything - each study needs to be taken in its own context. There have been some horrendous "studies" published in very reputable medical journals that fail under more scrutiny and have caused changes in medical care that has harmed rather than helped people - all because of vested interests.
Anyway to the OP
People have sex and do kinky stuff in relationships - No big deal that's what people do and if you can't accept it then that is a sign of immaturity. It's pretty much what the previous guy said "we're all cucking each other".
On the other hand I can't accept certain things in a girls past which are mainly ONS or cheating related. Anyone who accepts their gf who has cheated or been used as a tissue by dozens of guys with the "past is the past" mentality is just asking for trouble later in life.
05-23-2016, 04:47 PM
-
#89
- ineedadrink
- Banned
-
- ineedadrink
- Banned
- Join Date: Jul 2014
- Age: 43
- Posts: 3,877
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Jesus. Is this really all you fuks think about? OP is probably fapping to the thought right now.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
