Forum
ยป
NASA caught using wires and hairspray to fake zero gravity
12-10-2017, 11:50 AM
-
#61
- dingler
- Registered User
-
- dingler
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: District Of Columbia, United States
- Posts: 8,920
- Rep Power: 53570
-
-
Fuk you for trying to cover up the real truth OP, space isn't real, the moon isn't real the earth isn't real and you are not real. The only thing that is real is the misc. You working for the gov't op?
no crew crew
12-10-2017, 11:53 AM
-
#62
Before some ignorant globe-believer asks "how can I travel around da world if it's flat dur dur", this is what the map looks like in the flat earth model. The center is the North Pole, with the continents located around it. East-West brings you in a circle around the North Pole. The outer ridge is Antarctica. Reminder, no human has ever circumnavigated the earth by going across the South Pole. The coast of Antarctica is an ice wall which holds the earth's oceans in place. We don't know what lies beyond Antarctica, there's an international treaty in place banning anyone from exploring it.







12-10-2017, 11:53 AM
-
#63
- nutsy54
- Random Words
-
- nutsy54
- Random Words
- Join Date: Apr 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 126,581
- Rep Power: 181292
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
Three different photographers were cited after a quick Google search.Just visited the guy's Twitter account, he claims to be an amateur but is supposedly taking pictures like this (his pics below). These are the photoshopped images we're all brainwashed to believe are real. He's another disinfo agent.
But of course...it's just another massive conspiracy, and everyone's in on it. Wait, didn't you just say that only the top guys at NASA were involved and aware (well, right after you said a lot of people were involved)...

12-10-2017, 11:55 AM
-
#64
Originally Posted By nutsy54⏩
Have you ever seen one of these ground-based towers? Yeah, that's where your phone signal comes from. The same reason why cell phones don't work in planes and remote nature areas despite the imaginary satellites flying overhead. Try to find a single non-photoshopped image of a satellite in space or a video of it being launched into orbit ten times faster than a speeding bullet.Then how are those satellites working and communicating if they're not in orbit? The "verification" is that they're working and providing/relaying data, exactly as designed for orbiting in space around a spherical planet.

Look I found proof of satellites in space!

12-10-2017, 11:56 AM
-
#65
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
You don't know anything about physics, yet you are trying to challenge empirical evidence about rocket flight paths.The rockets you see launched never go into space, but instead land in water. That's why all launch sites are located right next to the ocean (Cape Canaveral in Florida for example). In fact, if you watch a rocket launch yourself you'll see that they don't go straight up, but instead have a flight path in the shape of a parabola.
Do these paths look like they're going into space to you?

Do these paths look like they're going into space to you?

How do you think satellites stay up in space? You think they just launch straight up into space and hang out there for no reason?
No, the Earth's gravity must be taken into account when you launch stuff into space. If a rockets went straight up and did not achieve escape velocity, they would fall back to Earth after the fuel runs out.
The main objective of the rocket engine is not only to get the cargo above the atmosphere, but more importantly to accelerate it in horizontal direction to the orbital speed (7.5 km/s for the orbital altitudes of the Shuttle and International Space Station). That is why all rockets / shuttles curve their path gradually to horizontal direction and then burn a lot of fuel in horizontal direction. If the cargo did not reach enough horizontal speed, it would fall back to Earth.
*Snowboarder Crew*
*MK7 VW GTI crew*
IF crew
12-10-2017, 11:57 AM
-
#66
Originally Posted By nutsy54⏩
I never said it was only the top guys at NASA. It's Freemasons, the same people who control the world's media, governments and international banking system. The same people who orchestrated 9/11 to justify their Middle East wars. It's much bigger than just NASA.Three different photographers were cited after a quick Google search.
But of course...it's just another massive conspiracy, and everyone's in on it. Wait, didn't you just say that only the top guys at NASA were involved and aware (well, right after you said a lot of people were involved)...

But of course...it's just another massive conspiracy, and everyone's in on it. Wait, didn't you just say that only the top guys at NASA were involved and aware (well, right after you said a lot of people were involved)...

12-10-2017, 12:02 PM
-
#67
Originally Posted By SoSteezy⏩
So at a certain point you believe that the shuttle has enough thrust to reach 17,000 miles per hour to go into orbit, ten times faster than a speeding bullet. Instead our senses tell us that they travel much slower when we watch rocket launches.You don't know anything about physics, yet you are trying to challenge empirical evidence about rocket flight paths.
How do you think satellites stay up in space? You think they just launch straight up into space and hang out there for no reason?
No, the Earth's gravity must be taken into account when you launch stuff into space. If a rockets went straight up and did not achieve escape velocity, they would fall back to Earth after the fuel runs out.
The main objective of the rocket engine is not only to get the cargo above the atmosphere, but more importantly to accelerate it in horizontal direction to the orbital speed (7.5 km/s for the orbital altitudes of the Shuttle and International Space Station). That is why all rockets / shuttles curve their path gradually to horizontal direction and then burn a lot of fuel in horizontal direction. If the cargo did not reach enough horizontal speed, it would fall back to Earth.
How do you think satellites stay up in space? You think they just launch straight up into space and hang out there for no reason?
No, the Earth's gravity must be taken into account when you launch stuff into space. If a rockets went straight up and did not achieve escape velocity, they would fall back to Earth after the fuel runs out.
The main objective of the rocket engine is not only to get the cargo above the atmosphere, but more importantly to accelerate it in horizontal direction to the orbital speed (7.5 km/s for the orbital altitudes of the Shuttle and International Space Station). That is why all rockets / shuttles curve their path gradually to horizontal direction and then burn a lot of fuel in horizontal direction. If the cargo did not reach enough horizontal speed, it would fall back to Earth.
Do you ACTUALLY think humans are inside and the shuttle eventually reaches 17,000 miles per hour after blast-off? It's ridiculous.
Does this thing look like it's going to reach 17,000 miles per hour?

Also, how exactly does rocket propulsion work in space? NO AIR TO PUSH AGAINST, it's a vacuum. How exactly are they maneuvering? Did you globe-believers ever bother asking yourselves this question? The entire hoax falls apart once you start examining it critically.
12-10-2017, 12:09 PM
-
#68
- Malakaibeats
- Registered User
-
- Malakaibeats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 45
- Posts: 7,058
- Rep Power: 18095
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
The reason cellphones don't work in airplanes is because you're moving at 600mph and out of range of cellphone towers, which are on the ground. You're thinking of satellite phones, which do work in airplanes if an external antenna is mounted on the fuselage.Have you ever seen one of these ground-based towers? Yeah, that's where your phone signal comes from. The same reason why cell phones don't work in planes
How do you think an airplane's GPS system works?
ITALIAN CREW
PUREBLOOD CREW
12-10-2017, 12:10 PM
-
#69
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
-
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
- Join Date: Jun 2016
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 13,552
- Rep Power: 63078
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
So they do all this but can't hide wires?Where did I say they don't fake live interviews? If they're using a combination of harnesses, wires, green screen, CGI and other techniques during live interviews then that counts as fake.
I'm confused OP, this doesn't make sense. On one hand, you say they are competent enough to run a massive scam on pretty much all of humanity, capable of faking all kinds of things with 'a combination of harnesses, wires, green screen, CGI and other techniques during live interviews', and on the other hand you tell me they are incapable of successfully hiding wires in this interview?
12-10-2017, 12:13 PM
-
#70
- darkninja67
- The Dark Lord
-
- darkninja67
- The Dark Lord
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Posts: 87,403
- Rep Power: 802217
-
-
Originally Posted By Ripper908⏩
Technology at that time would not allow an actual moon landing. The whole thing is sham.Not a flat earther by any means but alot of the footage nasa does show is suspicious to say the least
rumpler of stiltskins
"I'm not afraid to die, I'm afraid I'll survive and have to watch you suffer" - Thy Art Is Murder
"Life will cease so breathe deep" - Lorna Shore
12-10-2017, 12:15 PM
-
#71
Originally Posted By soaponarope1⏩
The guy is performing a live maneuver on television with all sorts of deceptive video tricks going on, not to mention hanging from a harness with wires attached. It's inevitable that NASA is going to mess up sometime no matter how much expertise they have, and this video was an example of that. It's not the first time they've messed up.So they do all this but can't hide wires?
I'm confused OP, this doesn't make sense. On one hand, you say they are competent enough to run a massive scam on pretty much all of humanity, capable of faking all kinds of things with 'a combination of harnesses, wires, green screen, CGI and other techniques during live interviews', and on the other hand you tell me they are incapable of successfully hiding wires in this interview?
I'm confused OP, this doesn't make sense. On one hand, you say they are competent enough to run a massive scam on pretty much all of humanity, capable of faking all kinds of things with 'a combination of harnesses, wires, green screen, CGI and other techniques during live interviews', and on the other hand you tell me they are incapable of successfully hiding wires in this interview?
12-10-2017, 12:15 PM
-
#72
- nutsy54
- Random Words
-
- nutsy54
- Random Words
- Join Date: Apr 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 126,581
- Rep Power: 181292
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
Wow. You just sit there and lie endlessly. Please show us this "treaty" that bans exploration of Antarctica, when we've had science expeditions for over a century, and tourism down there for decades.We don't know what lies beyond Antarctica, there's an international treaty in place banning anyone from exploring it.
https://oceanwide-expeditions.com/bl...-of-antarctica
Then there's this...
http://www.australiangeographic.com....ate-antarctica
"Lisa Blair becomes first woman to solo circumnavigate Antarctica"
Reminder, no human has ever circumnavigated the earth by going across the South Pole.
Oops, another lie (amazing how they're so common with conspiracy theorists...)The Pan Am flight which flew over both poles in 1977 (and it certainly wasn't the first plane over the South Pole)...
Regular sight-seeing flights over the South Pole:
http://www.antarcticaflights.com.au
The same reason why cell phones don't work in planes and remote nature areas despite the imaginary satellites flying overhead.
Um,cellularphones don't work in remote areas.Satellitephones work anywhere on the planet. Damn, you just disproved your own claim.Do you actually believe any of the fiction and obvious lies you keep posting? If so, there's no hope for you. If not, buh-bye troll

12-10-2017, 12:15 PM
-
#73
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
Again, you do not know a lick about physics. stfu.So at a certain point you believe that the shuttle has enough thrust to reach 17,000 miles per hour to go into orbit, ten times faster than a speeding bullet. Instead our senses tell us that they travel much slower when we watch rocket launches.
Do you ACTUALLY think humans are inside and the shuttle eventually reaches 17,000 miles per hour after blast-off? It's ridiculous.
Does this thing look like it's going to reach 17,000 miles per hour?

Also, how exactly does rocket propulsion work in space? NO AIR TO PUSH AGAINST, it's a vacuum. How exactly are they maneuvering? Did you globe-believers ever bother asking yourselves this question? The entire hoax falls apart once you start examining it critically.
Do you ACTUALLY think humans are inside and the shuttle eventually reaches 17,000 miles per hour after blast-off? It's ridiculous.
Does this thing look like it's going to reach 17,000 miles per hour?

Also, how exactly does rocket propulsion work in space? NO AIR TO PUSH AGAINST, it's a vacuum. How exactly are they maneuvering? Did you globe-believers ever bother asking yourselves this question? The entire hoax falls apart once you start examining it critically.
Why don't you spend some time and research how rocket science works? You seem to be very curious and you might actually learn how men and women who work very hard to advance technology and our quality of life are able to do their jobs.
Put simply, propulsion in space works due to one of Newton's laws of physics: "every action has an equal and opposite reaction". There is empirical evidence to support this. You can even test it yourself.
So, in space, if you throw a baseball that accelerates at 4m/s, then not only is the baseball accellerating away from you at 4m/s, the force is also pushed onto you. That has increased your acceleration away from the baseball with the same amount of force. It has nothing to do with "air to push against".
This is elementary stuff, man. I learned this in an intro to engineering physics class in college.
Edit:
Here is a picture to help you understand the concept:

*Snowboarder Crew*
*MK7 VW GTI crew*
IF crew
12-10-2017, 12:33 PM
-
#74
12-10-2017, 12:33 PM
-
#75
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
-
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
- Join Date: Jun 2016
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 13,552
- Rep Power: 63078
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
Again you assert that they put in all this effort to fake it, yet don't make fake live interviews as well? I don't understand how you believe they fake all this other **** but can't / don't fake a 'live' interview. Unless you see the interview with your own two eyes how do you know it also isn't fake?The guy is performing a live maneuver on television with all sorts of deceptive video tricks going on, not to mention hanging from a harness with wires attached. It's inevitable that NASA is going to mess up sometime no matter how much expertise they have, and this video was an example of that. It's not the first time they've messed up.
12-10-2017, 04:13 PM
-
#76
Earth supposedly tilts at 66.6 degrees and travels 666 hundred mph around the sun. Coincidence?
Freemason vector symbol portrayed going back over 2000 years. The globe earth conspiracy is not recent.

Astronauts with Freemason vector

Freemason vector symbol portrayed going back over 2000 years. The globe earth conspiracy is not recent.

Astronauts with Freemason vector

Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts